内蒙古十大孔兑西柳沟流域土壤侵蚀及水土保持措施调查

张怡捷; 康宾; 张秀梅; 王晨光; 张泽宇; 张锦鑫; 朱丽琴; 王智; 马波

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.06.044

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

内蒙古十大孔兑西柳沟流域土壤侵蚀及水土保持措施调查

试验研究

- 内蒙古十大孔兑西柳沟流域土壤侵蚀及水土保持措施调查
- Soil Erosion and Soil and Water Conservation Measures at Xiliugou Watershed in Ten Tributaries Area in Inner Mongolia
- 水土保持通报 2023年43卷第6期页码：391-401
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 西北农林科技大学水土保持科学与工程学院, 陕西杨凌,712100
  2. 内蒙古自治区鄂尔多斯市水利事业发展中心,内蒙古,鄂尔多斯,017001
  3. 西北农林科技大学草业与草原学院, 陕西杨凌,712100
  4. 西北农林科技大学黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西杨凌,712100
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  鄂尔多斯市科技计划项目“鄂尔多斯十大孔兑综合治理拦沙换水工程生态恢复效果评估”（2022YY012）;国家自然科学基金项目“黄土高原北部冻融作用下物理结皮特性变化对风蚀的影响机理”（42277342）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.06.044
  中图分类号： S157.1
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
张怡捷, 康宾, 张秀梅, 等. 内蒙古十大孔兑西柳沟流域土壤侵蚀及水土保持措施调查[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(6):391-401.

Zhang Yijie, Kang Bin, Zhang Xiumei, et al. Soil Erosion and Soil and Water Conservation Measures at Xiliugou Watershed in Ten Tributaries Area in Inner Mongolia[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(6): 391-401.
张怡捷, 康宾, 张秀梅, 等. 内蒙古十大孔兑西柳沟流域土壤侵蚀及水土保持措施调查[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(6):391-401. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.06.044.

Zhang Yijie, Kang Bin, Zhang Xiumei, et al. Soil Erosion and Soil and Water Conservation Measures at Xiliugou Watershed in Ten Tributaries Area in Inner Mongolia[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(6): 391-401. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.06.044.

摘要

[目的] 内蒙古十大孔兑地区属黄河中上游多沙粗沙区和生态脆弱区，对该区典型流域西柳沟的土壤侵蚀进行实地调查，分析流域土壤侵蚀特征及成因，为该区水土流失防治提供科学依据。[方法] 于2022年9月19—26日和2023年6月21—26日沿X640解柴线（解家营—柴沟堡）和G109京拉线（北京—拉萨）2条公路分别布设15个调查点和14个集水区，对调查点及集水区植被、土壤、土壤侵蚀特征和水土保持措施等进行调查。[结果] 流域内草地片蚀较为严重，耕地侵蚀不严重，沟谷内裸地风蚀较为严重。上游黄土高原丘陵区沟蚀严重，且溯源侵蚀、下切侵蚀及沟岸扩张未停止，伴随较为严重的重力侵蚀。中游风沙区以风水复合侵蚀为主，大幅增加了流域的产沙总量。流域内道路建设及边坡开挖等人为扰动进一步加剧了侵蚀风险。径流泥沙含量测定结果验证了流域泥沙的主要来源为上游地区。流域内水土保持措施以植被措施及工程措施为主，虽已起到一定水土保持作用，但由于形式单一而未能发挥理想效果。[结论] 西柳沟短历时高强度的降雨特点叠加下层砒砂岩土壤条件共同加剧了该区土壤侵蚀，经济发展压力下的人类活动扰动加剧了生态风险，当地政府亟需持续增加水土保持投入，提高监管能力，加强对于土壤侵蚀的监测与机理研究，完善水土保持综合治理。

Abstract

[Objective] The Ten Tributaries Area in Inner Mongolia belongs to the sandy and coarse sediment area and the ecologically fragile area in the middle and upper reaches of the Yellow River. A field investigation was conducted on soil erosion at Xiliugou watershed (a typical watershed in the Ten Tributaries area)

and the characteristics and causes of soil and water loss in the watershed were analyzed in order to provide a basis for soil erosion control in the Ten Tributaries Area. [Methods] From September 19 to 26

2022

and from June 21 to 26

2023

15 investigation sites and 14 watersheds were respectively set up along the X640 Jiechai (Jiejiaying-Chaijiapu) line and G109 Jingla (Beijing-Lhasa) line to investigate the vegetation

soil

soil erosion characteristics

and water and soil conservation measures of the investigation sites and watersheds. [Results] Grassland erosion in the watershed was observed to be severe

while erosion of cultivated land was not severe. Wind erosion of bare soil was more serious in gullies. In the upstream of loess plateau hilly area

there was severe gully erosion

and the processes of headwind erosion

downcutting erosion

and gully bank expansion had not ceased during the study period. These processes were accompanied by significant gravity erosion. In the midstream sandstorm region

wind-water complex erosion was the main type

which greatly increased the total sediment yield of the watershed. Man-made disturbances such as road construction and slope excavation further increased the risk of erosion. The results of runoff sediment content measurement verified that the main source of sediment in the watershed was from the upstream region. Soil and water conservation measures within the watershed mainly consisted of vegetation and engineering measures. Although these measures have made some contributions to soil and water conservation

they have been relatively limited in their forms

and have not fully achieved the desired effects. [Conclusion] The short duration and high intensity of rainfall that occurs at Xiliugou watershed

combined with soil dominated by arsenic sandstone

have led to soil erosion in the area. Human activities under economic development pressure have exacerbated ecological risks. The local government should continue to increase investment in soil and water conservation

enhance regulatory capabilities

strengthen research on the monitoring and mechanisms of soil erosion

and improve comprehensive soil and water conservation management.

关键词

Keywords

references

孙宝洋,李占斌,张洋,等.黄河内蒙古支流"十大孔兑"区风蚀强度时空变化特征[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(17):112-119.

姜文达,潘英华,王海军.浅析内蒙古黄河流域十大孔兑综合治理[J].内蒙古水利,2023,43(6):32-33.

白雪莲,王理想,季树新,等.鄂尔多斯草原沙漠交错区生态系统健康评价:以十大孔兑为例[J].中国沙漠,2020,40(1):187-194.

刘韬,张士锋,刘苏峡.十大孔兑暴雨洪水产输沙关系初探:以西柳沟为例[J].水资源与水工程学报,2007,18(3):18-21.

白雪莲,季树新,王理想,等.鄂尔多斯十大孔兑区植被生产力变化趋势对土地利用转移的响应[J].自然资源学报,2019,34(6):1186-1195.

张原锋,王平,侯素珍,等.黄河上游干支流交汇区沙坝淤堵形成条件[J].水科学进展,2013,24(3):333-339.

王之君,拓万全,王昱,等.黄河上游"十大孔兑"高含沙洪水灾害过程与输沙特性[J].灾害学,2019,34(3):93-96.

达古拉,史芮嘉.十大孔兑综合治理问题及经验探索[J].中国水土保持,2022,43(9):55-57.

张建,马翠丽,雷鸣,等.内蒙古十大孔兑水沙特性及治理措施研究[J].人民黄河,2013,35(10):72-74.

姚海芳,师长兴,顾畛逵.气候变化和人类活动对黄河上游十大孔兑水沙过程的影响[J].干旱区地理,2018,41(3):472-479.

Yang Hui, Shi Changxing, Cao Jiansheng.A field investigation on gully erosion and implications for changes in sediment delivery processes in some tributaries of the upper Yellow River in China [J].ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 2022,11(5):1-13.

张洋,李鹏,马文东,等.黄河上游西柳沟流域土壤侵蚀对土地利用变化响应[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(5):70-76,84.

王普庆,侯素珍.西柳沟丘陵区土壤组成及对流域产沙的影响[J].人民黄河,2020,42(2):1-4,17.

封扬帆,李鹏,张祎,等.西柳沟流域拦沙坝沟道冲刷减蚀能力模拟[J].水土保持学报,2022,36(5):24-31.

刘璐,郭月峰,姚云峰,等.西柳沟流域水沙关系及变化趋势[J].江苏农业科学,2020,48(21):269-273.

Jun Chen, Ban Yifang, Li Songnian.Open access to Earth land-cover map[J].Nature, 2014,514(7523):434-434.

王文君,陈新闯,李小倩,等.十大孔兑降雨侵蚀产沙时空分布特征及预测[J].人民黄河,2019,41(4):1-7,10.

张洪江.土壤侵蚀原理[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2006.

许炯心."十大孔兑"侵蚀产沙与风水两相作用及高含沙水流的关系[J].泥沙研究,2013,6(6):28-37.

肖南,董治宝,南维鸽,等.1957-2014年库布齐沙漠地面风场特征[J].中国沙漠,2018,38(3):1188-1195.

靳灵娜.库布齐沙漠密集流动沙丘治理技术研究[D].内蒙古呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2021.

阳辉,师长兴.黄河上游十大孔兑冲积扇泥沙运动和沉积环境研究[J].泥沙研究,2020,45(4):33-38.

姬宝霖,吕忠义,申向东,等.内蒙古达拉特旗十大孔兑综合治理方案研究[J].人民黄河,2004,26(1):31-32,36.

Yang Hui, Shi Changxing.Spatial and temporal variations of aeolian sediment input to the tributaries(the Ten Kongduis) of the upper Yellow River [J].Aeolian Research, 2018,30:1-10.

Zhao Hongsheng, Feng Shuang, Dang Xiaohong, et al.Aeolian sand erosion and deposition patterns in the arid region of the Xiliugou Tributary on the Upper Reaches of the Yellow River [J].Sustainability, 2023,15(15):1-18.

缑振国.砒砂岩遇水失稳对公路影响试验研究[J].城市道桥与防洪,2023,37(7):224-228,26.

王佳坤,郭月峰,祁伟,等.砒砂岩土壤水分入渗规律及适用模型研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2020,39(S1):117-121.

侯素珍,刘晓燕,万小刚,等.西柳沟暴雨洪水输沙分析[J].泥沙研究,2020,45(6):53-58.

李海光,李鹏,孟庆东,等.鄂尔多斯市水土保持公报[R].内蒙古鄂尔多斯:鄂尔多斯市水利局,2020.

鄂尔多斯市人民政府."拦沙换水"试点工程取得突破性进展[EB/OL].(2016-05-30) [2023-10-13].http://www.ordos.gov.cn/gk_128120/zdjsxm/201605/t20160530_2507099.html.

祖强.极端降雨条件下小流域淤地坝系级联溃决风险分析[D].陕西西安:西安理工大学,2022.

秦富仓,杨振奇,李龙.砒砂岩区土壤侵蚀机理与生态修复技术研究进展[J].北京林业大学学报,2020,42(12):142-150.

姚文艺,吴智仁,刘慧,等.黄河流域砒砂岩区抗蚀促生技术试验研究[J].人民黄河,2015,37(1):6-10.

惠波,李斌斌,惠露,等.鄂尔多斯水土保持"拦沙换水"生态补偿模式浅析[J].中国水土保持,2019(6):16-18.

周丽艳,崔振华,廖晓芳.黄河上游西柳沟流域水土保持治理及水沙置换初步探讨[J].泥沙研究,2012,37(1):63-67.

张慧玲.综治"十大孔兑"实现拦沙入黄[N].内蒙古日报(汉),2023-07-20(9).

浏览量

559

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

2024年宁夏极端暴雨事件引发的梯田侵蚀调查研究

不同水土保持耕作措施对黑土坡耕地产流产沙的影响机制

成渝地区双城经济圈生产建设活动水土保持监管试点研究

水土保持生态修复林植物群落演替研究

刍议水土保持生态修复工程的监测内容