1.中国地质大学(北京)土地科学技术学院, 北京100083
2.内蒙古农业大学沙漠治理学院, 内蒙古 呼和浩特 010000
3.中国建筑材料工业地质勘查中心陕西总队,陕西 西安 710003
阎佳妮(2002—),女(蒙古族),内蒙古自治区赤峰市人,硕士研究生,主要研究土地评价、保护方向。Email:yanjiani32@163.com。
赵华甫(1978—),男(汉族),河南省南阳市人,博士,教授,主要从事土地评价、规划和保护方面的研究。Email:huafuzhao@163.com。
收稿:2024-12-24,
修回:2025-02-19,
纸质出版:2025-06-10
移动端阅览
阎佳妮, 赵华甫, 杨霞, 等.内蒙古农牧交错区耕地韧性评价及管控[J].水土保持通报,2025,45(3):374-384.
Yan Jiani, Zhao Huafu, Yang Xia, et al. Evaluation on resilience of cultivated land and management in agro-pastoral ecotone of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region [J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2025,45(3):374-384.
阎佳妮, 赵华甫, 杨霞, 等.内蒙古农牧交错区耕地韧性评价及管控[J].水土保持通报,2025,45(3):374-384. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2025.03.033. CSTR: 32312.14.stbctb.2025.03.033..
Yan Jiani, Zhao Huafu, Yang Xia, et al. Evaluation on resilience of cultivated land and management in agro-pastoral ecotone of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region [J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2025,45(3):374-384. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2025.03.033. CSTR: 32312.14.stbctb.2025.03.033..
目的
2
对内蒙古自治区农牧交错区耕地进行韧性评价及管控研究,为辨析该区耕地韧性水平差异,有效开展分区调控及制定针对性的耕地持续利用保护对策提供科学参考。
方法
2
基于韧性理论,以内蒙古农牧交错区的29个旗县作为研究区域,通过构建“压力—状态—响应”模型,以旗县为研究单元,利用熵值法综合评价内蒙古农牧交错区耕地韧性特征,依据耕地韧性水平组合特点,划分农牧交错区韧性分区,并提出分区管控路径。
结果
2
①界定了耕地韧性内涵,并在识别耕地系统自然和社会压力,状态和响应指标基础上,构建了包含目标层、因素层、指标层为框架的“压力—状态—响应”模型。②2000—2022年内蒙古农牧交错带耕地整体韧性水平不高,呈现出“东部高,西部低”的趋势;从历史变化看,受气候影响,整体韧性水平呈降低趋势,东部韧性近期呈现恢复态势。 ③依据耕地韧性水平变化组合,划分3个区域。1级稳定种植区应严守耕地保护红线,发挥粮食生产功能区功能。2级监测保护区需加大人工投入力度,提升区域机械化水平。3级抚育休耕区应坚持宜农则农、宜牧则牧、宜养则养的国土空间适宜性格局。
结论
2
内蒙古农牧区耕地韧性普遍较低,应加强土地整治和风沙治理,实现“精准管理”,提高耕地韧性。
Objective
2
The resilience and management of cultivated land in the agro-pastoral ecotone of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region were studied. To distinguish the resilience levels of cultivated land in this area, regional regulations and controls were effectively enforced, and targeted countermeasures were formulated to improve scientific reference for a sustainable utilization and protection of the cultivated land.
Methods
2
Based on resilience theory, 29 counties (banners) in the agro-pastoral ecotone of Inner Mongolia were selected as the study area. A pressure-state-response (PSR) model was constructed, with counties as the study units. The entropy method was used to comprehensively evaluate the resilience characteristics of cultivated land in the agro-pastoral ecotone . According to the combined characteristics of cultivated land resilience levels, resilience zones were delineated, and zonal management strategies were proposed.
Results
2
① The meaning of cultivated land resilience was defined, and natural and social pressures, state, and response indicators of the cultivated land system were identified. A PSR model consisting of target, factor, and indicator layers was constructed. ② From 2000 to 2022, the overall resilience level of cultivated land in the agro-pastoral ecotone of Inner Mongolia was not high, showing a trend of higher resilience in the east and lower resilience in the west. Historically, influenced by the climate, the overall resilience level showed a declining trend, although resilience in the eastern region has recently recovered. ③ Based on a combination of changes in the cultivated land resilience levels, three zones were delineated. The first-level stable cultivation zone should strictly adhere to the red line of cultivated land protection and leverage the function of the grain production functional zones. The second-level monitoring and protection zone requires an increased artificial input to improve regional mechanization levels. The third-level fallow and restoration zone should adhere to a land use suitability pattern that promotes agriculture, pastoralism, and conservation, where appropriate.
Conclusion
2
The resilience of cultivated land in the agro-pastoral ecotone of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region is generally low. It is necessary to strengthen the land consolidation and sandstorm control, achieve precision management, and improve cultivated land resilience.
Holling C S . Resilience and stability of ecological systems [J]. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics , 1973 , 4 : 1 - 23 .
Berkes F , Folke C . Linking eocial and ecological systems for resilience and sustainability [C]∥Berkes F, Folke C. Linking Social and Ecological Systems:Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press , 1998 : 4 .
Xu Xing , Wang Meimei , Wang Mingfeng , et al . The coupling coordination degree of economic, social and ecological resilience of urban agglomerations in China [J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health , 2023 , 20 ( 1 ): 413 .
Carl F . Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses [J]. Global Environmental Change , 2006 , 16 ( 3 ): 253 - 267 .
赵华甫 , 屈雪冰 , 冯新伟 , 等 . 耕地的弹性变形理论及实证研究 [J]. 地域研究与开发 , 2012 , 31 ( 2 ): 73 - 77 .
Zhao Huafu , Qu Xuebing , Feng Xinwei , et al . The elastic deformation theory of cultivated land and its empirical research [J]. Areal Research and Development , 2012 , 31 ( 2 ): 73 - 77 .
杨智慧 , 路欣怡 , 孔祥斌 , 等 . 中国耕地刚性管制与弹性调控框架构建 [J]. 中国土地科学 , 2021 , 35 ( 6 ): 11 - 19 .
Yang Zhihui , Lu Xinyi , Kong Xiangbin , et al . Construction of China’s rigid control and resilient adjustment of cultivated land protection [J]. China Land Science , 2021 , 35 ( 6 ): 11 - 19 .
钱家乘 , 师诺 , 赵华甫 , 等 . 中国耕地弹性管控的理论解析与研究框架: 从单一目标权衡到多目标协同 [J]. 中国土地科学 , 2023 , 37 ( 3 ): 38 - 47 .
Qian Jiacheng , Shi Nuo , Zhao Huafu , et al . Theoretical analysis and research framework of resilience management of cultivated land in China: From single-objective trade-offs to multi-objective synergy [J]. China Land Science , 2023 , 37 ( 3 ): 38 - 47 .
胡林影 , 郭杰 , 欧名豪 , 等 . 耕地系统保护的“刚性—弹性—韧性”: 理论框架与实施路径 [J]. 规划师 , 2023 , 39 ( 11 ): 7 - 13 .
Hu Linying , Guo Jie , Ou Minghao , et al . The “rigidity-elasticity-resilience” of systematic farmland protection: Theoretical framework and implementation path [J]. Planners , 2023 , 39 ( 11 ): 7 - 13 .
孟丽君 , 黄灿 , 陈鑫 , 等 . 曲周县耕地利用系统韧性评价 [J]. 资源科学 , 2019 , 41 ( 10 ): 1949 - 1958 .
Meng Lijun , Huang Can , Chen Xin , et al . Evaluation of cultivated land system resilience of Quzhou County [J]. Resources Science , 2019 , 41 ( 10 ): 1949 - 1958 .
李窚琪 , 张翊 , 付保红 , 等 . 昆明市耕地韧性评价及空间差异 [J]. 科学技术与工程 , 2021 , 21 ( 12 ): 4848 - 4855 .
Li Chengqi , Zhang Yi , Fu Baohong , et al . Resilience evaluation and spatial difference of cultivated land system in Kunming [J]. Science Technology and Engineering , 2021 , 21 ( 12 ): 4848 - 4855 .
祝锦霞 , 潘艺 , 张艳彬 , 等 . 种植类型变化对耕地系统韧性影响的关键阈值研究 [J]. 中国土地科学 , 2022 , 36 ( 4 ): 49 - 58 .
Zhu Jinxia , Pan Yi , Zhang Yanbin , et al . Research on the key threshold of the resilience of cultivated land system under planting changes [J]. China Land Science , 2022 , 36 ( 4 ): 49 - 58 .
李玉恒 , 黄惠倩 , 郭桐冰 , 等 . 多重压力胁迫下东北黑土区耕地韧性研究及其启示: 以黑龙江省拜泉县为例 [J]. 中国土地科学 , 2022 , 36 ( 5 ): 71 - 79 .
Li Yuheng , Huang Huiqian , Guo Tongbing , et al . Research on cultivated land resilience of the black soil region in the northeast China under multiple stresses and its implications: The study of Baiquan County, Heilongjiang Province [J]. China Land Science , 2022 , 36 ( 5 ): 71 - 79 .
苗欣然 , 李泽红 , 王梦媛 . 粮食供应安全下东北黑土区耕地利用系统韧性时空演变: 以齐齐哈尔市为例 [J]. 资源科学 , 2023 , 45 ( 9 ): 1801 - 1816 .
Miao Xinran , Li Zehong , Wang Mengyuan . Spatiotemporal changes of cultivated land use system resilience in the black soil region of northeast China under food supply security: A case study of Qiqihar City [J]. Resources Science , 2023 , 45 ( 9 ): 1801 - 1816 .
李文博 , 闫卓冉 , 张英男 , 等 . 食物系统韧性视角下的城市区域耕地利用再地化转型 [J]. 中国土地科学 , 2023 , 37 ( 11 ): 63 - 72 .
Li Wenbo , Yan Zhuoran , Zhang Yingnan , et al . Resilience of food systems: Relocalized transition of cultivated land use in the city-region [J]. China Land Science , 2023 , 37 ( 11 ): 63 - 72 .
吕军骁 , 江婉婷 , 马凌 , 等 . 太行山山地及山前平原耕地系统韧性评价: 以石家庄市为例 [J]. 地理与地理信息科学 , 2024 , 40 ( 6 ): 110 - 117 .
Lyu Junxiao , Jiang Wanting , Ma Ling , et al . Resilience evaluation of cultivated land system in Taihang Mountains and piedmont plains: A case study of Shijiazhuang City [J]. Geography and Geo-Information Science , 2024 , 40 ( 6 ): 110 - 117 .
金晨阳 , 杜宏茹 . 新疆耕地系统韧性时空变化特征及其分区划定 [J]. 干旱区研究 , 2024 , 41 ( 10 ): 1778 - 1788 .
Jin Chenyang , Du Hongru . Characteristics of spatial and temporal changes and zoning of cultivated land resilience in Xinjiang [J]. Arid Zone Research , 2024 , 41 ( 10 ): 1778 - 1788 .
吉泽男 , 王鹏程 . 干旱地区耕地系统韧性水平测度及动态演进: 以新疆为例 [J/OL]. 农业资源与环境学报 , 2024 : 1 - 14 .( 2024-06-12 )[ 2024-04-22 ]. https:∥kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx? filename=NHFZ20240610003&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=NHFZ20240610003&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ .
Ji Zenan , Wang Pengcheng . Measurement and dynamic evolution of cultivated land system resilience level in arid areas: A case study of Xinjiang [J/OL]. China Industrial Economics , 2024 : 1 - 14 .( 2024-06-12 )[ 2024-04-22 ]. https:∥kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx? filename=NHFZ20240610003&dbname=CJFD & dbc ode=CJFQ https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?filename=NHFZ20240610003&dbname=CJFD&dbcode=CJFQ .
吕添贵 , 陈安莹 , 付舒斐 , 等 . 农业绿色转型下中国耕地系统韧性时空演化特征及其影响因素研究 [J]. 生态学报 , 2025 , 45 ( 6 ): 2891 - 2904 .
Lü Tiangui , Chen Anying , Fu Shufei , et al . Spatial-temporal evolution characteristics and influencing factors of cultivated land system resilience in China under agricultural green transformation [J]. Acta Ecological Sinica , 2025 , 45 ( 6 ): 2891 - 2904 .
Rose A . Economic resilience to natural and man-made disasters: Multidisciplinary origins and contextual dimensions [J]. Environmental Hazards , 2007 , 7 ( 4 ): 383 - 398 .
Yang Jie , Huang Xin . The 30 m annual land cover dataset and its dynamics in China from 1990 to 2019 [J]. Earth System Science Data , 2021 , 13 ( 8 ): 3907 - 3925 .
江雅婷 , 赵伟 , 骆佳玲 , 等 . 基于“极化—涓滴” 理论的成渝地区双城经济圈休耕地分区研究 [J]. 中国土地科学 , 2024 , 38 ( 2 ): 73 - 82 .
Jiang Yating , Zhao Wei , Luo Jialing , et al . Study on zoning of fallow land in the Chengdu-Chongqing economic circle based on the theory of polarization and trickle-down effect [J]. China Land Science , 2024 , 38 ( 2 ): 73 - 82 .
0
浏览量
3
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621