1. 中国林业科学研究院亚热带林业实验中心, 江西 分宜,336600
2. 生物多样性保护与资源利用江西省重点实验室, 江西 分宜,336600
网络首发:2025-05-16,
纸质出版:2025
移动端阅览
肖斌, 姚甲宝, 徐克芹, 等. 低效杉木林林窗土壤—凋落物的持水特性[J]. 水土保持通报, 2025,45(2):45-53.
Xiao Bin, Yao Jiabao, Xu Keqin, et al. Water-holding characteristics of soil-litter at forest gap of low-efficiency Chinese fir forest[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2025, 45(2): 45-53.
肖斌, 姚甲宝, 徐克芹, 等. 低效杉木林林窗土壤—凋落物的持水特性[J]. 水土保持通报, 2025,45(2):45-53. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2025.02.006.
Xiao Bin, Yao Jiabao, Xu Keqin, et al. Water-holding characteristics of soil-litter at forest gap of low-efficiency Chinese fir forest[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2025, 45(2): 45-53. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2025.02.006.
[目的
]
研究不同杉木林窗大小与年龄对土壤及凋落物的持水特性,为杉木低效林质量提升提供理论依据。[方法
]
采用时空替代法选取4,15,30,50 a林窗,并以顶级群落作为对照,每个林窗年龄设置小林窗(≤50 m
2
)、中林窗(50~100 m
2
)、大林窗(≥100 m
2
)及非林窗对照4个处理,通过环刀法、铝盒烘干法、凋落物浸泡法分别测定土壤及凋落物持水特性。[结果
]
①仅杉木林窗年龄对土壤及凋落物持水特性具有显著性影响,而林窗大小、林窗年龄与大小的交互作用影响不显著。②4 a中林窗土壤持水性最佳,15 a中林窗半分解凋落物的现存量、最大持水量、最大持水率、自然持水量和有效拦蓄量表现最优。③各林窗年龄凋落物持水率随浸泡时间变化,中林窗和大林窗表现较好,半分解层持水能力强于未分解层。④凋落物半分解自然持水量与土壤毛管孔隙度、田间持水量和毛管持水量呈显著正相关。[结论
]
4 a和15 a中林窗土壤及凋落物持水性良好,人工开设中等大小林窗可作为杉木低效林质量提升的重要技术手段。
[Objective] The water holding characteristics of soil and litter in low-efficiency of Chinese fir trees with different gap sizes and ages were investigated to provide a theoretical basis for improving the tree quality in low-efficiency Chinese fir forests. [Methods] Gap ages of 4
15
30
and 50 years were selected based on the results of the space-time substitution method
and the climax community was used as the control. Four treatments were set for each gap age: small (≤50 m2)
medium (50—100 m2)
and large (≥100 m2) gaps
as well as a non-gap control. The water holding characteristics of soil and litter were determined using the cutting-ring method
oven drying method
and litter soaking methods
respectively. [Results] ① Only the gap age had a significant effect on the water-holding characteristics of soil and litter
whereas the gap size and the interaction between gap age and size had no significant effect. ② The best soil water holding capacity was observed in the 4-year-forest gap
and the best standing crop
maximum water-holding capacity
maximum water-holding rate
natural water holding capacity
and effective storage capacity of semi-decomposed litter was observed in the 15-year-forest gap. ③ The water holding rate of litter in different gap ages changed with soaking time; the middle and large gaps performed the best
and the water-holding capacity of the semi-decomposed layer was stronger than that of the undecomposed layer. ④ The natural water-holding capacity of semi-decomposed litter was significantly positively correlated with soil capillary porosity
field water-holding capacity
and capillary water-holding capacity. [Conclusion] The water-holding capacity of soil and litter was good in the 4 and 15-year-forest gaps. Based on our results
the artificial opening of a medium-sized forest gap could be used as an important technical means to improve the quality of low-efficiency Chinese fir forest.
葛乐,虞木奎,成向荣,等.杉木林下套种不同树种对土壤改良效应初探[J].土壤通报,2011,42(4):948-952. Ge Le, Yu Mukui, Cheng Xiangrong, et al. Preliminary studies on improvement effect of interplantation different trees in Chinese-fir forest on soil physical and chemical properties [J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2011,42(4):948-952.
李天玲.马尾松林窗年龄、面积对植物多样性、土壤理化性质及油樟化学计量特征的影响[D].四川雅安:四川农业大学,2020. Li Tianling. Effects of gap age and area of
Pinus massoniana
on plant diversity, physical and chemical properties of soil and stoichiometric characteristics of camphor [D]. Yaan, Sichuan:Sichuan Agricultural University, 2020.
袁媛,徐克芹,曾平生,等.亚热带生态系统5种修复树种的光合特征[J].东北林业大学学报,2024,52(5):28-33. Yuan Yuan, Xu Keqin, Zeng Pingsheng, et al. Photosynthetic characteristics of five restoration tree species in subtropical ecosystems [J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2024,52(5):28-33.
林庆凯.天童常绿阔叶林林窗对植物群落更新和物种多样性的影响[D].上海:华东师范大学,2017. Lin Qingkai. Effects of gaps on the plants regeneration and species diversity in Tiantong evergreen broad-leaved forest [D]. Shanghai: East China Normal University, 2017.
段仁燕,王孝安,吴甘霖.林窗干扰与森林群落演替[J].广西植物,2005,25(5):419-423. Duan Renyan, Wang Xiaoan, Wu Ganlin. Gap disturbance and forest community succession [J]. Guihaia, 2005,25(5):419-423.
兰雪.马尾松林窗特征及其对土壤生态功能的影响[D].贵州贵阳:贵州大学,2022. Lan Xue. Gap Characteristics of gap in
Pinus massoniana
and its effects on soil ecological function[D]. Guiyang Guizhou: Guizhou University, 2022.
刘昌,路琦,汪生财,等.林窗对黄檗幼树空间分布及生长发育的影响[J].北京林业大学学报,2024,46(2):9-17. Liu Chang, Lu Qi, Wang Shengcai, et al. Effects of forest gaps on spatial distribution and growth of
Phellodendron amurense
saplings [J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2024,46(2):9-17.
刘海英,蒋仲龙,姚任图,等.木荷林窗微环境特征及幼苗更新研究[J].西南林业大学学报(自然科学),2022,42(5):56-63. Liu Haiying, Jiang Zhonglong, Yao Rentu, et al. Microenvironment characteristics and dynamic regeneration of seedlings in
Schima superba
forest gaps [J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University (Natural Sciences), 2022,42(5):56-63.
Yang X, Long Y, Sarkar B, et al. Influence of soil microorganisms and physicochemical properties.on plant diversity in an arid desert of Western China[J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2021,32(6):2645-2659.
曾洪,吴雨茹,钟欣艺,等.华西雨屏带马尾松人工林林窗大小对植物多样性与土壤理化性质的影响[J].四川农业大学学报,2023,41(2):185-192. Zeng Hong, Wu Yuru, Zhong Xinyi, et al. Effects of different gap sizes of
Pinus massoniana
plantation on plant diversity and soil physicochemical properties in the West China rain zone [J]. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 2023,41(2):185-192.
杨婷惠,祁凯斌,黄俊胜,等.林窗式疏伐对云杉人工林土壤持水性能的影响[J].应用与环境生物学报,2018,24(5):1171-1178. Yang Tinghui, Qi Kaibin, Huang Junsheng, et al. Effects of different sizes of simulated gaps on the soil water-holding capacity of a
Picea asperata
plantation [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2018,24(5):1171-1178.
褚欣,潘萍,郭丽玲,等.不同密度飞播马尾松林凋落物及土壤持水性能比较分析[J].浙江农林大学学报,2017,34(5):808-815. Chu Xin, Pan Ping, Guo Liling, et al. Comparing water-holding capacity in forest litter and soils for an aerially seeded
Pinus massoniana
plantation with different stand densities [J]. Journal of Zhejiang A & F University, 2017,34(5):808-815.
Putuhena W M, Cordery I. Estimation of interception capacity of the forest floor[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 1996,180(1-4):283-299.
杨俊玲.几种典型杉木人工林凋落物及土壤持水能力研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2013. Yang Junling. Study on litter and soil water holding capacity of several typical Chinese fir plantations [D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2013.
刘效东,乔玉娜,周国逸,等.鼎湖山3种不同演替阶段森林凋落物的持水特性[J].林业科学,2013,49(9):8-15. Liu Xiaodong, Qiao Yuna, Zhou Guoyi, et al. Water-holding characteristics of litters in three forests at different successional stages in Dinghushan [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2013,49(9):8-15.
简永旗,吴家森,盛卫星,等.间伐和林分类型对森林凋落物储量和土壤持水性能的影响[J].浙江农林大学学报,2021,38(2):320-328. Jian Yongqi, Wu Jiasen, Sheng Weixing, et al. Effects of thinning and stand types on litter stock and soil water-holding capacity [J]. Journal of Zhejiang A & F University, 2021,38(2):320-328.
王景燕,胡庭兴,龚伟,等.川南坡地不同退耕模式土壤及枯落物持水特性[J].四川农业大学学报,2012,30(1):24-29. Wang Jingyan, Hu Tingxing, Gong Wei, et al. Water-holding characteristics of soil and litter in several slope farmlands with different de-farming patterns in Southern Sichuan Province of China [J]. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 2012,30(1):24-29.
苏薇.林窗对赤松和刺槐林凋落物—土壤生态化学计量特征的影响[D].山东泰安:山东农业大学,2023. Su Wei. Effects of forest gaps on the ecological chemometric characteristics of litter-soil in
Pinusdensiflora
Sieb. and
Robinia pseudoacacia
L. forests [D]. Tai’an, Shandong: Shandong Agricultural University, 2023.
Watt A. Pattern and process in the plant community [J]. Journal of Ecology, 1947,35:1-22.
Kern C C, D’Amato A W, Strong T F. Diversifying the composition and structure of managed, late-successional forests with harvest gaps: What is the optimal gap size? [J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2013,304:110-120.
张明锦,张健,纪托未,等.林窗对凋落物分解过程中细菌群落结构和多样性的影响[J].生态环境学报,2015,24(8):1287-1294. Zhang Mingjin, Zhang Jian, Ji Tuowei, et al. Influence of forest gap on bacterial community structure and diversity during litter decomposition [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2015,24(8):1287-1294.
Prescott C E, Hope G D, Blevins L L. Effect of gap size on litter decomposition and soil nitrate. concentrations in a high-elevation spruce fir forest [J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2003,33(11):2210-2220.
梁锋娜,张锦新,沈亚芝,等.森林凋落物持水性影响因素分析[J].热带农业工程,2019,43(1):101-102. Liang Fengna, Zhang Jinxin, Shen Yazhi, et al. Analysis on the water holding capacity of forest litter and its influencing factors [J]. Tropical Agricultural Engineering, 2019,43(1):101-102.
金鹏,徐明,冉富菊,等.森林光环境特征及其生态作用[J].山地农业生物学报,2023,42(2):38-47. Jin Peng, Xu Ming, Ran Fuju, et al. Characteristics of forest light environment and its ecological effects [J]. Journal of Mountain Agriculture and Biology, 2023,42(2):38-47.
李羽翎,张广奇.林窗定义及林窗特征测定方法研究进展[J].世界林业研究,2021,34(5):58-63. Li Yuling, Zhang Guangqi. Forest gap definition and forest gap characteristics measurement methods [J]. World Forestry Research, 2021,34(5):58-63.
王卓敏,薛立.林窗效应研究综述[J].世界林业研究,2016,29(6):48-53. Wang Zhuomin, Xue Li. A review on effects of forest gap [J]. World Forestry Research, 2016,29(6):48-53.
巢林,洪滔,李键,等.不同林龄、径级杉木人工林种内竞争规律[J].浙江农林大学学报,2015,32(3):353-360. Chao Lin, Hong Tao, Li Jian, et al. Intraspecific competition in a
Cunninghamia lanceolata
plantation with different age and diameter classes [J]. Journal of Zhejiang A & F University, 2015,32(3):353-360.
Dirzo R, Horvitz C C, Quevedo H, et al. The effects of gap size and age on the understorey herb community of a tropical Mexican rain forest [J]. The Journal of Ecology, 1992,80(4):809.
张瑛,徐庆,高德强,等.湖南会同不同林分类型杉木人工林凋落物水文效应[J].林业科学研究,2021,34(6):81-89. Zhang Ying, Xu Qing, Gao Deqiang, et al. Hydrological effects of litters in different types of cunninghamia lanceolata plantations in Huitong of Hunan, China [J]. Forest Research, 2021,34(6):81-89.
汪星星,廖文海,许祖元,等.森林凋落物分解影响因素的研究进展[J].北方园艺,2022(4):126-132. Wang Xingxing, Liao Wenhai, Xu Zuyuan, et al. Research progress of influencing factors affecting forest litter decomposition [J]. Northern Horticulture, 2022(4):126-132.
孙浩,刘晓勇,何齐发,等.修河上游流域4种森林类型的水源涵养功能评价[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(4):337-341. Sun Hao, Liu Xiaoyong, He Qifa, et al. Assessments of four types of forests on soil water conservation functions in the upper reaches of Xiu River [J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation,2017,24(4):337-341.
李鹏,陈璇,杨章旗,等.不同密度马尾松人工林枯落物输入对土壤理化性质的影响[J].水土保持学报,2022,36(2):368-377. Li Peng, Chen Xuan, Yang Zhangqi, et al. Effects of litter input on soil physical and chemical properties of
Pinus massoniana
plantations with different densities [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022,36(2):368-377.
赵敏,戴全厚,严友进,等.喀斯特山地典型植被类型凋落物和土壤水文效应[J].水土保持研究,2024,31(1):241-249. Zhao Min, Dai Quanhou, Yan Youjin, et al. Litter and soil hydrological effects of typical vegetation types in Karst Mountains [J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2024,31(1):241-249.
陈进,徐明,邹晓,等.贵阳市不同林龄马尾松林凋落物储量及持水特性[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(6):146-151. Chen Jin, Xu Ming, Zou Xiao, et al. Litter layer reserve and water holding capacity of
Pinus massoniana
in different successional stages in Guiyang [J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018,25(6):146-151.
Shi Rui, Li Biao, Liu Shaoxiong, et al. Water holding characteristics of litters from different ecological public welfare forest types [C]//Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Green Materials and Environmental Engineering.December 20-21, 2015. Phuket, Thailand. Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2015:55-59.
李开凤.不同叶形凋落物层持水能力及其影响因素研究[D].贵州贵阳:贵州大学,2021. Li Kaifeng. Study on the water holding capacity of different leaf litter layers and its influencing factors [D]. Guiyang, Guizhou: Guizhou University, 2021.
0
浏览量
2
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621