水土保持政策与农业生态效率耦合协调关系及其驱动因素

李文颜; 李良鑫; 邵景安

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2025.01.040

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

水土保持政策与农业生态效率耦合协调关系及其驱动因素

试验研究

- 水土保持政策与农业生态效率耦合协调关系及其驱动因素
- Coupling coordination relationship between soil and water conservation policy, agricultural eco-efficiency, and its driving factors
- 水土保持通报 2025年45卷第1期页码：393-404
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 重庆师范大学地理与旅游学院,重庆,401331
  2. 广安市教育科学研究所,四川,广安,638550
  3. 鲁甸县第一中学,云南,昭通,657100
  4. 三峡库区地表过程与生态修复重庆市重点实验室,重庆,401331
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家社会科学基金重大项目“长江上游生态大保护政策可持续性与机制构建研究”(20&ZD096)
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2025.01.040
  中图分类号： S171.4;S157.1
- 纸质出版：2025
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
李文颜, 李良鑫, 邵景安. 水土保持政策与农业生态效率耦合协调关系及其驱动因素[J]. 水土保持通报, 2025,45(1):393-404.

Li Wenyan, Li Liangxin, Shao Jingan. Coupling coordination relationship between soil and water conservation policy, agricultural eco-efficiency, and its driving factors[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2025, 45(1): 393-404.
李文颜, 李良鑫, 邵景安. 水土保持政策与农业生态效率耦合协调关系及其驱动因素[J]. 水土保持通报, 2025,45(1):393-404. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2025.01.040.

Li Wenyan, Li Liangxin, Shao Jingan. Coupling coordination relationship between soil and water conservation policy, agricultural eco-efficiency, and its driving factors[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2025, 45(1): 393-404. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2025.01.040.

摘要

[目的] 探究水土保持政策与农业生态效率耦合协调关系及其驱动要素，为深入理解水土保持政策与农业生态效率之间的协调关系提供新的视角和思路。[方法] 以三峡库区(重庆段)作为研究区，建立水土保持政策强度与农业生态效率评价指标体系，运用耦合协调度模型、地理探测器模型以及最小二乘法(OLS)回归分析2015—2022年区域内水土保持政策与农业生态效率耦合关系及其驱动机制。[结果] ①三峡库区(重庆段)内部各区域在政策强度与生态效率方面存在显著差异，方山丘陵和平行岭谷保土人居环境维护区在政策实施上表现出较强的增长势头，而其余区域则相对平稳；都市山水人居环境维护区农业生态效率表现优异，武陵山山地水源涵养保土区则相对较低，呈现出明显的两极分化趋势。②水土保持政策与农业生态效率之间的耦合协调度整体呈现上升趋势，都市山水人居环境维护区和方山丘陵保土人居环境维护区的协调程度尤为突出。然而，渝中平行岭谷保土人居环境维护区中的开州区则存在显著的失调现象。③农田水利设施投入有助于提升两者协调水平，合理控制播种面积也可以更积极地影响水土保持政策与农业生态效率之间的协调关系，经过反事实检验也进一步证实其回归结果的稳健性。[结论] 三峡库区(重庆段)为有效维护水土资源和农业生态安全，应坚持因地治理、区域联动的原则，积极引导社会各方参与形成治理合力，共同推动扶贫、保土、助农相结合的多元化帮扶模式发展。

Abstract

[Objective] The coupling and coordination relationship between soil and water conservation policy and agricultural eco-efficiency

and its driving factors were analyzed to provide a new perspective and thinking for further understanding of the coordination relationship between soil and water conservation policy and agricultural eco-efficiency. [Methods] An evaluation index system for soil and water conservation policy intensity and agricultural eco-efficiency was established using the Three Gorges reservoir (Chongqing section) as the research area. The coupling coordination degree model

geographical detector model

and ordinary least squares (OLS) regression were used to analyze the coupling relationship between the soil and water conservation policy and agricultural eco-efficiency

and its driving mechanism in the region from 2015 to 2022. [Results] ① There were significant differences in policy intensity and ecological efficiency among regions in the Three Gorges reservoir area (Chongqing section). The maintenance area of soil-conserving human settlements in the Fangshan Hills and parallel ridges and valleys showed strong growth momentum during policy implementation

whereas the rest of the region was relatively stable. The agricultural ecological efficiency of the urban landscape living environment maintenance area was excellent

whereas that of the Wuling Mountain water and soil conservation areas was relatively low

showing an obvious polarization trend. ② The degree of coupling coordination between soil and water conservation policies and agricultural ecological efficiency showed an overall upward trend

and the coordination degree of the urban landscape human settlement environment maintenance area and the Fangshan hilly soil conservation human settlement environment maintenance area was particularly prominent. However

there was a significant imbalance of that in Kaizhou District in the areas of soil conservation and human settlement in the parallel ridge valley of Yuzhong. ③ The input of farmland water conservation facilities was helpful in improving the coordination level

and reasonable control of the planting area could also more positively affect the coordination relationship between the soil and water conservation policy and agricultural ecological efficiency. The robustness of the regression results is confirmed using a counterfactual test. [Conclusion] To effectively maintain soil and water resources and agricultural ecological security

the Three Gorges reservoir area (Chongqing section) should adhere to the principles of local governance and regional linkages

actively guide all parties in society to participate in the formation of governance synergy

and jointly promote the development of a diversified support model combining poverty alleviation

soil conservation

and agricultural assistance.

关键词

Keywords

references

侯孟阳,姚顺波.1978—2016年中国农业生态效率时空演变及趋势预测[J].地理学报,2018,73(11):2168-2183. Hou Mengyang, Yao Shunbo. Spatial-temporal evolution and trend prediction of agricultural eco-efficiency in China: 1978—2016[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2018,73(11):2168-2183.

高瑜玲,林翊.环境规制对区域生态效率的影响: 基于中国省际面板数据的检验[J].福建农林大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,21(3):44-50. Gao Yuling, Lin Yi. The impact of environmental regulation on the regional eco-efficiency: Based on the verification of provincial panel data in China [J]. Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2018,21(3):44-50.

包健,郭宝棋.异质性环境规制对区域生态效率的影响研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2022,36(2):25-30. Bao Jian, Guo Baoqi. Influence of heterogeneous environmental regulation on regional ecological efficiency [J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2022,36(2):25-30.

王瑶,陈怀超.能源禀赋、环境规制强度与区域生态效率[J].生态经济,2021,37(9):161-168. Wang Yao, Chen Huaichao. Energy endowment,environmental regulation intensity and regional eco-efficiency [J]. Ecological Economy, 2021,37(9):161-168.

董会忠,闫梓昱,辛佼.环境规制对工业生态效率的影响机理研究: 人力资本与科技研发的双重调节[J].华东经济管理,2022,36(3):1-11. Dong Huizhong, Yan Ziyu, Xin Jiao. Study on the influence mechanism of environmental regulation on industrial ecological efficiency: Dual regulation of human capital and scientific and technological R & D [J]. East China Economic Management, 2022,36(3):1-11.

王梓瑛,王兆峰.环境规制对旅游生态效率影响的时空异质性研究: 以长江三角洲城市群为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2022,31(4):750-758. Wang Ziying, Wang Zhaofeng. A study on spatial-temporal heterogeneity of environmental regulation on tourism eco-efficiency: Taking Yangtze River delta urban agglomeration as an example [J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2022,31(4):750-758.

钟成林,胡雪萍.异质性环境规制、制度协同与城市建设用地生态效率[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2019,36(6):70-81. Zhong Chenglin, Hu Xueping. Incentive and non-incentive environmental regulation, institutional coordination and ecological efficiency of urban construction land use [J]. Journal of Shenzhen University (Humanities & Social Sciences), 2019,36(6):70-81.

Leiter A M, Parolini A, Winner H. Environmental regulation and investment: Evidence from European industry data [J]. Ecological Economics, 2011,70(4):759-770.

曹俐,范黎明,雷岁江.财政分权、环境规制与农业生态效率[J].统计与决策,2021,37(19):138-143. Cao Li, Fan Liming, Lei Suijiang. Fiscal decentralization, environmental regulation and agricultural eco-efficiency [J]. Statistics & Decision, 2021,37(19):138-143.

黄玛兰,曾琳琳,李晓云.LCA和DEA法相结合的农业生态效率研究: 兼顾绿色认知和环境规制的影响[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2022(1):94-104. Huang Malan, Zeng Linlin, Li Xiaoyun. Joint life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis for assessing agriculture eco-efficiency: Considering the impacts of green cognition and government regulations [J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 2022(1):94-104.

谢芳宇,刘灵芝,赵佳佳.环境规制对肉鸭养殖生态效率的影响研究：兼论绿色认知的中介作用[J].中国农业资源与区划,2023,44(8):179-188. Xie Fangyu, Liu Lingzhi, Zhao Jiajia. Influence of environmental regulation on the ecological efficiency of meat duck breeding： Considering the mediating role of green cognition [J]. Journal of China Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2023,44(8):179-188.

姜微,刘俊昌,胡皓.我国林业生态效率时空演变及环境规制门槛效应研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2020,40(6):166-174. Jiang Wei, Liu Junchang, Hu Hao. Study on the temporal and spatial evolution of forestry ecological efficiency and threshold effect of environmental regulation in China [J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2020,40(6):166-174.

展进涛,徐钰娇.环境规制、农业绿色生产率与粮食安全[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2019,29(3):167-176. Zhan Jintao, Xu Yujiao. Environmental regulation, agricultural green TFP and grain security [J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2019,29(3):167-176.

Murty M N, Kumar S, Paul M. Environmental regulation, productive efficiency and cost of pollution abatement: A case study of the sugar industry in India [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2006,79(1):1-9.

李南洁,肖新成,曹国勇,等.面源污染下三峡库区农业生态环境效率及影子价格测算[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(11):203-210. Li Nanjie, Xiao Xincheng, Cao Guoyong, et al. Agricultural eco-environment efficiency and shadow price measurement in Three Gorges reservoir area under non-point source pollution constraints [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2017,33(11):203-210.

李冬琴.环境政策工具组合、环境技术创新与绩效[J].科学学研究,2018,36(12):2270-2279. Li Dongqin. The interaction of regulation policy instruments, environmental technological innovation and performance [J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2018,36(12):2270-2279.

王红梅,王振杰.环境治理政策工具比较和选择: 以北京PM

2.5

治理为例[J].中国行政管理,2016(8):126-131. Wang Hongmei, Wang Zhenjie. The comparison and selection of policy instrument of environmental governance: In case of gorernance of beijing’s PM

2.5

. Chinese Public Administration, 2016(8):126-131.

陈宇科,刘蓝天,董景荣.环境规制工具、区域差异与企业绿色技术创新: 基于系统GMM和动态门槛的中国省级数据分析[J].科研管理,2022,43(4):111-118. Chen Yuke, Liu Lantian, Dong Jingrong. Environmental regulation tools, regional differences and green technology innovation of enterprises: An analysis of China’s provincial panel data based on the system GMM and dynamic threshold [J]. Science Research Management, 2022,43(4):111-118.

王国峰,钱子玉,石瑞.中国农业生态效率研究热点和趋势分析[J].中国农业资源与区划,2023,44(10):20-31. Wang Guofeng, Qian Ziyu, Shi Rui. Research hotspots and trends of agriculture eco-efficiency in China [J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2023,44(10):20-31.

郑德凤,郝帅,孙才志.基于DEA-ESDA的农业生态效率评价及时空分异研究[J].地理科学,2018,38(3):419-427. Zheng Defeng, Hao Shuai, Sun Caizhi. Evaluation of agricultural ecological efficiency and its spatial-temporal differentiation based on DEA-ESDA [J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018,38(3):419-427.

王宝义,张卫国.中国农业生态效率的省际差异和影响因素: 基于1996—2015年31个省份的面板数据分析[J].中国农村经济,2018(1):46-62. Wang Baoyi, Zhang Weiguo. Cross-provincial differences in determinants of agricultural eco-efficiency in China: An analysis based on panel data from 31 provinces in 1996-2015[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2018(1):46-62.

汪亚琴,姚顺波,侯孟阳,等.基于地理探测器的中国农业生态效率时空分异及其影响因素[J].应用生态学报,2021,32(11):4039-4049. Wang Yaqin, Yao Shunbo, Hou Mengyang, et al. Spatial-temporal differentiation and its influencing factors of agricultural eco-efficiency in China based on geographic detector [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021,32(11):4039-4049.

陈莹,杨芳玲.中国城镇化与土地财政耦合协调关系研究: 基于省级面板数据的分析[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2018,18(1):106-114. Chen Ying, Yang Fangling. Study on the coupling coordination between urbanization and land finance in China: An empirical analysis based on provincial panel data [J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 2018,18(1):106-114.

王劲峰,徐成东.地理探测器: 原理与展望[J].地理学报,2017,72(1):116-134. Wang Jinfeng, Xu Chengdong. Geodetector: Principle and prospective [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017,72(1):116-134.

郭健斌,张英,张志伟,等.基于地理探测器的藏东南高山峡谷区土地利用变化及其驱动机制: 以西藏林芝市为例[J].中国农业大学学报,2023,28(4):210-226. Guo Jianbin, Zhang Ying, Zhang Zhiwei, et al. Land use change and its driving mechanism in the alpine gorge of southeast Tibet based on geodetector: A case study of Nyingchi City [J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2023,28(4):210-226.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

基于HF-WFPPSIM法的山水林田湖生命共同体耦合协调度评价研究

吉林省西部“三生”功能及其耦合协调度演变特征

2013—2023年三峡库区植被覆盖度时空变化及其驱动力

干旱区农业生态效率与经济韧性协同权衡识别及其驱动因素

2013—2022年重庆市耕地多功能性时空演变及耦合协调关系