1. 贵州大学, 资源与环境工程学院,贵州,贵阳,550000
2. 喀斯特地质资源与地质环境 教育部重点实验室,贵州,贵阳,550000
3. 中国科学院 亚热带农业生态研究所,湖南,长沙,410000
纸质出版:2025
移动端阅览
陈浩, 刘冬冬, 冯娜, 等. 上覆碳酸盐岩红土层对磷石膏水分运移的影响及Green-Ampt模型模拟[J]. 水土保持通报, 2025,45(1):225-234.
Chen Hao, Liu Dongdong, Feng Na, et al. Effect and simulation of overlying carbonate red soil layers on water migration in phosphogypsum[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2025, 45(1): 225-234.
陈浩, 刘冬冬, 冯娜, 等. 上覆碳酸盐岩红土层对磷石膏水分运移的影响及Green-Ampt模型模拟[J]. 水土保持通报, 2025,45(1):225-234. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2025.01.024.
Chen Hao, Liu Dongdong, Feng Na, et al. Effect and simulation of overlying carbonate red soil layers on water migration in phosphogypsum[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2025, 45(1): 225-234. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2025.01.024.
[目的
]
分析上覆碳酸盐岩红土对磷石膏入渗特性的影响机制,为西南喀斯特地区磷石膏堆场合理处置及利用提供科学依据。[方法
]
通过室内扁平土柱入渗试验研究3种磷石膏容重(1.2,1.3,1.4 g/cm
3
)和3种上覆土层厚度(0,6,12 cm)对磷石膏水分入渗过程的影响,并通过改进的分层型Green-Ampt模型进行入渗过程数值模拟。[结果
]
①6和12 cm覆土厚度处理下水分入渗到底部的时间差异不显著(p>0.05),而在0与6 cm、0与12 cm覆土厚度处理下入渗时间差异显著(p<0.05)。覆土厚度为0 cm的初始入渗率、平均入渗率和稳定入渗率显著高于6,12 cm的初始入渗率、平均入渗率和稳定入渗率(p<0.05),稳定入渗率随覆土厚度增大而显著减小。6,12 cm覆土厚度累积入渗量差异不显著(p>0.05),其余覆土厚度之间累积入渗量差异显著(p<0.05)。②相同覆土厚度下,磷石膏容重对初始入渗率、平均入渗率和稳定入渗率的影响均不显著(p>0.05)。③湿润峰深度实测值与模拟值决定系数(R
2
)变化范围为0.951~0.995,均方根误差(RMSE)为12.174~40.856,平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)为0.070~0.227。覆土6和12 cm时,累积入渗量实测值与模拟值决定系数(R
2
)变化范围为0.963~0.999,均方根误差(RMSE)为1.471~11.201,平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)为0.046~0.169。[结论
]
磷石膏覆土与未覆土的土壤水分入渗特征存在显著差异,改进的分层型Green-Ampt模型能够用于模拟上覆土层条件下磷石膏的入渗过程。
[Objective] The influence of overlying carbonate red soil on the infiltration characteristics of phosphogypsum was analyzed in order to provide an scientific basis for the rational disposal and utilization of phosphogypsum storage yards in southwest karst areas. [Methods] The influences of three phosphogypsum bulk densities (1.2
1.3
1.4 g/cm3) and three overburden thicknesses (0
6
12 cm) on the water infiltration process of phosphogypsum were studied through an indoor flat soil column infiltration test
and the infiltration process was numerically simulated using the improved layered Green-Ampt model. [Results] ① The difference in water infiltration time to the bottom between the 6 cm and 12 cm soil cover treatments was not significant (p>0.05). However
significant differences in infiltration time were observed between the 0 and 6 cm treatments
as well as between the 0 and 12 cm treatments (p<0.05). The initial infiltration rate
average infiltration rate
and stable infiltration rate of the 0 cm soil cover were significantly higher than those of the 6 and 12 cm soil cover (p<0.05)
and the stable infiltration rate decreased significantly with the increase in soil cover thickness. There was no significant difference in cumulative infiltration between the 6 and 12 cm cover soil thicknesses (p>0.05)
but there was a significant difference among the other cover soil thicknesses (p<0.05). ② For the same cover thickness
the influence of phosphogypsum bulk density on the initial infiltration rate
average infiltration rate
and stable infiltration rate was not significant (p>0.05). ③ The coefficient of determination (R2) between the measured and simulated values of the wetting peak depth varied was 0.951—0.995
the root mean square error (RMSE) ranged was 12.174—40.856
and the average absolute percentage error (MAPE) ranged was 0.070—0.227. When the soil was covered at 6 and 12 cm
the variation range of the determination coefficient (R2) between the measured and simulated values was 0.963—0.999
the root mean square error (RMSE) was 1.471—11.201
and the average absolute percentage error (MAPE) was 0.046—0.169. [Conclusion] There were significant differences in soil water infiltration characteristics between phosphogypsum-covered soil and uncovered soil
and the improved layered Green-Ampt model could be used to simulate the infiltration process of phosphogypsum under the condition of overlying soil.
欧志兵,杨文娟,何宾宾.国内外磷石膏综合利用现状[J].云南化工,2021,48(11):6-9. Ou Zhibing, Yang Wenjuan, He Binbin. The general introduction of phosphogypsum comprehensive utilization technology in China [J]. Yunnan Chemical Technology, 2021,48(11):6-9.
邓华,侯硕旻,李中军,等.磷石膏综合利用现状及展望[J].无机盐工业,2024,56(1):1-8. Deng Hua, Hou Shuomin, Li Zhongjun, et al. Current situation and prospect of comprehensive utilization of phosphogypsum [J]. Inorganic Chemicals Industry, 2024,56(1):1-8.
李剑秋,李子军,王佳才,等.磷石膏充填材料与技术发展现状及展望[J].现代矿业,2018,34(10):1-4. Li Jianqiu, Li Zijun, Wang Jiacai, et al. Development status and prospect of phosphogypsum filling material and technique [J]. Modern Mining, 2018,34(10):1-4.
保关丽.污泥—磷石膏固化体的工程特性分析及环境风险评价[D].云南昆明:昆明理工大学,2022. Bao Guanli. Engineering characteristic analysis and environmental risk assessment of sludge-phosphogypsum solidified body [D]. Kunming, Yunnan: Kunming University of Science and Technology, 2022.
朱雪涛,杜兵,阿曼角,等.半水磷石膏地下充填材料的磷和氟浸出特性及地球化学模拟[J].中国环境科学,2022,42(2):680-687. Zhu Xuetao, Du Bing, A Manjiao, et al. Leaching properties of phosphorus and fluorine in hemihydrate phosphogypsum as underground filiing materials and geochemical simulation [J]. China Environmental Science, 2022,42(2):680-687.
徐长忠,於金浩,李义连.磷石膏的预处理和综合利用研究进展[J].安全与环境工程,2024,31(1):260-270. Xu Changzhong, Yu Jinhao, Li Yilian. Research progress of pretreatment and comprehensive utilization of phosphogypsum [J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering, 2024,31(1):260-270.
杨花,齐佳敏,李彬.磷石膏改良土壤研究进展[J].磷肥与复肥,2023,38(5):40-44. Yang Hua, Qi Jiamin, Li Bin. Research progress of phosphogypsum in soil improvement [J]. Phosphate & Compound Fertilizer, 2023,38(5):40-44.
卢维宏,王要芳,刘娟,等.磷石膏无害化改性及其在农田土壤改良中的应用研究进展[J].土壤,2023,55(4):699-707. Lu Weihong, Wang Yaofang, Liu Juan, et al. Phosphogypsum (PG) harmless modification and its application in farmland soil improvement: A review [J]. Soils, 2023,55(4):699-707.
Tian Tao, Zhang Chaolan, Zhu Feng, et al. Effect of phosphogypsum on saline-alkalinity and aggregate stability of bauxite residue [J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2021,31(5):1484-1495.
尚凯.磷石膏堆场污染原位控制及生态修复研究进展[J].广州化工,2015,43(24):42-43. Shang Kai. Research progress of phosphogypsum stacks pollution
in situ
control and ecological restoration [J]. Guangzhou Chemical Industry,2015,43(24):42-43.
Green W H, Ampt G A. Studies on soil physics: Part l. the flow of air and water though soils[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science, 1911(4):1-24.
Mein R G, Larson C L. Modeling infiltration during a steady rain [J]. Water Resources Research, 1973,9(2):384-394.
Jahanshir M H, Heidarpour M. Application of the Green-Ampt model for infiltration into layered soils [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2015,527:824-832.
Chen Bin, Ren Qingyang, Wang Feifei, et al. Progressive failure analysis of slope water damage based on improved green-ampt infiltration model [J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2021,39(7):5109-5118.
黄良誉,何廷全,周成,等.边坡植被恢复中植被水泥土Green-Ampt入渗模型的改进与应用[J].岩土工程学报,2022,44(S1):183-188. Huang Liangyu, He Tingquan, Zhou Cheng, et al. Improvement and application of Green-Ampt infiltration model forvegetated cement soil in vegetation restoration of slopes [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022,44(S1):183-188.
陈舟,赵贵清,王志光,等.岩溶区某磷石膏堆放场渗漏特征分析[J].水文地质工程地质,2017,44(2):144-150. Chen Zhou, Zhao Guiqing, Wang Zhiguang, et al. Leakage characteristics of a phosphorus gypsum storage site in karst area [J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2017,44(2):144-150.
张政.磷石膏渗滤液与岩溶含水介质作用机理研究[D].贵州贵阳:贵州大学,2019. Zhang Zheng. Study on reaction processes and mechanism of phosphogypsum leachate and karst medium [D]. Guiyang, Guizhou: Guizhou University, 2019.
Melki S, Gueddari M. Impact assessment of phosphogypsum leachate on groundwater of Sfax-agareb (southeast of Tunisia): Using geochemical and isotopic investigation [J]. Journal of Chemistry, 2018,1:2721752.
彭展翔,褚学伟.摆纪磷石膏堆场渗漏分析[J].地下水,2012,34(5):14-15. Peng Zhanxiang, Chu Xuewei. Leakage analysis of phosphogypsum still in Baiji [J]. Ground Water, 2012,34(5):14-15.
邵明安,王全九,黄明斌.土壤物理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006. Shao Mingan, Wang Quanjiu, Huang Mingbin. Soil Physics [M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2006.
Abed Gatea Alshammary A, Kouzani A Z, Kaynak A, et al. Soil bulk density estimation methods: A review [J]. Pedosphere, 2018,28(4):581-596.
冯娜,刘冬冬,丁继辉,等.反演含碎石碳酸盐岩红土水力特性[J].水土保持学报,2022,36(1):101-109. Feng Na, Liu Dongdong, Ding Jihui, et al. Inversion of hydraulic properties of carbonate-derived laterite containing gravel [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022,36(1):101-109.
印家旺,阿拉木萨,苏宇航,等.科尔沁沙地不同土地利用类型土壤入渗特征比较研究[J].水土保持通报,2022,42(4):90-98. Yin Jiawang, A L, Su Yuhang, et al. Comparative study on soil infiltration characteristics of different land use types in horqin sandy land [J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022,42(4):90-98.
雷志栋.土壤水动力学[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1988. Lei Zhidong, Yang Shixiu, Xie Senchuan. Soil Water Dynamics [M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 1988.
陈俊英,何旭佳,杨亚龙,等.盐碱土入渗下修正Green-Ampt模型参数确定与验证[J].农业工程学报,2021,37(12):125-133. Chen Junying, He Xujia, Yang Yalong, et al. Parameter determination and verification of improved Green-Ampt model under saline-alkali soil infiltration [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2021,37(12):125-133.
张雅楠,吕刚.露天煤矿排土场覆土厚度对土壤水分入渗及植物水分利用的影响[J].水土保持学报,2023,37(5):345-351. Zhang Yanan, Lü Gang. Effect of soil cover thickness on soil water infiltration and plant water utilization in the dump of open pit coal mine [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023,37(5):345-351.
常艺睿,马娟娟,孙西欢,等.上覆蓄水陶土层对黄土高原土壤水分入渗与蒸发的影响[J].水土保持学报,2022,36(6):101-109. Chang Yirui, Ma Juanjuan, Sun Xihuan, et al. Effect of overlying water storage clay layer on soil water infiltration and evaporation on the Loess Plateau [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022,36(6):101-109.
张建丰.黄土区层状土入渗特性及其指流的实验研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2004. Zhang Jianfeng. Experimental study on infiltration characteristicsand finger flow in layer soils of the loess area [D]. Yangling, Shaanxi: Northwest A&F University, 2004.
Basset C, Abou Najm M, Ghezzehei T, et al. How does soil structure affect water infiltration? A meta-data systematic review [J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2023,226:105577.
阿茹·苏里坦,常顺利,张毓涛.天山林区不同群落土壤水分入渗特性的对比分析与模拟[J].生态学报,2019,39(24):9111-9118. Aru SULTAN, Chang Shunli, Zhang Yutao. Comparative analysis and simulation of soil moisture infiltration characteristics in different communities in the forests of Tianshan Mountains, China [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019,39(24):9111-9118.
林代杰,郑子成,张锡洲,等.不同土地利用方式下土壤入渗特征及其影响因素[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(1):33-36. Lin Daijie, Zheng Zicheng, Zhang Xizhou, et al. Characteristic and influencing factors of soil infiltration of different land use patterns [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2010,24(1):33-36.
裴青宝,赵新宇,张建丰,等.容重对红壤水平入渗特性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(6):111-114. Pei Qingbao, Zhao Xinyu, Zhang Jianfeng, et al. Effects of density on horizontal infiltration characteristics of red loam soil [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2014,28(6):111-114.
陈敏,陈孝杨,王芳,等.容重对煤矸石水力特性的影响[J].煤炭技术,2017,36(3):52-54. Chen Min, Chen Xiaoyang, Wang Fang, et al. Effect of bulk density on coal gangue hydraulic characteristics [J]. Coal Technology, 2017,36(3):52-54.
李强,贾森,李鑫,等.考虑非饱和浸润区的改进Green-Ampt模型[J].岩土力学,2022,43(12):3484-3492. Li Qiang, Jia Sen, Li Xin, et al. An improved Green-Ampt model considering unsaturated infiltration zone [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2022,43(12):3484-3492.
0
浏览量
13
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621