人工造林对冀北林草交错带土壤碳密度的影响

王晓蕊; 贾彦龙; 许中旗; 杨晨阳; 崔红娜; 黄晴晴

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2025.01.022

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

人工造林对冀北林草交错带土壤碳密度的影响

试验研究

- 人工造林对冀北林草交错带土壤碳密度的影响
- Effects of afforestation on soil organic carbon density in forest-steppe ecotone of Northern Hebei Province
- 水土保持通报 2025年45卷第1期页码：208-214
- 作者机构：
  
  河北农业大学林学院,河北,保定,071000
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  河北省科学技术研究与发展计划项目“燕山北部山地典型森林生态系统碳汇功能及其对森林经营措施的响应”(10236728);国家重点研发计划项目“水热变化对典型人工林不同林龄期木质部生长的影响”(2019YFF0303203)
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2025.01.022
  中图分类号： S153.6;S725.7
- 纸质出版：2025
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
王晓蕊, 贾彦龙, 许中旗, 等. 人工造林对冀北林草交错带土壤碳密度的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2025,45(1):208-214.

Wang Xiaorui, Jia Yanlong, Xu Zhongqi, et al. Effects of afforestation on soil organic carbon density in forest-steppe ecotone of Northern Hebei Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2025, 45(1): 208-214.
王晓蕊, 贾彦龙, 许中旗, 等. 人工造林对冀北林草交错带土壤碳密度的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2025,45(1):208-214. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2025.01.022.

Wang Xiaorui, Jia Yanlong, Xu Zhongqi, et al. Effects of afforestation on soil organic carbon density in forest-steppe ecotone of Northern Hebei Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2025, 45(1): 208-214. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2025.01.022.

摘要

[目的

]

探究人工造林对冀北林草交错带土壤有机碳密度(SOCD)的影响，为提升该地区陆地生态系统碳汇功能提供科学依据。[方法

]

以御道口地区的樟子松(Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica)和华北落叶松(Larix principis-rupprechtii)人工林为研究对象，以未造林地为对照，分析人工林与未造林地(按生物量由高到低分为未造林地Ⅰ、未造林地Ⅱ和未造林地Ⅲ共3种类型)之间、不同人工林之间土壤有机碳含量(SOC)和碳密度(SOCD)的差异。[结果

]

①御道口地区未造林地土壤有机碳含量在2.54 ~60.57 g/kg，与植被生物量呈明显的正相关关系(p＜0.001)。②相同林龄(16～20 a)华北落叶松人工林和樟子松人工林各土层土壤有机碳含量均明显高于未造林地Ⅱ和未造林地Ⅲ，低于未造林地Ⅰ(p＜0.05)，同时，华北落叶松人工林又明显高于樟子松人工林，且在0—10 cm土层有显著差异(p＜0.05)。③土壤有机碳密度(0—60 cm)由高到低依次为：未造林地Ⅰ(127.56 t/hm

)＞16～20 a华北落叶松人工林(105.26 t/hm

)＞16～20 a樟子松人工林(75.52 t/hm

)＞未造林地Ⅱ(56.06 t/hm

)＞未造林地Ⅲ(31.78 t/hm

)，除樟子松人工林与未造林地Ⅱ之间没有显著差异外(p＞0.05)，其他类型之间均存在显著差异(p＜0.05)。④华北落叶松人工林土壤有机碳密度随林龄的增加而增加，不同林龄华北落叶松人工林土壤有机碳密度(0—60 cm)分别为105.26 t/hm

(16～20 a)，112.29 t/hm

(21～25 a)和159.73 t/hm

(26～30 a)；樟子松人工林则随着林龄的增加呈先下降后上升趋势，不同林龄樟子松人工林土壤有机碳密度(0—60 cm)分别为79.38 t/hm

(6～10 a)，54.24 t/hm

(11～15 a)，75.52 t/hm

(16～20 a)和82.24 t/hm

(＞20 a)。[结论

]

人工造林对土壤有机碳含量和碳密度的影响与初始条件和造林树种有关，在御道口地区，使用华北落叶松和樟

子松在土壤有机碳含量较低地段进行造林能显著提高土壤有机碳含量和碳密度，华北落叶松较樟子松的提高效果更为显著。

Abstract

[Objective] The effect of afforestation on soil organic carbon density (SOCD) was studied to provide a scientific basis for improving the carbon sink of terrestrial ecosystems in the forest-steppe ecotone of Northern Hebei Province. [Methods] Scotch pines (Pinus Sylvestris var. mongolica) and larch (Larix principis-rupprechtii) plantations were selected as the research subjects in the Yudaokou area located in a forest-steppe ecotone. Unforested lands (including unforested land Ⅰ with high biomass

unforested land Ⅱ with medium biomass

and unforested land Ⅲ with low biomass) served as controls. The soil organic carbon (SOC ) content and soil organic carbon density (SOCD) of different terrestrial ecosystems were studied. [Results] ① The SOC content of unforested lands in Yudaokou area ranging from 2.54 to 60.57 g/kg were positively correlated with the vegetation biomass. ② At the same age (16—20 years)

the SOC content in the L. principis-rupprechtii and P. Sylvestris var. mongolica plantations was significantly higher than that in unforested land Ⅱ and unforested land Ⅲ and lower than that in unforested land Ⅰ (p<0.05)

and the SOC content in the L. principis-rupprechtii plantations was higher than that in the P. Sylvestris var. mongolica plantations

with a significant difference observed in the 0—10 cm soil layer (p<0.05). ③ The order of SOCD (0—60 cm) from high to low was unforested land Ⅰ (127.56 t/hm2)＞L. principis-rupprechtii plantation(105.26 t/hm2)＞P. Sylvestris var. mongolica plantation (75.52 t/hm2)＞ unforested land Ⅱ (56.06 t/hm2)＞ unforested land Ⅲ (31.78 t/hm2)

and there were significant differences between the vegetation types (p＜0.05) except that between P. Sylvestris var. mongolica plantations and unforested land Ⅱ (p>0.05). ④ The SOCD of 0—60 cm in the L. principis-rupprechtii plantations increased with the increase of the ages in all soil layer

and they were 105.26 t/hm2 (16~20 a)

112.29 t/hm2(21~25 a) and 159.73 t/hm2 (26~30 a)

respectively; the SOCD of the P. Sylvestris var. mongolica plantations decreased first and then increased with the increase of the ages

and the SOCD of 0—60 cm soil depth was 79.38 t/hm2(6～10 a)

54.24 t/hm2(11～15 a)

75.52 t/hm2(16～20 a) and 82.24 t/hm2(＞20 a)

respectively. [Conclusion] The effect of afforestation on SOC content and storage depends on the initial conditions of forested land and the tree species; in Yudaokou area

afforestation using L. principis-rupprechtii and P. Sylvestris var. mongolica pine in places with lower SOC content can increase SOCD

and L. principis-rupprechtii can increase SOCD more than P. Sylvestris var. mongolica.

关键词

Keywords

references

Gómez Martín E, Máñez Costa M, Egerer S, et al. Assessing the long-term effectiveness of nature-based solutions under different climate change scenarios [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021,794:148515.

刘延惠,王彦辉,于澎涛,等.六盘山南部华北落叶松人工林土壤有机碳含量[J].林业科学,2012,48(12):1-9.Liu Yanhui, Wang Yanhui, Yu Pengtao, et al. Soil organic carbon contents of

Larix principis-rupprechtii

plantations in the southern part of Liupan Mountains [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2012,48(12):1-9.

Thuille A, Buchmann N, Schulze E D. Carbon stocks and soil respiration rates during deforestation, grassland use and subsequent Norway spruce afforestation in the Southern Alps, Italy [J]. Tree Physiology, 2000,20(13):849-857.

Fang Jingyun, Chen Ahping, Peng Changhui, et al. Changes in forest biomass carbon storage in China between 1949 and 1998[J]. Science, 2001,292(5525):2320-2322.

史军,刘纪远,高志强,等.造林对土壤碳密度影响的研究[J].生态学杂志,2005,24(4):410-416.Shi Jun, Liu Jiyuan, Gao Zhiqiang, et al. A review on the influence of afforestation on soil carbon storage [J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2005, 24(4):410-416.

Post W M, Kwon K C. Soil carbon sequestration and land-use change: Processes and potential [J]. Global Change Biology, 2000,6(3):317-327.

Zhou Xiaohe, Li Jia, Zhao Yunfei, et al. Effect of time since afforestation on soil organic carbon stock and turnover rate [J]. Sustainability, 2022,14(16):10403.

Liu Xiang, Yang Tao, Wang Quan, et al. Dynamics of soil carbon and nitrogen stocks after afforestation in arid and semi-arid regions: A meta-analysis [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018,618:1658-1664.

刘玉林,朱广宇,邓蕾,等.黄土高原植被自然恢复和人工造林对土壤碳氮储量的影响[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(7):2163-2172.Liu Yulin, Zhu Guangyu, Deng Lei, et al. Effects of natural vegetation restoration and afforestation on soil carbon and nitrogen storage in the Loess Plateau, China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018,29(7):2163-2172.

Kumar R, Pande V C, Bhardwaj A K, et al. Long-term impacts of afforestation on biomass production, carbon stock, and climate resilience in a degraded semi-arid ravine ecosystem of India [J]. Ecological Engineering, 2022,177:106559.

Chen Longfei, He Zhibin, Zhu Xi, et al. Impacts of afforestation on plant diversity, soil properties, and soil organic carbon storage in a semi-arid grassland of Northwestern China [J]. CATENA, 2016,147:300-307.

Thuille A, Schulze E D. Carbon dynamics in successional and afforested spruce stands in Thuringia and the Alps [J]. Global Change Biology, 2006,12(2):325-342.

Laclau P. Biomass and carbon sequestration of ponderosa pine plantations and native cypress forests in Northwest Patagonia [J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2003,180(1/2/3):317-333.

Specht A, West P W. Estimation of biomass and sequestered carbon on farm forest plantations in Northern New South Wales, Australia [J]. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2003,25(4):363-379.

Groenendijk F M, Condron L M, Rijkse W C. Effects of afforestation on organic carbon, nitrogen and sulfur concentrations in New Zealand hill country soils [J]. Geoderma, 2002,108(1/2):91-100.

Quideau S A, Chadwick O A, Trumbore S E, et al. Vegetation control on soil organic matter dynamics [J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2001,32(2):247-252.

牛庆花,彭博,陆贵巧,等.河北省坝上地区牧场防护林的防风效能研究[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(4):114-117.Niu Qinghua, Peng Bo, Lu Guiqiao, et al. Windbreak efficiency of pasture shelterbelt in Bashang area of Hebei Province [J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018,38(4):114-117.

Hong Songbai, Yin Guodong, Piao Shilong, et al. Divergent responses of soil organic carbon to afforestation [J]. Nature Sustainability, 2020,3:694-700.

Slessarev E W, Mayer A, Kelly C, et al. Initial soil organic carbon stocks govern changes in soil carbon: Reality or artifact? [J]. Global Change Biology, 2023,29(5):1239-1247.

Deng Lei, Zhu Guangyu, Tang Zhuangsheng, et al. Global patterns of the effects of land-use changes on soil carbon stocks [J]. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2016,5:127-138.

Xu Lin, Zhang Jiguang, Hu Peilei, et al. Bedrock outcrops weakly promote rather than inhibit soil carbon sequestration after vegetation restoration [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2023,858:159470.

Kuzyakov Y. Priming effects: Interactions between living and dead organic matter [J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2010,42(9):1363-1371.

Kuzyakov Y, Friedel J K, Stahr K. Review of mechanisms and quantification of priming effects [J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2000,32(11/12):1485-1498.

姜玲玲.塞罕坝地区人工林土壤有机碳及其组分的差异[D].河北保定:河北农业大学,2020.Jiang Ling. Differences of soil organic carbon and its components in plantations in Saihanba area [D]. Baoding, Hebei: Hebei Agricultural University, 2020.

李红运,辛颖,赵雨森.火烧迹地不同恢复方式土壤有机碳分布特征[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(9):2747-2753.Li Hongyun, Xin Ying, Zhao Yusen. Distribution characteristics of soil organic carbon of burned area under different restorations [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016,27(9):2747-2753.

Paul K I, Polglase P J, Nyakuengama J G, et al. Change in soil carbon following afforestation [J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2002,168(1/2/3):241-257.

侯海潮,丁丽,许中旗,等.燕山北部山地典型造林树种幼树根系分布特征[J].林业资源管理,2018(4):10-16.Hou Haichao, Ding Li, Xu Zhongqi, et al. Root distribution of young trees of typical species in the northern region of Yanshan Mountains [J]. Forest Resources Management, 2018(4):10-16.

Lima A M N, Silva I R, Neves J C L, et al. Soil organic carbon dynamics following afforestation of degraded pastures with

Eucalyptus

in Southeastern Brazil [J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2006,235(1/2/3):219-231.

胡建文,刘常富,勾蒙蒙,等.林龄对马尾松人工林微生物残体碳积累的影响机制[J].应用生态学报,2024,35(1):153-160.Hu Jianwen, Liu Changfu, Gou Mengmeng, et al. Influencing mechanism of stand age to the accumulation of microbial residue carbon in the

Pinus massoniana

plantations [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2024,35(1):153-160.

潘嘉琛,刘超,董智,等.黄泛沙地不同林龄杨树人工林土壤团聚体及有机碳特征[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(3):25-30.Pan Jiachen, Liu Chao, Dong Zhi, et al. Distribution characteristics of soil aggregates and soil organic carbon in populus artificial forest with different forest ages in Yellow River flood plain [J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022,29(3):25-30.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

黄土高原丘陵区人工刺槐林林分结构及林下植物多样性研究

重庆市四面山人工林土壤持水与入渗特性

连栽桉树人工林土壤理化性质的主分量分析

黄土丘陵半干旱区人工林细根分布特征及土壤特性

不同干扰措施下黄土丘陵区人工刺槐林生长结构及土壤理化性质分析