1. 国家电网甘肃省电力公司建设分公司, 甘肃 兰州 73,000
2. 西北农林科技大学 水土保持科学与工程学院, 陕西 杨凌,712100
纸质出版:2025
移动端阅览
金子惠, 耿文婷, 李永红, 等. 特高压输电工程植被恢复过程中树草种适宜性研究——以酒泉—湖南±800 kV直流输电工程甘肃段为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2025,45(1):199-207.
Jin Zihui, Geng Wenting, Li Yonghong, et al. Vegetation restoration and screening with suitable tree and grass taxa for extra-high voltage transmission projects —Taking Gansu section of Jiuquan—Hunan ±800 kV DC transmission line project as an example[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2025, 45(1): 199-207.
金子惠, 耿文婷, 李永红, 等. 特高压输电工程植被恢复过程中树草种适宜性研究——以酒泉—湖南±800 kV直流输电工程甘肃段为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2025,45(1):199-207. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2025.01.021.
Jin Zihui, Geng Wenting, Li Yonghong, et al. Vegetation restoration and screening with suitable tree and grass taxa for extra-high voltage transmission projects —Taking Gansu section of Jiuquan—Hunan ±800 kV DC transmission line project as an example[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2025, 45(1): 199-207. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2025.01.021.
[目的] 开展输电工程植被恢复及适宜树草种筛选研究,为提升输变电工程植被恢复效率和质量、减少工程造成的水土流失,降低生态恢复成本,保障电网绿色高质量可持续发展提供科学依据。[方法] 以甘肃酒泉—湖南±800 kV直流输电工程甘肃段为例,采用现场调查、实地观测和室内分析的方法,设置26个栽种观测点,观测栽种2 a和5 a草种、树种的生长情况,观测指标主要包括草种及其丛高、干草产量、树种及其株高、分枝数和冠幅。通过熵值法排序并筛选草、树种在输变电沿线各植被分区的生长适宜性。[结果] 根据观测结果,初步筛选出6个草种(冰草、芨芨草、草木犀、紫花苜蓿、老芒麦和披碱草)和6个树种(多花柽柳、柠条、沙棘、梭梭、沙地柏、胡杨)。适宜性评价结果显示:在秦岭阔叶—落叶混交区,芨芨草、紫花苜蓿、柠条均排序第1;在河西走廊荒漠戈壁区,草木樨(第2)和梭梭(第1)排名最高;在河西走廊绿洲平原区,冰草(第2)和沙棘(第1)排名最高;在河西走廊荒漠草原区,老芒麦(第2)、多花柽柳(第1)和胡杨(第1)排名最高;在黄土高原荒漠草原区,披碱草、多花柽柳、柠条、梭梭和沙地柏排序最高,均为第2名;在黄土高原干旱草原区,芨芨草(第2)和沙地柏(第1)排名最高。[结论] 输变电沿线各植被区分植被恢复适宜树草种选择应因地制宜,综合考虑生长适宜性和生态功能,推荐优先选择乡土种,如在黄土高原干旱草原区宜优先种植芨芨草、沙棘和沙地柏。
[Objective] Vegetation restoration and screening with suitable trees and grasses in power transmission projects were performed to provide scientific guidance to improve vegetation restoration success in power transmission and transformation projects
reduce soil erosion caused by the project
and reduce ecological restoration costs. This is particularly important to guarantee the green
high-quality and sustainable development of power grids. [Methods] Using on-site investigation
field observation
and indoor analysis
26 planting observation points were set up to observe the growth of grass and tree taxa two and five years after planting. The observation indices mainly included grass taxa and their height
hay production
tree taxa and their height
branch number
and crown width. The entropy value method was used to sort and screen the suitability of the growth of the grass and tree taxa in the various vegetation sub-zones along the transmission and substation routes. [Results] According to the observations
six grass taxa (Agropyron ristatum
Achnathurum splendens
Melilotus suavcolen
Medicago sativa
Elymus sibiricus and Elymus dahuricus) and six tree taxa (Tamarix hohenackeri
Caragana korshinskii
Hippophae rhamnoides
Haloxylon aphyllum
Sabina vulgaris
and Populus euphratica) were screened for the suitability evaluation. The results showed that in the broadleaf-deciduous mixed zone of the Qinling Mountains
A. splendens
M. sativa
and C. korshinskii ranked No. 1. In the desert Gobi zone of the West Hebei Corridor
M. suavcolen (No. 2) and H. aphyllum (No. 1) ranked the highest. In the oasis plain zone of the Hexi Corridor
A. ristatum (No. 2) and H. rhamnoides subsp. sinensis (No. 1) ranked the highest. In the desert grassland zone of the Hexi Corridor
E. sibiricus (No. 2)
T. hohenackeri (No. 1) and P. euphratica (No. 1) ranked the highest. In the desert steppe zone of the Loess Plateau
E. dahuricus
T. hohenacke
C. korshinskii
H. aphyllum
and S. vulgaris were the most highly ranked species
and they were all ranked No. 2. In the dry steppe zone of the Loess Plateau
A. splendens (No. 2) and S. vulgaris ranked No. 1. [Conclusion] Selecting suitable tree and grass taxa for vegetation restoration in each vegetation zone along the transmission line should be adapted to local conditions
taking into account the suitability for growth and ecological function. It is recommended to prioritize selecting native species. For example
in the dry grassland area of the Loess Plateau
it is preferable to prioritize planting water with A. splendens
H. rhamnoides and S. vulgaris.
Feng Quanlong, Niu Bowen, Ren Yan, et al. A 10 m national-scale map of ground-mounted photovoltaic power stations in China of 2020[J]. Scientific Data, 2024,11(1):198.
黄志元,刘宝华,崔星怡,等.输变电工程对土壤环境的影响及其防控[J].农业资源与环境学报,2019,36(5):561-569. Huang Zhiyuan, Liu Baohua, Cui Xingyi, et al. Impacts of power transmission projects on the surrounding soil environment: Prevention and control [J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2019,36(5):561-569.
刘强,李熙,江世雄,等.输变电工程边坡生态防护关键问题及发展趋势[J].人民长江,2022,53(S1):16-20. Liu Qiang, Li Xi, Jiang Shixiong, et al. Key problems and development trends of slope ecological protection in power transmission and transformation projects [J]. Yangtze River, 2022,53(S1):16-20.
陈卓鑫,李魁,王文龙,等.不同类型山丘区输变电线路工程水土流失的来源、影响因素及措施体系配置[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(4):151-157. Chen Zhuoxin, Li Kui, Wang Wenlong, et al. Sources,influencing factors,and controlling measures configuration of soil and water loss in power transmission line projects in different hilly and mountainous regions [J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021,41(4):151-157.
孙中峰,杨文姬,宋康.输变电工程建设低扰动水土保持技术研究: 以山西省输变电工程为例[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(3):62-67. Sun Zhongfeng, Yang Wenji, Song Kang. Research on low disturbance soil and water conservation technology integration of power transmission engineering: Power transmission engineering in Shanxi Province as examples [J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2014,21(3):62-67.
赵力,廖彤,汤泽平,等.500 kV国安输变电工程穿越水源保护区的生态影响与生态保护调查分析[J].生态科学,2019,38(3):107-115. Zhao Li, Liao Tong, Tang Zeping, et al. Ecological impacts and ecological protection of power transmission projects crossing water source protection areas: A case study of 500 kV Guo’an transmission and transformation project [J]. Ecological Science, 2019,38(3):107-115.
Yang Dan, Du Siying, Zhang Wentao, et al. Study on vegetation restoration technology in ecologically sensitive area of power transmission and transformation project in Sichuan-Chongqing area [J]. Advances in Education, Humanities and Social Science Research, 2023,8(1):83.
樊成虎,王雅琛,许丽娟,等.西北生态脆弱区输变电工程植被恢复技术体系构建[J].环境生态学,2023,5(8):112-118. Fan Chenghu, Wang Yachen, Xu Lijuan, et al. Construction of vegetation restoration technology system for power transmission and transformation projects in ecological fragile area of Northwest China [J]. Environmental Ecology, 2023,5(8):112-118.
鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000. Bao Shidan. Soil Agricultural Chemistry Analysis [M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2020.
穆少杰,李建龙,陈奕兆,等.2001—2010年内蒙古植被覆盖度时空变化特征[J].地理学报,2012,67(9):1255-1268. Mu Shaojie, Li Jianlong, Chen Yizhao, et al. Spatial differences of variations of vegetation coverage in Inner Mongolia during 2001—2010[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012,67(9):1255-1268.
王国梁,刘国彬,许明祥.黄土丘陵区纸坊沟流域植被恢复的土壤养分效应[J].水土保持通报,2002,22(1):1-5. Wang Guoliang, Liu Guobin, Xu Mingxiang. Effect of vegetation restoration on soil nutrient changes in Zhifanggou watershed of loess hilly region [J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2002,22(1):1-5.
0
浏览量
13
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621