不同水土保持措施对露天煤矿排土场土壤与植被的影响

尹佳琪; 郭建英; 珊丹; 邢恩德; 李耀

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.06.002

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

不同水土保持措施对露天煤矿排土场土壤与植被的影响

试验研究

- 不同水土保持措施对露天煤矿排土场土壤与植被的影响
- Effects of Different Soil and Water Conservation Measures on Soil and Vegetation of Open-pit Coal Mine Drainage Sites
- 水土保持通报 2024年44卷第6期页码：12-22
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 内蒙古农业大学沙漠治理学院,内蒙古,呼和浩特,010018
  2. 中国水利水电科学研究院内蒙古阴山北麓草原生态水文国家野外科学观测研究站,北京,100038
  3. 鄂尔多斯市国土空间规划院,内蒙古,鄂尔多斯市,017000
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  鄂尔多斯市科技合作重大专项“黄河流域绿色矿山建设生态修复关键技术研究与示范”(2021EEDSCXQDFZ2016);创建鄂尔多斯国家可持续发展议程创新示范区项目“窟野河流域山水林田湖草沙矿城系统治理技术与示范”(2022EEDSKJXM005-03);内蒙古自治区水利科技项目“皇甫川生态清洁小流域建设目标分类评价体系构建研究”(NSK202203)
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.06.002
  中图分类号： X752;S157.2
- 纸质出版：2024
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
尹佳琪, 郭建英, 珊丹, 等. 不同水土保持措施对露天煤矿排土场土壤与植被的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2024,44(6):12-22.

Yin Jiaqi, Guo Jianying, Shan Dan, et al. Effects of Different Soil and Water Conservation Measures on Soil and Vegetation of Open-pit Coal Mine Drainage Sites[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2024, 44(6): 12-22.
尹佳琪, 郭建英, 珊丹, 等. 不同水土保持措施对露天煤矿排土场土壤与植被的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2024,44(6):12-22. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.06.002.

Yin Jiaqi, Guo Jianying, Shan Dan, et al. Effects of Different Soil and Water Conservation Measures on Soil and Vegetation of Open-pit Coal Mine Drainage Sites[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2024, 44(6): 12-22. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.06.002.

摘要

[目的] 探究不同水土保持措施对露天煤矿排土场土壤养分和植物多样性的影响，旨在为矿区排土场等废弃地的生态恢复提供可行的技术措施。[方法] 在草原露天煤矿排土场裸露边坡布设8种水土保持工程措施与植物措施相结合的水土保持措施，以无措施(CK)为对照，采用样方法调查植物群落特征，并测定土壤主要理化性质，对比分析不同水土保持措施下植物群落特征、土壤特性的变化差异，采用冗余法分析植物群落特征与土壤特性之间的相互关系。[结果] ①排土场边坡采取水土保持措施对土壤主要理化性质有不同程度的影响，其中土壤速效养分含量变化明显(p<0.05)，撒播混草＋生态袋间隔1 m (Ⅱ)和撒播混草＋生态袋间隔2 m (Ⅲ)2种措施的土壤速效磷含量达到3.38，3.13 mg/kg，分别比对照(CK)(2.20 mg/kg)增加53.6%，42.3%；撒播混草＋生态袋间隔2 m (Ⅲ)，撒播混草＋土工格室(Ⅶ)，撒播混草＋草帘子(Ⅷ)3种措施的土壤速效钾含量为108.25，126.25 ，124.00 mg/kg，对照样地土壤速效钾含量仅为53.25 mg/kg。②水土保持措施对植物群落特征的影响主要表现在Simpson优势度指数上，除撒播混草＋沙柳沙障(Ⅵ)和撒播混草＋土工格室(Ⅶ)的与对照(CK)间差异不显著外(p>0.05)，其他组均显著高于对照(CK，p<0.05)。③冗余分析结果表明，Margalef丰富度，Simpson优势度指数和Shannon-Wiener多样性指数均与土壤速效磷呈显著正相关；Louie均匀度指数与土壤全氮、速效钾和缓效钾呈显著正相关。[结论] 露天煤矿排土场实施水土保持措施可提高土壤养分含量和植物多样性，对于生态恢复有积极的作用；撒播混草＋生态袋间隔2 m (Ⅲ)和撒播混草＋沙柳沙障(Ⅵ)的水土保持措施具有较好的生态修复效果，可作为矿区排土场生态修复的主要措施推广应用。

Abstract

[Objective] The effects of different soil and water conservation measures on soil nutrients and plant diversity in open-pit coal mine dumps were explored

aiming to provide feasible technical measures for the ecological restoration of mine dumps and other abandoned lands. [Methods] Eight soil and water conservation measures combining soil and water-conservation-engineering and plant measures were deployed on the exposed slopes of the grassland open-pit coal mine discharge site

with no measures (CK) as the control. Sampling was conducted to investigate the characteristics of the plant community

as well as to determine the main physicochemical properties of the soil

compare and analyze the differences in the changes in the characteristics of the plant community

and soil properties of the different soil and water conservation measures. The redundancy method was used to analyze the correlation between plant community characteristics and soil properties. [Results] ① The soil and water conservation measures applied on the slope of the discharge site affected differently the main physicochemical properties of the soil

in which the soil quick-acting nutrient content changed significantly (p<0.05)

and the soil quick-acting phosphorus content of the two measures-spreading mixed grass + ecological bag spacing 1m (Ⅱ) and spreading mixed grass + ecological bag spacing 2 m (Ⅲ)-reached 3.38 and 3.13 mg/kg

respectively. These increased by 53.6% and 42.3% compared to that of the control (CK) (2.20 mg/kg)

respectively. The soil quick-effect potassium content of the three measures of spreading mixed grass + ecological bag spacing 2 m (Ⅲ)

spreading mixed grass + geocell (Ⅶ)

and spreading mixed grass + grass curtain (Ⅷ) was 108.25

126.25

and 124.00 mg/kg

respectively. In contrast

the soil quick-effect potassium content of the control plot was only 53.25 mg/kg. ② The effects of soil and water conservation measures on plant community characteristics manifested mainly in the Simpson’s dominance index

which was significantly higher than that of the control (CK)

except for the insignificant differences (p>0.05) between the spreading of sedge + salix psammophila sand barriers (Ⅵ) and the spreading of sedge + geocell (Ⅶ) (p<0.05). ③ The results of redundancy analysis showed that the Margalef richness

Simpson dominance index

and Shannon-Wiener diversity index were all significantly positively correlated with soil quick-acting phosphorus. The Louie evenness index was significantly positively correlated with soil total nitrogen

quick-acting potassium

and slow-acting potassium. [Conclusion] The implementation of soil and water conservation measures in open-pit coal mine dumps can improve the soil nutrient content and plant diversity

which has a positive effect on ecological restoration. The soil and water conservation measures of spreading mixed grass + ecological bag with an interval of 2 m (Ⅲ) and spreading mixed grass + salix psammophila sand barriers (Ⅵ) have a better ecological restoration effect

which can be popularized and applied as the main measures for ecological restoration of dumps in the mining area.

关键词

Keywords

references

阎仲康,曹银贵,李志涛,等.内蒙古东部草原区矿山生态修复研究:关键技术与减碳路径[J].农业资源与环境学报,2023,40(3):570-582. Yan Zhongkang, Cao Yingui, Li Zhitao, et al. Ecological restoration of mines in eastern grassland area of Inner Mongolia, China: Key technologies and carbon reduction paths [J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2023,40(3):570-582.

李全生.东部草原区大型煤电基地开发的生态影响与修复技术[J].煤炭学报,2019,44(12):3625-3635. Li Quansheng. Progress of ecological restoration and comprehensive remediation technology in large-scale coal-fired power base in theeastern grassland area of China [J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2019,44(12):3625-3635.

高志香,李希来,张静,等.覆土处理对高寒矿区露天煤矿排土场植被和土壤特征的影响[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(1):82-87. Gao Zhixiang, Li Xilai, Zhang Jing, et al. Effects of replacing topsoil treatment on vegetation and soil characteristics of open-pit coal mine dump in alpine mining area [J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021,41(1):82-87.

徐佳,曹雪峰,王玺圳,等.半干旱地区矿区生态系统土壤保持功能评价:以神府—东胜矿区为例[J].水土保持通报,2023,43(4):178-185. Xu Jia, Cao Xuefeng, Wang Xizhen, et al. Evaluation on soil conservation function of a mining area ecosystem in semi-arid areas： A case study at Shenfu-Dongsheng mining area[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023,43(4):178-185.

丰菲,许丽,顾清敏,等.宁东矿区天然植物群落特征及其与土壤理化性质的关系[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(6):48-56. Feng Fei, Xu Li, Gu Qingmin, et al. Characteristics of natural plant community and its relationship with soil physi-chemical properties in ningdong mining area [J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021,41(6):48-56.

李轲,赵勇钢,刘小芳,等.黄土丘陵区典型草地演替中植物群落特征与土壤储水量关系[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(1):55-60. Li Ke, Zhao Yonggang, Liu Xiaofang, et al. Relationship between plant community characteristics and soil water storage along typical grassland succession in loess hilly region [J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019,39(1):55-60.

陈卓鑫,郭明明,王文龙,等.白草塬植被恢复后沟头草本植物多样性与土壤因子的关系[J].水土保持通报,2023,43(4):53-60,76. Chen Zhuoxin, Guo Mingming, Wang Wenlong, et al. Relationship between herbaceous plant diversity and soil factors at a gully head after revegetation in Baicao Tableland [J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023,43(4):53-60,76.

刘海亚.基于植被恢复力的矿区生态修复适应性管理研究:以黑岱沟露天煤矿排土场为例[D].江苏徐州:中国矿业大学,2023. Liu Haiya. Research on adaptive management of ecological restoration in miningarea based on vegetation resilience: A case study of Heidaigou open-pit coal mine dump [D]. Xuzhou, Jiangsu: China University of Mining and Technology, 2023.

薛东明,郭小平,张晓霞.干旱矿区排土场不同边坡生态修复模式下减流减沙效益[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(6):15-21. Xue Dongming, Guo Xiaoping, Zhang Xiaoxia. Runoff and sediment reduction under different slope ecological restoration modes of waste dump in arid mining area [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021,35(6):15-21.

刘宝昌,刘畅,王凯,等.矿山排土场边坡植被恢复过程中土壤团聚体稳定性机制[J].重庆理工大学学报(自然科学),2023,37(1):257-264. Liu Baochang, Liu Chang, Wang Kai, et al. The stabilitymechanism of soil aggregates during the vegetation recovery process on coalmine dump slopes [J]. Journalof Chongqing University of Technology (Natural Science), 2023,37(1):257-264.

珊丹,崔崴,邢恩德,等.矿山废弃地植被恢复对土壤养分的影响与评价[J].山西农业大学学报(自然科学版),2024,44(1):101-110. Shan Dan, Cui Wei, Xing Ende, et al. Effects and evaluation of vegetation restoration on soil nutrients in abandoned coalmining area [J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 2024,44(1):101-110.

胡宜刚,张鹏,赵洋,等.植被配置对黑岱沟露天煤矿区土壤养分恢复的影响[J].草业科学,2015,32(10):1561-1568. Hu Yigang, Zhang Peng, Zhao Yang, et al. Effects of various vegetation patterns on soil nutrients recovery in Heidaigou coal mine [J]. Pratacultural Science, 2015,32(10):1561-1568.

张进德,郗富瑞.我国废弃矿山生态修复研究[J].生态学报,2020,40(21):7921-7930. Zhang Jinde, Xi Furui. Study on ecological restoration of abandoned mines in China [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2020,40(21):7921-7930.

刘百灵,李仓水.复垦植被对排土场土壤持水能力的影响与评价[J].山西农业大学学报(自然科学版),2023,43(6):89-98. Liu Bailing, Li Cangshui. Effects and evaluation of vegetation restoration on the soil’s water retention capacity in reclaimed soil area [J]. Journal of Shanxi AgriculturalUniversity (Natural Science Edition), 2023,43(6):89-98.

唐玉情,孙飞,刘海龙,等.基于AHP法黑龙江多宝山铜业矿山排土场植物筛选[J].植物研究,2021,41(5):700-711. Tang Yuqing, Sun Fei, Liu Hailong, et al. Plant screening in dumping site of Duobaoshan copper mine in Heilongjiang based on AHP method [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2021,41(5):700-711.

李叶鑫,吕刚,王道涵,等.露天煤矿排土场复垦区不同植被类型土壤质量评价[J].生态环境学报,2019,28(4):850-856. Li Yexin, Lv Gang, Wang Daohan, et al.Soil quality evaluation with different vegetation types of reclamation area in a surface coal mine dump [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2019,28(4):850-856.

庞景豪,梁燊,刘亚斌,等.恢复年限对高寒金属矿山排土场植物多样性和土壤化学特性的影响[J].水土保持通报,2023,43(4):110-120. Pang Jinghao, Liang Shen, Liu Yabin, et al.Influence of recovery years on plant diversity and soil chemical properties for alpine metal mine dumps [J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023,43(4):110-120.

王明涛,高国荣,苗彦军,等.拉林公路生态袋护坡植被和土壤现状及关联性研究[J].中国草地学报,2023,45(4):67-73, 89. Wang Mingtao, Gao Guorong, Miao Yanjun, et al. Study on the current situation and correlation between vegetation and soil of ecological bag slope protection in Lalin highway [J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2023,45(4):67-73,89.

詹慧宗.柔性生态棒在高陡废弃矿山生态环境修复中的应用[J].现代矿业,2022,38(5):188-191. Zhan Huizong. Application of flexible ecological rod in ecological environment restoration of high and steep abandoned mines [J]. Modern Mining, 2022,38(5):188-191.

范永丰,韩宇琨,刘丛木,等.土工格室加固边坡稳定性参数分析[J].科学技术与工程,2022,22(6):2507-2514. Fan Yongfeng, Han Yukun, Liu Congmu, et al. Analysisof stability parameters of geocell reinforced slope [J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2022,22(6):2507-2514.

王召明,王君芳,杨红艳.生态包：CN201410843860.1[P].2015-05-13. Wang Zhaoming, Wang Junfang, Yang Hongyan. Eco-bag: China，CN201410843860.1[P]. 2015-05-13.

杨广庆,王贺,刘华北,等.HDPE土工格栅加筋土结构的筋材长期强度研究[J].东华大学学报(自然科学版),2014,40(2):167-170. Yang Guangqing, Wang He, Liu Huabei, et al. Research on the long-term tensile strength of HDPE geogrids in reinforced soil structure [J]. Journal of Donghua University (Natural Science), 2014,40(2):167-170.

井明博,周天林,梁健,等.4种适生植物对陇东地区油污土壤场地生态修复的响应[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(1):286-293. Jing Mingbo, Zhou Tianlin, Liang Jian, et al. Response of four kinds of adaptable plants to ecological restoration of crude-oil contaminated soil in eastern Gansu Province [J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019,39(1):286-293.

刘灿然,马克平.生物群落多样性的测度方法：Ⅴ.生物群落物种数目的估计方法[J].生态学报,1997,17(6):601-610. Liu Canran, Ma Keping. Measurement oe biotic community diversity: Ⅴ. methods for estimating the number of species in a community [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1997,17(6):601-610.

杨鑫光,李希来,金立群,等.不同人工恢复措施下高寒矿区煤矸石山植被和土壤恢复效果研究[J].草业学报,2019,28(3):1-11. Yang Xinguang, Li Xilai, Jin Liqun, et al. Effectiveness of different artificial restoration measures for soil and vegetation recovery on coal mine tailings in an alpine area [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019,28(3):1-11.

Yang Liu, Wang Xiuwei, Mao Zijun, et al. Root exudation rates decrease with increasing latitude in some tree species [J]. Forests, 2020,11(10):1045.

Dai Weiwei, Peng Bo, Liu Jun, et al. Four years of litter input manipulationchanges soil microbial characteristics in a temperate mixed forest [J]. Biogeochemistry, 2021,154(2):371-383.

杨利宁,敖特根·白银,李秋凤,等.苜蓿根系分泌物对土壤中难溶性磷的影响[J].草业科学,2015,32(8):1216-1221. Yang Lining, Aotegen·baiyin, Li Qiufeng, et al. Effects of alfalfa root exudates on insoluble phosphorus in soil [J]. PrataculturalScience, 2015,32(8):1216-1221.

谢建昌,周健民.我国土壤钾素研究和钾肥使用的进展[J].土壤,1999,31(5):244-254. Xie Jianchang, Zhou Jianmin. Research progress of soil potassium and application of potassium fertilizer in China [J]. Soils, 1999,31(5):244-254.

Rosell R A, Galantini J A, SuÑer L G. Long-term crop rotation effects on organic carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in haplustoll soil fractions [J]. Arid Soil Research and Rehabilitation, 2000,14(4):309-315.

李鹏飞,张兴昌,朱首军,等.植被恢复对黑岱沟矿区排土场土壤性质的影响[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(5):64-70. Li Pengfei, Zhang Xingchang, Zhu Shoujun, et al. Effects of vegetation restoration on soil properties in Heidaigou Mine dump [J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2015,35(5):64-70.

寇晓蓉,白中科,杜振州,等.黄土区大型露天煤矿企业土地复垦质量控制研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2017,36(5):957-965. Kou Xiaorong, Bai Zhongke, Du Zhenzhou, et al. Land reclamation quality completion standards for large opencast coal mine enterprises in Loess areas [J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2017,36(5):957-965.

董倩,李素清.安太堡露天煤矿区复垦地不同植被下草本植物群落生态关系研究[J].中国农学通报,2018,34(4):95-100. Dong Qian, Li Suqing. The ecological relationships of herbaceous plant communities under different plantations on the reclaimed dumps in Antaibao opencast coal mining area [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018,34(4):95-100.

徐志果.安太堡露天矿复垦地草本植物群落多样性研究[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2013. Xu Zhiguo. Study on the diversity of herbaceous plant communitiesin reclaimed land of Antaibao opencast mine [D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences (Beijing), 2013.

毕银丽,李向磊,彭苏萍, 等.露天矿区植物多样性与土壤养分空间变异性特征[J].煤炭科学技术,2020,48(12):205-213. Bi Yinli, Li Xianglei, Peng Suping, et al. Characteristics of spatial variability of plantdiversity and soil nutrients in open-pit mining area [J]. Coal Science and Technology, 2020,48(12):205-213.

张亦扬.榆神府采煤塌陷区不同植被恢复方式下土壤与植物演替规律及其耦合关系[D].陕西西安:西安科技大学,2019. Zhang Yiyang. Soil-vegetation evolution dynamics and coupling effects ofdifferent vegetation restoration modes in Yushenfu coal mining area[D]. Xi’an, Shaanxi: Xi’an University of Science and Technology, 2019.

黄雅茹,辛智鸣,葛根巴图,等.乌兰布和沙漠东北缘典型灌木群落多样性与土壤养分相关性研究[J].中国农业科技导报,2018,20(9):95-105. Huang Yaru, Xin Zhiming, Ge G, et al. Correlation of typical shrub community diversity and soil nutrient in northeast ulanbuh desert [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018,20(9):95-105.

王洪丹,王金满,曹银贵,等.黄土区露天煤矿排土场土壤与地形因子对植被恢复的影响[J].生态学报,2016,36(16):5098-5108. Wang Hongdan, Wang Jinman, Cao Yingui, et al. Effect of soil and topography on vegetation restoration in an opencast coal mine dump in a loess area [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016,36(16):5098-5108.

浏览量

110

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

吉林省低山丘陵区侵蚀沟治理的碳汇作用

砒砂岩区4种人工林林下草本植物多样性与土壤理化性质

不同水保措施下红壤坡地泥沙及氮磷流失对雨型的响应

商洛山区主要中低产田改良利用探析

黄土高原向阳沟流域水土保持措施效益分析