不同经营强度对雷竹林土壤理化性质及土壤质量的影响

高雨; 曹迁; 陈蕾如; 张志丽; 张爱婷; 徐小牛

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.05.032

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

不同经营强度对雷竹林土壤理化性质及土壤质量的影响

试验研究

- 不同经营强度对雷竹林土壤理化性质及土壤质量的影响
- Effects of Different Management Intensities on Soil Physicochemical Properties and Soil Quality in Phyllostachys Praecox Plantations
- 水土保持通报 2024年43卷第5期页码：294-304
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 安徽省林木资源培育重点实验室,安徽,合肥,230036
  2. 安徽农业大学林学与园林学院,安徽,合肥,230036
  3. 安徽省黄山市黄山区新华林业站,安徽,黄山,245718
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家“十三五”重点研发计划项目“竹林立体复合高值化经营技术”(2018YFD0600105);安徽省中央引导地方科技发展专项(202007d06020010)
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.05.032
  中图分类号： S714.8
- 纸质出版：2024
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
高雨, 曹迁, 陈蕾如, 等. 不同经营强度对雷竹林土壤理化性质及土壤质量的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2024,43(5):294-304.

Gao Yu, Cao Qian, Chen Leiru, et al. Effects of Different Management Intensities on Soil Physicochemical Properties and Soil Quality in Phyllostachys Praecox Plantations[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2024, 43(5): 294-304.
高雨, 曹迁, 陈蕾如, 等. 不同经营强度对雷竹林土壤理化性质及土壤质量的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2024,43(5):294-304. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.05.032.

Gao Yu, Cao Qian, Chen Leiru, et al. Effects of Different Management Intensities on Soil Physicochemical Properties and Soil Quality in Phyllostachys Praecox Plantations[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2024, 43(5): 294-304. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.05.032.

摘要

[目的] 开展不同经营强度对雷竹林土壤理化性质及土壤质量的影响研究，为雷竹林科学经营及养分管理提供科学依据。[方法] 采用样地调查法对安徽黄山市黄山区新华乡不同经营强度下雷竹林土壤理化性质进行分析，利用主成分析法建立土壤养分最小数据集比较该地区不同经营强度下雷竹林的土壤质量状况。[结果] 不同经营强度下土壤理化性质差异显著。在0—10 cm土层中，中度经营的土壤容重显著低于高度经营、粗放经营；中、高强度经营的土壤含水量显著低于粗放经营。在0—10 cm土层中，土壤pH值：强度经营(4.12)＞粗放经营(4.01)＞中度经营(3.97)；中度经营的土壤有机碳(24.82 g/kg)、全氮(1.67 g/kg)显著高于粗放经营(18.64，1.35 g/kg)和强度经营(17.39，1.25 g/kg)；中、强度经营的土壤全磷(0.53，0.49 g/kg)显著高于粗放经营(0.27 g/kg)。中、强度经营下的C/P范围(30.99～53.40)、N/P范围(2.77～3.60)均低于粗放经营〔(64.82～78.96)，(5.20～5.56)〕，3种不同经营强度下土壤C/N均值介于10.95～14.68之间。在0—10 cm土层中，不同经营强度下雷竹林的土壤质量指数大小顺序为：粗放经营(0.42)＞中度经营(0.36)＞强度经营(0.31)，土壤质量指数随土层加深而降低。[结论] 强酸性土壤环境不利于雷竹的生长，中度经营林分土壤持水能力及水源涵养能力较好，随着经营强度的加强土壤肥力越低，不利于土壤质量的维持。

Abstract

[Objective] The effects of different management intensities on soil physicochemical properties and soil quality were analyzed to provide a scientific basis for the scientific management and nutrient management of Phyllostachys praecox forests. [Methods] Based on the analysis of soil physicochemical properties in P. praecox plantations under various management intensities in Huangshan District

Anhui Province

a minimum dataset was established through principal component analysis

and the soil quality in P. praecox plantations under different management intensities was analyzed. [Results] Significant differences were observed in the soil physicochemical properties under different management intensities. The bulk density was significantly lower in mid-intensity management than in high-intensity and extensive management in the 0—10 cm soil layer. The soil water contents in mid- and high-intensity management were significantly lower than those in extensive management. In the 0—10 cm soil layer

the value of soil pH value was ranked in the order of high-intensity management (4.12) ＞extensive management (4.01) ＞mid-intensity management (3.97). The soil organic carbon (24.82 g/kg) and total nitrogen (1.67 g/kg) in mid-intensity management were significantly higher than those in extensive management (18.64

1.35 g/kg) and high-intensity management (17.39

1.25 g/kg). The soil total phosphorus (0.53

0.49 g/kg) was significantly higher in mid- and high-intensity management than in extensive management (0.27 g/kg). The ranges of C/P (30.99—53.40) and N/P (2.77—3.60) in mid-and high-intensity were lower than those in extensive management 〔(64.82—78.96) and (5.20—5.56)〕

and the average value of soil C/N in three different management intensities ranged from 10.95 to 14.68. In the 0—10 cm soil layer

the soil quality indices in the different management intensities were ranked in the order of extensive management (0.42) ＞mid-intensity management (0.36) ＞high-intensity management (0.31)

where the soil quality index decreased with the deepening of the soil layer. [Conclusion] A strong acidic soil environment was determined not to be conducive to the growth of bamboo. Soil water holding capacity and water conservation capacity of mid-intensity management were determined to be better. Soil fertility was observed to be lower with the strengthening of management intensity

which is not conducive to the maintenance of soil quality.

关键词

Keywords

references

郭子武,陈双林,杨清平,等.雷竹林土壤和叶片N、P化学计量特征对林地覆盖的响应[J].生态学报,2012,32(20):6361-6368. Guo Ziwu, Chen Shuanglin, Yang Qingping, et al. Responses of N and P stoichiometry on mulching management in the stand of

Phyllostachys praecox

. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012,32(20):6361-6368.

王启兰,王溪,曹广民,等.青海省海北州典型高寒草甸土壤质量评价[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(6):1416-1422. Wang Qilan, Wang Xi, Cao Guangmin, et al. Soil quality assessment of alpine meadow in Haibei State of Qinghai Province [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011,22(6):1416-1422.

Zhang Jing, Li Pengzhan. Using soil microorganism to construct a new index of soil quality evaluation [J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2020,440(5):052023.

刘世梁,傅伯杰,刘国华,等.我国土壤质量及其评价研究的进展[J].土壤通报,2006,37(1):137-143. Liu Shiliang, Fu Bojie, Liu Guohua, et al. Research review of quantitative evaluation of soil quality in China [J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2006,37(1):137-143.

杨东伟,徐秋桐,章明奎.水田改雷竹林后土壤发生学性质和土壤类型的演变[J].土壤通报,2014,45(4):777-782. Yang Dongwei, Xu Qiutong, Zhang Mingkui. Evolution of genetic characteristics and types of soils transformed into Lei bamboo forest from paddy fields [J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2014,45(4):777-782.

张同娟,杨劲松,刘广明,等.长江河口地区土壤肥力质量综合评价研究: 以启东市为例[J].土壤通报,2011,42(3):513-517. Zhang Tongjuan, Yang Jinsong, Liu Guangming, et al. Evaluation of soil quality in Yangtze River estuary area: A case study of Qidong City [J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2011,42(3):513-517.

李颖,朱炜,徐新泉,等.利用主成分分析对不同覆盖时间毛竹林土壤质量进行评价: 以浙江长兴毛竹林为例[J].东北林业大学学报,2024,52(1):85-91. Li Ying, Zhu Wei, Xu Xinquan, et al. Evaluation of soil quality in different mulched times of phyllostachys edulis forest by principal component analysis: A case of

Phyllostachys edulis

forest in Zhejiang Changxing [J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2024,52(1):85-91.

刘雅洁,王亮,樊伟,等.海拔对杉木人工林土壤活性有机碳组分的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2021,49(8):59-69. Liu Yajie, Wang Liang, Fan Wei, et al. Effects of altitude on soil active organic carbon components in

Cunninghamia lanceolata

plantations [J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Natural Science Edition), 2021,49(8):59-69.

蒋丛泽,受娜,高玮,等.青藏高原东北缘不同土地利用类型土壤质量综合评价[J].应用生态学报,2022,33(12):3279-3286. Jiang Congze, Shou Na, Gao Wei, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of soil quality of different land use types on the northeastern margin of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022,33(12):3279-3286.

刘鑫,王一博,杨文静.青藏高原植被退化背景下土壤质量评价方法研究[J].兰州大学学报(自然科学版),2020,56(2):143-153. Liu Xin, Wang Yibo, Yang Wenjing. Study on soil quality evaluation methods under the background of vegetation degradation in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau [J]. Journal of Lanzhou University (Natural Sciences), 2020,56(2):143-153.

胡优琼,姜金香,黄安玲,等.贵州及其周边地区朱砂根、红凉伞质量评价[J].中成药,2024,46(2):383-390. Hu Youqiong, Jiang Jinxiang, Huang Anling, et al. Quality evaluation of

Ardisia crenata

and

Ardisia crenata

var.

bicolor

from Guizhou and its surrounding regions [J]. Chinese Traditional Patent Medicine, 2024,46(2):383-390.

李鑫,张文菊,邬磊,等.土壤质量评价指标体系的构建及评价方法[J].中国农业科学,2021,54(14):3043-3056. Li Xin, Zhang Wenju, Wu Lei, et al. Advance in indicator screening and methodologies of soil quality evaluation [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021,54(14):3043-3056.

张光亮,白军红,郗敏,等.黄河三角洲湿地土壤质量综合评价[J].湿地科学,2015,13(6):744-751. Zhang Guangliang, Bai Junhong, Xi Min, et al. Comprehensive assessment of soil quality of wetlands in the Yellow River delta [J]. Wetland Science, 2015,13(6):744-751.

刘鑫,王一博,吕明侠,等.基于主成分分析的青藏高原多年冻土区高寒草地土壤质量评价[J].冰川冻土,2018,40(3):469-479. Liu Xin, Wang Yibo, Lv Mingxia, et al. Soil quality assessment of alpine grassland in permafrost regions of Tibetan Plateau based on principal component analysis [J]. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 2018,40(3):469-479.

巩杰,陈利顶,傅伯杰,等.黄土丘陵区小流域土地利用和植被恢复对土壤质量的影响[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(12):2292-2296. Gong Jie, Chen Liding, Fu Bojie, et al. Effects of land use and vegetation restoration on soil quality in a small catchment of the Loess Plateau [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2004,15(12):2292-2296.

Keller T, Håkansson I. Estimation of reference bulk density from soil particle size distribution and soil organic matter content [J]. Geoderma, 2010,154(3/4):398-406.

姜沛沛,曹扬,陈云明,等.不同林龄油松(

Pinus tabulaeformis

)人工林植物、凋落物与土壤C、N、P化学计量特征[J].生态学报,2016,36(19):6188-6197. Jiang Peipei, Cao Yang, Chen Yunming, et al. Variation of C,N,and P stoichiometry in plant tissue,litter,and soil during stand development in

Pinus tabulaeformis

plantation [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016,36(19):6188-6197.

李鹏,陈璇,杨章旗,等.不同密度马尾松人工林枯落物输入对土壤理化性质的影响[J].水土保持学报,2022,36(2):368-377. Li Peng, Chen Xuan, Yang Zhangqi, et al. Effects of litter input on soil physical and chemical properties of

Pinus massoniana

plantations with different densities [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022,36(2):368-377.

陈昭旭,高聚林,于晓芳,等.不同耕作及秸秆还田方式对土壤物理性质及作物产量的影响[J].内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版),2022,43(6):21-27. Chen Zhaoxu, Gao Julin, Yu Xiaofang, et al. Effects of different tillage and straw returning methods on soil physical properties and crop yield [J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 2022,43(6):21-27.

徐祖祥,祝小祥,徐进,等.临安雷竹林施肥现状及问题的分析[J].农学学报,2015,5(5):53-56. Xu Zuxiang, Zhu Xiaoxiang, Xu Jin, et al. The status and problem analysis of fertilization in the bamboo forest in Lin’an [J]. Journal of Agriculture, 2015,5(5):53-56.

Ye Chenglong, Chen Dima, Hall S J, et al. Reconciling multiple impacts of nitrogen enrichment on soil carbon: Plant, microbial and geochemical controls [J]. Ecology Letters, 2018,21(8):1162-1173.

郭洁芸,王雅歆,李建龙.氮添加对中国陆地生态系统植物—土壤碳动态的影响[J].生态学报,2022,42(12):4823-4833. Guo Jieyun, Wang Yaxin, Li Jianlong. Effects of nitrogen addition on plant-soil carbon dynamics in terrestrial ecosystems of China [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022,42(12):4823-4833.

陈婕妮,石思雨,钟羡芳,等.武夷山不同海拔土壤微生物生物量碳、氮、磷含量及其生态化学计量特征[J].生态学杂志,2023:1-8. Chen Jieni, Shi Siyu, Zhong Xianfang, et al. Soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus contents and their ecological stoichiometric characteristics along an elevations gradient in the Wuyi Mountain [J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2023:1-8.

刘冬,张剑,包雅兰,等.水分对敦煌阳关湿地芦苇叶片与土壤C、N、P生态化学计量特征的影响[J].生态学报,2020,40(11):3804-3812. Liu Dong, Zhang Jian, Bao Yalan, et al. Effects of soil moisture on

Phragmites australis

leaves and soil C, N and P ecological stoichiometric characteristics in Yangguanwetland, Dunhuang [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020,40(11):3804-3812.

Bui E N, Henderson B L. C∶N∶P stoichiometry in Australian soils with respect to vegetation and environmental factors [J]. Plant and Soil, 2013,373(1):553-568.

Wang Linjiao, Wang Pan, Sheng Maoyin, et al. Ecological stoichiometry and environmental influencing factors of soil nutrients in the karst rocky desertification ecosystem, Southwest China [J]. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2018,16:e00449.

Cui Hu, Ou Yang, Wang Lixia, et al. Dynamic changes in microbial communities and nutrient stoichiometry associated with soil aggregate structure in restored wetlands [J]. Catena, 2021,197:104984.

赵文东,李凯,朱传晟,等.闽南山地树种转换对土壤碳氮磷及化学计量的影响[J].江西农业大学学报,2022,44(2):299-310. Zhao Wendong, Li Kai, Zhu Chuansheng, et al. Effects of tree species transformation on soil carbon, nitrogen,phosphorus and stoichiometry in mountainous areas of Southern Fujian [J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2022,44(2):299-310.

田雨,庄莹,曹义,等.雾灵山低山区土地利用类型对土壤理化性质的影响[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(6):41-44. Tian Yu, Zhuang Ying, Cao Yi, et al. Effects of land uses on soil physical and chemical properties in hilly areas of Wuling Mountain [J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2012,19(6):41-44.

苏浩浩,黄桥明,邓翠,等.退化马尾松林恢复过程中芒萁覆盖对土壤微生物生物量碳氮及其周转的影响[J].水土保持学报,2023,37(3):336-344. Su Haohao, Huang Qiaoming, Deng Cui, et al. Effects of dicranopteris dichotoma covered on soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen and their turnover during restoration of degraded

Pinus massoniana

forest [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023,37(3):336-344.

Barbosa E R M, Tomlinson K W, Carvalheiro L G, et al. Short-term effect of nutrient availability and rainfall distribution on biomass production and leaf nutrient content of savanna tree species [J]. PLoS One, 2014,9(3):e92619.

倪惠菁.经营强度对毛竹细根生长及土壤微环境的影响研究[D].北京:中国林业科学研究院,2021. Ni Huijing. Effect of management intensities on fine root growth and soil microenvironment of

Phyllostachys edulis

forests [D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2021.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

放牧强度对干旱区白墩子盐沼湿地土壤与植被的影响

人为干扰方式对希拉穆仁草原土壤-草地系统健康的影响

改良剂对秦巴山区新造耕地土壤质量的影响

毛乌素沙地东南缘沙漠化过程中土壤理化性质分析

半干旱退化山区不同土地利用方式土壤理化性质的特征研究