防洪综合治理对小清河流域幸福状况的影响

杨程珺; 武玮; 张文飞; 刘笑语

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.05.025

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

防洪综合治理对小清河流域幸福状况的影响

试验研究

- 防洪综合治理对小清河流域幸福状况的影响
- Impacts of Comprehensive Flood Control Management on Happiness Level of Xiaoqing River Basin
- 水土保持通报 2024年43卷第5期页码：234-242
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 济南大学水利与环境学院,山东,济南,250022
  2. 山东省海河淮河小清河流域水利管理服务中心,山东,济南,250100
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  小清河防洪综合治理工程科学研究试验项目“基于小清河流域的“幸福河”综合评价理论及驱动机制研究”(XQHFHZL-KY202003)
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.05.025
  中图分类号： TV213.4
- 纸质出版：2024
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
杨程珺, 武玮, 张文飞, 等. 防洪综合治理对小清河流域幸福状况的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2024,43(5):234-242.

Yang Chengjun, Wu Wei, Zhang Wenfei, et al. Impacts of Comprehensive Flood Control Management on Happiness Level of Xiaoqing River Basin[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2024, 43(5): 234-242.
杨程珺, 武玮, 张文飞, 等. 防洪综合治理对小清河流域幸福状况的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2024,43(5):234-242. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.05.025.

Yang Chengjun, Wu Wei, Zhang Wenfei, et al. Impacts of Comprehensive Flood Control Management on Happiness Level of Xiaoqing River Basin[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2024, 43(5): 234-242. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.05.025.

摘要

[目的] 明确防洪综合治理工程对河流幸福状况提升的影响，提升幸福河建设水平，为山东省河流幸福河评价与建设提供理论依据。[方法] 本研究以小清河为研究对象，从水安全、水资源、水环境、水生态和水文化5个准则层选取20个评价指标，建立了基于“目标层—准则层—指标层”的多层次幸福河评价指标体系，并进行幸福状况评价，识别了阻碍幸福河建设的主要障碍因子。运用基于层次分析法和反熵权法的组合赋权法分别确定了城区段和乡村段的指标权重，采用河流幸福指数进行幸福河评价，并通过障碍度筛选影响幸福河建设的主要障碍因子。[结果] ①城区段以水域面积保留率的权重最高，乡村段以堤岸防洪标准达标率占比最高。②治理前城区段和乡村段幸福状况分别为幸福和一般偏下等级，治理后幸福状况均得到提升，城区段保持幸福等级，乡村段提升为一般偏上等级。③从准则层来看，影响城区段幸福河建设的主要障碍因子为水资源准则层，影响乡村段的主要障碍因子主要集中在水安全、水资源和水文化准则层。[结论] 未来提升河流幸福状况需通过水库蓄水、调水等工程措施提高水资源供水能力，保持河道行洪畅通性和河势稳定，以保障河流防洪安全。

Abstract

[Objective] The impact of comprehensive flood control projects on the improvement of river happiness was analyzed in order to improve the construction level of happy rivers

and provide a theoretical basis for the evaluation and construction of happy rivers in Shandong Province. [Methods] Taking Xiaoqing River basin as the research object

a multi-level happy river evaluation index system

based on the “goal layer-criteria layer-index layer” was established

including 20 indices from 5 criteria layers: water safety

water resources

water environment

water ecology

and water culture. It also evaluated the state of well-being and identified the main obstacles that hindered the construction of happy rivers. A combination weighting method based on the analytic hierarchy process and reverse entropy weight method was applied to determine the indices weights at urban and rural sections and identify the main obstacles affecting the construction of happy rivers through the obstacle degree. [Results] ① Watershed area retention had the highest weight in the urban section

and the percentage of levee flood defense standard compliance had the highest weight in the rural section. ② Before the construction of the flood control project

the happiness levels of the urban and rural sections were generally lower. After construction

the happiness levels in both sections improved; happiness was maintained in the urban section and improved to a generally higher level in the rural section. ③ In the criteria layer

the main obstacle affecting the construction of happy rivers in the urban section focused on the water resource layer

and the main obstacle affecting the rural section focused on the water safety

water resources

and water culture layers. [Conclusion] To improve the happiness level of rivers

it is necessary to enhance the water supply capacity through reservoir storage and water diversion projects

maintain a smooth flow in flood channels

and stabilize river courses to ensure flood control safety.

关键词

Keywords

references

杨文慧,杨宇.河流健康概念及诊断指标体系的构建[J].水资源保护,2006,22(6):28-30. Yang Wenhui, Yang Yu. Concept and assessment indicator system of river health [J]. Water Resources Protection, 2006,22(6):28-30.

Ding Rui, Yu Kai, Fan Ziwu, et al. Study and application of urban aquatic ecosystem health evaluation index system in river network plain area [J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022,19(24):16545-16555.

张宇航,渠晓东,彭文启,等.北京市河流生态系统健康评价[J].环境科学,2023,44(10):5478-5489. Zhang Yuhang, Qu Xiaodong, Peng Wenqi, et al. Health assessment of the stream ecosystem in Beijing, China [J]. Environmental Science, 2023,44(10):5478-5489.

鞠茜茜,柳长顺.幸福河评价方法研究进展[J].人民黄河,2023,45(3):7-12. Ju Qianqian, Liu Changshun. Research progress of happy river evaluation method [J]. Yellow River, 2023,45(3):7-12.

左其亭,郝明辉,姜龙,等.幸福河评价体系及其应用[J].水科学进展,2021,32(1):45-58. Zuo Qiting, Hao Minghui, Jiang Long, et al. Happy river evaluation system and its application [J]. Advances in Water Science, 2021,32(1):45-58.

李先明.幸福河的文化内涵及其启示[J].中国水利,2020(11):55-59. Li Xianming. Cultural connotation of happy river and its enlightenment [J]. China Water Resources, 2020(11):55-59.

贡力,田洁,靳春玲,等.基于ERG需求模型的幸福河综合评价[J].水资源保护,2022,38(3):25-33. Gong Li, Tian Jie, Jin Chunling, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of happy river based on ERG demand model [J]. Water Resources Protection, 2022,38(3):25-33.

靳春玲,李燕,贡力,等.基于UMT模型的幸福河绩效评价及障碍因子诊断[J].中国环境科学,2022,42(3):1466-1476. Jin Chunling, Li Yan, Gong Li, et al. Performance evaluation and obstacle factor diagnosis of happy river based on UMT [J]. China Environmental Science, 2022,42(3):1466-1476.

杨谦.推进生态流量管理全覆盖维护长江健康水生态[J].中国水利,2020(15):40-43. Yang Qian. Boost the full coverage of ecological flow management and preserve healthy water ecology of the Yangtze River [J]. China Water Resources, 2020(15):40-43.

王何予,郭生练,王俊,等.“幸福河” 综合评价指标体系研究: 以汉江湖北省域为例[J].水文,2023,43(2):35-40. Wang Heyu, Guo Shenglian, Wang Jun, et al. Comprehensive “happy river” evaluation system: A case study of Hanjiang River in Hubei Province [J]. Journal of China Hydrology, 2023,43(2):35-40.

韩宇平,夏帆.基于需求层次论的幸福河评价[J].南水北调与水利科技(中英文),2020,18(4):1-7. Han Yuping, Xia Fan. Evaluation of Xingfu River based on demand level theory [J]. South-to-North Water Transfers and Water Science & Technology, 2020,18(4):1-7.

王子悦,徐慧,黄丹姿,等.基于熵权物元模型的长三角幸福河层次评价[J].水资源保护,2021,37(4):69-74. Wang Ziyue, Xu Hui, Huang Danzi, et al. Hierarchy evaluation of Happy River in the Yangtze River delta based on entropy weight and matter element model [J]. Water Resources Protection, 2021,37(4):69-74.

幸福河研究课题组.幸福河内涵要义及指标体系探析[J].中国水利,2020(23):1-4. Research group of the happy river. Analysis of the connotation and index system for the happy river [J]. China Water Resources, 2020(23):1-4.

金菊良,刘东平,周戎星,等.基于投影寻踪权重优化的水资源承载力评价模型[J].水资源保护,2021,37(3):1-6. Jin Juliang, Liu Dongping, Zhou Rongxing, et al. Evaluation model of water resources carrying capacity based on projection pursuit weight optimization [J]. Water Resources Protection, 2021,37(3):1-6.

Chen Yiqing, Wang Deyun, Zhang Ludan, et al. Flood risk assessment of Wuhan, China, using a multi-criteria analysis model with the improved AHP-Entropy method [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2023,30(42):96001-96018.

唐新玥,唐德善,常文倩,等.基于云模型的区域河长制考核评价模型[J].水资源保护,2019,35(1):41-46. Tang Xinyue, Tang Deshan, Chang Wenqian, et al. Evaluation model of regional river chief system based on cloud model [J]. Water Resources Protection, 2019,35(1):41-46.

韩笑宇,武玮,李振卿,等.变化环境下小清河干流河流健康综合评价[J].南水北调与水利科技(中英文),2023,21(3):570-580. Han Xiaoyu, Wu Wei, Li Zhenqing, et al. Comprehensive health assessment in the main stream of the Xiaoqing River under the changing environment [J]. South-to-North Water Transfers and Water Science & Technology, 2023,21(3):570-580.

范新凤,韩美,王磊,等.小清河入海口近十年水质变化及驱动因素分析[J].环境科学,2020,41(4):1619-1628. Fan Xinfeng, Han Mei, Wang Lei, et al. Analysis of water quality change and its driving factors of the Xiaoqing River Estuary in recent ten rears [J]. Environmental Science, 2020,41(4):1619-1628.

Li Jie, Huang Lintong, Zhu Kai. Ecological health assessment of an urban river: The case study of Zhengzhou City, China [J]. Sustainability, 2023,15(10):8288-8301.

Shan Chengju, Dong Zengchuan, Lu Debao, et al. Study on river health assessment based on a fuzzy matter-element extension model [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021,127:107742-107750.

Yang Yonglin, Cao Hongye, Xia Yuyun, et al. Assessing ecological health in a semi-arid basin: A case study of the Wei River basin, China [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024,31(14):21687-21708.

Fang Y X, Liu G J, Liu R J. Fish community structure and ecological health assessment of the Shuaishui River basin, China [J]. Nature Environment and Pollution Technology, 2021,20(1):153-161.

金菊良,魏一鸣,丁晶.基于改进层次分析法的模糊综合评价模型[J].水利学报,2004,35(3):65-70. Jin Juliang, Wei Yiming, Ding Jing. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model based on improved analytic hierarchy process [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2004,35(3):65-70.

向思阳,蔡泽祥,刘平,等.基于AHP-反熵权法的配电网低碳运行模糊综合评价[J].电力科学与技术学报,2019,34(4): 69-76. Xiang Siyang, Cai Zexiang, Liu Ping, et al. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of the low-carbon operation of distribution network based on AHP-anti-entropy method [J]. Journal of Electric Power Science and Technology, 2019,34(4):69-76.

马纪,刘希喆.基于序关系-熵权法的低压配网台区健康状态评估[J].电力系统保护与控制,2017,45(6):87-93. Ma Ji, Liu Xizhe. Evaluation of health status of low-voltage distribution network based on order relation-entropy weight method [J]. Power System Protection and Control, 2017,45(6):87-93.

张民强,胡敏杰,董良,等.浙江省河湖幸福指数评估指标体系与评估方法探讨[J].浙江水利科技,2021,49(4):1-3. Zhang Minqiang, Hu Minjie, Dong Liang, et al. Discussion on evaluation index system and evaluation method of river and lake happiness index in Zhejiang Province [J]. Zhejiang Hydrotechnics, 2021,49(4):1-3.

Zhang Jingqi, Jiang Shaohua. Evaluation of sustainable development capacity of water sources: A case study of China [J]. Water Science & Technology, 2024,89(6):1482-1496.

代雪静,姜腾龙,刘杨,等.近二十年小清河济南段污染状况及其趋势分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2022,36(1):143-150. Dai Xuejing, Jiang Tenglong, Liu Yang, et al. Pollution status and trend analysis of Xiaoqing River in Jinan section in recent 20 years [J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2022,36(1):143-150.

汪顺生,杨金月,王爱丽,等.河南省黄河流域水资源—经济—生态系统耦合协调评价及预测[J].湖泊科学,2022,34(3):919-934. Wang Shunsheng, Yang Jinyue, Wang Aili, et al. Evaluation and forecast of coupling coordination of water resources, economy and ecosystem in the Yellow River Basin of Henan Province [J]. Journal of Lake Sciences, 2022,34(3):919-934.

张国栋,董文平,刘晓晖,等.我国水环境中抗生素赋存、归趋及风险评估研究进展[J].环境化学,2018,37(7):1491-1500. Zhang Guodong, Dong Wenping, Liu Xiaohui, et al. Occurrence, fate and risk assessment of antibiotics in water environment of China [J]. Environmental Chemistry, 2018,37(7):1491-1500.

丁敬坤,李加琦,薛素燕,等.莱州湾小清河口近岸海域底栖生境健康评价[J].生态学报,2021,41(12):4806-4817. Ding Jingkun, Li Jiaqi, Xue Suyan, et al. Health assessment for benthic habitats of macrobenthos in the sea area adjacent to the Xiaoqing River estuary, Laizhou Bay [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021,41(12):4806-4817.

刘浦东,王远轲,张冬,等.基于多源数据的小清河流域生态环境时空变化分析[J].生态学杂志,2024,43(2):600-608. Liu Pudong, Wang Yuanke, Zhang Dong, et al. Analysis of temporal and spatial variations of ecological environment in Xiaoqing River basin based on multi-source data [J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2024,43(2):600-608.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

甘肃省长江流域水土保持综合治理效益分析

甘肃省泾河流域2010-2019年农村生态环境质量分析及预测

冻融循环条件下伊犁地区滑坡黄土湿陷特性及微观机理

资源枯竭型城市转型对净生态系统生产力的影响——以江苏省徐州市为例

不同恢复措施对新疆伊犁退化草地植被特征及多样性的影响