生态产品价值核算及“两山”转化路径——以贵州省为例

魏媛; 吴灿; 吴长勇; 石鸿宇

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.05.021

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

生态产品价值核算及“两山”转化路径——以贵州省为例

试验研究

- 生态产品价值核算及“两山”转化路径——以贵州省为例
- Value Accounting of Ecological Products and Transformation Path of “Two Mountains”—A Case Study in Guizhou Province
- 水土保持通报 2024年43卷第5期页码：193-203
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 贵州财经大学管理科学与工程学院,贵州,贵阳,550025
  2. 贵州财经大学机关纪委,贵州,贵阳,550025
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  贵州省2022年度哲学社会科学规划课题“贵州生态产品总值核算及其绩效考核研究”(22GZYB57)
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.05.021
  中图分类号： F062;X196
- 纸质出版：2024
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
魏媛, 吴灿, 吴长勇, 等. 生态产品价值核算及“两山”转化路径——以贵州省为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2024,43(5):193-203.

Wei Yuan, Wu Can, Wu Changyong, et al. Value Accounting of Ecological Products and Transformation Path of “Two Mountains”—A Case Study in Guizhou Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2024, 43(5): 193-203.
魏媛, 吴灿, 吴长勇, 等. 生态产品价值核算及“两山”转化路径——以贵州省为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2024,43(5):193-203. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.05.021.

Wei Yuan, Wu Can, Wu Changyong, et al. Value Accounting of Ecological Products and Transformation Path of “Two Mountains”—A Case Study in Guizhou Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2024, 43(5): 193-203. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.05.021.

摘要

[目的

]

科学核算生态产品价值，探索“两山”转化路径，为提升“两山”理论实践成效，推进生态文明建设提供理论支撑。[方法

]

基于“两山”理论”，以贵州省为研究对象，构建生态产品价值核算指标体系，运用GEP核算法测算了生态产品价值，并对”两山”转化成效进行核算评估。[结果

]

①2017—2021年，贵州省GEP表现出上升的变化趋势，是同年GDP的2.08～2.54倍，但GEP增速低于GDP增速。单位面积GEP为1.96×10

～2.32×10

元/m

，人均GEP为9.05～10.61万元/人，表明环境资源保护和可持续利用、经济增长模式转变取得了一定的成效。②生态物质供给产品价值(EPV)呈现出上升的变化趋势，变化幅度为18.66%，占GEP的12.04%～13.07%，其中农业产品价值最高，渔业产品价值最低，研究结果揭示贵州仍然属于以农业为主的省份，农业产业中以种植业为主。③生态调节服务产品总价值(ERV)呈现出上升的变化趋势，上升幅度为8.34%，占GEP的60.30%～66.35%，其中气候调节价值最高，水质净化价值最低，表明优越生态环境和高森林覆盖率是重要的气候调节器和生态屏障。④生态文化服务产品价值(ECV)表现出上升的变化趋势，上升幅度为45.71%，占GEP的20.56%～27.65%。⑤“两山”转化价值表现出上升的动态变化态势，上升幅度为39.37%，占GDP的82.40%～92.40%，揭示“两山”转化取得了一定的成效，ECV对其贡献度较高。但贵州在“两山”转化过程中需要进一步提升生态物质产品价值和生态文化产品价值的成效和贡献度。据此提出促进“两山”转化的路径。[结论

]

贵州省自然资源、生态环境保护成效不断上升，生态系统具有强大的生态调节功能，气候调节是其主要生态调节类型；生态产品价值中，非实物产品价值占主导地位，实物产品价值相对较少；“两山”转化成效逐年上升，但生态物质产品价值和生态文化产品价值对其贡献度有待于进一步提高。

Abstract

[Objective] The value of ecological products was calculated scientifically and the transformation path of “Two Mountains” (lucid waters and lush mountains are invaluable assets) was explored in order to provide theoretical support for the practical effect of the “Two Mountains” theory and promote the construction of an ecological civilization. [Methods] Based on the theory of “Two Mountains

” and taking Guizhou Province as the research object

this paper constructed an index system of ecological product value accounting

measured the ecological product value using the gross ecosystem production (GEP) accounting method

and assessed the effect of the “Two Mountains” transformation. [Results] ① From 2017 to 2021

the GEP of Guizhou province showed an upward trend

which was 2.08~2.54 times the GDP of the same year

but the growth rate of the GEP was lower than that of the GDP. The GEP per unit area was 1.96×107 yuan/m2 to 2.32×107 yuan/m2

and the per capita GEP was 90 500 yuan/m2 to 1.06×106 yuan/m2. The results showed that the transformation of environmental resource protection

sustainable utilization

and the economic growth mode has achieved certain results. ② The value of ecological material supply products presented an upward trend with a range of 18.66%; the value of agricultural products was the highest and the value of fishery products was the lowest. The results showed that Guizhou is still a province with agriculture as its main focus

and planting is the main aspect of the agricultural industry. ③ The total value of ecological regulation service products showed an increasing trend

with an increasing range of 8.34%

accounting for 60.30%—66.35% of the GEP. The value of climate regulation was the highest

and the value of water quality purification was the lowest. This shows that a superior ecological environment and high forest coverage are important climate regulators and ecological barriers. ④ The value of eco-cultural service products (ECVs) showed an increasing trend

with an increasing range of 45.71%

accounting for 20.56%—27.65% of the GEP. ⑤ The transformation value of “Two mountains” showed an increasing trend of dynamic change

with an increasing range of 39.37%

accounting for 82.40%—92.40% of the GDP. This shows that the “Two Mountains” transformation has achieved certain results

and the contribution of ECVs has been high. However

Guizhou Province needs to further enhance the effectiveness and contribution of eco-material product value and eco-cultural product value in the process of the “Two Mountains” transformation. Based on the research results

this paper refines the path to promoting the “Two Mountains” transformation. [Conclusion] The protection effect of natural resources and ecological environment in Guizhou Province is increasing

the ecosystem has strong ecological regulation function

and climate regulation is the main type of ecological regulation; The value of non-physical products is dominant

and the value of physical products is relatively small. The transformation effect of “Two Mountains” is increasing year by year

however

it is necessary to further improve the contribution of the value of ecological material products and ecological culture products to the transformation of “Two mountains”.

关键词

Keywords

references

庄大力.湖南财政服务生态文明建设的实践探索[J].预算管理与会计,2023(6):18-21. Zhuang Dali. Practical exploration of Hunan financial service for ecological civilization construction [J]. Budget Management & Accounting, 2023(6):18-21.

蒋凡,秦涛.“生态产品” 概念的界定、价值形成的机制与价值实现的逻辑研究[J].环境科学与管理,2022,47(1):5-10. Jiang Fan, Qin Tao. Definition of “ecological products” concept and value creation logic [J]. Environmental Science and Management, 2022,47(1):5-10.

陈宗铸,雷金睿,吴庭天,等.国家公园生态系统生产总值核算: 以海南热带雨林国家公园为例[J].应用生态学报,2021,32(11):3883-3892. Chen Zongzhu, Lei Jinrui, Wu Tingtian, et al. Gross ecosystem product accounting of national park: Taking Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park as an example [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021,32(11):3883-3892.

Abd Elbasit M A M, Knight J, Liu Gang, et al. Valuation of ecosystem services in South Africa, 2001—2019[J]. Sustainability, 2021,13(20):11262.

Bicknell J E, O’Hanley J R, Armsworth P R, et al. Enhancing the ecological value of oil palm agriculture through set-asides [J]. Nature Sustainability, 2023,6:513-525.

Yang Ying, Xiong Kangning, Huang Huiqiong, et al. A commented review of eco-product value realization and ecological industry and its enlightenment for agroforestry ecosystem services in the Karst ecological restoration [J]. Forests, 2023,14(3):448.

曾贤刚,虞慧怡,谢芳.生态产品的概念、分类及其市场化供给机制[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2014,24(7):12-17. Zeng Xiangang, Yu Huiyi, Xie Fang. Concept, classification and market supply mechanism of ecological products [J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2014,24(7):12-17.

石敏俊,陈岭楠,王金南.生态产品第四产业的概念辨析与核算框架[J].自然资源学报,2023,38(7):1784-1796. Shi Minjun, Chen Lingnan, Wang Jinnan. Analysis on concept and accounting framework of the quaternary industry of ecological products [J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2023,38(7):1784-1796.

仇晓璐,赵荣,陈绍志.生态产品及其分类体系构建研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2024,45(3):69-78. Qiu Xiaolu, Zhao Rong, Chen Shaozhi. Research on connotation and development of classification system of ecological products [J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2024,45(3):69-78.

樊轶侠,王正早.“双碳” 目标下生态产品价值实现机理及路径优化[J].甘肃社会科学,2022(4):184-193. Fan Yixia, Wang Zhengzao. The realization mechanism and optimization of ecological product value under “double carbon” targets [J]. Gansu Social Sciences, 2022(4):184-193.

栾晓梅,陈池波,田云,等.数字经济赋能乡村生态农产品价值实现的典型模式与形成机制分析[J].四川农业大学学报,2024,42(1):224-230. Luan Xiaomei, Chen Chibo, Tian Yun, et al. Analysis of typical mode and formation mechanism of value realization of rural ecological agricultural products enabled by digital economy [J]. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 2024,42(1):224-230.

王玲,郭静怡,林震.永定河流域生态产品价值实现研究: 基于京津冀协同发展视角[J].中国国土资源经济,2024,37(4):35-42. Wang Ling, Guo Jingyi, Lin Zhen. Research on value realization of ecological products in Yongding River basin: Based on the perspective of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei coordinated development [J]. Natural Resource Economics of China, 2024,37(4):35-42.

孔凡斌,程文杰,徐彩瑶.数字经济发展能否提高森林生态产品价值转化效率: 基于浙江省丽水市的实证分析[J].中国农村经济,2023(5):163-184. Kong Fanbin, Cheng Wenjie, Xu Caiyao. Does the development of digital economy improve the value transformation efficiency of forest ecological products: An empirical analysis in Lishui, Zhejiang Province [J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2023(5):163-184.

杜雪莲,常滨丽.生态产品价值实现效益评价及障碍因子分析: 以喀斯特山区贵州省为例[J/OL].生态经济,2024,40(5):206-213,222. Du Xuelian, Chang Binli. Benefit evaluation and obstacle factor analysis of ecological product value realization: A case study of Guizhou Province in Karst Mountains [J/OL]. Ecological Economy, 2024,40(5):206-213,222.

陈天傲,李想.生态扶贫背景下退耕还林生态产品的经济效益: 以核桃和茶树林为例[J].水土保持通报,2023,43(2):409-415. Chen Tian’ao, Li Xiang. Economic benefits of ecological products of grain for green project under background of ecological poverty alleviation: Taking walnut and tea forests as an example [J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023,43(2):409-415.

胡超,凌仕全,董加云.生态产品价值实现的研究述评与展望[J].林业经济问题,2023,43(6):665-672. Hu Chao, Ling Shiquan, Dong Jiayun. The research reviews and prospects of the value realization of ecological products [J]. Issues of Forestry Economics, 2023,43(6):665-672.

熊康宁,黄慧琼,杨英,等.喀斯特修复区生态产品价值实现与生态文明建设模式[J].贵州民族研究,2023,44(3):169-174. Xiong Kangning, Huang Huiqiong, Yang Ying, et al. Mode of ecological product value realization and ecological civilization construction in karst ecological restoration areas [J]. Guizhou Ethnic Studies, 2023,44(3):169-174.

陆恩永.“绿水青山” 转化为“金山银山” 路径探析: 基于贵州省毕节市生态产品价值实现视域[J].理论与当代,2023(3):8-11. Lu Enyong. Analysis on the path of “green water and green mountains” transforming into “Jinshan Yinshan”: Based on the perspective of realizing the value of ecological products in Bijie City, Guizhou Province [J]. Theory and Contemporary, 2023(3):8-11.

杨晨,皮云丽.关于贵州长江流域水生态产品价值核算与实现机制的思考[J].生态文明新时代,2023(4):43-47. Yang Chen, Pi Yunli. Considerations on the value accounting and realization mechanism of the water ecological products in the Yangtze River Basin in Guizhou Province [J]. The New Era of Ecological Civilization, 2023(4):43-47.

才琪.生态产品价值实现与乡村振兴协同发展机制研究: 以贵州生态产业为例[J].中国林业产业,2022(12):12-17. Cai Qi. Study on the synergistic development mechanism of ecological product value realization and rural revitalization: A case study of ecological industry in Guizhou [J]. China Forestry Industry, 2022(12):12-17.

范振林,李维明.生态产品价值实现机制研究: 以贵州省为例[J].河北地质大学学报,2020,43(3):82-90. Fan Zhenlin, Li Weiming. Research on the realization mechanism of ecological product value: A case study of Guizhou Province [J]. Journal of Hebei GEO University, 2020,43(3):82-90.

中华人民共和国生态环境部.陆地生态系统生产总值(CEP)核算技术指南[S].北京:中华人民共和国生态环境部,2020. Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China. Technical Guidelines for Calculating Gross Domestic Product (CEP) of Terrestrial Ecosystems [S]. Beijing: Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China, 2020.

贵州省市场监督管理局. DB52/T1608-2021生态系统生产总值(GEP)核算技术规范[S].贵州贵阳：贵州省市场监督管理局，2021. Administration for Market Regulation of Guizhou Province. DB52/T1608-2021 Technical Specification for Gross Ecosystem Product (GEP) Accounting [S]. Guiyang, Guizhou: Administration for Market Regulation of Guizhou Province, 2021.

白玛卓嘎,肖燚,欧阳志云,等.基于生态系统生产总值核算的习水县生态保护成效评估[J].生态学报,2020,40(2):499-509. Bai Mazhuoga, Xiao Yi, Ouyang Zhiyun, et al. Assessment of ecological conservation effect in Xishui County based on gross ecosystem product [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020,40(2):499-509.

任杰,钱发军,李双权,等.河南省生态产品价值核算研究[J].环境科学与管理,2022,47(9):159-164. Ren Jie, Qian Fajun, Li Shuangquan, et al. Gross ecosystem product accounting for Henan Province [J]. Environmental Science and Management, 2022,47(9):159-164.

廖薇.黎平县生态系统生产总值(GEP)核算研究[D].贵州贵阳:贵州大学,2019. Liao Wei. A Study on gross ecosystem product accounting of Liping County[D].Guiyang, Guizhou: Guizhou University, 2019.

邓晓红,毕坤.贵州省喀斯特地貌分布面积及分布特征分析[J].贵州地质,2004,21(3):191-193. Deng Xiaohong, Bi Kun. Analysis on the karst topographic distribution in Guizhou Province [J]. Guizhou Geology, 2004,21(3):191-193.

闻常玲,李文洁,卢瑛莹.生态产品价值市场化转化成效评估模型的构建与应用: 以浙江山区26县为例[J].环境污染与防治,2024,46(1):139-144. Wen Changling, Li Wenjie, Lu Yingying. Construction and application of evaluation model for ecological products value marketization transformation effectiveness: A case study of 26 counties in mountain areas, Zhejiang [J]. Environmental Pollution & Control, 2024,46(1):139-144.

陈梅,纪荣婷,刘溪,等.“两山”基地生态系统生产总值核算与“两山”转化分析:以浙江省宁海县为例.生态学报,2021,41(14):5899-5907. Chen Mei, Ji Rongting, Liu Xi, et al. Gross ecosystem product accounting for ‘Two Mountains’ Bases and transformation analysis: The case study of Ninghai County [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021,41(14):5899-5907.

代汝磊,梁彦庆,黄志英,等.河北省2010—2020年生态产品价值空间演变特征及归因分析[J].水土保持通报,2024,44(1):247-258. Dai Rulei, Liang Yanqing, Huang Zhiying, et al. Spatial Evolution Characteristics and Attribution Analysis of Ecological Product Value in Hebei Province from 2010 to 2020[J].Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2024,44(1):247-258.

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

内蒙古西乌珠穆沁旗退化草原生态经济损失空间分异规律及驱动因子

典型喀斯特灌丛草坡类型区土壤水变化规律研究

基于地质尺度的贵州省区域水土流失特征分析

贵州省水土保持监测点观测数据整编方案及分析评价方法

贵州省水土保持监测点径流小区存在问题与优化对策