吉林省辽河流域耕地的生态补偿主体及差异化补偿标准

王盼盼; 鄂施璇; 张文琦

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.03.018

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

吉林省辽河流域耕地的生态补偿主体及差异化补偿标准

试验研究

- 吉林省辽河流域耕地的生态补偿主体及差异化补偿标准
- Ecological Compensation Subject and Differentiated Compensation Standards of Cultivated Land in Liaohe River Basin of Jilin Province
- 水土保持通报 2024年44卷第3期页码：171-179
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 沈阳建筑大学管理学院,辽宁,沈阳,110168
  2. 重庆工商大学公共管理学院,重庆,400067
  3. 吉林农业大学经济管理学院,吉林,长春,130118
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目“基于耕地'三位一体’保护的流域多尺度耕地保护生态补偿研究”(42101260)
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.03.018
  中图分类号： F301.21
- 纸质出版：2024
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
王盼盼, 鄂施璇, 张文琦. 吉林省辽河流域耕地的生态补偿主体及差异化补偿标准[J]. 水土保持通报, 2024,44(3):171-179.

Wang Panpan, E Shixuan, Zhang Wenqi. Ecological Compensation Subject and Differentiated Compensation Standards of Cultivated Land in Liaohe River Basin of Jilin Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2024, 44(3): 171-179.
王盼盼, 鄂施璇, 张文琦. 吉林省辽河流域耕地的生态补偿主体及差异化补偿标准[J]. 水土保持通报, 2024,44(3):171-179. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.03.018.

Wang Panpan, E Shixuan, Zhang Wenqi. Ecological Compensation Subject and Differentiated Compensation Standards of Cultivated Land in Liaohe River Basin of Jilin Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2024, 44(3): 171-179. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.03.018.

摘要

[目的

]

明确流域及流域内各区域耕地生态价值空间分异特征，建立差异化的耕地生态补偿标准测算模型，完善耕地保护生态补偿机制，为流域耕地保护生态补偿政策的制定及实施提供参考依据。[方法

]

以吉林省辽河流域为例，界定耕地生态补偿支付主体及受偿主体，分析流域耕地生态价值空间差异，在此基础上，衡量耕地生态外溢效益及边界，结合区域耕地资源禀赋、社会经济发展阶段等关键因素，建立差别化耕地生态补偿标准测算模型，制定研究区耕地生态补偿标准及额度。[结果

]

①2020年，流域耕地整体存在生态盈余，属于耕地生态受偿区。流域范围内，除铁西区、龙山区及西安区属于耕地生态支付区。其他区域耕地生态服务可持续性良好，对区域内的耕地生态消耗具有较强的承载作用，均属于耕地生态受偿区。②流域耕地具有重要的生态价值，且空间差异显著。流域耕地生态外溢价值达8.73×10

元，为其他区域提供了重要的生态产品及服务。流域范围内，公主岭市和梨树县是主要的耕地生态价值外溢区。③流域耕地生态补偿标准为5 191.16元/hm

，总受偿额度为5.98×10

元，各区域间由于耕地生态价值、耕地生态盈亏面积、耕地保护责任及发展阶段等差异，其补偿标准及额度差异较大。[结论

]

判别耕地生态补偿相关利益主体，确定耕地生态外溢效益，考虑空间尺度及地区实际，进行差异化耕地生态补偿，可以完善耕地生态补偿机制，提高生态补偿的有效性。

Abstract

[Objective] The spatial differentiation characteristics of the ecological value of cultivated land in river basins and regions within river basins were clarified

and a differential calculation model of the ecological compensation standard for cultivated land was established to improve the ecological compensation mechanism for cultivated land protection

in order to provide a reference for the formulation and implementation of ecological compensation policies for cultivated land protection in river basins. [Methods] The payers and beneficiaries of ecological compensation for cultivated land was defined

and the spatial differences in the ecological value of cultivated land in Liaohe River basin in Jilin Province were analyzed. On this basis

the ecological spillover benefits and boundaries of cultivated land were measured. Based on key factors such as regional cultivated land resource endowment and socio-economic development stage

a differentiated ecological compensation standard calculation model for cultivated land was established

and the ecological compensation standards and quotas for cultivated land in the research area were formulated. [Results] ① In 2020

there was an overall ecological surplus in the cultivated land of the research area

which belongs to the ecological compensation area. Except for Tiexi District

Longshan District

and Xi’an District

which belong to the cultivated land ecological payment area

the sustainability of cultivated land ecological services in other areas was good

and they had a strong carrying effect on the ecological consumption of cultivated land in the region

all of which belong to the cultivated land ecological compensation area. ② The cultivated land in the research area had an important ecological value

and its spatial differences were significant. The ecological spillover value of cultivated land reached 8.732 billion yuan

providing important ecological products and services for other regions

among which Gongzhuling City and Lishu County were the main areas of ecological spillover value of cultivated land. ③ The ecological compensation standard for cultivated land in the research area was 5 191.16 yuan/ha

with a total compensation amount of 5.976 billion yuan. Due to differences in ecological value

ecological profit and loss area

protection responsibility

and development stage of cultivated land

there were significant differences in compensation standards and amounts among different regions. [Conclusion] The research results scientifically identified the relevant stakeholders of ecological compensation for cultivated land and determined the ecological spillover benefits of cultivated land while considering spatial scale and regional reality

thereby achieving differentiated ecological compensation for cultivated land. The significance of the study is that it improves the mechanism of ecological compensation for cultivated land and enhances ecological compensation.

关键词

Keywords

references

谢高地,鲁春霞,冷允法,等.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(2):189-196.Xie Gaodi, Lu Chunxia, Leng Yunfa, et al. Ecological assets valuation of the Tibetan Plateau [J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2003,18(2):189-196.

朱文娟,李建兵,高阳,等.基于经济—社会—生态价值的耕地价值量核算研究:以Y市为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2022,31(9):2086-2095.Zhu Wenjuan, Li Jianbing, Gao Yang, et al. Cultivated land value accounting based on economic-social-ecological value: A case study of Y City [J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze basin, 2022,31(9):2086-2095.

张皓玮,方斌,魏巧巧,等.区域耕地生态价值补偿量化模型构建:以江苏省为例[J].中国土地科学,2015,29(1):63-70.Zhang Haowei, Fang Bin, Wei Qiaoqiao, et al. Building quantitative model of ecological value compensation for regional arable land: A case study of Jiangsu Province [J]. China Land Sciences, 2015,29(1):63-70.

马爱慧,张安录.选择实验法视角的耕地生态补偿意愿实证研究: 基于湖北武汉市问卷调查[J].资源科学,2013,35(10):2061-2066.Ma Aihui, Zhang Anlu. Cultivated land ecological compensation willingness based on choice experiments [J]. Resources Science, 2013,35(10):2061-2066.

葛颖,徐崇森,李坦.农户视角下耕地生态服务保护补偿意愿研究[J].云南农业大学学报(社会科学),2020,14(5):104-111.Ge Ying, Xu Chongsen, Li Tan. The compensation willingness of cultivated land ecological service protection from the perspective of farmers [J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University(Social Science), 2020,14(5):104-111.

唐秀美,潘瑜春,刘玉.北京市耕地生态价值评估与时空变化分析[J].中国农业资源与区划,2018,39(3):132-140.Tang Xiumei, Pan Yuchun, Liu Yu. Evaluation and spatio-temporal analysis of ecological value of cultivated land in Beijing [J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2018,39(3):132-140.

蒋琳莉,黄好钦,何苏榕,等.广西稻田生态系统服务价值评估及其时空演变特征[J].西南农业学报,2022,35(11):2633-2640.Jiang Linli, Huang Haoqin, He Surong, et al. Service value evaluation and spatial-temporal evolution characteristics of paddy field ecosystem in Guangxi [J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2022,35(11):2633-2640.

崔宁波,生世玉,方袁意如.粮食安全视角下省际耕地生态补偿的标准量化与机制构建[J].中国农业大学学报,2021,26(11):232-243.Cui Ningbo, Sheng Shiyu, Fang Yuanyiru. Standard quantification and mechanism construction of inter-provincial cultivated land ecological compensation from the perspective of food security [J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2021,26(11):232-243.

阮熹晟,李坦,张藕香,等.基于生态服务价值的长江经济带耕地生态补偿量化研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2021,42(1):68-76.Ruan Xisheng, Li Tan, Zhang Ouxiang, et al. A quantitative study on ecological compensation of cultivated land in the Yangtze River economic belt based on ecological service value [J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2021,42(1):68-76.

高攀,梁流涛,刘琳轲,等.基于虚拟耕地视角的河南省县际耕地生态补偿研究[J].农业现代化研究,2019,40(6):974-983.Gao Pan, Liang Liutao, Liu Linke, et al. Study of the ecological compensation of inter-county farmland from the virtual farmland perspective: A case study of Henan Province [J]. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2019,40(6):974-983.

梁流涛,高攀,刘琳轲.区际农业生态补偿标准及“两横”财政跨区域转移机制:以虚拟耕地为载体[J].生态学报,2019,39(24):9281-9294.Liang Liutao, Gao Pan, Liu Linke. The “Two Horizon” inter-regional agro-ecological compensation standard and cross-regional financial transfer mechanism: A study based on virtual cultivated land [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019,39(24):9281-9294.

刘利花,张丙昕,刘向华.粮食安全与生态安全双视角下中国省域耕地保护补偿研究[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(19):252-263.Liu Lihua, Zhang Bingxin, Liu Xianghua. Compensation of provincial cultivated land protection in China from the dual perspectives of food security and ecological security [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020,36(19):252-263.

靳亚亚,赵凯,肖桂春.陕西省耕地保护经济补偿分区研究:基于粮食安全与生态安全双重视角[J].中国土地科学,2015,29(10):12-19.Jin Yaya, Zhao Kai, Xiao Guichun. The economic compensation zoning of the cultivated land protection in Shanxi Province: From the perspective of food and ecological security [J]. China Land Science, 2015,29(10):12-19.

李晓燕.基于生态价值量和支付能力的耕地生态补偿标准研究:以河南省为例[J].生态经济,2017,33(2):151-155,161.Li Xiaoyan. Study on the ecological compensation standard of cultivated land based on the ecological value and the ability of payment: Taking Henan Province as an example [J]. Ecological Economy, 2017,33(2):151-155,161.

张俊峰,梅岭,张雄,等.长江经济带耕地保护生态价值的时空特征与差别化补偿机制[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2022,32(9):173-183.Zhang Junfeng, Mei Ling, Zhang Xiong, et al. Spatial and temporal characteristics of the ecological value of cultivated land and its differentiated compensation mechanisms in the Yangtze River economic belt [J]. China population, resources and environment, 2022,32(9):173-183.

Zhang Junfeng, Zhang Anlu, Song Min. Ecological benefit spillover and ecological financial transfer of cultivated land protection in river basins: A case study of the Yangtze River economic belt, China [J]. Sustainability, 2020,12(17):7085.

党昱譞,孔祥斌,温良友,等.中国耕地生态保护补偿的省级差序分区及补偿标准[J].农业工程学报,2022,38(6):254-263.Dang Yuxuan, Kong Xiangbin, Wen Liangyou, et al. Provincial eco-compensation zonings and standards of cultivated land in China [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2022,38(6):254-263.

Moore D W, Booth P, Alix A, et al. Application of ecosystem services in natural resource management decision making [J]. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 2017,13(1):74-84.

刘利花,杨彬如.中国省域耕地生态补偿研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2019,29(2):52-62. Liu Lihua, Yang Binru. Research on ecological compensation of provincial cultivated land in China [J]. China population, resources and environment, 2019,29(2):52-62.

刘某承,李文华.基于净初级生产力的中国各地生态足迹均衡因子测算[J].生态与农村环境学报,2010,26(5):401-406. Liu Moucheng, Li Wenhua. Calculation of equivalence factor used in ecological footprint for China and its provinces based on net primary production [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2010,26(5):401-406.

李明琦,刘世梁,武雪,等.云南省农田生态系统碳足迹时空变化及其影响因素[J].生态学报,2018,38(24):8822-8834. Li Mingqi, Liu Shiliang, Wu Xue, et al. Temporal and spatial dynamics in the carbon footprint and its influencing factors of farmland ecosystems in Yunnan Province [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018,38(24):8822-8834.

浏览量

199

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

基于生态产品价值实现的中国省域耕地差异化生态补偿标准体系研究

基于RSEI的辽河流域生态环境动态变化、归因及分区研究

基于耕地“三生”功能的耕地生态供需差异研究——以吉林省辽河流域为例

流域多尺度耕地保护生态价值及其补偿标准

海河流域气候-土地利用-生态治理对水生态系统服务的影响