基于ESV-ERI-MCR评价的嘉陵江流域景观生态格局构建与优化

杨光容; 蒋贵国; 周娟

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.03.014

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

基于ESV-ERI-MCR评价的嘉陵江流域景观生态格局构建与优化

试验研究

- 基于ESV-ERI-MCR评价的嘉陵江流域景观生态格局构建与优化
- Construction and Optimization of Landscape Ecological Pattern in Jialing River Basin Based on ESV-ERI-MCR Evaluation
- 水土保持通报 2024年44卷第3期页码：124-135
- 作者机构：
  
  四川师范大学地理与资源科学学院, 西南土地资源评价与监测教育部重点实验室,四川,成都,610066
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  教育部规划基金项目“基于充分均衡发展视角下的彝汉交错深度贫困区生态稳定脱贫机制研究”(18XJA630005)
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.03.014
  中图分类号： X171.1
- 纸质出版：2024
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
杨光容, 蒋贵国, 周娟. 基于ESV-ERI-MCR评价的嘉陵江流域景观生态格局构建与优化[J]. 水土保持通报, 2024,44(3):124-135.

Yang Guangrong, Jiang Guiguo, Zhou Juan. Construction and Optimization of Landscape Ecological Pattern in Jialing River Basin Based on ESV-ERI-MCR Evaluation[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2024, 44(3): 124-135.
杨光容, 蒋贵国, 周娟. 基于ESV-ERI-MCR评价的嘉陵江流域景观生态格局构建与优化[J]. 水土保持通报, 2024,44(3):124-135. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.03.014.

Yang Guangrong, Jiang Guiguo, Zhou Juan. Construction and Optimization of Landscape Ecological Pattern in Jialing River Basin Based on ESV-ERI-MCR Evaluation[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2024, 44(3): 124-135. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.03.014.

摘要

[目的

]

分析嘉陵江流域景观生态格局，旨在增强生态系统服务功能，稳固生态系统从而降低生态风险，为促进区域可持续发展提供科学依据。[方法

]

以长江上游重要生态屏障嘉陵江流域为研究区，基于动态当量的生态系统服务价值(ESV)评价结果识别生态源地，基于最优空间尺度的景观生态风险(ERI)评价结果确定生态阻力面，再结合最小累积阻力模型(MCR)提取的生态廊道构建生态网络。[结果

]

①2005—2020年嘉陵江流域ESV呈北高南低格局和呈波动增长趋势。生态系统服务价值总计增加2.10×10

元，林地贡献率最高(50%)，依次为草地(25%)、耕地(14%)。 ②嘉陵江流域适宜分析粒度和幅度分别为150，750 m。2005—2020年ERI呈西北部高，中南部低格局和呈逐年降低趋势。 ③整个生态网络呈西北—东南向分布。共识别出生态源地11个，总面积36 297.19 km

，潜在生态廊道365条，生态节点133个。其中，重要生态廊道47条，重要生态节点39个。 ④建设的重点生态保护区作为新增生态源地，为嘉陵江流域限制开发区域。新增道路型生态廊道6条，绿带型生态廊道3条，河流型生态廊道13条，生态节点24个。[结论

]

优化后嘉陵江流域生态网络密度增加，贯穿了全方位的生态源地，整体连通度得以提升。研究成果可为流域生态格局修复、生态保护策略和可持续发展提供新思路。

Abstract

[Objective] The landscape ecological pattern of the Jialing River basin was analyzed to enhance ecosystem service functions and stabilize the ecosystem to reduce ecological risks

thereby providing a scientific basis for promoting regional sustainable development. [Methods] The study was conducted for the Jialing River basin

an important ecological barrier in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River. The dynamic equivalent ecological service value model (ESV) evaluation results were used to identify ecological sources based on the optimal spatial scale of the ecological risk index model (ERI) evaluation results to determine the ecological resistance surface. These results were combined with the minimal cumulative resistance model (MCR) to extract an ecological corridor construction landscape network. [Results] ① From 2005 to 2020

ESV in the Jialing River basin was high in the north and low in the south

with a fluctuating growth trend. In total

ecosystem service value increased by 2.10×1010 yuan

and the contribution rate of woodland was the highest (50%)

with contribution rates of 25% for grassland and 14% for farmland. ② The particle size and amplitude for suitable analysis in the Jialing River basin were 150 m and 750 m

respectively. From 2005 to 2020

ERI showed a pattern of higher in the northwest and lower in the central and south

with a decreasing trend over time. ③ The entire ecological network distribution presented a northwest-southeast direction. Eleven ecological sources were identified

with a total area of 36 297.19 km2

365 potential ecological corridors

and 133 ecological nodes. Among them

there were 47 important ecological corridors and 39 important ecological nodes. ④ Key ecological protection areas should be constructed as new ecological sources

and development in the Jialing River basin should be restricted. There are six road-type ecological corridors

three green-type ecological corridors

13 river-type ecological corridors

and 24 ecological nodes were identified. [Conclusion] After optimization

the ecological network density of the Jialing River basin increased

running through the full range of ecological sources

and the overall connectivity was improved. These results could provide new ideas for the pattern of ecological watershed restoration

and strategies for ecological protection and sustainable development.

关键词

Keywords

references

Forman R T T，Godron M. Landscape Ecology [M]. New York: Wiley & Sons,1986.

俞孔坚.生物保护的景观生态安全格局[J].生态学报,1999,19(1):8-15.Yu Kongjian.Landscape ecological security pattern of biological protection [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1999,19(1): 8-15.

易浪,孙颖,尹少华,等.生态安全格局构建:概念、框架与展望[J].生态环境学报,2022,31(4):845-856.Yi Lang, Sun Ying, Yin Shaohua, et al. Construction of ecological security pattern: Concept, framework and prospect [J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2022,31(4):845-856.

王媛,周长威.黔中城市群景观生态安全格局构建[J].生态与农村环境学报,2019,35(9):1111-1117.Wang Yuan, Zhou Changwei. Landscape Ecological Security Pattern in Central Guizhou urban agglomeration [J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2019,35(9):1111-1117.

陈竹安,况达,危小建,等.基于MSPA与MCR模型的余江县生态网络构建[J].长江流域资源与环境,2017,26(8):1199-1207.Chen Zhuan, Kuang Da,Wei Xiaojian, et al. Developing ecological networks based on MSPA and MCR: A case study in Yujiang County [J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2017,26(8):1199-1207.

李青圃,张正栋,万露文,等.基于景观生态风险评价的宁江流域景观格局优化[J].地理学报,2019,74(7):1420-1437.Li Qingpu, Zhang Zhengdong, Wan Luwen, et al. Landscape pattern optimization in NingJiang River basin based on landscape ecological risk assessment [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019,74(7):1420-1437.

姚材仪,何艳梅,程建兄,等.基于MCR模型和重力模型的岷江流域生态安全格局评价与优化建议研究[J].生态学报,2023,43(17):1-14.Yao Caiyi, He Yanmei, Cheng Jianxiong, et al. Evaluation of ecological security pattern and optimization suggestions in Minjiang River basin based on MCR model and gravity model [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023,43(17):1-14.

Knaapen J P, Scheffer M, Harms B. Estimating habitat isolation in landscape planning [J]. Landscape & Urban Planning, 1992,23(1):1-16.

Anderson J E. The gravity model [J]. Annual Review of Economics, 2011,3(1):133-160.

邵新娟,张永福,陈文倩,等.基于最小累计阻力的农村居民点整治优化研究[J].水土保持研究,2016,23(3):309-313.Shao Xinjuan, Zhang Yongfu, Chen Wenqian, et al. Research for regulation optimization of rural residential areas based on the model of least resistance [J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016,23(3):309-313.

Robert Costanza, Ralph d’Arge, Rudolf De Groot, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital [J]. Nature, 1997,387(15):253-260.

谢高地,甄霖,鲁春霞,等.一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J].自然资源学报,2008,23(5):911-919.Xie Gaodi, Zhen Lin, Lu Chunxia, et al. Expert knowledge based valuation method of ecosystem services in China [J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2008,23(5):911-919.

潘洪义,张琴,李加安,等.基于动态当量的彝汉交错深度贫困区生态系统服务价值时空演变研究[J].生态学报,2020,40(22):8218-8229.Pan Hongyi, Zhang Qin, Li Jia’an, et al. Spatial and temporal evolution of ecosystem service value based on dynamic equivalent in Yi-Han severely impoverished areas [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020,40(22):8218-8229.

马胜,梁小英,刘迪,等.生态脆弱区多尺度景观生态风险评价:以陕西省米脂县高渠乡为例[J].生态学杂志,2018,37(10):3171-3178.Ma Sheng,Liang Xiaoying,Liu Di, et al. Multi-scale landscape ecological risk assessment in ecologically fragile regions: A case study in Gaoqu Town in Mizhi County, Shanxi Province [J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2018,37(10):3171-3178.

陈雅如,肖文发,滕明君,等.三峡库区景观格局粒度效应及其对土地利用变化过程的响应[J].自然资源学报,2018,33(4):588-599.Chen Yaru, Xiao Wenfa, Teng Mingjun, et al. Grain size effect of landscape pattern and its response to land use change in the Three Gorges reservoir area [J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2018,33(4):588-599.

徐芝英,胡云锋,刘越,等.空间尺度转换数据精度评价的准则和方法[J].地理科学进展,2012,31(12): 1574-1582.Xu Zhiying, Hu Yunfeng, Liu Yue, et al. A review on the accuracy analysis of spatial scaling data [J]. Progress in Geography, 2012,31(12): 574-1582.

李栋科,丁圣彦,梁国付,等.基于移动窗口法的豫西山地丘陵地区景观异质性分析[J].生态学报,2014,34(12):3414-3424.Li Dongke, Ding Shengyan, Liang Guofu, et al. Landscape heterogeneity of mountainous and hilly area in the Western Henan Province based on moving window method [J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014,34(12):3414-3424.

岳文泽,徐建华,徐丽华,等.不同尺度下城市景观综合指数的空间变异特征研究[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(11):49-55.Yue Wenze, Xu Jianhua, Xu Lihua, et al. Spatial variance characters of urban synthesis pattern indices at different scales [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2005,16(11):49-55.

田雅楠,马龙,吴全.黄河流域内蒙古段土地利用演变与景观生态风险评价[J].生态科学,2023,42(5):103-113.Tian Yanan, Ma Long, Wu Quan. Landscape ecological risk assessment in Inner Mongolia reach of Yellow River based on land use evolution [J]. Ecological Science, 2023,42(5):103-113.

王飞,叶长盛,华吉庆,等.南昌市城镇空间扩展与景观生态风险的耦合关系[J].生态学报,2019,39(4):1248-1262.Wang Fei, Ye Changsheng, Hua Jiqing, et al. Coupling relationship between urban spatial expansion and landscape ecological risk in Nanchang City [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2019,39(4):1248-1262.

孙枫,章锦河,王培家,等.城市生态安全格局构建与评价研究:以苏州市区为例[J].地理研究,2021,40(9):2476-2493.Sun Feng, Zhang Jinhe, Wang Peijia, et al. Construction and evaluation of urban ecological security pattern: A case study of Suzhou City[J]. Geographical Research, 2021,40(9):2476-2493.

陈宇阳,彭建川,陈文宽.推进成渝地区双城经济圈嘉陵江流域现代高效特色农业产业带建设[J].乡村振兴,2021(1):39-41.Chen Yuyang, Peng Jianchuan, Chen Wenkuan. Promote the construction of modern and efficient characteristic agricultural industrial belt in Jialing River basin of the Chengdu-Chongqing twin-city economic circle [J]. Rural Revitalization, 2021(1):39-41.

浏览量

212

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

基于生态系统服务和生态敏感性评价的云中山-系舟山生态网络构建

嘉陵江流域降雨侵蚀力时空变化分析

近50a嘉陵江流域径流变化特征及影响因素

基于最小费用距离的土地整治生态网络构建

江苏省沿海地区土地利用变化及其生态效应