1. 甘肃农业大学 林学院,甘肃,兰州,730070
2. 甘肃林业职业技术学院 林业工程学院,甘肃,天水,741000
3. 甘肃智富瑞达生态环境工程有限公司,甘肃,兰州,730070
纸质出版:2024
移动端阅览
陈素娥, 马瑞, 张富, 等. 甘肃省庆城县极端暴雨下水保措施抵御暴洪灾害的能力[J]. 水土保持通报, 2024,44(3):26-35.
Chen Sue, Ma Rui, Zhang Fu, et al. Ability of Soil and Water Conservation Measures to Resist Flash Flood Disaster Under Extreme Rainstorm Conditions in Qingcheng County of Gansu Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2024, 44(3): 26-35.
陈素娥, 马瑞, 张富, 等. 甘肃省庆城县极端暴雨下水保措施抵御暴洪灾害的能力[J]. 水土保持通报, 2024,44(3):26-35. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.03.004.
Chen Sue, Ma Rui, Zhang Fu, et al. Ability of Soil and Water Conservation Measures to Resist Flash Flood Disaster Under Extreme Rainstorm Conditions in Qingcheng County of Gansu Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2024, 44(3): 26-35. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.03.004.
[目的
]
最大洪峰流量是导致暴洪灾害的决定性因素。研究小流域降水频率、治理程度与洪峰流量、暴洪灾害损失的关联性,为水土保持减灾防灾工作提供科学依据。[方法
]
采用回归分析、对比分析等方法,对甘肃省庆阳市庆城县蔡家庙、野狐沟两条相邻流域1981—2022年水保措施的调水效益以及降水因子、水保措施对洪峰流量的影响进行分析。[结果
]
①小流域水保措施调水效益随治理程度的提高而增加,随降水频率的提高而减少。 ②年最大日降水量对洪峰流量变化具有极显著的正向影响(p<0.01),贡献率系数为0.707;治理程度对洪峰流量呈负影响,贡献率系数为-0.237。 ③30 a一遇洪峰流量(频率为3%)与50 a一遇洪峰流量(频率为2%)灾害损失强度分别达到1.74×10
5
,3.13×10
6
元/km
2
,后者比前者增长了16.95倍。[结论
]
影响洪峰流量变化的主要因素是年最大日降水量。水保措施对削减洪峰流量具有显著的影响。流域治理程度越高,削减洪峰流量的效果越明显,减少暴洪灾害经济损失的能力越大。
[Objective] Maximum flood peak flow is the decisive factor leading to flood disaster. The correlation between precipitation frequency
management level
and flood peak flow and flood disaster loss in a small watershed was studied to provide a scientific basis for soil and water conservation
disaster reduction
and prevention. [Methods] The water transfer benefits of soil and water conservation measures in two adjacent basins of Caijiamiao and Yehugou from 1981 to 2022 were analyzed by using both regression analysis and comparative analysis
as well as the effects of precipitation factors and soil and water conservation measures on flood peak flow. [Results] ① The benefit of water conservation measures in a small watershed increased with increasing management level
and decreased with increasing precipitation frequency. ② Annual maximum daily precipitation had a highly significant positive effect on the change of flood peak flow (p<0.01)
and the contribution rate coefficient was 0.707. Management level had a negative impact on the flood peak flow
and the contribution rate coefficient was -0.237. ③ The disaster loss intensity of 30-year flood peak flow (frequency of 3%) and 50-year flood peak flow (frequency of 2%) reached 1.74×105 yuan/km2 and 3.13×106 yuan/km2
respectively
with the latter value being 16.95 times greater than the former value. [Conclusion] The main factor affecting the change of flood peak flow was the annual maximum daily precipitation. Soil and water conservation measures had a significant impact on the reduction of flood peak flow. The higher the degree of watershed management
the more obvious the effect of reducing flood peak flow
and the greater the ability to reduce the economic loss of flood disasters.
史德明.土壤侵蚀与人类生存环境恶化[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1995,9(1):26-33.Shi Deming. Soil erosion and deterioration of human living environment [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1995,9(1):26-33.
李大鸣,陈海舟,范玉.国内外防洪减灾发展与现状[J].中国农村水利水电,2005(9):33-37.Li Daming, Chen Haizhou, Fan Yu. Present situation and development of flood control and mitigation in China and abroad [J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2005(9):33-37.
邱粲,刘焕彬,万程程,等.1984—2019年山东省暴雨洪涝灾害时空变化特征及其成因分析[J].灾害学,2022,37(4):57-63.Qiu Can, Liu Huanbin, Wan Chengcheng, et al. Tempo-spatial variation and cause analysis of rainstorms and related flood disasters in Shandong from 1984 to 2019 [J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2022,37(4):57-63.
张辉,许新宜,张磊,等.2000—2010年我国洪涝灾害损失综合评估及其成因分析[J].水利经济,2011,29(5):5-9.Zhang Hui, Xu Xinyi, Zhang Lei, et al. Comprehensive assessment of loss of flood and waterlogging disasters from 2000 to 2010 and analysis of their causes [J]. Journal of Economics of Water Resources, 2011,29(5):5-9.
张葆蔚,万金红.2003—2012年我国洪涝灾情评估与成因分析[J].中国水利,2013(11):35-37.Zhang Baowei, Wan Jinhong. Assessment and analysis of flood and water logging of China from 2003 to 2012 [J]. China Water Resources, 2013(11):35-37.
世行新报告称自然灾害 每年造成经济损失达5200亿美元[J].国际融资,2017(1):72.New World Bank analysis finds: Natural disasters cost $520bn in losses every year [J]. International Financing, 2017(1):72.
张富,姚进忠,雷升文,等.甘肃省水土保持综合治理效益研究[M].河南 郑州:黄河水利出版社,2014:218-220.Zhang Fu, Yao Jinzhong, Lei Shengwen, et al. Study on the benefits of comprehensive management measures for soil and water conservation in Gansu Province [M]. Zhengzhou, Henan: Yellow River Water Conservancy Press, 2014:218-220.
杨文治.黄河中上游水土流失灾害问题的浅析[J].水土保持通报,1986,6(4):9-12.Yang Wenzhi. Analysis of soil erosion disaster in the middle and upper reaches of the Yellow River [J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 1986,6(4):9-12.
史德明.中国水土流失及其对旱涝灾害的影响[J].自然灾害学报,1996,5(2):40-50.Shi Deming. Soil erosion in China and its influence on drought and flood disasters [J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 1996,5(2):40-50.
罗利芳,李双才,叶芝菡,等.黄土高原生物措施减水减沙效益动态分析[J].地理与地理信息科学,2004,20(3):78-81.Luo Lifang, Li Shuangcai, Ye Zhihan, et al. Analysis of runoff and sediment reduction from biological measurements in the Loess Plateau [J]. Geography and Geo-Information Science, 2004,20(3):78-81.
王光谦,张长春,刘家宏,等.黄河流域多沙粗沙区植被覆盖变化与减水减沙效益分析[J].泥沙研究,2006(2):10-16.Wang Guangqian, Zhang Changchun, Liu Jiahong, et al. Analyses on the variation of vegetation coverage and water/sediment reduction in the rich and coarse sediment area of the Yellow River basin [J]. Journal of Sediment Research, 2006(2):10-16.
柳荣先,马勇,杨国礼.论水土保持综合治理作用及防治措施: 以昕水河流域的水沙变化为例[J].水土保持学报,1995,9(4):43-48.Liu Rongxian, Ma Yong, Yang Guoli. Discussion on the effect of comprehensive harnessing and prevention measures of soil and water loss: According to the analysis of runoff and sediment variations in Xishui River watershed [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1995,9(4):43-48.
白璐璐,时鹏,李占斌,等.黄土高原梯田和淤地坝坡沟治理措施对产流产沙的协同效应[J].农业工程学报,2023,39(13):96-104.Bai Lulu, Shi Peng, Li Zhanbin, et al. Synergistic effects of terraces and check dams on runoff and sediment yields in a slope-gully system in Loess Plateau [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2023,39(13):96-104.
王飞,穆兴民,张晓萍,等.水土保持对偏关河径流和泥沙的影响分析[J].中国水土保持科学,2005,3(2):10-14.Wang Fei, Mu Xingmin, Zhang Xiaoping, et al. Effect of soil and water conservation on runoff and sediment in Pianguan River [J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2005,3(2):10-14.
丁琳霞,穆兴民.水土保持对小流域地表径流时间特征变化的影响[J].干旱区资源与环境,2004,18(3):103-106.Ding Linxia, Mu Xingmin. The effects of soil and water conservation on temporal change of the surface runoff in watersheds [J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources & Environment, 2004,18(3):103-106.
冉大川,刘斌,罗全华,等.泾河流域水土保持措施减水减沙作用分析[J].人民黄河,2001,23(2):6-8.Ran Dachuan, Liu Bin, Luo Quanhua, et al. Analysis of water and sediment reduction effects by soil and water conservation treatments in Jing River basin [J]. Yellow River, 2001,23(2):6-8.
阎文哲,赵光耀,马国力.黄河流域水土保持综合效益分析[J].人民黄河,1996,18(5): 7-11,39.Yan Wenzhe, Zhao Guangyao, Ma Guoli. Comprehensive benefit analysis of soil and water conservation in the Yellow River basin [J]. Yellow River, 1996,18(5):7-11,39.
陈渠昌,张如生.水土保持综合效益定量分析方法及指标体系研究[J].中国水利水电科学研究院学报,2007,5(2):95-104.Chen Quchang, Zhang Rusheng. Study on approaches and index system for quantitatively analyzing comprehensive benefits of soil and water conservation [J]. Journal of China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, 2007,5(2):95-104.
张丽娟.水土保持措施对黄土丘陵沟壑区小流域产汇流过程影响研究[D].山西 太原:太原理工大学,2020.Zhang Lijuan. Effect of soil and water conservation measures on runoff production and confluence in small watershed loess hilly-gully region [D]. Taiyuan,Shanxi: Taiyuan University Technology, 2020.
刘宏志.植被和降雨类型对地表径流和土壤侵蚀的影响研究[J].陕西水利,2023(10):112-114.Liu Hongzhi. Effects of vegetation and rainfall types on surface runoff and soil erosion [J]. Shaanxi Water Resources, 2023(10):112-114.
宋子龙.暴雨洪灾成因分析及其防治对策: 以广州市增城区“5·22” 、“6·8” 两场特大暴雨为例[J].珠江水运,2021(19):75-76.Song Zilong. Cause analysis of rainstorm and flood disaster and its prevention countermeasures: Taking “5·22” and “6·8” two torrential rains in Zengcheng District of Guangzhou as examples [J]. Pearl River Water Transport, 2021(19):75-76.
马吉刚,王玉俭.小流域综合治理对减轻洪涝灾害的调查分析[J].水土保持通报,1991,11(6):35-39.Ma Jigang, Wang Yujian. Surveys and analysis of effects of small watershed controlling upon lessening flood and water logging disasters [J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 1991,11(6):35-39.
翟婷婷,赵广举,穆兴民,等.黄河中游典型流域极端降雨条件的水沙过程变化[J].泥沙研究,2021,46(1):57-63.Zhai Tingting, Zhao Guangju, Mu Xingmin, et al. Processes of water and sediment in the representative catchments of the middle Yellow River under extreme rainfalls [J]. Journal of Sediment Research, 2021,46(1):57-63.
邓国卫,王敏.都江堰特大暴雨过程中GIS的多种面雨量计算方法对比[J].高原山地气象研究,2018,38(1):81-86.Deng Guowei, Wang Min. Comparison of multi surface rainfall calculation methods for GIS during the heavy rain process in Dujiangyan [J]. Plateau and Mountain Meteorology Research, 2018,38(1):81-86.
祁春阳,戴欢,赵晓燕,等.基于虚拟力和泰森多边形的分布式覆盖算法[J].计算机工程与设计,2018,39(3):606-611.Qi Chunyang, Dai Huan, Zhao Xiaoyan, et al. Distributed coverage algorithm based on virtual force and Voronoi [J]. Computer Engineering and Design, 2018,39(3):606-611.
汪岗,范昭.黄河水沙变化研究(第一卷)[M].河南 郑州:黄河水利出版社,2002: 832.Wang Gang, Fan Zhao. Research on water and sediment changes in the Yellow River (Vol. 1) [M]. Zhengzhou, Henan: Yellow River Water Conservancy Press, 2002.
冉大川,左仲国,吴永红,等.黄河中游近期水沙变化对人类活动的响应[M].北京:科学出版社,2012:124.Ran Dachuan, Zuo Zhongguo, Wu Yonghong, et al. Response of recent water and sediment changes to human activities in the middle reaches of the Yellow River [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2012.
0
浏览量
247
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621