1. 兰州理工大学 能源与动力工程学院,甘肃,兰州,730050
2. 农业农村部智慧农业 节水灌溉装备重点实验室,甘肃,兰州,730050
3. 兰州新区农业科技开发有限责任公司,甘肃,兰州,730300
纸质出版:2024
移动端阅览
赵文举, 张雪儿, 李建承, 等. 不同灌溉方式和灌水量对土壤水盐及燕麦生长特征的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2024,44(3):16-25.
Zhao Wenju, Zhang Xueer, Li Jiancheng, et al. Effects of Different Irrigation Methods and Irrigation Amounts on Soil Water and Salt, and Oat Growth Characteristics[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2024, 44(3): 16-25.
赵文举, 张雪儿, 李建承, 等. 不同灌溉方式和灌水量对土壤水盐及燕麦生长特征的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2024,44(3):16-25. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.03.003.
Zhao Wenju, Zhang Xueer, Li Jiancheng, et al. Effects of Different Irrigation Methods and Irrigation Amounts on Soil Water and Salt, and Oat Growth Characteristics[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2024, 44(3): 16-25. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.03.003.
[目的
]
探究不同灌溉方式和灌水量对土壤水盐变化规律及燕麦生长特征的影响,为提高盐碱地作物的生产效能和土壤水分管理提供科学参考。[方法
]
采用盆栽试验,设置3种灌溉方式:常规灌溉、固定单侧灌溉(fixed unilateral root zone irrigation ,FURI)、交替灌溉(alternative partial root zone irrigation,APRI),3组灌水量:W
1
(60% θ
f
~70% θ
f
,θ
f
为田间持水率),W
2
(70% θ
f
~80% θ
f
)和W
3
(80% θ
f
~90% θ
f
),以常规灌溉作为对照,共9组交互处理。[结果
]
①不同灌溉方式下,土壤各层含水率变化趋势基本一致,随灌水量增加洗盐效果越显著,常规灌溉的深层含水率总体高于其他两种灌溉方式。 ②燕麦株高、叶绿素相对含量(relative chlorophyll content of leaves,SPAD)、品质随灌水量的增加而上升,与常规灌溉相比,W
2
灌溉水平下,分根交替灌溉处理的粗脂肪,粗蛋白,β-葡聚糖含量分别增加7.02%,3.76%,6.06%,但降低了燕麦叶片的SPAD值,影响其光合能力。③随着燕麦生育期的推进,土壤盐分均呈现不同程度的累积,分根交替灌溉的积盐率最低,同时对燕麦根系生长、水分利用效率及产量影响显著,其中根系总长、根系总表面积、根系总体积较相同灌水量(W
2
)的常规灌溉分别增加6.75%,6.92%,12.5%,水分利用效率提高17.32%。[结论
]
采用分根交替灌溉方式下的中等灌水量(W
2
)有利于提高燕麦的生产效能,对盐分累积的控制效果较好。
[Objective] The effects of different irrigation methods and irrigation amounts on soil water
soil salt changes
and oat growth characteristics were explored to provide a scientific reference for improving crop production efficiency and soil water management in saline-alkali land. [Methods] Pot experiments were conducted with three irrigation treatments: conventional irrigation
fixed unilateral root-zone irrigation (FURI)
and alternate partial root-zone irrigation (APRI). Three irrigation amounts were evaluated: W1 (60% θf—70% θf
θf is field water-holding capacity)
W2 (70% θf—80% θf)
and W3 (80% θf—90% θf). Conventional irrigation was used as the control. Therefore
there were a total of nine treatment combinations. [Results] ① Under the different irrigation treatments
the change trend of water content in each soil layer was basically the same. As irrigation amount increased
the effect of salt leaching was more significant. The deep water content of conventional irrigation was generally higher than that of the other two irrigation treatments. ② Plant height
relative chlorophyll content of leaves
and oat quality increased with increasiong irrigation amount. The contents of crude fat
crude protein
and β-glucan in oat were 7.02%
3.76%
and 6.06%
respectively
greater under the W2 irrigation level than under the conventional irrigation level
but the SPAD values of oat leaves were lower under W2
which affected the photosynthetic capacity of oat. ③ Soil salinity showed different degrees of accumulation as oat growth progressed
and the salt accumulation rate with alternate partial root-zone irrigation was the lowest. At the same time
soil salinity had a significant effect on oat root growth
water use efficiency
and yield. Total root length
total root surface area
and total root volume increased by 6.75%
6.92%
and 12.5%
respectively. Water use efficiency increased by 17.32% compared with conventional irrigation with the same irrigation amount (W2). [Conclusion] The medium irrigation amount (W2) under alternate partial root-zone irrigation was beneficial for improving the production efficiency of oat and was better at controlling salt accumulation.
Hu Yanzhe, Ding Risheng, Kang Shaozhong, et al. The trade-offs between resistance and resilience of forage stay robust with varied growth potentials under different soil water and salt stress [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2022,846:157421.
王玉宝,吴楠,张富尧,等.基于三维水足迹模型的农业用水可持续性评估[J]. 农业机械学报,2023,54(1):287-295.Wang Yubao, Wu Nan, Zhang Fuyao, et al. Assessment of agricultural water sustainability based on 3D water footprint model [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2023,54(1):287-295.
王全九,邓铭江,宁松瑞,等.农田水盐调控现实与面临问题[J].水科学进展,2021,32(1):139-147.Wang Quanjiu, Deng Mingjiang, Ning Songrui, et al. Reality and problems of controlling soil water and salt in farmland [J]. Advances in Water Science, 2021,32(1): 139-147.
Stavi I, Thevs N, Priori S. Soil salinity and sodicity in drylands: A review of causes, effects, monitoring, and restoration measures [J]. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2021,9:712831.
康绍忠,张建华,梁宗锁,等.控制性交替灌溉一种新的农田节水调控思路[J].干旱地区农业研究,1997(1):4-9.Kang Shaozhong, Zhang Jianhua, Liang Zongsuo, et al. The controlled alternative irrigation: A new approach for water saving regulation in farmland [J]. Agricultural research in the Arid Areas,1997,(1):4-9.
Zhang Y, Li X, Simunek J, et al. Optimizing drip irrigation with alternate use of fresh and brackish waters by analyzing salt stress: The experimental and simulation approaches [J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2022,219:105355.
Aragüés R, Medina E T, Martínez-Cob A, et al. Effects of deficit irrigation strategies on soil salinization and sodification in a semiarid drip-irrigated peach orchard [J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2014,142:1-9.
Kaman H, Özbek Ö. Salt and water distributions in the plant root zone under deficit irrigation [J]. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 2012,10(3):496-500.
Zhou L. Influences of deficit irrigation on soil water content distribution and spring wheat growth in Hetao Irrigation District, Inner Mongolia of China [J]. Water Supply, 2020, 20(8): 3722-3729.
Zhang Q, Chen W, Wu G, et al. Effect of PVA-treated soil on water-salt capillary rise in loess soil: Soil column experiment [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2022,610:127806.
陈逸凡,云岚,艾芊,等.苜蓿与禾草混播对海流图盐碱地土壤改良效果研究[J].草地学报,2023,31(10):3203-3211.Chen Yifan, Yun Lan, Ai Qian, et al. Effect of alfalfa-grass mixed pasture on the remediation soil in saline area of Hailiutu [J]. Grassland Journal, 2023,31(10):3203-3211.
Köse Ö D E, Mut Z, Akay H. Assessment of grain yield and quality traits of diverse oat (
Avena sativa
L.) genotypes [J]. Annali di Botanica, 2021:55-66.
海霞,刘景辉,杨彦明,等.盐胁迫对燕麦幼苗Na
+
、K
+
吸收和离子积累的影响[J].麦类作物学报,2019,39(5):613-620.Hai Xia, Liu Jinghui, Yang Yanming, et al. Na
+
and K
+
uptake and ion accumulation in oat seedlings under salt stress [J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2019,39(5):613-620.
卢培娜,白健慧,米俊珍,等.菌肥与腐熟秸秆对盐碱地燕麦渗透生理特性及产量的影响[J].麦类作物学报,2023,43(6):753-765.Lu Peina, Bai Jianhui, Mi Junzhen, et al. Effects of bio-fertillizer and rott straw on osmotic physiological characteristics and yield of oats in saline-alkali soil enviroment [J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2023,43(6):753-765.
刘小刚,张富仓,杨启良,等.控制性分根区灌溉对玉米根区水氮迁移和利用的影响[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(11):62-67.Liu Xiaogang, Zhang Fucang, Yang Qiliang, et al. Effects of controlled root-divided irrigation on transport and utilization of water and nitrogen in maize rootzone soil [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2009, 25(11): 62-67.
Cheng Minghui, Wang Haidong, Fan Junliang, et al. A global meta-analysis of yield and water use efficiency of crops, vegetables and fruits under full, deficit and alternate partial root-zone irrigation [J]. Agricultural Water Management,2021,248(12):106771.
Sonawane A V, Shrivastava P K. Partial root zone drying method of irrigation: A review [J]. Irrigation and Drainage, 2022,71(3):574-588.
Qi Dongliang, Hu Tiantian, Song Xue. Effects of nitrogen application rates and irrigation regimes on grain yield and water use efficiency of maize under alternate partial root-zone irrigation [J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020,19(11):2792-2806.
Khaleghi M, Hassanpour F, Karandish F, et al. Integrating partial root-zone drying and saline water irrigation to sustain sunflower production in freshwater-scarce regions [J]. Agricultural water management, 2020,234:106094.
Qi Dongliang, Hu Tiantian, Liu Tingting. Biomass accumulation and distribution, yield formation and water use efficiency responses of maize (
Zea mays
L.) to nitrogen supply methods under partial root-zone irrigation [J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2020,230:105981.
刘琳絮,王铁梅,张霁,等. 紫花苜蓿根系主要功能性状对分根区交替灌溉的响应[J].草地学报,2023,31(3):852-859.Liu Linxiu, Wang Tiemei, Zhang Ji, et al. Response of main functional traits of alfalfa partial root-zone irrigation [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023,31(3):852-859.
Fernández J E, Alcon F, Diaz-Espejo A, et al. Water use indicators and economic analysis for on-farm irrigation decision: A case study of a super high density olive tree orchard [J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2020,237:106074.
Wang Xingchen, Liu Rui, Luo Jia’nan, et al. Effects of water and NPK fertigation on watermelon yield, quality, irrigation-water, and nutrient use efficiency under alternate partial root-zone drip irrigation [J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2022,271:107785.
Sarker K K, Hossain A, Timsina J, et al. Alternate furrow irrigation can maintain grain yield and nutrient content, and increase crop water productivity in dry season maize in sub-tropical climate of South Asia [J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2020, 238: 106229.
杨培岭,王瑜,任树梅,等.咸淡水交替灌溉下土壤水盐分布与玉米吸水规律研究[J].农业机械学报,2020,51(6):273-281.Yang Peiling, Wang Yu, Ren Shumei, et al. Soil Moisture and saline distribution characteristics and maize stem water uptake under alternate irrigation between saline water and groundwater [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2020,51(6):273-281.
Slamini M, Sbaa M, Arabi M, et al. Review on partial root-zone drying irrigation: Impact on crop yield, soil and water pollution[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2022,271:107807.
余根坚,黄介生,高占义,等.基于HYDRUS模型不同灌水模式下土壤水盐运移模拟[J].水利学报,2013,44(7):826-834.Yu genjian, Huang Jiesheng, Gao Zhanyi, et al. Study on water and salt transportation of different irrigation modes by the simulation of HYDRUS model [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2013,44(7):826-834.velopment, 2017,28(2):602-615.
0
浏览量
193
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621