1. 青海民族大学 经济与管理学院,青海,西宁,810007
2. 天津大学-青海民族大学 双碳研究院,青海,西宁,810007
纸质出版:2024
移动端阅览
郭玮, 胡西武. 黄河流域农业灰水足迹效率时空格局演变与驱动因素[J]. 水土保持通报, 2024,44(2):437-445.
Guo Wei, Hu Xiwu. Spatial-temporal Pattern Evolution and Driving Factors of Agricultural Grey Water Footprint Efficiency in Yellow River Basin[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2024, 44(2): 437-445.
郭玮, 胡西武. 黄河流域农业灰水足迹效率时空格局演变与驱动因素[J]. 水土保持通报, 2024,44(2):437-445. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.02.043.
Guo Wei, Hu Xiwu. Spatial-temporal Pattern Evolution and Driving Factors of Agricultural Grey Water Footprint Efficiency in Yellow River Basin[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2024, 44(2): 437-445. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.02.043.
[目的
]
探讨农业灰水足迹效率时空格局演变与驱动因素,为协同推进农业用水节约集约和水污染综合治理、实现黄河流域农业高质量发展提供科学参考。 [方法
]
以黄河流域9省区为研究对象,利用灰水足迹模型、泰尔指数和对数平均迪氏指数等研究方法对2000—2021年农业灰水足迹效率进行测算,并探讨其时空演变格局和驱动因素。 [结果
]
①2000—2021年黄河流域农业灰水足迹效率呈上升趋势,年均效率为0.235 8元/m
3
,内蒙古效率最高为0.467 0元/m
3
,青海效率最低为0.026 3元/m
3
。 ②农业灰水足迹效率地区内部差距多年平均贡献率为80.11%,上游地区差距年均贡献率为75%,是造成黄河流域农业灰水足迹效率差距较大的主要原因。 ③黄河流域农业灰水足迹效率总效应为正向效应0.202 4元/m
3
,耕地资源效应和农业环境效应分别是促进和抑制农业灰水足迹效率的主要因素,二者贡献值分别为0.442 7和-0.440 6元/m
3
。 ④黄河流域农业灰水足迹效率驱动效应可分为4种模式,不同模式地区提升农业灰水足迹效率的方式不同。 [结论
]
黄河流域9省区应采用因地制宜的发展策略,优化农业结构,减少化肥农药的高强度使用,加强农业水环境治理,提升农业灰水足迹效率。
[Objective] The spatiotemporal pattern evolution and driving factors of agricultural grey water footprint efficiency were explored in order to provide a scientific reference for promoting agricultural water conservation and comprehensive water pollution control
and high-quality agricultural development in the Yellow River Basin. [Methods] A grey water footprint model
the Theil index
and the log-average Dietscher index were used to estimate the efficiency of agricultural grey water footprint for nine provinces in the Yellow River basin from 2000 to 2021
and the spatial-temporal evolution pattern and driving factors were discussed. [Results] ① The agricultural grey water footprint efficiency during 2000—2021 in the Yellow River basin showed an overall upward trend over time
with an average annual efficiency of 0.235 8 yuan/m3. Inner Mongolia had the highest efficiency (0.467 0 yuan/m3)
and Qinghai had the lowest efficiency (0.026 3 yuan/m3). ② The annual average contribution rate of the regional gap in agricultural grey water footprint efficiency was 80.11%
and the annual contribution rate of the upstream gap was 75%
which was the main reason for the large gap in agricultural grey water footprint efficiency in the Yellow River basin. ③ The total effect of agricultural grey water footprint efficiency was 0.202 4 yuan/m3
and the cultivated land resource effect and agricultural environment effect were the main factors in promoting and inhibiting the agricultural grey water footprint efficiency
with contribution values of 0.442 7 yuan/m3 and -0.4406 yuan/m3
respectively. ④ The driving effect of agricultural grey water footprint efficiency in the Yellow River basin can be divided into four models. Different models have different ways of improving agricultural grey water footprint efficiency in different regions. [Conclusion] The nine provinces in the Yellow River basin should adopt different development strategies according to local conditions
optimize the agricultural structure
reduce the intensive use of fertilizers and pesticides
strengthen agricultural water management
and improve agricultural grey water footprint efficiency.
付凯,高红杰,李发东,等.典型农业区河流水质评价及影响因素分析[J].农业资源与环境学报,2023,40(3):583-597. Fu Kai, Gao Hongjie, Li Fadong et al. River water quality evaluation and analysis of influencing factors in typical agricultural areas[J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2023,40(3):583-597.
董雯,王瑞琛,李怀恩,等.渭河西咸段水质时空变异特征分析[J].水力发电学报,2020,39(11):80-89. Dong Wen, Wang Ruichen, Li Huaien, et al. Spatiotemporal characteristics analysis of water pollutants in Xixian New Area in Weihe River basin[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2020,39(11):80-89.
张慧妍,段瑜,王小艺,等.数据驱动的模糊支持向量农业水质评价模型[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(1):142-146,153. Zhang Huiyan, Duan Yu, Wang Xiaoyi, et al. Data-driven fuzzy support vector model for agriculture water quality evaluation[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2019,39(1):142-146,153.
黄瑞,韩龙喜,张防修.强降雨过程中入库面源污染对库区水质的影响[J].长江科学院院报,2018,35(5):12-16. Huang Rui, Han Longxi, Zhang Fangxiu. Effects of non-point source pollutants on water quality of reservoir during heavy rainfall[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2018,35(5):12-16.
于嘉骥,张慧妍,王小艺,等.基于改进的投影寻踪-云模型的农业灌溉水质综合评价[J].水资源保护,2017,33(6):142-146. Yu Jiaji, Zhang Huiyan, Wang Xiaoyi, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of agricultural irrigation water quality based on modified projection pursuit-cloud model[J]. Water Resources Protection, 2017,33(6):142-146.
王圣云,林玉娟.中国区域农业生态效率空间演化及其驱动因素:水足迹与灰水足迹视角[J].地理科学,2021,41(2):290-301. Wang Shengyun, Lin Yujuan. Spatial evolution and its drivers of regional agro-ecological efficiency in China's from the perspective of water footprint and gray water footprint[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2021,41(2):290-301.
张鑫,李磊,甄志磊,等.时空与效率视角下汾河流域农业灰水足迹分析[J].中国环境科学,2019,39(4):1502-1510. Zhang Xin, Li Lei, Zhen Zhilei, et al. Analysis of agricultural grey water footprint in Fenhe River basin based on the perspective of space-time and efficiency[J]. China Environmental Science, 2019,39(4):1502-1510.
贺志文,向平安.湖南省灰水足迹变化特征及其驱动因子分析[J].中国农村水利水电,2018(10):19-26. He Zhiwen, Xiang Pingan. An analysis of the variations and driving factors of grey water footprint in Hunan Province[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2018(10):19-26.
孙诗阶,许朗,陈杰.农业灰水足迹与农业经济增长的脱钩关系研究:基于长江经济带11省市的实证分析[J].节水灌溉,2022(6):17-23. Sun Shijie, Xu Lang, Chen Jie. A study on the decoupling relationship between agricultural grey water footprint and agricultural economic growth:Based on the empirical analysis of 11 provinces and cities in the Yangtze River Economic Belt[J].Water Saving Irrigation,2022(6):17-23.
洪传春,刘某承,张雅静,等.时空视角下京津冀农业灰水足迹强度与效率分析[J].河北农业大学学报,2021,44(2):128-135. Hong Chuanchun, Liu Moucheng, Zhang Yajing, et al. Analysis on the intensity and efficiency of agricultural grey water footprint in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region under the perspective of spatial-temporal patten[J]. Journal of Hebei Agricultural University, 2021,44(2):128-135.
陈岩,童国平,王蕾.基于DEA-BCC模型的农业灰水足迹效率研究[J].人民黄河,2020,42(12):61-65,81. Chen Yan, Tong Guoping, Wang Lei. Study on agricultural grey water footprint efficiency of Huaihe River Basin based on DEA-BCC model[J]. Yellow River, 2020,42(12):61-65,81.
傅春,陈毓迪,刘业忠,等.江西省农田灰水足迹时空分析[J].农业环境科学学报,2022,41(7):1501-1508. Fu Chun, Chen Yudi, Liu Yezhong, et al. Temporal and spatial analysis of grey water footprint in Jiangxi Province farmland[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2022,41(7):1501-1508.
中共中央国务院.黄河流域生态保护和高质量发展规划纲要[N].人民日报,2021-10-09(1). The CPC Central Committee and the State Council. Outline of the plan for ecological protection and high-quality development of the Yellow River basin[N]. People'S Daily, 2021-10-09(1).
朱兆良.农田中氮肥的损失与对策[J].土壤与环境,2000(1):1-6. Zhu Zhaoliang. Loss of fertilizer N from plants-soil system and the strategies and techniques for its reduction[J]. Soil and Environmental Sciences, 2000(1):1-6.
刘俊国,曾昭,赵乾斌,等.水足迹评价手册[M].北京:科学出版社,2012. Liu Junguo, Zeng Zhao, Zhao Qianbin, et al. Water Footprint Evaluation Manual[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2012.
郑德凤,郝帅,孙才志.基于DEA-ESDA的农业生态效率评价及时空分异研究[J].地理科学,2018,38(3):419-427. Zheng Defeng, Hao Shuai, Sun Caizhi. Evaluation of agricultural ecological efficiency and its spatial-temporal differentiation based on DEA-ESDA[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2018,38(3):419-427.
李飞,董锁成.西部地区畜禽养殖污染负荷与资源化路径研究[J].资源科学,2011,33(11):2204-2211. Li Fei, Dong Suocheng. Pollution from livestock and poultry and its resource strategy in West China[J]. Resources Science, 2011,33(11):2204-2211.
韩琴,孙才志,邹玮.1998-2012年中国省际灰水足迹效率测度与驱动模式分析[J].资源科学,2016,38(6):1179-1191. Han Qin, Sun Caizhi, Zou Wei. Grey water footprint efficiency measure and its driving pattern analysis on provincial scale in China from 1988 to 2012[J]. Resources Science, 2016,38(6):1179-1191.
宋金昭,胡湘湘,王晓平,等.黄河流域新型城镇化、产业结构升级与绿色经济效率的时空耦合研究[J].软科学,2022,36(10):101-108. Song Jinzhao, Hu Xiangxiang, Wang Xiaoping, et al. Research on the time-space coupling of new urbanization, industrial structure upgrading and green economic efficiency in the Yellow River[J]. Soft Science, 2022,36(10):101-108.
汪克亮,刘悦,史利娟,等.长江经济带工业绿色水资源效率的时空分异与影响因素:基于EBM-Tobit模型的两阶段分析[J].资源科学, 2017, 39(8):1522-1534. Wang Keliang, Liu Yue, Shi Lijuan, et al. Yangtze River Economic Zone spatial and temporal disparities in industrial green water resource efficiency and influencing factors based on two-step analysis of EBM-Tobit model[J]. Resources Science, 2017,39(8):1522-1534.
陈岩,童国平,王蕾.淮河流域农业灰水足迹效率的时空分布与驱动模式[J].水资源保护,2020,36(6):60-66,85. Chen Yan, Tong Guoping, Wang Lei. Spatial-temporal distribution and driving models of agricultural grey water footprint efficiency in the Huai River basin[J]. Water Resources Protection, 2020,36(6):60-66,85.
孙付华,杨一帆,沈菊琴,等.基于水足迹-LMDI模型的江苏省水资源利用与经济发展的脱钩关系研究[J].江苏社会科学,2020(6):233-240. Sun Fuhua, Yang Yifan, Shen Juqin, et al. Study on the decoupling relationship between water resources utilization and economic development in Jiangsu province based on water footprint-LMDI model[J]. Jiangsu Social Sciences, 2020(6):233-240.
孙才志,阎晓东.基于MRIO的中国省区和产业灰水足迹测算及转移分析[J].地理科学进展,2020,39(2):207-218. Sun Caizhi, Yan Xiaodong. Measurement and transfer analysis of grey water footprint of Chinese provinces and industries based on a multi-regional input-output model[J]. Progress in Geography, 2020,39(2):207-218.
邓远建,超博.灰水足迹视角下我国省域农业生态效率及其影响因素[J].中国农业科学,2022,55(24):4879-4894. Deng Yuanjian, Chao Bo. Provincial agricultural ecological efficiency and its influencing factors in China from the perspective of grey water footprint[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022,55(24):4879-4894.
0
浏览量
369
下载量
2
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621