“23·7”京津冀地区暴雨洪水与土壤侵蚀调查——以河北省邢台市临城县为例

李天毅; 戴宁; 丛佩娟; 陈恒昌; 贾继宏; 李扬; 贵欣瑞

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.02.017

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

“23·7”京津冀地区暴雨洪水与土壤侵蚀调查——以河北省邢台市临城县为例

试验研究

- “23·7”京津冀地区暴雨洪水与土壤侵蚀调查——以河北省邢台市临城县为例
- Investigation on Rainstorm Flood and Soil Erosion in “23·7” Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region—A Case Study at Lincheng County, Xingtai City, Hebei Province
- 水土保持通报 2024年44卷第2期页码：155-166
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 水利部水土保持监测中心,北京,100053
  2. 西安理工大学省部共建西北旱区生态水利国家重点实验室,陕西,西安,710048
  3. 河北省临城县水务局, 河北临城,054399
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金黄河水科学联合基金项目“黄土高原极端暴雨土壤侵蚀致灾及蓄排协调防控机制”(U2243213);国家重点研发计划黄河中游多沙粗沙区风水复合侵蚀协同治理技术与示范项目“黄土高原风水复合侵蚀生态治理技术识别挖掘和配置模式研究”(2022YFF130080402)，“多沙粗沙区水土流失生态治理技术全生命周期抑沙阻沙效益分析”(2022YFF130080403)
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.02.017
  中图分类号： S157.1;P426.616
- 纸质出版：2024
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
李天毅, 戴宁, 丛佩娟, 等. “23·7”京津冀地区暴雨洪水与土壤侵蚀调查——以河北省邢台市临城县为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2024,44(2):155-166.

Li Tianyi, Dai Ning, Cong Peijuan, et al. Investigation on Rainstorm Flood and Soil Erosion in “23·7” Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region—A Case Study at Lincheng County, Xingtai City, Hebei Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2024, 44(2): 155-166.
李天毅, 戴宁, 丛佩娟, 等. “23·7”京津冀地区暴雨洪水与土壤侵蚀调查——以河北省邢台市临城县为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2024,44(2):155-166. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.02.017.

Li Tianyi, Dai Ning, Cong Peijuan, et al. Investigation on Rainstorm Flood and Soil Erosion in “23·7” Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region—A Case Study at Lincheng County, Xingtai City, Hebei Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2024, 44(2): 155-166. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.02.017.

摘要

[目的

]

开展“23·7”(20230729—0801)京津冀地区暴雨洪水过程及水土保持调查工作，分析小流域的暴雨洪水过程以及暴雨所造成的土壤侵蚀状况，为水土保持决策提供科学支撑。 [方法

]

采用野外调查的方法对河北省临城县皇迷东沟和梁家庄西沟开展洪痕测量调查并计算洪峰流量模数，分析暴雨洪水对小流域造成的侵蚀危害。 [结果

]

①该次降雨持续时间长、雨强大。梁家庄西沟和皇迷东沟流域累计雨量分别达到1 008.5和613.6 mm。 ②按洪痕法调查推算了洪峰流量，皇迷东沟、梁家庄西沟小流域洪峰流量模数为10.80和36.07 m

/(s·km

)。坡度和水土保持措施是影响洪峰流量的主要因素。较大的坡度会使洪峰流量变大，而完善的水土保持措施可以起到有效的削峰作用。 ③调查小流域位于泜河流域上游，是该次暴雨中心和洪水的主要产流区，小流域洪峰流量模数大于下游水文站洪峰流量模数。 ④梁家庄西沟的侵蚀情况比皇迷东沟严重，主要原因是皇迷东沟的果园、梯田和谷坊的面积比例大于梁家庄西沟，皇迷东沟的平均坡度小于梁家庄西沟且梁家庄雨量站的降雨量峰值持续时间更长。 [结论

]

良好的水土保持措施可以有效减少洪峰流量以及侵蚀现象的发生。实施水土保持措施是必要且有效的。应该进一步完善梯田、台地谷坊的建设。

Abstract

[Objective] Investigations on rainstorm and flood processes and soil and water conservation in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region from July 29 to August 1

2023 (referried as “7·23”) were carried out， and the rainstorm and flood processes in small basins and soil erosion caused by rainstorm were analyzed

in order to provide scientific support for soil and water conservation decision-making. [Methods] Field survey methods were used

in which flood marks were measured and investigated at Huangmi xigou and the Liangjiazhuang donggou of Lincheng County

Xingtai City

Hebei Province. The flood peak discharge modulus was calculated to analyze the erosion damage caused by rainstorm floods to small watersheds. [Results] ① The rainfall lasted for a long time and was strong. The cumulative rainfall in the Liangjiazhuang donggou valley and the Huangmi xigou valley reached 1 008.5 mm and 613.6 mm

respectively. ② According to the flood mark survey

the peak discharge modulus of the Huangmi xigou and the Liangjiazhuang donggou watersheds were 10.80 m3/(s·km2) and 36.07 m3/(s·km2)

respectively. Slope and soil and water conservation measures were the main factors affecting flood peak discharge. Larger slopes will increase flood peak discharge

and soil and water conservation measures could play an effective role in peak reduction. ③ The investigated small watersheds were located in the upper reaches of the river basin

which is the main runoff producing area of the rainstorm center and flood. The peak flood discharge modulus of the small watersheds was larger than that of the downstream hydrology station. ④ The erosion situation of the Liangjiazhuang donggou was more serious than that of the Huangmi xigou

mainly due to the following reasons: the area proportion of orchards

terraces

and check dams in the Huangmi xigou was larger than that of the Huangmi west ditch; the average slope of the Huangmi xigou was smaller than that of the Liangjiazhuang donggou; and the peak duration of rainfall at the Liangjiazhuang rain-measuring station was longer. [Conclusion] Optimized soil and water conservation measures can effectively reduce the occurrence of flood peak discharge and erosion phenomenon. The implementation of soil and water conservation measures is necessary and effective. The construction of terraces and terrace valleys must be further improved.

关键词

Keywords

references

乔殿新,冯伟,王飞,等.台风"利奇马"暴雨引发的流域产流产沙特征:以山东省临朐县为例[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(2):31-35,42. Qiao Dianxin, Feng Wei, Wang Fei, et al. Characteristics of runoff and sediment yield of typhoon "Lekima" Rainstorm:A case in Linqu County, Shandong Province[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022,29(2):31-35.

党维勤,党恬敏,张泉,等."7·26"暴雨调查对黄土高原水土保持工作的启示[J].中国水土保持,2021(3):24-27. Dang Weiqin, Dang Tianmin, Zhang Quan, et al. Enlightenment of investigation of July 26 rainstorm on soil and water conservation in Loess Plateau[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 2021(3):24-27.

阎思宇,李斌斌,于坤霞,等.2022年 "7·13" 暴雨下生产道路侵蚀强度调查:以宁夏回族自治区西吉县五十岔小流域为例[J].水土保持通报,2022,42(6):14-22. Yan Siyu, Li Binbin,Y u Kunxia, et al. Investigation on erosion intensity of production roads under "7·13" rainstorm in 2020:Taking Wushicha small watershed at Xiji County,Ningxia Hui autonomous region as an example[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022,42(6):14-22.

何奂.泾河流域降雨侵蚀力的时空变化[J].广东气象,2022,44(6):25-28. He Huan. Spatiotemporal variations of rainfall erosivity in the basin of Jinghe River[J]. Guangdong Meteorology, 2022,44(6):25-28.

王任超,凌璐璐.浅议水土保持在防洪减灾中的作用[J].黑龙江科技信息,2009(11):196-197. Wang Renchao, Ling Lulu. Discussion on the role of soil and water conservation in flood control and disaster reduction[J]. Heilongjiang Science and Technology Information, 2009(11):196-197.

刘沛妤.郑州 "7·20" 特大暴雨大坡小流域水土流失灾害调查与评价[D].山东泰山:山东农业大学,2023. Liu Peiyu. Investigation and evaluation of soil and water loss disaster in the"July 20"rainstorm in Zhengzhou[D]. Taishan, Shandong:Shandong Agricultural University, 2023.

林祚顶,刘宝元,丛佩娟,等.山东临朐2019年 "8·10" 特大暴雨水土保持调查[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(1):149-153. Lin Zuoding, Liu Baoyuan, Cong Peijuan, et al. Soil and water conservation survey after a heavy storm on 10th August, 2019 in Linqu, Shandong Province[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021,35(1):149-153.

盛菲,刘士余,陈子惟,等.场次暴雨条件下濂水流域水沙关系探究[J].农业工程学报,2023,39(3):68-75. Sheng Fei, Liu Shiyu, Chen Ziwei, et al. Exploration of the runoff-sediment relationship in Lianshui watershed in South Jiangxi of China under the condition of a single rainstorm[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2023,39(3):68-75.

蒋熙,何保善,李凯.暴雨的危害及其防御对策[J].现代农业科技,2017(14):231-235. Jiang Xi, He Baoshan, Li Kai. The harm of rainstorm and its defense countermeasures[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2017(14):231.

余萍,李建柱,刘阳.基于实测暴雨洪水资料的流域水土保持工程对洪水特征影响程度估算[J].干旱区资源与环境,2014,28(7):90-95. Yu Ping, Li Jianzhu, Liu Yang. Assessment of the effects of soil and water conservation engineering on flood characteristics[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2014,28(7):90-95.

魏兆珍.海河流域下垫面要素变化及其对洪水的影响研究[D].天津:天津大学,2015. Wei Zhaozhen. A study on changes of underlying surface elements and their effects on flood in Haihe River Basin[D]. Tianjin:Tianjin University,2015.

冯平,李建柱,徐仙.潘家口水库入库水资源变化趋势及影响因素[J].地理研究,2008,27(1):213-220. Feng Ping, Li Jianzhu, Xu Xian. Analysis of water resources trend and its causes of Panjiakou Reservoir[J]. Geographical Research, 2008,27(1):213-220.

韩瑞光,冯平.流域下垫面变化对洪水径流影响的研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2010,24(8):27-30. Han Ruiguang, Feng Ping. Effects of sublayer and land-cover change on flood in Daqinghe River Basin[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2010,24(8):27-30.

Li Jianzhu, Feng Ping. Runoff variations in the Luanhe River basin during 1956-2002[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2007,17(3):339-350.

乔殿新,柳庆斌,党恬敏,等.场次暴雨水土保持调查探索与思考[J].中国水土保持,2021(10):13-15. Qiao Dianxin, Liu Qingbin, Dang Tianmin, et al. Exploration and consideration on soil and water conservation survey of rainstorm event[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 2021(10):13-15.

临城县地方志编纂委员.临城县志[M].北京:团结出版社,1996. Local Chronicles Compilation Committee of Lincheng County. Records of Lincheng County[M]. Beijing:Tuanjie Publishing House,1996.

Yerokhin A L, Snizhko L O, Gurevina N L, et al. Discharge characterization in plasma electrolytic oxidation of aluminium[J]. Journal of Physics D:Applied Physics, 2003,36(17):2110-2111.

Cheng Nansheng, Nguyen H T. Hydraulic radius for evaluating resistance induced by simulated emergent vegetation in open-channel flows[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2011,137(9):995-1004.

Manning R. On the flow of water in open channels and pipes[J]. Institution of Civil Engineers of Lreland, 1889,20:161-207.

Pinder G F, Jones J F. Determination of the ground-water component of peak discharge from the chemistry of total runoff[J]. Water Resources Research, 1969,5(2):438-445.

曾杉.相同降雨过程下洪水对不同流域地形响应的概化试验研究[D].陕西西安:西安理工大学,2018. Zeng Shan. Generalized experimental study on response of flood to topography of different basins under the same rainfall process[D]. Xi'an, Shaanxi:Xi'an University of Technology, 2018.

盛菲.场次暴雨条件下降雨和植被变化对洪水影响的定量研究[D].江西南昌:江西农业大学,2022. Sheng Fei. Quantitative study on the impact of rainfall and vegetation change on flood under the condition of rainstorm[D]. Nanchang, Jiangxi:Jiangxi Agricultural University, 2022.

程文飞,陈军锋,张飞,等.不同水保措施对不同量级降雨量汇流的影响[J].人民黄河,2018,40(9):96-99. Cheng Wenfei, Chen Junfeng, Zhang Fei, et al. Study on influence of soil and water conservation measures on rainfall of different magnitude[J]. Yellow River, 2018,40(9):96-99.

魏义长,康玲玲,王云璋,等.水土保持措施对土壤物理性状的影响:以黄土高原水土保持世界银行贷款项目区为例[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(5):114-116. Wei Yichang, Kang Lingling, Wang Yunzhang, et al. Effect of soil and water conservation measures on soil physical behaviors:Taking world bank's loan project area of soil and water conservation on Loess Plateau as example[J]. Journal of Soil Water Conservation, 2003,17(5):114-116.

徐建华,金双彦,高亚军,等.水保措施对 "7·26" 暴雨洪水减水减沙的作用[J].人民黄河,2017,39(12):22-26. Xu Jianhua, Jin Shuangyan, Gao Yajun, et al. Analysis of the effect of water and soil conservation measures on storm water and sediment reduction of the flood on July 26,2017[J]. Yellow River, 2017,39(12):22-26.

冯家豪.基于复合指纹识别技术的皇甫川流域场次洪水泥沙来源研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2021. Feng Jiahao. Research on the source of sediment from multiple floods in Huangfuchuan basin based on composite fingerprint recognition technology[D]. Yangling, Shaanxi:Northwest A&F University, 2021.

Zhao Guangju, Yue Xiaoli, Tian Peng, et al. Comparison of the suspended sediment dynamics in two Loess Plateau catchments, China[J]. Land Degradation&Development, 2017,28(4):1398-1411.

张新和.黄土坡面片蚀-细沟侵蚀-切沟侵蚀演变与侵蚀产沙过程研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2007. Zhang Xinha. Study on the evolution of sheet erosion, rill erosion and trenching erosion and the process of sediment production on loess slope[D]. Shaanxi Yangling:Northwest A&F University, 2007.

黄晨璐.近40年黄土高原土壤侵蚀时空变化及其主控因子研究[D].陕西西安:西北大学,2021. Huang Chenlu. Spatiotemporal changes of soil erosion and its controlling factors in the Loess Plateau in recent 40 years[D]. Xi'an, Shaanxi:Northwest University, 2021.

陈强.人工模拟降雨条件下重庆市黄壤坡耕地降雨侵蚀研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2012. Chen Qiang. Study on rainfall erosion of cultivated land on yellow soil slope in Chongqing under simulated rainfall conditions[D]. Chongqing:Southwest University, 2012.

刘刚才,朱波,代华龙,等.四川低山丘陵区紫色土不同土地利用类型的水蚀特征[J].水土保持学报,2001,15(S):96-99. Liu Gangcai, Zhu Bo, Dai Hualong, et al. Study of water erosion features of purple soil under different land utilizati on in hilly and low mountain area of Sichuan[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2001,15(S2):96-99.

He Jijun, Cai Qiangguo, Wang Zhongke. Integrated control measures and environmental effects in small basins in rocky area of Northern China[J]. International Journal of Sediment Research, 2010,25(3):294-303.

肖继兵,孙占祥,刘志,等.降雨侵蚀因子和植被类型及覆盖度对坡耕地土壤侵蚀的影响[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(22):159-166. Xiao Jibing, Sun Zhanxiang, Liu Zhi, et al. Effects of rainfall erosion factor, vegetation type and coverage on soil erosion of sloping farmland[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2017,33(22):159-166.

浏览量

396

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

吉林省低山丘陵区侵蚀沟治理的碳汇作用

不同水保措施下红壤坡地泥沙及氮磷流失对雨型的响应

黄土高原向阳沟流域水土保持措施效益分析

基于栅格的分布式SCS产流模型研究

巨尾桉工业原料林地与不同土地利用类型坡面产流产沙特征对比分析