1. 西北农林科技大学 水土保持科学与工程学院, 陕西 杨凌,712100
2. 中国科学院 水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西 杨凌,712100
3. 中国电建集团 昆明勘测设计院有限公司,云南,昆明,650000
纸质出版:2024
移动端阅览
王子吟, 魏育超, 李镇, 等. 连续降雨条件下工程堆积体产流产沙对砾石含量的响应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2024,44(2):91-100.
Wang Ziyin, Wei Yuchao, Li Zhen, et al. Response of Runoff and Sediment Yield to Gravel Content in Engineered Deposit Slopes Under Continuous Rainfall Conditions[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2024, 44(2): 91-100.
王子吟, 魏育超, 李镇, 等. 连续降雨条件下工程堆积体产流产沙对砾石含量的响应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2024,44(2):91-100. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.02.010.
Wang Ziyin, Wei Yuchao, Li Zhen, et al. Response of Runoff and Sediment Yield to Gravel Content in Engineered Deposit Slopes Under Continuous Rainfall Conditions[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2024, 44(2): 91-100. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2024.02.010.
[目的
]
探究连续降雨条件下不同砾石含量对陕北沙壤土上方有来水工程堆积体坡面产流产沙的影响,为生产建设项目水土流失治理提供数据支撑和理论参考。 [方法
]
通过室内模拟降雨试验,研究不同砾石含量(0,10%,20%,30%,40%)工程堆积体坡面土壤水动力学特性及产流产沙特征。 [结果
]
①降雨强度相同,随砾石含量增加,工程堆积体坡面初始产流时间表现为递减趋势,减幅为27.22%~64.62%,35.09%~71.70%,47.37%~78.77%,51.75%~82.31%。次降雨径流率表现为“迅速增加—稳定波动”的变化趋势,平均径流率随砾石含量、降雨时间的增加显著增大;但产流峰值随砾石含量增加而降低,且出现时间逐渐提前。 ②试验各场次雷诺数的变化范围介于74.13~165.05,均小于500,水流属于层流;弗劳德数的变化范围集中在2.14~3.71,表现为急流。水流剪切力、水流功率和单位水流功率随降雨场次的增加而显著增加。 ③0%~40%砾石含量工程堆积体坡面侵蚀速率介于0.45~6.73,0.13~4.09,0.25~1.26,0.14~0.96,0.13~0.88 g/(m
2
·min),各砾石含量堆积体减沙幅度分别为36.06%,49.05%,55.23%和56.62%,其中高砾石含量(40%)的沙壤土工程堆积体坡面土壤侵蚀强度较小。 [结论
]
砾石覆盖在沙壤土工程堆积体坡面的水土流失过程中可显著降低土壤侵蚀速率,从而实现拦蓄水土,保持较高的减沙效益。
[Objective] The impact of different gravel contents on soil erosion of engineered deposit slopes were explored in the sandy soil region of Northern Shaanxi Province under continuous rainfall conditions in order to provide data support and theoretical references for soil erosion control in production and construction projects. [Methods] Indoor rainfall experiments were conducted to study the hydrodynamic
runoff
and sediment characteristics of engineered deposit slopes with varying gravel contents (0%
10%
20%
30%
40%). [Results] ① Under the same rainfall intensity
the initial runoff time on the engineered deposit slopes showed a decreasing trend with the increase of gravel content
with ranges of 27.22%—64.62%
35.09%—71.70%
47.37%—78.77%
and 51.75%—82.31%
respectively. The runoff coefficient during subsequent rainfall events exhibited a “rapid increase-stable fluctuation” trend
and the average runoff coefficient increased significantly with increasing gravel content and rainfall duration. However
the peak value of runoff decreased with increasing gravel content
and the occurrence time of the runoff peak was gradually advanced. ② The Reynolds index for all experiments ranged from 74.13 to 165.05
all of which were below 500
indicating that the flow type was laminar flow
while the Froude number ranged from 2.14 to 3.7l indicating rapid flow. The shear force
flow power
and unit flow power increased with increasing rainfall time. ③ The ranges of erosion modulus on the engineered deposit slopes were 0.45—6.73
0.13—4.09
0.25—1.26
0.14—0.96
and 0.13—0.88 g/(m2·min)
respectively. The sediment reductions for each gravel content were 36.06%
49.05%
55.23%
and 56.62%
respectively. The highest gravel content (40%) resulted in the lowest soil erosion intensity of the engineered deposit slopes in the sandy soil region. [Conclusion] Gravel coverage on engineered deposit slopes of sandy loam soil significantly reduces soil erosion rate
thereby achieving soil retention and maintaining high sediment reduction benefits.
赵暄,谢永生,景民晓,等.生产建设项目弃土堆置体下垫面仿真模拟标准化参数[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(5):229-234. Zhao Xuan, Xie Yongsheng, Jing Minxiao, et al. Standardization parameter for spoilbank underlying surface simulation development construction project[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2012,26(5):229-234.
张乐涛,高照良,田红卫.工程堆积体陡坡坡面土壤侵蚀水动力学过程[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(24):94-102. Zhang Letao, Gao Zhaoliang, Tian Hongwei. Hydrodynamic process of soil erosion in steep slope of engineering accumulation[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2013,29(24):94-102.
牛耀彬.降雨和上方来水条件下工程堆积体土壤侵蚀特征研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2019. Niu Yaobin. Study on characteristics of soil erosion of engineering accumulation under the conditions of rainfall and Inflow[D]. Yangling, Shaanxi:Northwest A&F University, 2019.
赵满,王文龙,郭明明,等.含砾石风沙土堆积体坡面径流产沙特征[J].土壤学报,2019,56(4):847-859. Zhao Man, Wang Wenlong, Guo Mingming, et al. Runoff and sediment yielding characteristics of slopes of stacks of gravels-containing aeolian sandy soil[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2019,56(4):847-859.
Ma Donghao, Shao Mingan. Simulating infiltration into stony soils with a dual-porosity model[J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 2008,59(5):950-959.
王葆,马俊明,程金花,等.华北土石山区砾石覆盖对土壤溅蚀的影响[J].中国水土保持科学,2015,13(5):93-98. Wang Bao, Ma Junming, Cheng Jinhua, et al. Effects of gravel coverage on splash erosion in the mountainous region of Northern China[J]. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2015,13(5):93-98.
Zhang Yinghu, Zhang Mingxiang, Niu Jianzhi, et al. Rock fragments and soil hydrological processes:significance and progress[J]. Catena, 2016,147:153-166.
Khetdan C, Chittamart N, Tawornpruek S, et al. Influence of rock fragments on hydraulic properties of Ultisols in Ratchaburi Province, Thailand[J]. Geoderma Regional, 2017,10:21-28.
Sekucia F, Dlapa P, Kollar J, et al. Land-use impact on porosity and water retention of soils rich in rock fragments[J]. Catena, 2020,195(1)104807.
Wu Xiaolong, Meng Zhongju, Dang Xiaohong, et al. Effects of rock fragments on the water infiltration and hydraulic conductivity in the soils of the desert steppes of Inner Mongolia, China[J]. Soil Water Research, 2021,16:151-163.
王永武,朱青,赖晓明,等.土壤水文过程对土壤砾石的响应:全球Meta分析[J].中国科学:地球科学,2023,53(9):2094-2109. Wang Yongwu, Zhu Qing, Lai Xiaoming, et al. Response of soil hydrological processes to soil rock fragments:A global meta-analysis[J]. Scientia Sinica (Terrae), 2023,53(9):2094-2109.
纪丽静,王文龙,康宏亮,等.黄土区土质与土石质塿土堆积体水力侵蚀过程差异[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(5):1587-1598. Ji Lijing, Wang Wenlong, Kang Hongliang, et al. Differences in hydraulic erosion processes of the earth and earth-rock lou soil engineering accumulation in the Loess Region[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020,31(5):1587-1598.
史倩华,王文龙,郭明明,等.模拟降雨条件下含砾石红壤工程堆积体产流产沙过程[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(9):2673-2680. Shi Qianhua, Wang Wenlong, Guo Mingming, et al. Runoff and sediment yielding processes on red soil engineering accumulation containing gravels by a simulated rainfall experiment[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015,26(9):2673-2680.
吕佼容,张文博,胡锦昇,等.连续降雨下不同砾石含量工程堆积体土壤侵蚀[J].水科学进展,2019,30(2):210-219. Lv Jiaorong, Zhang Wenbo, Hu Jinsheng, et al. Effects of rock fragment content on erosion characteristics of spoil heaps under multiple rainfall events[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2019,30(2):210-219.
Poesen J, De Luna E, Franca A, et al. Concentrated flow erosion rates as affected by rock fragment cover and initial soil moisture content[J]. Catena, 1999,36:315-329.
Lv Jiaorong, Luo Han, Xie Yongsheng. Effects of rock fragment content, size and cover on soil erosion dynamics of spoil heaps through multiple rainfall events[J]. Catena, 2019,172:179-189.
Lv, Jiaorong, Luo Han, Hu Jinsheng, et al. The effects of rock fragment content on the erosion processes of spoil heaps:A laboratory scouring experiment with two soils[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2019,19:2089-2102.
张恒,高照良,牛耀彬,等.两种工程堆积体坡面细沟形态与产沙关系对比研究[J].土壤学报,2021,58(1):115-127. Zhang Heng, Gao Zhaoliang, Niu Yaobin, et al. A comparative study on relationship between rill morphology and sediment yield on slopes of two types of engineering mounds[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2021,58(1):115-127.
沙小燕,王文龙,娄义宝,等.不同土体类型工程堆积体坡面径流侵蚀动力差异[J].自然灾害学报,2022,31(6):191-199. Sha Xiaoyan, Wang Wenlong, Lou Yibao, et al. The dynamic difference of runoff erosion on slope surface of different soil engineering accumulation bodies[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2022,31(6):191-199.
丁文斌,李叶鑫,史东梅,等.两种工程堆积体边坡模拟径流侵蚀对比研究[J].土壤学报,2017,54(3):558-569. Ding Wenbin, Li Yexin, Shi Dongmei, et al. Contrast study on simulated runoff erosion of two engineering accumulation slopes[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2017,54(3):558-569.
王万忠,焦菊英,郝小品.黄土高原侵蚀产沙强度、面积、数量间相互关系的统计分析[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1998,4(1):54-60. Wang Wanzhong, Jiao Juying, Hao Xiaopin. Statistical analysis on inter-relationship among erosion sediment intensity, area and amount in Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1998,4(1):54-60.
王林华,汪亚峰,王健,等.地表粗糙度对黄土坡面产流机制的影响[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(5):120-128. Wang Linhua, Wang Yafeng, Wang Jian, et al. Effects of soil surface roughness on runoff generation mechanism on loess slope[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2018,34(5):120-128.
毛天旭,朱元骏,邵明安,等.模拟降雨条件下含砾石土壤的坡面产流和入渗特征[J].土壤通报,2011,42(5):1214-1218. Mao Tianxu, Zhu Yuanjun, Shao Mingan, et al. Characteristics of runoff and infiltration in stony soils under simulated rainfall conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2011,42(5):1214-1218.
梁洪儒,余新晓,樊登星,等.砾石覆盖对坡面产流产沙的影响[J].水土保持学报,2014,28(3):57-61. Liang Hongru, Yu Xinxiao, Fan Dengxing, et al. Effect of gravel-sand muchling on slope runoff and sediment yield[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2014,28(3):57-61.
Lai Xiaoming, Liu Ya, Li Liuyang, et al. Spatial variation of global surface soil rock fragment content and its roles on hydrological and ecological patterns[J]. Catena, 2022,208:105752.
肖培青,郑粉莉,姚文艺.坡沟系统坡面径流流态及水力学参数特征研究[J].水科学进展,2009,20(2):236-240. Xiao Peiqing, Zheng Fenli, Yao Wenyi. Flow pattern and hydraulic parameter characteristics in hillslope-gullyslope system[J]. Advances in Water Science, 2009,20(2):236-240.
周凡凡.坡面降雨径流侵蚀输沙的不平衡特性研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2021. Zhou Fanfan. Study on unbalance characteristics of sediment transport by rainfall runoff erosion on slope[D]. Yangling, Shaanxi:Northwest A&F University, 2021.
李瑞栋,王文龙,娄义宝,等.模拟降雨条件下砾石含量对塿土工程堆积体坡面产流产沙的影响[J].应用生态学报,2022,33(11):3027-3036. Li Ruidong, Wang Wenlong, Lou Yibao, et al. Effects of gravel content on runoff and sediment yield on Lou soil engineering accumulation slopes under simulated rainfall conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022,33(11):3027-3036.
0
浏览量
492
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621