云南省生态环境质量与生态修复区识别

杨雪; 李益敏; 赵娟珍; 蒋文学; 李媛婷

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20231024.002

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

云南省生态环境质量与生态修复区识别

试验研究

- 云南省生态环境质量与生态修复区识别
- Ecological Environmental Quality and Identification of Ecological Restoration Areas in Yunnan Province
- 水土保持通报 2024年44卷第2期页码：277-290
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 云南大学地球科学学院,云南,昆明,650500
  2. 云南省高校国产高分卫星遥感地质工程研究中心,云南,昆明,650500
  3. 云南大学国际河流与生态安全研究院,云南,昆明,650500
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  云南省科技厅—云南大学联合基金重点项目“天空地协同的高山峡谷区重大地质灾害隐患识别监测预警研究”(2019FY003017);国家自然科学基金项目(41161070);云南省中老孟缅自然资源遥感监测国际联合实验室项目(202303AP140015);云南大学大湄公河次区域气候变化研究省创新团队(2019HC027)
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20231024.002
  中图分类号： X87;X171.1
- 纸质出版：2024
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
杨雪, 李益敏, 赵娟珍, 等. 云南省生态环境质量与生态修复区识别[J]. 水土保持通报, 2024,44(2):277-290.

Yang Xue, Li Yimin, ZhaoJuanzhen, et al. Ecological Environmental Quality and Identification of Ecological Restoration Areas in Yunnan Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2024, 44(2): 277-290.
杨雪, 李益敏, 赵娟珍, 等. 云南省生态环境质量与生态修复区识别[J]. 水土保持通报, 2024,44(2):277-290. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20231024.002.

Yang Xue, Li Yimin, ZhaoJuanzhen, et al. Ecological Environmental Quality and Identification of Ecological Restoration Areas in Yunnan Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2024, 44(2): 277-290. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20231024.002.

摘要

[目的

]

分析云南省生态环境时空变化，识别生态修复优先序，为该省低碳的可持续发展提供科学依据。 [方法

]

基于遥感生态指数(RSEI)研究生态环境质量时空变化及空间相关性，与区域生态系统碳储量及生态保护红线结合识别云南省生态修复优先序。 [结果

]

①22 a间云南省RSEI均值呈S形变化趋势，分别以2005年和2011年作为上升和下降的拐点。 ②2000—2022年空间上生态环境质量均表现为“西高东低”的态势，西部地区生态环境质量较好，而中部城市群及东部喀斯特地区生态环境质量较差。 ③2000—2005年受退耕还林政策的影响生态环境质量变好。2005—2011年则因旱灾和建设用地的剧烈扩张导致生态环境质量大幅下降。2011—2016年是旱灾后恢复时段，除中部城市化快速发展地区外，其他地区生态环境质量在逐渐恢复。2016—2022年受国家政策的影响，生态环境质量进一步变好。 ④云南省生态环境质量在空间上表现出明显的空间全局与局部自相关。 ⑤2000—2022年云南省碳储量呈先增加后减少的趋势，22 a间总碳储量减少2.38×10

t，在空间上总体表现为“南北高，中间低”的地带性分布特征。 ⑥云南省生态修复极优先区主要分布在北部及东部地区，约占总面积的18.08%，生态修复优先区及中等优先区则分布较为广泛，约占总面积的70.17%。生态修复一般优先区主要位于普洱市等地，约占总面积的11.76%。 [结论

]

云南省2000—2022年生态环境质量在时空上均呈现一定规律，在此基础上进行生态修复区划分，因地制宜地治理生态环境，推进云南省生态及低碳的可持续发展。

Abstract

[Objective] The temporal and spatial changes of ecological environment quality in Yunnan Province were analyzed

and ecological restoration priorities were identified to provide scientific basis for the low-carbon sustainable development of the province. [Methods] The spatio-temporal change and spatial correlation of eco-environmental quality in Yunnan Province were determined based on remote sensing environmental indicators (RSEI)

and the priority of ecological restoration in Yunnan Province was identified by combining these results with regional ecosystem carbon reserves and an ecological protection red line. [Results] ① The average value of RSEI in Yunnan Province showed an S-shaped trend over the past 22 years

with 2005 and 2011 being the inflection points of increasing and decreasing RSEI

respectively. ② From 2000 to 2022

the spatial eco-environmental quality was characterized as “high in the west and low in the east”. The ecological environmental quality in the western region was good

while the ecological environmental quality in the central urban agglomeration and the eastern karst region was poor. ③ From 2000 to 2005

the ecological environmental quality became better under the influence of the policy of returning farmland to forests. From 2005 to 2011

the ecological environmental quality decreased significantly due to drought and the drastic expansion of construction land. 2011—2016 was a period of recovery after drought. Except for the areas with rapid urbanization in Central China

the ecological environmental quality in other areas gradually recovered. Due to the influence of national policies from 2016 to 2022

the ecological environmental quality was further improved. ④ The ecological environmental quality of Yunnan Province showed obvious spatial global and local autocorrelation; ⑤ The carbon reserves of Yunnan Province initially increased and then decreased from 2000 to 2022

and the total carbon reserves decreased by 2.38×107 t in 22 years. Carbon reserves showed a zonal distribution characterized as “high in the north and south

and low in the central region”. ⑥ The high priority areas for ecological restoration in Yunnan Province were mainly located in the north and east

accounting for about 18.08% of the total area

while the priority and the medium priority areas for ecological restoration were more widely distributed

accounting for about 70.17% of the total area. The general priority areas for ecological restoration were mainly located in Pu’er City and other places

accounting for about 11.76% of the total area. [Conclusion] The ecological environmental quality of Yunnan Province exhibited distinct patterns in time and space from 2000 to 2022. Based on these results

the ecological restoration area should be divided

and the ecological environment should be controlled according to local conditions in order to promote ecological and sustainable low-carbon development in Yunnan Province.

关键词

Keywords

references

Li Yurui, Cao Zhi, Long Hualou, et al. Dynamic analysis of ecological environment combined with land cover and NDVI changes and implications for sustainable urban-rural development:The case of Mu Us sandy land, China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017,142:697-715.

徐勇,郑志威,郭振东,等.2000-2020年长江流域植被NDVI动态变化及影响因素探测[J].环境科学,2022,43(7):3730-3740. Xu Yong, Zheng Zhiwei, Guo Zhendong, et al. Dynamic variation in vegetation cover and its influencing factor detection in the Yangtze River Basin from 2000 to 2020[J]. Environmental Science, 2022,43(7):3730-3740.

张国兴,王涵.基于PSR模型的黄河流域中心城市水生态文明建设评价[J].生态经济,2022,38(2):211-216,222. Zhang Guoxing, Wang Han. Evaluation of water ecological civilization construction in central cities of the Yellow River Basin based on PSR model[J]. Ecological Economy, 2022,38(2):211-216.

Wang Di, Li Yuman, Yang Xiaodi, et al. Evaluating urban ecological civilization and its obstacle factors based on integrated model of PSR-EVW-TOPSIS:A case study of 13 cities in Jiangsu Province, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021,133:108431.

欧阳玲,马会瑶,王宗明,等.基于遥感与地理信息数据的科尔沁沙地生态环境状况动态评价[J].生态学报,2022,42(14):5906-5921. Ouyang Ling, Ma Huiyao, Wang Zongming, et al. Dynamic evaluation of ecological environment in Horqin sandy land based on remote sensing and geographic information data[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022,42(14):5906-5921.

徐涵秋.城市遥感生态指数的创建及其应用[J].生态学报,2013,33(24):7853-7862. Xu Hanqiu. A remote sensing urban ecological index and its application[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013,33(24):7853-7862.

章程焱,杨少康,董晓华,等.基于RSEI指数的长江上游流域生态环境质量时空演变及影响因子研究[J].水土保持研究,2023,30(1):356-363. Zhang Chengyan, Yang Shaokang, Dong Xiaohua, et al. Research on spatiotemporal evolution and influencing factors of ecological environment quality in the Upper Yangtze River Basin based on RSEI index[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023,30(1):356-363.

何天星,田宁,周锐,等.基于GEE和RSEI的长三角一体化示范区生态环境质量动态评估[J].生态学杂志,2023,42(2):436-444. He Tianxing, Tian Ning, Zhou Rui, et al. Dynamic assessment of eco-environmental quality in Yangtze River delta integration demonstration area based on GEE and RSEI[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2023,42(2):436-444.

吴小波,范晓雨,刘晓敬,等.基于Google Earth Engine云平台的成渝城市群生态环境质量时空变化[J].生态学杂志,2023,42(3):759-768. Wu Xiaobo, Fan Xiaoyu, Liu Xiaojing, et al. Temporal and spatial variations of ecological quality of Chengdu-Chongqing Urban Agglomeration based on Google Earth Engine cloud platform[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology,2023,42(3):759-768.

袁媛,白中科,师学义,等.基于生态安全格局的国土空间生态保护修复优先区确定:以河北省遵化市为例[J].生态学杂志,2022,41(4):750-759. Yuan Yuan, Bai Zhongke, Shi Xueyi, et al. Determining priority areas for ecosystem preservation and restoration of territory based on ecological security pattern:A case study in Zunhua City, Hebei Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2022,41(4):750-759.

封志雪,周键,杨飞龄,等.集成生态系统服务与生物多样性的系统保护规划[J].生态学报,2023,43(2):522-533. Feng Zhixue, Zhou Jian, Yang Feiling, et al. Systematic conservation planning by integrating ecosystem services and biodiversity[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023,43(2):522-533.

孙传谆,王梓辰,李景刚,等.基于生态系统多维特征的粤港澳大湾区国土空间生态保护修复分区研究[J].生态学报,2023,43(5):2061-2073. Sun Chuanzhun, Wang Zichen, Li Jinggang, et al. Ecological protection and restoration zoning of territorial space in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area based on multidimensional ecosystem features[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023,43(5):2061-2073.

屠越,刘敏,高婵婵,等.大都市区生态源地识别体系构建及国土空间生态修复关键区诊断[J].生态学报,2022,42(17):7056-7067. Tu Yue, Liu Min, Gao Chanchan, et al. Construction of ecological sources identification system for metropolitan areas and diagnosis of key areas for ecological restoration in nationally spatial areas[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022,42(17):7056-7067.

Wang Chaoyue, Li Tingzhen, Guo Xianhua, et al. Plus-InVEST study of the Chengdu-Chongqing urban agglomeration's land-use change and carbon storage[J]. Land, 2022,11(10):1617.

刘洋,张军,周冬梅,等.基于InVEST模型的疏勒河流域碳储量时空变化研究[J].生态学报,2021,41(10):4052-4065. Liu Yang, Zhang Jun, Zhou Dongmei, et al. Temporal and spatial variation of carbon storage in the Shule River Basin based on InVEST model[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021,41(10):4052-4065.

吕金平,李茜茜.建设人与自然和谐共生的美丽云南[N].人民政协报,2022-06-06(1). Lu Jinping, Li Xiqian. To build a beautiful Yunnan with harmonious symbiosis between man and nature[N]. CPPCC Daily, 2022-06-06(1).

徐涵秋,邓文慧. MRSEI指数的合理性分析及其与RSEI指数的区别[J].遥感技术与应用,2022,37(1):1-7. Xu Hanqiu, Deng Wenhui. The rationality analysis of MRSEI index and its difference with RSEI index[J]. Remote Sensing Technology and Application, 2022, 37(1):1-7.

孙兴齐.基于InVEST模型的香格里拉市生态系统服务功能评估[D].云南昆明:云南师范大学,2017. Sun Xingqi. Evaluation of ecosystem service function in Shangri-La based on InVEST model[D]. Kunming, Yunnan:Yunnan Normal University, 2017.

李俊,杨德宏,吴锋振,等.基于PLUS与InVEST模型的昆明市土地利用变化动态模拟与碳储量评估[J].水土保持通报,2023,43(1):378-387. Li Jun, Yang Dehong, Wu Fengzhen, et al. Dynamic simulation of land use changes and assessment of carbon storage in Kunming city based on PLUS and InVEST models[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2023,43(1):378-387.

Alam S A, Starr M, Clark B J F. Tree biomass and soil organic carbon densities across the Sudanese woodland savannah:A regional carbon sequestration study[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2013,89:67-76.

Giardina C P, Ryan M G. Evidence that decomposition rates of organic carbon in mineral soil do not vary with temperature[J]. Nature, 2000,404(6780):858-861.

胡思汉,姚玉增,付建飞,等.基于RSEI指数的东北矿区生态质量变化评价:以辽宁弓长岭区为例[J].生态学杂志,2021,40(12):4053-4060. Hu Sihan, Yao Yuzeng, Fu Jianfei, et al. Evaluation of ecological quality variation in mining area of Northeast China based on RSEI Index:A case study of Gongchangling District, Liaoning Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2021,40(12):4053-4060.

Chen Chao, Fu Jiaoqi, Zhang Shuai, et al. Coastline information extraction based on the tasseled cap transformation of Landsat-8 OLI images[J]. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 2019,217:281-291.

刘栩位,周启刚,周浪,等.基于RSEI的三峡库区重庆段水土保持生态功能区生态环境质量动态监测[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(5):278-286. Liu Xuwei, Zhou Qigang, Zhou Lang, et al. RSEI-based dynamic monitoring of ecological quality of the soil and water conservation functional area in the Chongqing section of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021,28(5):278-286.

陈勉为,冯丹,张仕凯,等.基于RSEI和ANN-CA-Markov模型的伊宁市生态环境质量动态监测及预测研究[J].干旱区地理,2023,46(6):911-921. Chen Mianwei, Feng Dan, Zhang Shikai, et al. Dynamic monitoring and prediction of eco-environmental quality in Yining City based on RSEI and ANN-CA-Markov model[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2023,46(6):911-921.

An Min, Xie Ping, He Weijun, et al. Spatiotemporal change of ecologic environment quality and human interaction factors in Three Gorges ecologic economic corridor, based on RSEI[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2022,141:109090.

Xiong Yuan, Xu Weiheng, Lu Ning, et al. Assessment of spatial-temporal changes of ecological environment quality based on RSEI and GEE:A case study in Erhai Lake Basin, Yunnan Province, China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021,125:107518.

马振刚,李黎黎,杨润田,等.京张区域生态系统健康评价与应对策略[J].干旱区研究,2019,36(1):228-236. Ma Zhengang, Li Lili, Yang Runtian, et al. Assessment and countermeasures of ecosystem health in the Beijing-Zhangjiakou Area[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2019,36(1):228-236.

Liao Weihua, Jiang Weiguo. Evaluation of the spatiotemporal variations in the eco-environmental quality in China based on the remote sensing ecological index[J]. Remote Sensing, 2020,12(15):2462.

林彤,杨木壮,吴大放,等.基于InVEST-PLUS模型的碳储量空间关联性及预测:以广东省为例[J].中国环境科学,2022,42(10):4827-4839. Lin Tong, Yang Muzhuang, Wu Dafang, et al. Spatial correlation and prediction of land use carbon storage based on the InVEST-PLUS model-a case study in Guangdong Province[J]. China Environmental Science, 2022,42(10):4827-4839.

朱文博,张静静,崔耀平,等.基于土地利用变化情景的生态系统碳储量评估:以太行山淇河流域为例[J].地理学报,2019,74(3):446-459. Zhu Wenbo, Zhang Jingjing, Cui Yaoping, et al. Assessment of territorial ecosystem carbon storage based on land use change scenario:A case study in Qihe River Basin[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019,74(3):446-459.

王天福,龚直文,邓元杰.基于土地利用变化的陕西省植被碳汇提质增效优先区识别[J].自然资源学报,2022,37(5):1214-1232. Wang Tianfu, Gong Zhiwen, Deng Yuanjie.Identification of priority areas for improving quality and efficiency of vegetation carbon sinks in Shaanxi Province based on land use change[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2022,37(5):1214-1232.

徐涵秋.水土流失区生态变化的遥感评估[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(7):91-97,294. Xu Hanqiu. Assessment of ecological change in soil loss area using remote sensing technology[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2013,29(7):91-97.

岳奕帆,陈国鹏,王立,等.基于Google Earth Engine云平台的甘肃舟曲县生态环境质量动态监测与评价[J].应用生态学报,2022,33(6):1608-1614. Yue Yifan, Chen Guopeng, Wang Li, et al. Dynamic monitoring and evaluation of ecological environment quality in Zhouqu County, Gansu, China based on Google Earth Engine cloud platform[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022,33(6):1608-1614.

吴树荣,潘换换,姬倩倩,等.基于生态系统服务的山西黄河流域保护优先区识别[J].生态学报,2022,42(20):8126-8137. Wu Shurong, Pan Huanhuan, Ji Qianqian, et al. Identification of priority conservation areas in the Yellow River Basin of Shanxi Province based on ecosystem services[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022,42(20):8126-8137.

农兰萍,王金亮,玉院和.基于改进型遥感生态指数(MRSEI)模型的滇中地区生态环境质量研究[J].生态与农村环境学报,2021,37(8):972-982. Nong Lanping, Wang Jinliang, Yu Yuanhe. Research on ecological environment quality in central Yunnan based on MRSEI model[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2021,37(8):972-982.

施馨雨,赵筱青,普军伟,等.基于斑块尺度的云南省景观生态安全时空演变及归因[J].生态学报,2021,41(20):8087-8098. Shi Xinyu, Zhao Xiaoqing, Pu Junwei, et al. Spatio-temporal evolution and attribution of Landscape Ecological Security at patch scale in Yunnan Province[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2021,41(20):8087-8098.

覃彬桂,林伊琳,赵俊三,等.基于InVEST模型和电路理论的昆明市国土空间生态修复关键区域识别[J].中国环境科学,2023,43(2):809-820. Qin Bingui, Lin Yilin, Zhao Junsan, et al. Identification of key areas for the ecological restoration of territorial space in Kunming based on the InVEST model and circuit theory[J]. China Environmental Science, 2023,43(2):809-820.

陈相标,丁文荣.基于生态安全格局的国土空间生态修复关键区域识别:以滇中五大高原湖泊流域为例[J].环境工程技术学报,2023,13(6):2248-2260. Chen Xiangbiao, Ding Wenrong. Identification of key areas for ecological restoration of territorial space based on ecological security pattern:A case of five plateau lake basins in central Yunnan[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2023,13(6):2248-2260.

浏览量

393

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

不同利用类型土地改为耕地后土壤养分的变化

毛乌素沙地生态环境质量时空演变及驱动因素

数量—质量—生态“三位一体”视角下云南省耕地利用格局变化分析与风险评估

太阳活动与ENSO事件对云南省旱涝灾害的影响

云南省城市化与水资源的耦合协调发展研究