1. 三峡大学 生物与制药学院,湖北,宜昌,443002
2. 水泥基生态修复技术湖北省工程研究中心,湖北,宜昌,443002
3. 三峡大学 水利与环境学院,湖北,宜昌,443002
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
马佳鑫, 夏栋, 刘芳, 等. 向家坝水电站生态修复边坡土壤团聚体及有机碳含量特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(5):404-410.
Ma Jiaxin, Xia Dong, Liu Fang, et al. Characteristics of Soil Aggregates and Organic Carbon Content for Ecological Restoration Slopes at Xiangjiaba Hydropower Station[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(5): 404-410.
马佳鑫, 夏栋, 刘芳, 等. 向家坝水电站生态修复边坡土壤团聚体及有机碳含量特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(5):404-410. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20230831.001.
Ma Jiaxin, Xia Dong, Liu Fang, et al. Characteristics of Soil Aggregates and Organic Carbon Content for Ecological Restoration Slopes at Xiangjiaba Hydropower Station[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(5): 404-410. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20230831.001.
[目的
]
分析生态工程修复技术对土壤团聚体稳定性及有机碳分布的影响,为向家坝水电站不同生态修复边坡土壤结构稳定及碳汇功能的提升提供科学依据。[方法
]
以向家坝水电站4种不同生态修复边坡:植被混凝土(CBS)、厚层基材喷播(TB)、框格梁覆土(FB)、客土喷播(SS)表层土壤为研究对象,并以天然林(NF)和弃渣地(AS)两种自然恢复边坡为对照,采用湿筛法研究土壤团聚体分布和稳定性及其有机碳含量特征。[结果
]
①各边坡土壤均以>0.25 mm的大团聚体粒径为主;其中天然林大团聚体含量最高,为81.83%;植被混凝土和厚层基材边坡次之,弃渣地含量最低,仅占55.19%。4个人工生态修复边坡的MWD和GMD均低于天然林高于弃渣地,其中厚层基材边坡的值最高,分别为2.96 mm和1.47 mm。客土喷播和弃渣地的分形维数(D)显著高于(p<0.05)其余4个边坡。②各生态修复边坡措施均以>0.25 mm粒径的大团聚体有机碳含量最高;除客土喷播和弃渣地外,其他修复措施和天然林均以>2 mm粒级土壤团聚体贡献率最大。③相关性分析表明土壤SOC与MWD,GMD和R
0.25
呈极显著正相关(p<0.01),>5 mm和5~2 mm粒级团聚体数量与土壤MWD,GMD,R
0.25
和土壤SOC均呈极显著正相关(p<0.01),与D呈极显著负相关(p<0.01)。[结论
]
向家坝水电站研究区内厚层基材喷播技术和植被混凝土生态修复技术对土壤结构和有机碳库的改善效果比较接近天然林,客土喷播技术改善效果较差。
[Objective] The effects of ecological engineering restoration technology on soil aggregate stability and organic carbon distribution were analyzed in order to provide a scientific basis for improving soil structure stability and carbon sink function of different ecological restoration slopes at Xiangjiaba Hydropower Station. [Methods] Four different ecological restoration slopes at Xiangjiaba Hydropower Station were studied: vegetation concrete (CBS)
thick base material spraying (TB)
frame beam covering soil (FB)
and external soil spraying (SS). The distribution and stability of soil aggregates and the characteristics of organic carbon content were determined by the wet sieve method for two natural restoration slopes: natural forest (NF) and abandoned land (AS
used as the control). [Results] ① The soil for each slope was dominated by large aggregates >0.25 mm. The macroaggregate content in natural forest was the highest (81.83%). The vegetation concrete and thick base material slope had the second highest macroaggregate contents
and the macroaggregate content of waste residue land was the lowest (55.19%). The MWD and GMD values of the four artificial ecological restoration slopes were lower than the values of the natural forest
and higher than the values of the waste residue land. The values of the thick substrate slope were the highest (2.96 mm and 1.47 mm)
respectively. The fractal dimension (D) of the soil spray seeding and slag field was significantly higher (p<0.05) than observed for the other four slopes. ② The organic carbon contents of macro aggregates with particle size >0.25 mm were the highest in all ecological restoration slope measures. In addition to soil spray seeding and waste residue land
other restoration measures and natural forests had the largest contribution rate of >2 mm soil aggregates. ③ Correlation analysis showed that SOC was significantly positively correlated with MWD
GMD
and R0.25 (p<0.01). Aggregates of size >5 mm and 5—2 mm were significantly positively correlated with soil MWD
GMD
R0.25
and SOC (p<0.01)
and significantly negatively correlated with D (p<0.01). [Conclusion] In the study area of Xiangjiaba Hydropower Station
thick substrate spraying technology and vegetation concrete ecological restoration technology improved soil structure and organic carbon pool similarly to natural forest. The improvement effect of external soil spraying technology was poor.
李桂媛,陈静,段中元,等.水电建设区的生态环境监测与评价: 以向家坝水电站为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2013,22(12):1573-1580.
Raiesi F. A minimum data set and soil quality index to quantify the effect of land use conversion on soil quality and degradation in native rangelands of upland arid and semiarid regions [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2017,75:307-320.
Hartley W, Riby P, Waterson J. Effects of three different biochars on aggregate stability, organic carbon mobility and micronutrient bioavailability [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2016,181:770-778.
Li Junya, Yuan Xiaoliang, Ge Le, et al. Rhizosphere effects promote soil aggregate stability and associated organic carbon sequestration in rocky areas of desertification [J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2020,304:107126.
Six J, Paustian K. Aggregate-associated soil organic matter as an ecosystem property and a measurement tool [J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2014,68:A4-A9.
徐慧,吕庆,杨雨荷,等.边坡植被重建效果评价: 研究进展与展望[J].生态学杂志,2022,41(3):589-596.
何园球,沈其荣,王兴祥.红壤丘岗区人工林恢复过程中的土壤养分状况[J].土壤,2003,35(3):222-226.
Qiao Leilei, Li Yuanze, Song Yahui, et al. Effects of vegetation restoration on the distribution of nutrients, glomalin-related soil protein, and enzyme activity in soil aggregates on the Loess Plateau, China [J]. Forests, 2019,10(9):796.
Gu Xiang, Fang Xi, Xiang Wenhua, et al. Vegetation restoration stimulates soil carbon sequestration and stabilization in a subtropical area of Southern China [J]. Catena, 2019,181:104098.
Huang Yanzhang, Xin Zhongbao, Ran L, et al. Topsoil carbon sequestration of vegetation restoration on the Loess Plateau [J]. Ecological Engineering, 2022,177:106570.
孙涛,刘艺杉,孙崇玉,等.石灰岩山地植被恢复对土壤水稳性团聚体的影响[J].草业科学,2018,35(6):1361-1367.
张钦弟,刘剑荣,杨磊,等.半干旱黄土区植被恢复对土壤团聚体稳定性及抗侵蚀能力的影响[J].生态学报,2022,42(22):9057-9068.
Zhong Zekun, Wu Shaojun, Lu Xuqiao, et al. Organic carbon, nitrogen accumulation, and soil aggregate dynamics as affected by vegetation restoration patterns in the Loess Plateau of China [J]. Catena, 2021,196:104867.
陈月明,裴隆翠,崔钢,等.不同水土保持植被对典型黑土微团聚体稳定性的影响[J].东北林业大学学报,2019,47(6):26-30.
中国科学院南京土壤研究所土壤物理研究室.土壤物理性质测定法[M].北京:科学出版社,1978.
鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000.
季波,时龙,徐金鹏,等.宁夏典型天然草地土壤团聚体稳定性及其有机碳分布特征[J].生态学报,2021,41(19):7669-7678.
王冰,张鹏杰,张秋良.不同林型兴安落叶松林土壤团聚体及其有机碳特征[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2021,45(3):15-24.
赵晶,刘美英,郝孟婕,等.植被恢复对干旱区生态光伏电站土壤团聚体组成及有机碳的影响[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(5):137-143.
王心怡,周聪,冯文瀚,等.不同林龄杉木人工林土壤团聚体及其有机碳变化特征[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(5):126-131.
Zeng Quanchao, Darboux F, Man Cheng, et al. Soil aggregate stability under different rain conditions for three vegetation types on the Loess Plateau (China) [J]. Catena, 2018,167:276-283.
刘梦云,吴健利,刘丽雯,等.黄土台塬土地利用方式对土壤水稳性团聚体稳定性影响[J].自然资源学报,2016,31(9):1564-1576.
张艳,刘彦伶,李渝,等.喀斯特石漠化地区土地利用方式对土壤团聚体稳定性及其有机碳分布特征的影响[J].土壤通报,2021,52(6):1308-1315.
李文龙,刘美英,李雪,等.植被恢复对采煤沉陷区土壤团聚体稳定性的影响[J].煤炭科学技术,2022,50(11):222-229.
周明涛,许文年,夏栋.向家坝水电站工程扰动区不同类型边坡土壤酸碱度与肥力分析[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(4):1031-1037.
杜祥运,许文年,夏振尧.向家坝工程扰动边坡微生物群落功能多样性分析[J].人民长江,2016,47(21):20-24.
徐红伟,吴阳,乔磊磊,等.不同植被带生态恢复过程土壤团聚体及其稳定性: 以黄土高原为例[J].中国环境科学,2018,38(6):2223-2232.
田云国.旅游干扰对太原万柏林生态园土壤团聚体稳定性及有机碳分布的影响[J].土壤通报,2021,52(6):1316-1322.
陈海,朱大运,陈浒.石漠化地区土地利用方式对土壤团聚体稳定性及有机碳的影响[J].中国岩溶,2021,40(2):346-354.
程曼,朱秋莲,刘雷,等.宁南山区植被恢复对土壤团聚体水稳定及有机碳粒径分布的影响[J].生态学报,2013,33(9):2835-2844.
安韶山,张玄,张扬,等.黄土丘陵区植被恢复中不同粒级土壤团聚体有机碳分布特征[J].水土保持学报,2007,21(6):109-113.
潘蕊蕊,李小雁,胡广荣,等.青海湖流域季节性冻土区坡面土壤有机碳分布特征及其影响因素[J].生态学报,2020,40(18):6374-6384.
周军,陈舰,郝国鹏.银合欢用于白鹤滩水电站渣场边坡绿化的研究[J].水电与新能源,2021,35(2):46-49.
唐亚,谢瑶,乔雪.新银合欢在四川盆地高速公路边坡防护中的应用[J].中国水土保持,2022(6):23-25.
0
浏览量
704
下载量
4
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621