1. 中国科学院大学,北京,101408
2. 中国科学院 水利部 水土保持研究所, 陕西 杨凌,712100
3. 黄河水文水资源科学研究院,河南,郑州,45000
4. 西北农林科技大学 水土保持研究所, 陕西 杨凌,712100
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
姚怡航, 张展, 李永红, 等. 基于无人机贴近摄影测量的坡面细沟侵蚀及形态演化研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(6):142-147.
Yao Yihang, Zhang Zhan, Li Yonghong, et al. Slope Rill Erosion and Morphological Evolution Based on UAV Nap-of-the-object Photogrammetry[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(6): 142-147.
姚怡航, 张展, 李永红, 等. 基于无人机贴近摄影测量的坡面细沟侵蚀及形态演化研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(6):142-147. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20230614.001.
Yao Yihang, Zhang Zhan, Li Yonghong, et al. Slope Rill Erosion and Morphological Evolution Based on UAV Nap-of-the-object Photogrammetry[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(6): 142-147. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20230614.001.
[目的
]
寻求效率和精度均高且适应性强的坡面细沟侵蚀测量技术手段,克服传统测量方法效率低,成本高,适用性差等问题,为坡面细沟侵蚀演变过程及定量化研究提供新的思路和技术手段。[方法
]
利用无人机通过贴近摄影测量获取连续6场人工模拟降雨下坡面细沟发育的高分辨率影像及模型,经定位精度、模型精度和侵蚀模拟3个方面验证,定量揭示坡面细沟侵蚀及形态演化过程的可行性。[结果
]
①三维实景模型地理配准均方根误差RMSE
3D
=1.5 cm,像控点平面误差RMSE
H
=0.42 cm,高程误差RMSE
V
=0.88 cm,模型细节及纹理清晰,分辨率达到毫米级。②多期模型能够清晰刻画细沟发育经历的雨滴溅蚀—片蚀—小跌水—断续细沟—连续细沟5个阶段。坡面细沟平均沟宽、沟深、密度分别从最初的1.25 cm,0.82 cm,0.05发展到最终的3.27 cm,4.75 cm,0.23,最大沟长236 cm,最大沟深14.23 cm。③细沟土壤侵蚀量模拟值随着降雨历时的增加不断接近真实值并趋于稳定,平均误差在10%以内。[结论
]
无人机贴近摄影测量技术能较好地反映细沟发育演化过程,作业效率及便利性较传统测量方法具有显著优势。
[Objective] This study was conducted to determine a rill erosion technology having high efficiency
high accuracy and strong adaptability
and overcome deficiencies associated with traditional measurement methods (low efficiency
high cost
poor applicability
etc.) in order to provide new ideas and technical means for the evolution of slope rill erosion and quantitative research. [Methods] UAV technology was used to acquire high-resolution images and models of rill development on slopes under six consecutive simulated rainfall events by use of nap-of-the-object photogrammetry. The feasibility of slope rill erosion and morphological evolution was quantitatively evaluated by positioning accuracy
model accuracy
and erosion simulation. [Results] ① The root mean square error (RMSE) of geographic registration of the 3D real scene model was 1.5 cm. The image control point plane RMSE was 0.42 cm. The elevation RMSE was 0.88 cm. The model details and texture were clear
with millimeter-level resolution. ② The multi-phase model clearly described five stages of rill development:raindrop splash erosion
sheet erosion
small waterdrop erosion
intermittent rill erosion
and continuous rill erosion. The average width
depth
and density of rills on the slope surface developed from the initial values of 1.25 cm
0.82 cm
and 0.05 to the final values of 3.27 cm
4.75 cm and 0.23
respectively. The maximum trench length was 236 cm and the maximum trench depth was 14.23 cm. ③ As rainfall duration increased
the simulated values of soil erosion in rills were close to the real values and tended to become stable
with an average error of less than 10%. [Conclusion] UAV nap-of-the-object photogrammetry can better reflect rill development and evolution
and has significant advantages over traditional measurement methods in efficiency and convenience.
Piotr T K.Analysis of erosion rill development under rainfall events using structure-from-motion photogrammetry:a case study from Kielce (Holy Cross Mts., Poland) [J].Journal of Mountain Science, 2022,19(5):1231-1244.
覃超,何超,郑粉莉,等.黄土坡面细沟沟头溯源侵蚀的量化研究[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(6):160-167.
郑粉莉,徐锡蒙,覃超.沟蚀过程研究进展[J].农业机械学报,2016,47(8):48-59,116.
吴淑芳,刘勃洋,雷琪,等.基于三维重建技术的坡面细沟侵蚀演变过程研究[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(9):114-120.
Lou Yongcai, Gao Zhaoliang, Sun Guanfang, et al.Runoff scouring experimental study of rill erosion of spoil tips [J].Catena, 2022,214:106249.
冯林,李斌兵.利用无人机倾斜影像与GCP构建高精度侵蚀沟地形模型[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(3):88-95.
陶鹏杰,何佳男,席可,等.基于旋翼无人机的贴近摄影测量方法:中国湖北:CN110006407A[P],2019-07-12.
何佳男.贴近摄影测量及其关键技术研究[D].湖北武汉:武汉大学,2019.
李治郡,钟琳婷,黄炎,等.基于贴近摄影测量的崩岗侵蚀监测技术[J].农业工程学报,2021,37(8):151-159.
王小刚,赵薛强,王建成.贴近摄影测量在水利工程监测中的应用[J].人民长江,2021,52(S1):130-133.
齐星圆,高照良,张翔,等.黄土堆积体变坡长坡面细沟动态发育过程[J].水土保持研究,2019,26(3):42-48.
杨明义,田均良.坡面侵蚀过程定量研究进展[J].地球科学进展,2000,15(6):649-653.
谢云,刘宝元,章文波.侵蚀性降雨标准研究[J].水土保持学报,2000,14(4):6-11.
吴普特,周佩华,武春龙,等.坡面细沟侵蚀垂直分布特征研究[J].水土保持研究,1997,4(2):47-56.
PadróJoan C, Muoz F J, Planas J, et al.Comparison of four UAV georeferencing methods for environmental monitoring purposes focusing on the combined use with airborne and satellite remote sensing platforms [J].International Journal of Applied Earth Observations and Geoinformation, 2018,75:654-676.
蔡嘉伦,贾洪果,刘国祥,等.对比传统低空航测的无人机倾斜摄影测量精度评估[J].测绘通报,2022(2):31-36.
王一峰,牛俊,张长伟.基于三维激光扫描仪技术的坡面径流小区土壤侵蚀运用研究[J].中国农业信息,2013(23):151-152.
覃超,郑粉莉,徐锡蒙,等.基于立体摄影技术的细沟与细沟水流参数测量[J].农业机械学报,2016,47(11):150-156.
Yang Ying, Lin Zongjian, Liu Fengzhu.Stable imaging and accuracy issues of low-altitude unmanned aerial vehicle photogrammetry systems [J].Remote Sensing, 2016,8(4):132-140.
Patricio M C, Francisco A V, Fernando C R, et al.Assessment of UAV photogrammetric mapping accuracy based on variation of ground control points [J].International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2018,72:1-10.
0
浏览量
493
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621