1. 河南农业大学 林学院,河南,郑州,450052
2. 河南省科学院 地理研究所,河南,郑州,450002
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
曾麒洁, 李双权, 马玉凤, 等. 伊洛河流域土壤保持生态服务功能动态变化[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(2):350-360.
Zeng Qijie, Li Shuangquan, Ma Yufeng, et al. Dynamic Change of Soil Conservation Ecological Service Function in Yiluo River Basin[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(2): 350-360.
曾麒洁, 李双权, 马玉凤, 等. 伊洛河流域土壤保持生态服务功能动态变化[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(2):350-360. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20230426.001.
Zeng Qijie, Li Shuangquan, Ma Yufeng, et al. Dynamic Change of Soil Conservation Ecological Service Function in Yiluo River Basin[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(2): 350-360. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20230426.001.
[目的] 分析河南省伊洛河流域土壤保持生态服务功能的动态变化特征,为流域水土保持和生态管理建设提供参考。 [方法] 采用修正通用水土流失方程(RUSLE)和统计学方法,分析2010—2020年伊洛河流域土壤保持功能时空变化特征以及影响因素。 [结果] ①2010—2020年伊洛河流域土壤保持功能呈递减趋势;空间分布基本一致,整体呈西南高,东北低的分布格局。 ②不同生态系统类型的土壤保持功能差异较大,2010—2020年森林和灌丛生态系统土壤保持总量较高,农田生态系统面积最大,但土壤保持功能较弱。 ③不同海拔和坡度的土壤保持功能随海拔和坡度的增加不断加强。 ④2010—2020年伊洛河流域土壤保持功能空间差异性主要受地形因素的控制,时间变化主要受降雨侵蚀力的影响。 [结论] 应注重和维护土壤保持功能较强的森林和灌丛生态系统,增强农田生态系统的水土保持措施,从而提高流域土壤保持功能,有助于提升伊洛河流域的生态安全。
[Objective] The dynamic change characteristics of the soil conservation ecological service function in the Yiluo River basin in He’nan Province were determined in order to provide a reference for soil and water conservation and ecological management construction in the basin. [Methods] The revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) and statistical methods were used to analyze the dynamic change characteristics and influencing factors of the soil conservation function in the Yiluo River basin from 2010 to 2020. [Results] ① The soil conservation function for the Yiluo River basin decreased from 2010 to 2020. The spatial distribution pattern was basically the same
and the overall distribution pattern was high in the southwest and low in the northeast of the study area during the ten years. ② The soil conservation functions of different ecosystem types were quite different. From 2010 to 2020
the total amount of soil conservation in the forest and shrub ecosystems was relatively high. The area of the farming ecosystem was the largest
but the soil conservation function was weak. ③ The role of the soil conservation function increased as altitude and slope increased. ④ The spatial differences of soil conservation functions in the Yiluo River basin from 2010 to 2020 were mainly controlled by topographic factors
and the temporal changes were mainly affected by rainfall erosivity. [Conclusion] Greater attention should be given to maintaining forest and shrub ecosystems with strong soil conservation functions
and strengthening the soil and water conservation measures of farmland ecosystems so as to improve the soil conservation function and the ecological security of the Yiluo River basin.
于德永,郝蕊芳.生态系统服务研究进展与展望[J].地球科学进展,2020,35(8):804-815.
韩永伟,高吉喜,王宝良,等.黄土高原生态功能区土壤保持功能及其价值[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(17):78-85.
Marques M J, Bienes R, Jimenez L, et al. Effect of vegetal cover on runoff and soil erosion under light intensity events. Rainfall simulation over USLE plots [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2007,378(1/2):161-165.
高峰.基于GIS和CSLE的区域土壤侵蚀定量评价研究[D].广西 桂林:广西师范学院,2014.
王敏,阮俊杰,姚佳,等.基于InVEST模型的生态系统土壤保持功能研究:以福建宁德为例[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(4):184-189.
Hou Jian, Fu Bojie, Wang Shuai, et al. Comprehensive analysis of relationship between vegetation attributes and soil erosion on hillslopes in the Loess Plateau of China [J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2014,72(5):1721-1731.
安妙颖,韩玉国,吴玉恒,等.基于KINEROS2模型的降雨和坡长因子对土壤侵蚀过程影响的研究[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(4):25-31.
Mukanov Y, Chen Y, Baisholanov S, et al. Estimation of annual average soil loss using the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE) integrated in a geographical information system (GIS) of the Esil River basin (ERB), Kazakhstan [J]. Acta Geophysica, 2019,67(3):921-938.
Roy P. Application of USLE in a GIS environment to estimate soil erosion in the Irga watershed, Jharkhand, India [J]. Physical Geography, 2018,40(4):361-383.
Rellini I, Scopesi C, Olivari S, et al. Assessment of soil erosion risk in a typical Mediterranean environment using a high resolution RUSLE approach(Portofino promontory, NW-Italy) [J]. Journal of Maps, 2019,15.
刘月,赵文武,贾立志.土壤保持服务:概念、评估与展望[J].生态学报,2019,39(2):432-440.
饶恩明,肖燚,欧阳志云,等.海南岛生态系统土壤保持功能空间特征及影响因素[J].生态学报,2013,33(3):746-755.
饶恩明,肖燚.四川省生态系统土壤保持功能空间特征及其影响因素[J].生态学报,2018,38(24):8741-8749.
宁婷,郭新亚,荣月静,等.基于RUSLE模型的山西省生态系统土壤保持功能重要性评估[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(6):205-210.
蒋春丽,张丽娟,张宏文,等.基于RUSLE模型的黑龙江省2000—2010年土壤保持量评价[J].中国生态农业学报,2015,23(5):642-649.
李该霞,宋蒙亚,谢丽芳,等.江苏省水土保持功能的重要性评价[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(1):236-241.
王子垚,韩磊,赵永华,等.陕西省土壤保持功能时空变化特征[J].西部大开发(土地开发工程研究),2020,5(3):30-37.
柳冬青,巩杰,张金茜,等.甘肃白龙江流域生态系统土壤保持功能时空变异及其影响因子[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(4):98-103.
贾振宇,高艳妮,刘学,等.2000—2015年三江源区土壤保持功能及其价值时空变化分析[J].环境生态学,2020,2(5):35-42.
李子,张艳芳.基于InVEST模型的渭河流域干支流生态系统服务时空演变特征分析[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(4):178-185.
田宇,朱建华,李奇,等.三峡库区土壤保持时空分布特征及其驱动力[J].生态学杂志,2020,39(4):1164-1174.
贾振宇,王世曦,刘学,等.辽河保护区土壤保持功能时空变化及其影响因素分析[J].环境工程技术学报,2021,11(4):686-692.
廖雯,胡砚霞,于兴修,等.丹江口库区2010—2020年土壤保持功能时空特征及其影响因素[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(6):288-294.
生态环境部. HJ 1173-2021.全国生态状况调查评估技术规范:生态系统服务功能评估[S].北京:生态环境部,2021.
吴昌广,李生,任华东,等. USLE/RUSLE模型中植被覆盖管理因子的遥感定量估算研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2012,23(6):1728-1732.
何莎莎,朱文博,张静静,等.基于InVEST模型的太行山淇河流域土壤保持功能研究[J].河南大学学报(自然科学版),2018,48(5):542-553.
宁婷,郭新亚,荣月静,等.基于RUSLE模型的山西省生态系统土壤保持功能重要性评估[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(6):205-210.
刘孟竹,张红娟,任贺宇,等.退耕还林背景下北方农牧交错带土壤保持功能时空变化[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(5):172-178.
杜军,赵胜朝,徐建昭,等.河南省豫西黄土丘陵区2015—2020年水土保持功能时空变化[J].河南科学,2021,39(11):1802-1808.
张静静,赵天旭,梁丹.伏牛山地区森林生态系统服务空间差异分析[J].生态环境学报,2020,29(7):1285-1291.
张静静,朱文博,朱连奇,等.伏牛山地区森林生态系统服务权衡/协同效应多尺度分析[J].地理学报,2020,75(5):975-988.
Pimentel D, Burgess M. Soil erosion threatens food production [J]. Agriculture, 2013,3(3):443-463.
王莉雁,肖燚,饶恩明,等.全国生态系统食物生产功能空间特征及其影响因素[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(2):188-196.
谢坤,丁明军,辛良杰,等.中国县域粮食产量的时空格局及其与经济发展的空间关系[J].经济地理,2021,41(11):167-175.
姚成胜,李政通,易行.中国粮食产量变化的驱动效应及其空间分异研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2016,26(9):72-81.
0
浏览量
761
下载量
2
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621