甘蔗等高种植与新植配置比例对坡面沟蚀引起的氮磷养分流失的影响

杨翠红; 李勇; 王旭; 陈婷婷; 郭豪; 杨江怡; 吴宗猛; 周小淇; 黄智刚

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20230327.002

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

甘蔗等高种植与新植配置比例对坡面沟蚀引起的氮磷养分流失的影响

试验研究

- 甘蔗等高种植与新植配置比例对坡面沟蚀引起的氮磷养分流失的影响
- Effects of Configuration Ratios for Contour Planting and Replanted Sugarcane on Gully Erosion-Induced Nitrogen and Phosphorus Losses on Slopes
- 水土保持通报 2023年43卷第5期页码：69-78
- 作者机构：
  
  广西大学农学院/广西农业环境与农产品安全重点实验室,广西,南宁,530004
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目“湿热区土壤水蚀面源污染对垦殖强度的响应:中缅泰对比研究”(42220104004)
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20230327.002
  中图分类号： S157.1
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
杨翠红, 李勇, 王旭, 等. 甘蔗等高种植与新植配置比例对坡面沟蚀引起的氮磷养分流失的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(5):69-78.

Yang Cuihong, Li Yong, Wang Xu, et al. Effects of Configuration Ratios for Contour Planting and Replanted Sugarcane on Gully Erosion-Induced Nitrogen and Phosphorus Losses on Slopes[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(5): 69-78.
杨翠红, 李勇, 王旭, 等. 甘蔗等高种植与新植配置比例对坡面沟蚀引起的氮磷养分流失的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(5):69-78. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20230327.002.

Yang Cuihong, Li Yong, Wang Xu, et al. Effects of Configuration Ratios for Contour Planting and Replanted Sugarcane on Gully Erosion-Induced Nitrogen and Phosphorus Losses on Slopes[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(5): 69-78. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20230327.002.

摘要

[目的

]

探讨甘蔗等高种植与新植适宜的配置比例，为甘蔗种植区减少坡面沟蚀和养分流失、提升耕地质量和合理种植甘蔗提供技术支撑。[方法

]

通过野外测量与试验分析相结合，确定苗期、分蘖期、伸长期和成熟期4个甘蔗生长时期内低、中、高3种等高种植和新植比例的甘蔗坡面沟蚀量和养分流失量，并明确其影响因素。[结果

]

①整个甘蔗生育期，那辣流域甘蔗种植坡面沟蚀及其导致的全氮、全磷流失量分别在31.3～66.3 t/hm

，39.0～82.5 kg/hm

，18.0～38.4 kg/hm

之间； ②苗期是那辣流域沟蚀和养分流失的主要时期，其贡献量占甘蔗全生育期的比例为47.7%～57.7%。③全生育期，高比例等高(H

)的坡面沟蚀和养分流失比低比例新植坡面(L

)低33.03%～35.42%(p＜0.05)，但中比例等高(M

)和H

，L

的流失量均不显著；低比例新植(L

)坡面沟蚀和养分流失量比高比例新植(H

)低27.41%～32.98%，比中比例新植(M

)低21.02%～25.86%(p＜0.05)，凋落物覆盖度和根系密度是影响沟蚀与养分流失的重要因素。④全生育期，坡面全氮和全磷流失量分别占年氮肥和磷肥施用量的24.1%～39.5%和107.0%～156.7%。[结论

]

在甘蔗种植时，60%以上的等高种植比例和30%以下新植比例，可以有效减少坡面土肥流失。

Abstract

[Objective] The suitable configuration ratios for contour planting and replanted sugarcane on slopes were determined in order to provide technical support for reducing slope ditch erosion and nutrient loss

improving cultivated land quality and rational sugarcane planting in sugarcane planting area. [Methods] Three configuration ratios (high

medium

and low) for contour planting and replanted sugarcane were evaluated. Slope-gully erosion and nutrient losses were determined by field measurements and laboratory experiments at the growth stages of establishment growth (EG)

vegetative growth (VG)

grand growth (GG)

and ripening growth (RG)

and the factors influencing erosion and nutrient loss were determined. [Results] ① During the total growth (TG) of sugarcane

the total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) losses caused by gully erosion on slopes planted to sugarcane in the Nala River basin were 31.3—66.3 t/hm2

39.0—82.5 kg/hm2 and 18.0—38.4 kg/hm2

respectively. ② EG was the main stage of gully erosion and nutrient losses in the Nala River basin

accounting for 47.7%—57.7% of the total erosion and nutrient losses. ③ During TG

gully erosion and associated nutrient losses for higher contour ratios (HC) were 33.03%—35.42% lower than for lower contour ratios (LC) (p＜0.05)

but the losses for medium contour ratios (MC) were not significant compared with those of HC and LC. Gully erosion and nutrient losses of lower replanted ratios (LRp) were 27.41%—32.98% lower than those of higher replanted ratios (HRp)

and 21.02%25.86% lower than those of medium replanted ratios (MRp) (p＜0.05). Litter cover and root density were the important factors affecting gully erosion and nutrient losses. ④ During TG

TN and TP losses on slopes accounted for 24.1%—39.5% and 107.0%—156.7% of the annual N and P application

respectively. [Conclusion] Planting sugarcane on slopes with a contour planting ratio of greater than 60% and a replanted ratio of less than 30% can effectively reduce soil and nutrient losses on slopes.

关键词

Keywords

references

国家统计局.中国统计年鉴[J].北京:中国统计出版社,2021.

Li Yong, Are K S, Qin Zhaohua, et al. Farmland size increase significantly accelerates road surface rill erosion and nutrient losses in southern subtropics of China [J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2020,204:104689.

王正兴,李芳.中国分省土壤侵蚀变化数据集(1985—2011)[J].全球变化数据学报(中英文),2018,2(1):51-58.

广西壮族自治区水利厅.广西壮族自治区水土保持公报[R].2021.

张维理,武淑霞,冀宏杰,等.中国农业面源污染形势估计及控制对策：(I).21世纪初期中国农业面源污染的形势估计[J].中国农业科学,2004,37(7):1008-1017.

Li Yong, Are K S, Huang Zhigang, et al. Particulate N and P exports from sugarcane growing watershed are more influenced by surface runoff than fertilization [J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2020,302:107087.

刘晓冰,张兴义.沟道侵蚀的多样性和发生过程及研究展望[J].土壤与作物,2018,7(2):90-102.

朱显谟.黄土区土壤侵蚀的分类[J].土壤学报,1956(2):99-115.

陈永宗.黄土高原沟道流域产沙过程的初步分析[J].地理研究,1983,2(1):35-47.

董旭,张宽地,杨明义,等.黄土坡面细沟流水动力学特性[J].中国水土保持科学,2016,14(3):45-51.

莫雅棋.广西集约化蔗区坡面沟蚀时空变化及主控因子分析[D].广西南宁:广西大学,2021:1-40.

郑粉莉,徐锡蒙,覃超.沟蚀过程研究进展[J].农业机械学报,2016,47(8):48-59.

郭太龙,卓慕宁,李定强,等.华南红壤坡面侵蚀水动力学机制试验研究[J].生态环境学报,2013,22(9):1556-1563.

Thomaz E L, Marcatto F S, Antoneli V. Soil erosion on the Brazilian sugarcane cropping system: an overview [J]. Geography and Sustainability, 2022,3(2):129-138.

邵帅,刘焕军,潘越,等.黑土区田块尺度微地形因子对土壤侵蚀与碱解氮的影响[J].土壤通报,2019,50(4):854-860.

Zhang Xiyu, Fan Jianrong, Liu Qing, et al. The contribution of gully erosion to total sediment production in a small watershed in Southwest China [J]. Physical Geography, 2018,39(3):246-263.

徐锡蒙,郑粉莉,武敏.雨强和坡度对黄土陡坡地浅沟形态特征影响的定量研究[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(11):124-132.

周怡雯,戴翠婷,刘窑军,等.耕作措施及雨强对南方红壤坡耕地侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(2):49-54.

于寒青,李勇,Nguyen M L,等.基于FRN技术的我国不同地区典型土壤保持措施的有效性评价[J].核农学报,2012,26(2):340-347.

Youlton C, Wendland E, Anache J, et al. Changes in erosion and runoff due to replacement of pasture land with sugarcane crops [J]. Sustainability, 2016,8(7):685-697.

杨任翔,邱凡,王坚桦,等.雨型和甘蔗种植对赤红壤坡面土壤侵蚀特征的影响[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(1):65-70.

黄艳荟,宁嘉丽,李桂芳,等.甘蔗种植方式对蔗地土壤侵蚀及氮素流失特征的影响[J].水土保持通报,2022,42(6):121-128.

Li Yong, Mo Yaqi, Are K S, et al. Sugarcane planting patterns control ephemeral gully erosion and associated nutrient losses: evidence from hillslope observation [J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2021,309:107289.

杨翠红,周小淇,郭豪,等.甘蔗种植配置模式对坡面沟蚀及土壤有机碳流失的影响研究[J/OL].江苏农业科学:1-10[2023-03-11.https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail//32.1214.S.20230104.1127.003.html.

王旭.甘蔗种植模式对那辣流域土壤侵蚀引起的养分流失及入河的影响研究[D].广西南宁:广西大学,2022:1-10.

戴谅,王旭,李勇,等.径流与施肥对流域入河重金属污染负荷的控制[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2022,28(3):379-391.

鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000.

赵龙山,侯瑞,吴发启.黄土坡面细沟侵蚀研究进展与展望[J].中国水土保持,2017(9):47-51.

Rong Li, Duan Xingwu, Zhang Guangli, et al. Impacts of tillage practices on ephemeral gully erosion in a dry-hot valley region in Southwestern China [J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2019,187:72-84.

罗键,郑子成,李廷轩,等.横垄坡面地表微地形多重分形特征及其对侵蚀产沙的影响[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(4):66-72.

陆淑宁,张泽瑜,李荣融,等.等高耕作对不同坡度坡面土壤侵蚀过程的影响[J].水土保持学报,2023,37(2):37-44.

刘冉,余新晓,蔡强国,等.坡长对坡面侵蚀、搬运、沉积过程影响的研究进展[J].中国水土保持科学(中英文),2020,18(6):140-146.

秦凤,郑子成,李廷轩,等.玉米季坡耕地地表糙度的变化特征及其对土壤侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(3):18-22.

Wang Xu, Li Yong, Dai Liang, et al. Control of sugarcane planting patterns on slope erosion-induced nitrogen and phosphorus loss and their export coefficients from the watershed [J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2022,336:108030.

明雪,康振威,黄智刚,等.甘蔗种植模式对流域水文连通性的影响[J].水土保持通报,2022,42(6):106-113.

Martinelli L A, Filoso S. Expansion of sugarcane ethanol production in Brazil: environmental and social challenges [J]. Ecological Applications: a Publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2008,18(4):885-898.

李勇.黄土高原植物根系与土壤抗冲性[M].北京:科学出版社,1995.

史志华,王玲,刘前进,等.土壤侵蚀: 从综合治理到生态调控[J].中国科学院院刊,2018,33(2):198-205.

余长洪,李就好,陈凯,等.甘蔗冠层对降雨再分配的影响[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(3):85-87.

Cerdà A, Rodrigo-Comino J, Giménez-Morera A, et al. Hydrological and erosional impact and farmer's perception on catch crops and weeds in citrus organic farming in Canyoles River watershed, Eastern Spain [J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2018,258:49-58.

谷学志.甘蔗高产栽培技术及病虫害防治措施[J].中国农业文摘—农业工程,2020,32(3):72-73.

浏览量

547

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

利用三维激光扫描技术动态监测沟蚀发育过程的方法研究

西藏中东部地区土壤侵蚀野外调查报告

西藏中南部侵蚀沟形态无人机航测与传统地面测量的对比分析

十大孔兑流域水土流失分布特征及防治对策

松花江沿岸二级阶地沟蚀调查分析