东华理工大学 地球科学学院,江西,南昌,330013
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
张海铃, 叶长盛. 环鄱阳湖城市群生态保护重要性评价及其空间格局[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(1):224-234.
Zhang Hailing, Ye Changsheng. Importance Evaluation of Ecological Protection and Spatial Pattern of Urban Agglomeration Around Poyang Lake[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(1): 224-234.
张海铃, 叶长盛. 环鄱阳湖城市群生态保护重要性评价及其空间格局[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(1):224-234. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20230224.002.
Zhang Hailing, Ye Changsheng. Importance Evaluation of Ecological Protection and Spatial Pattern of Urban Agglomeration Around Poyang Lake[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(1): 224-234. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20230224.002.
[目的
]
分析环鄱阳湖城市群生态保护重要区域的空间变化特征和空间聚集特征,为区域划定“三区三线”、合理规划国土空间提供基础依据,为促进大湖流域地区经济高质量发展和生态保护之间的协同发展提供理论参考。[方法
]
以环鄱阳湖城市群为例,2000
2010
2020年土地利用数据为基础,借助InVEST模型、修正的通用土壤流失方程(RUSLE)和GIS空间分析方法,选取水源涵养、土壤保持、生物多样性和水质净化等生态服务类型以及水土流失敏感性和水环境敏感性识别研究区生态保护重要区域,分析其空间变化特征。[结果
]
①2000
2010
2020年,研究区生态保护重要区域面积分别为6.34×10
4
,6.35×10
4
,6.28×10
4
km
2
,地类以林地和水域为主,呈现“两边高,中间低”分布特征; ②在2 km×2 km格网尺度下,环鄱阳湖城市群生态保护重要性在空间上显著聚集,高高聚集区主要分布在东西部山区等人为活动较少、生态保护良好的区域;低低聚集区主要分布在环鄱阳湖平原区,该区人类活动密集,经济发展的同时生态系统本身的某些功能与结构受损; ③2000—2020年,生态保护重要性变化稳定区位于怀玉山区和鄱阳湖平原,增强区位于浮梁县、婺源县和鄱阳湖区,减弱区位于宜春市、萍乡市和鹰潭市。[结论
]
对于极重要和高度重要区域,稳定森林覆盖率和提升森林质量是首要任务,其次,应采取措施有效促进湿地恢复和自然保护区建设,以达到遏制生境退化的目的。对于中等重要、一般重要和不太重要区域,应处理好经济高质量发展和生态保护之间的关系,尤其是在人类活动较为密集的区域,应提高城市绿地覆盖率,在城市周边建立生态缓冲区,以此缓解生态空间生存压力。
[Objective] The spatial change characteristics and spatial aggregation characteristics of important ecological protection areas in the Poyang Lake urban agglomeration were analyzed in order to provide a basis for delineating “three districts and three lines” and rational planning of territorial space
and to provide a theoretical reference for promoting the coordinated development between high-quality economic development and ecological protection in the Great Lake Basin. [Methods] The study area was the urban agglomeration around Poyang Lake. Land use data for 2000
2010
and 2020 were used with the InVEST model
the revised universal soil loss equation (RUSLE)
and a GIS spatial analysis method to select types of ecological services (such as water conservation
soil conservation
biodiversity conservation
water purification
soil erosion sensitivity
and water environment sensitivity) to identify the important areas of ecological protection in the study area
and to analyze their spatial variation characteristics. [Results] ① In 2000
2010
and 2020
the areas of important ecological protection in the urban agglomeration around Poyang Lake were 6.34×104
6.35×104
and 6.28×104 km2
respectively. The land use types were dominated by forest land and water areas
showing the distribution characteristics of “high on both sides and low in the middle”. ② At a grid scale of 2 km×2 km
the importance of ecological protection in the urban agglomeration around Poyang Lake was significantly clustered in space
and the high and high clustering areas were mainly located in the eastern and western mountainous areas with fewer anthropogenic activities and good ecological protection. Low and low agglomeration areas were mainly located in the plain area around the Poyang Lake (where human activities are intensive)
and some functions and structures of the ecosystem itself were damaged during economic development. ③ From 2000 to 2020
the changing and stable areas of ecological protection importance were located in the Huaiyu mountain area and the Poyang Lake Plain
and the enhanced areas were located in Fuliang County
Wuyuan County
and the Poyang Lake District; and the weakened areas were located in Yichun City
Pingxiang City
and Yingtan City. [Conclusion] For extremely important and highly important areas
stabilizing forest coverage and improving forest quality is the first task. Secondly
measures should be taken to effectively promote wetland restoration and the construction of nature reserves in order to curb habitat degradation. For medium-important
moderately important
and less important areas
the relationship between high-quality economic development and ecological protection should be properly handled. Especially in areas with intensive human activities
urban green space coverage should be increased
and ecological buffer zones should be established around cities to alleviate the pressure of ecological space survival.
谷树忠,胡咏君,周洪.生态文明建设的科学内涵与基本路径[J].资源科学,2013,35(1):2-13.
李杰,贾坤,张宁,等.基于遥感与生态服务模型的青岛市生态保护重要性评价[J].遥感技术与应用,2021,36(6):1329-1338.
自然资源部办公厅.自然资源部办公厅关于印发《资源环境承载能力和国土空间开发适宜性评价指南(试行)》的函自然资办函[2020] 127号[J].自然资源通讯,2020(4):41-54.
方一舒,祖健,艾东,等.面向国土空间规划的昆明市生态保护重要性评价[J].中国农业大学学报,2021,26(3):152-163.
熊善高,秦昌波,于雷,等.基于生态系统服务功能和生态敏感性的生态空间划定研究:以南宁市为例[J].生态学报,2018,38(22):7899-7911.
Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital [J]. Nature, 1997,387(6630):253-260.
赵予爽,刘春霞,李月臣,等.重庆市生态系统服务功能重要性评价[J].重庆师范大学学报(自然科学版),2017,34(3):44-53.
吕一河,张立伟,王江磊.生态系统及其服务保护评估: 指标与方法[J].应用生态学报,2013,24(5):1237-1243.
徐卫华,欧阳志云,王学志,等.汶川地震重灾区生态保护重要性评价与对策[J].生态学报,2008,28(12):5820-5825.
李晖,杨树华,姚文璟,等.基于GIS的怒江流域中段生态保护重要性评价[J].中国生态农业学报,2011,19(4):947-953.
牛晓楠,倪欢,陈国光,等.福建省生态保护重要性评价[J].生态学报,2022,42(3):1130-1141.
李晶,王媛,殷守强,等.张家口市生态保护重要性评价及主导生态功能分区研究[J].土壤通报,2020,51(2):280-288.
张雪飞,王传胜,李萌.国土空间规划中生态空间和生态保护红线的划定[J].地理研究,2019,38(10):2430-2446.
严政,王壮壮,周成杰,等.基于生态保护重要性的江西省瑞金市生态安全格局构建[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(1):260-266.
冯宇.呼伦贝尔草原生态红线区划定的方法研究[D].北京:中国环境科学研究院,2013.
Fu Baopu. On the calculation of the evaporation from land surface [J]. Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 1981,5(1):23-31.
Zhang L, Hickel K, Dawes W R, et al. A rational function approach for estimating mean annual evapotranspiration [J]. Water Resources Research, 2004,40(2).
杨蕾.基于InVEST模型的三江源主要生态系统服务权衡与协同研究[D].上海:上海师范大学,2020.
包玉斌,李婷,柳辉,等.基于InVEST模型的陕北黄土高原水源涵养功能时空变化[J].地理研究,2016,35(4):664-676.
张慧.基于生态服务功能的南京市生态安全格局研究[D].江苏南京:南京师范大学,2016.
刘月,赵文武,贾立志.土壤保持服务:概念、评估与展望[J].生态学报,2019,39(2):432-440.
丁玲.基于InVEST模型的宁安市土壤保持服务功能研究[D].黑龙江哈尔滨:东北农业大学,2020.
陆建忠,陈晓玲,李辉,等.基于GIS/RS和USLE鄱阳湖流域土壤侵蚀变化[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(2):337-344.
蔡崇法,丁树文,史志华,等.应用USLE模型与地理信息系统IDRISI预测小流域土壤侵蚀量的研究[J].水土保持学报,2000,14(2):19-24.
马超飞,马建文,布和敖斯尔.USLE模型中植被覆盖因子的遥感数据定量估算[J].水土保持通报,2001,21(4):6-9.
张学儒,周杰,李梦梅.基于土地利用格局重建的区域生境质量时空变化分析[J].地理学报,2020,75(1):160-178.
傅春,王乐志,邓俊鹏,等.不同影响因素对鄱阳湖流域生境质量变化特征分析[J].中国农村水利水电,2021(11):1-8.
王大尚,李屹峰,郑华,等.密云水库上游流域生态系统服务功能空间特征及其与居民福祉的关系[J].生态学报,2014,34(1):70-81.
陈泽怡,余珮珩,陈奕云,等.汉江流域水源涵养和水质净化服务时空分析[J].生态经济,2022,38(4):193-200.
傅春,康晚英.环鄱阳湖区农业面源污染TN/TP时空变化与分布特征[J].长江流域资源与环境,2012,21(7):864-868.
李益敏,管成文,郭丽琴,等.基于生态敏感性分析的江川区土地利用空间格局优化配置[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(20):267-276.
王丽婧,席春燕,郑丙辉.三峡库区流域水环境保护分区[J].应用生态学报,2011,22(4):1039-1044.
雷金睿,陈宗铸,吴庭天,等.海南岛东北部土地利用与生态系统服务价值空间自相关格局分析[J].生态学报,2019,39(7):2366-2377.
姚小薇,曾杰,李旺君.武汉城市圈城镇化与土地生态系统服务价值空间相关特征[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(9):249-256.
王博,黄晓军,刘萌萌.区域建设用地开发强度格局演化及影响因素分析: 以陕西省为例[J].干旱区地理,2020,43(6):1635-1647.
黄飞飞,张小林,余华,等.基于空间自相关的江苏省县域经济实力空间差异研究[J].人文地理,2009,24(2):84-89.
张翠菊,张宗益.中国省域产业结构升级影响因素的空间计量分析[J].统计研究,2015,32(10):32-37.
钱彩云,巩杰,张金茜,等.甘肃白龙江流域生态系统服务变化及权衡与协同关系[J].地理学报,2018,73(5):868-879.
李欣,方斌,殷如梦,等.江苏省县域“三生”功能时空变化及协同/权衡关系[J].自然资源学报,2019,34(11):2363-2377.
郭方圆.湘潭县“三生”功能空间分异特征及影响因素分析[D].湖南长沙:湖南师范大学,2021.
任金铜,杨可明,陈群利,等.草海湿地区域景观生态脆弱性时空变化特征[J].生态与农村环境学报,2018,34(3):232-239.
0
浏览量
665
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621