1. 南宁师范大学 自然资源与测绘学院,广西,南宁,530001
2. 南宁师范大学 地理科学与规划学院,广西,南宁,530001
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
韦燕飞, 魏锋, 童新华. 2005—2020年广西左右江革命老区耕地多功能耦合协调度时空分布及影响因素[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(1):174-183.
Wei Yanfei, Wei Feng, Tong Xinhua. Spatio-temporal Distribution and Influencing Factors of Multi-Functional Coupling Coordination Degree of Cultivated Land in Zuoyoujiang Old Revolutionary Base Area, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region During 2005—2020[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(1): 174-183.
韦燕飞, 魏锋, 童新华. 2005—2020年广西左右江革命老区耕地多功能耦合协调度时空分布及影响因素[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(1):174-183. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20230222.002.
Wei Yanfei, Wei Feng, Tong Xinhua. Spatio-temporal Distribution and Influencing Factors of Multi-Functional Coupling Coordination Degree of Cultivated Land in Zuoyoujiang Old Revolutionary Base Area, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region During 2005—2020[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(1): 174-183. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20230222.002.
[目的] 分析广西壮族自治区左右江革命老区县级尺度耕地农业生产、社会保障与生态安全功能的空间分布特征,为优化耕地多功能配置,促进区域协调发展提供依据。[方法] 通过构建耕地多功能评价体系,运用熵权法、耦合协调度方法测算广西左右江32个县域耕地多功能的协调关系,运用灰色关联度分析法揭露各指标对耕地多功能系统的影响。[结果] 2005—2020年广西左右江耕地农业生产能力和生态安全维持能力持续提高,社会保障功能有所下降;2005—2020年广西左右江各县区耕地多功能综合指数平均值呈现差异,即“边缘高,中间低”的状态;在耦合协调度方面,广西左右江耕地的3个功能尚未达到良性共振阶段,但整体上朝着正向发展;从总体来看,各指标对广西左右江耕地整体功能影响是从2005年的人口数量、耕地资源禀赋和要素投入过渡到2020年的经济发展水平和城市化水平。[结论] 未来各县区可根据耕地主导功能的不同因地制宜地利用耕地,以促进耕地多功能子系统间的协调发展。
[Objective] The spatial distribution characteristics of agricultural production
social security
and ecological security of cultivated land in the Zuoyoujiang old revolutionary base area of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region were analyzed at the county level to provide a basis for optimizing the multi-functional allocation of cultivated land
and to promote coordinated regional development. [Methods] The entropy weight method and the coupling coordination degree method were used to calculate a coordination relationship of multifunctional cultivated land in 32 counties of the Zuojiang River in Guangxi by constructing a multifunctional evaluation system of cultivated land. The grey relational analysis method was used to reveal the influence of each index on the multi-functional system of cultivated land. [Results] From 2005 to 2020
the agricultural production capacity and ecological security maintenance capacity of cultivated land in the Zuoyoujiang area of Guangxi continued to increase
and the social security function declined. During the same period
the average value of the multi-functional comprehensive index of cultivated land in the counties of the Zuoyoujiang area of Guangxi exhibited differences
showing a distribution pattern of “high at the edge and low in the middle”. In terms of coupling coordination degree
the three subsystems of functional cultivated land have not yet reached the stage of benign resonance
but they are developing in a positive direction as a whole. The impact of each indicator on the overall function of cultivated land in the Zuoyoujiang area of Guangxi has transitioned from the population
cultivated land resource endowment
and factor input in 2005 to the level of economic development and urbanization in 2020. [Conclusion] In the future
according to the different dominant functions of cultivated land
each county can use cultivated land according to local conditions
so as to promote coordinated development among the multi-functional subsystems of cultivated land.
宋小青,吴志峰,欧阳竹.1949年以来中国耕地功能变化[J].地理学报,2014,69(4):435-447.
张利国,王占岐,柴季,等.湖北省耕地多功能地区差异及综合分区研究[J].地域研究与开发,2019,38(5):125-130.
彭建,刘志聪,刘焱序.农业多功能性评价研究进展[J].中国农业资源与区划,2014,35(6):1-8.
Ferrari S, Rambonilaza M. Agricultural activities, rural areas and natural environment: Drawing up the frontiers of the multifunctionality concept [M]//Rural Landscapes and Agricultural Policies in Europe. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer (Berlin Heidelberg), 2009:21-34.
Aubry C, Ramamonjisoa J, Dabat M H, et al. Urban agriculture and land use in cities: An approach with the multi-functionality and sustainability concepts in the case of Antananarivo (Madagascar) [J]. Land Use Policy, 2012,29(2):429-439.
Jongeneel R A, Polman N B P, Slangen L H G. Why are Dutch farmers going multifunctional? [J]. Land Use Policy, 2008,25(1):81-94.
Coyle C, Creamer R E, Schulte R P O, et al. A Functional Land Management conceptual framework under soil drainage and land use scenarios [J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2016,56:39-48.
Van der Ploeg J D, Laurent C, Blondeau F, et al. Farm diversity, classification schemes and multifunctionality [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009,90:124-131.
Bastian C T, McLeod D M, Germino M J, et al. Environmental amenities and agricultural land values: A hedonic model using geographic information systems data [J]. Ecological Economics, 2002,40(3):337-349.
杨凤妍子,胡伟艳,刘恬,等.耕地多功能权衡与协同关系的尺度效应: 以武汉城市圈为例[J].浙江农业学报,2022,34(1):184-195.
刘宝涛,陆鹏,刘帅,等.中国粮食主产区耕地多功能时空格局及其优化[J].华东经济管理,2021,35(12):92-99.
向敬伟,廖晓莉,宋小青,等.中国耕地多功能的区域收敛性[J].资源科学,2019,41(11):1959-1971.
杨雪,谈明洪.近年来北京市耕地多功能演变及其关联性[J].自然资源学报,2014,29(5):733-743.
王成,彭清,唐宁,等.2005—2015年耕地多功能时空演变及其协同与权衡研究:以重庆市沙坪坝区为例[J].地理科学,2018,38(4):590-599.
张英男,龙花楼,戈大专,等.黄淮海平原耕地功能演变的时空特征及其驱动机制[J].地理学报,2018,73(3):518-534.
杨雪,谈明洪.北京市耕地功能空间差异及其演变[J].地理研究,2014,33(6):1106-1118.
张一达,刘学录,任君,等.基于耕地多功能权衡与协同分析的耕地利用转型研究:以北京市为例[J].中国农业资源与区划,2020,41(6):25-33.
付鸿昭,郭熙,周丙娟,等.南方丘陵山区耕地资源多功能时空演变及协同与权衡研究:以安福县为例[J].安徽农业科学,2021,49(6):85-91.
路昌,耿昊,刘蕊,等.山东省耕地多功能耦合协调度时空格局分析[J].农业机械学报,2021,52(3):265-274.
柯新利,李红艳,刘荣霞.武汉市耕地景观游憩功能与可达性的空间匹配格局[J].长江流域资源与环境,2016,25(5):751-760.
谭永忠,王庆日,陈佳,等.耕地资源非市场价值评价方法的研究进展与述评[J].自然资源学报,2012,27(5):883-892.
王亚辉,李秀彬,辛良杰,等.耕地资产社会保障功能的空间分异研究:不同农业类型区的比较[J].地理科学进展,2020,39(9):1473-1484.
宋小青,欧阳竹.中国耕地多功能管理的实践路径探讨[J].自然资源学报,2012,27(4):540-551.
罗成,蔡银莺.湖北省农产品主产区耕地资源功能的时空演变[J].经济地理,2016,36(3):153-161.
唐春云,臧俊梅.新时代广州市耕地多功能评价及时空演变分析[J].农业资源与环境学报,2021,38(2):332-343.
施园园,赵华甫,郧文聚,等.北京市耕地多功能空间分异及其社会经济协调模式解释[J].资源科学,2015,37(2):247-257.
靳文娟,边振兴,魏忠义,等.沈阳城市周边耕地多功能评价[J].中国农业资源与区划,2019,40(5):166-173.
范业婷,金晓斌,项晓敏,等.苏南地区耕地多功能评价与空间特征分析[J].资源科学,2018,40(5):980-992.
杜继丰,袁中友.基于耕地多功能需求的巨型城市区耕地保护阈值探讨:以珠江三角洲为例[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(8):1255-1266.
董鹏宇,赵华甫.耕地多功能权衡与协同关系研究:以上海市青浦区为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2019,28(2):368-375.
陈丽,刘娟,郝晋珉,等.大都市区耕地系统多功能运行效应综合评价:以北京为例[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2018,54(3):284-291.
Qian Fengkui, Chi Yanru, Lal R. Spatiotemporal characteristics analysis of multifunctional cultivated land: A case of Shenyang, Northeast China [J]. Land Degradation and Development, 2020,31(24):1812-1822.
殷如梦,李欣,曹锦秀,等.江苏省耕地多功能利用权衡/协同关系研究[J].南京师大学报(自然科学版),2020,43(1):69-75.
0
浏览量
643
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621