1. 新疆农业大学 资源与环境学院,新疆,乌鲁木齐,830052
2. 新疆农业大学 草业学院,新疆,乌鲁木齐,830052
3. 新疆土壤与植物生态过程重点实验室,新疆,乌鲁木齐,830052
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
李可依, 愚广灵, 陈末, 等. 不同利用方式对高寒草地土壤团聚体稳定性及其有机碳含量分布的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(1):332-340.
Li Keyi, Yu Guangling, Chen Mo, et al. Effects of Different Land Utilization Methods on Soil Aggregate Stability and Organic Carbon Content in Alpine Grassland[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(1): 332-340.
李可依, 愚广灵, 陈末, 等. 不同利用方式对高寒草地土壤团聚体稳定性及其有机碳含量分布的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(1):332-340. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20230221.001.
Li Keyi, Yu Guangling, Chen Mo, et al. Effects of Different Land Utilization Methods on Soil Aggregate Stability and Organic Carbon Content in Alpine Grassland[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(1): 332-340. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20230221.001.
[目的] 分析不同利用方式下新疆巴音布鲁克高寒草地土壤团聚体稳定性及其有机碳分布差异,为评价该区域土壤团聚体有机碳等生态功能提供理论基础。[方法] 选取巴音布鲁克高寒草地开垦、弃耕还牧、放牧3种处理,以10 cm为一个梯度,采集0—40 cm土层土壤,采用干筛和湿筛两种方法筛分土壤团聚体,测算土壤团聚体的平均重量直径(MWD)、几何平均直径(GMD)、土壤团聚体破坏率(PDA)和土壤有机碳(SOC)含量,明确不同利用方式下高寒草地土壤团聚体稳定性及团聚体有机碳含量的差异。[结果] ①3种利用方式下,高寒草地土壤团聚体均以大团聚体(≥0.25 mm粒径)为主。亚表层(10—20 cm)土壤,弃耕还牧处理的PDA显著低于放牧处理(p<0.05),与开垦处理无显著差异(p>0.05);而除亚表层(10—20 cm)外,弃耕还牧处理其余土层土壤PDA显著高于开垦处理和放牧处理(p<0.05)。表层(0—10 cm)土壤,开垦处理与放牧处理PDA无显著差异(p>0.05);而除表层(0—10 cm)外,开垦处理其余土层土壤PDA显著高于放牧处理。 ②弃耕还牧处理的SOC含量、土壤团聚体有机碳含量及贡献率均显著低于其他处理(p<0.05)。在表层(0—10 cm)土壤中,放牧处理≥5 mm粒径土壤团聚体有机碳含量及其贡献率显著高于开垦处理(27.89 g/kg,6.34%)和弃耕还牧处理(36.96 g/kg,14.3%)。而亚表层(10—20 cm)、下层(20—30 cm)、深层(30—40 cm),弃耕还牧处理≥5 mm粒径的土壤团聚体有机碳含量及其贡献率显著低于开垦处理和放牧处理(p<0.05)。 ③土壤团聚体质量百分比及其稳定性与SOC含量呈显著相关(p<0.05);≥2 mm土壤团聚体质量百分比、土壤团聚体MWD和GMD与SOC含量呈显著正相关(p<0.05),其中≥5 mm呈极显著正相关(p<0.01);<2 mm土壤团聚体质量百分比、土壤团聚体稳定性与SOC含量呈显著负相关(p<0.05),其中<1 mm呈极显著负相关(p<0.01)。[结论] 草地开垦活动会降低土壤团聚体稳定性及其SOC含量,其中弃耕还牧处理土壤团聚体稳定性最差,SOC含量最低。建议草地弃耕后应进行适度恢复(施肥、播种等),再进行放牧利用。
[Objective] The soil aggregate stability and differences in organic carbon distribution for Bayanbulak alpine grassland
Xinjiang Wei Autonomous Region under different land utilization methods were analyzed in order to provide a theoretical basis for the evaluation of soil aggregate organic carbon and other ecological functions in this region. [Methods] Three land utilization methods for an alpine grassland in Bayinbuluk were evaluated: reclamation
abandoning farming to grazing
and grazing. Soil aggregates were screened by dry screening and wet screening
mean weight diameter (MWD)
geometric mean diameter (GMD)
percentage of aggregate destruction (PDA)
and soil organic carbon (SOC) contents of soil aggregates were measured and calculated to quantify differences in soil aggregate stability and organic carbon in an alpine grassland under different land utilization methods. [Results] ① Under the three land utilization methods
soil aggregates in an alpine grassland were primarily large aggregates (≥0.25 mm). In the subsurface (10—20 cm) soil
the PDA for the treatment of abandoning farming to grazing was significantly lower than that of the grazing treatment (p<0.05)
and was not significantly different from the PDA for the reclamation treatment (p>0.05). In addition
the soil PDA values of the remaining soil layers in the treatment of abandoning farming to grazing were significantly greater than those observed for the reclamation treatment and the grazing treatment (p<0.05). In the surface layer (0—10 cm)
there was no significant difference in PDA between the reclamation treatment and the grazing treatment (p>0.05). The PDA values of the other soil layers in the reclamation treatment were significantly greater than in the grazing treatment. ② The SOC content
soil aggregate organic carbon content
and the contribution rate of soil aggregates in the treatment of abandoning farming to grazing were significantly less than those in the other treatments (p<0.05). In the 0—10 cm soil layer
organic carbon content and its contribution rate of aggregates with particle size greater than 5 mm in the grazing treatment were greater than those in the reclamation treatment (27.89 g/kg
6.34%) and the treatment of abandoning farming to grazing (36.96 g/kg
14.3%). In the subsurface layer (10—20 cm)
lower layer (20—30 cm)
and deep layer (30—40 cm)
the organic carbon content and contribution rate of soil aggregates with a particle size of ≥5 mm in the treatment of abandoning farming to grazing were significantly less than those in the reclamation treatment and the grazing treatment (p<0.05). ③ The mass percentage of soil aggregates and their stability were significantly correlated with SOC content (p<0.05). The mass percentage of soil aggregates ≥2 mm
MWD and GMD of soil aggregates were significantly positively correlated with SOC content (p<0.05)
of which soil aggregates ≥5 mm showed a very significant positive correlation (p<0.01) with SOC content. The mass percentage of soil aggregates less than 2 mm and the stability of soil aggregates were significantly negatively correlated with SOC content (p<0.05)
of which soil aggregates <1 mm were extremely significantly negatively correlated with SOC content (p<0.01). [Conclusion] Grassland reclamation activities reduced the stability of soil aggregates and their SOC contents. Soil aggregate stability and SOC content were the lowest in the treatment of abandoning farming to grazing. It is recommended that grassland should be moderately restored (fertilized
sown
etc.) after abandonment for grazing and utilization.
Fang Jingyun, Guo Zhaodi, Piao Shilong, et al. Terrestrial vegetation carbon sinks in China,1981—2000[J]. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences, 2007,50(9):1341-1350.
贾宏涛,蒋平安,程路明,等.巴音布鲁克亚高山草原生态系统有机碳贮量的估算[J].新疆农业科学,2006,43(6):480-483.
陈志杰,廖翠华,黄仕凤.土地利用变化对土壤团聚体有机碳的影响[J].安徽农业科学,2010,38(24):13203-13204.
季波,时龙,徐金鹏,等.宁夏典型天然草地土壤团聚体稳定性及其有机碳分布特征[J].生态学报,2021,41(19):7669-7678.
李景.长期耕作对土壤团聚体有机碳及微生物多样性的影响[D].北京:中国农业科学院,2014.
Six J, Bossuyt H, Degryze S, et al. A history of research on the link between (micro) aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic matter dynamics [J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2004,79(1):7-31.
Mikha M M, Rice C W. Tillage and manure effects on soil and aggregate-associated carbon and nitrogen [J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal,2004,68(3):809-816.
周文昌,索郎夺尔基,崔丽娟,等.围栏禁牧与放牧对若尔盖高原泥炭地CO
2
和CH
4
排放的影响[J].生态环境学报,2015,24(2):183-189.
陈高起,傅瓦利,沈艳,等.岩溶区不同土地利用方式对土壤有机碳及其组分的影响[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(3):123-129.
展争艳,李小刚,张德罡,等.利用方式对高寒牧区土壤有机碳含量及土壤结构性质的影响[J].土壤学报,2005,42(5):777-782.
李永强,赵萌莉,韩国栋,等.不同年限草原撂荒地土壤理化特性研究[J].中国草地学报,2012,34(3):61-64.
冷暖,邓羽松,林立文,等.南亚热带不同母质发育土壤团聚体特征及其稳定性[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(5):80-86.
庄正,张芸,张颖,等.不同发育阶段杉木人工林土壤团聚体分布特征及其稳定性研究[J].水土保持学报,2017,31(6):183-188.
苏建红,朱新萍,贾宏涛,等.围栏封育对巴音布鲁克草原土壤理化性质的影响[J].地球环境学报,2016,7(5):501-508.
祁迎春,王益权,刘军,等.不同土地利用方式土壤团聚体组成及几种团聚体稳定性指标的比较[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(1):340-347.
姜敏,刘毅,刘闯,等.丹江口库区不同土地利用方式土壤团聚体稳定性及分形特征[J].水土保持学报,2016,30(6):265-270.
鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000.
姚贤良.土壤结构的肥力意义[J].土壤学报,1965,2(1):111-120.
陈琳,王健,宋鹏帅,等.黄土坡面结皮对土壤水稳性团聚体的稳定性和可蚀性的影响[J].中国农学通报,2020,36(18):87-92.
邓志豪,杨静,戴全厚,等.喀斯特区土地利用方式对石灰土团聚体稳定性及其有机碳的影响[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(5):114-121.
朱源山,王义东,郭长城,等.天津盐碱化沼泽湿地开垦对土壤团聚体有机与无机碳含量的影响[J].生态学杂志,2020,39(1):206-216.
罗晓虹,王子芳,陆畅,等.土地利用方式对土壤团聚体稳定性和有机碳含量的影响[J].环境科学,2019,40(8):3816-3824.
杨如萍,郭贤仕,吕军峰,等.不同耕作和种植模式对土壤团聚体分布及稳定性的影响[J].水土保持学报,2010,24(1):252-256.
韩东亮.利用方式高寒草原土壤有机碳过程及其对增温与增雨的响应[D].新疆乌鲁木齐:新疆农业大学,2018.
Tai J C, Pan G X. Change in Agricultural Soil Organic Carbon Fractions with Land Uses in Soil from Different Origins in Jianghan Plain [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2012,26(6):153-157.
Tang Yiqun, Li Jun, Zhang Xiaohui, et al. Fractal characteristics and stability of soil aggregates in karst rocky desertification areas [J]. Natural Hazards, 2013,65(1):563-579.
韩可欣,禹朴家,韩东亮,等.开垦年限对松嫩碱化草地土壤碳库的影响[J].土壤通报,2017,48(1):127-133.
王志强,李雪薇.新疆土地利用类型转变的碳强度变化规律分析[J].中国农机化学报,2022,43(5):165-172.
Tang Xinyi, Liu Shuguang, Liu Juxiu, et al. Effects of vegetation restoration and slope positions on soil aggregation and soil carbon accumulation on heavily eroded tropical land of Southern China [J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2010,10(3):505-513.
芦琛,蒋小董,吴冠宇,等.黄土丘陵区不同退耕林地表土水溶性有机质含量及光谱特征差异[J].林业科学,2021,57(11):13-23.
蒋腊梅,白桂芬,吕光辉,等.不同管理模式对干旱区草原土壤团聚体稳定性及其理化性质的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2018,36(4):15-21.
陈曦,王改玲,刘焕焕,等.黄土高原吕梁山不同撂荒年限土壤团聚体稳定性及有机碳分布特征[J].土壤,2021,53(2):375-382.
谷忠元,康黎,罗梦娟,等.湘东地区典型土壤团聚体稳定性的影响因素[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(5):58-63.
黎宏祥,王彬,王玉杰,等.不同林分类型对土壤团聚体稳定性及有机碳特征的影响[J].北京林业大学学报,2016,38(5):84-91.
莫彬,曹建华,徐祥明,等.岩溶山区不同土地利用方式对土壤活性有机碳动态的影响[J].生态环境,2006,15(6):1224-1230.
闫靖华,张凤华,谭斌,等.不同恢复年限对土壤有机碳组分及团聚体稳定性的影响[J].土壤学报,2013,50(6):1183-1190.
0
浏览量
512
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621