重庆工商大学 公共管理学院,重庆,400067
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
鄂施璇, 李琴, 张露洋. 三峡库区1980—2021年土地利用碳排放格局及碳补偿[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(1):300-306.
E Shixuan, Li Qin, Zhang Luyang. Land Use Carbon Emission Pattern and Carbon Compensation in Three Gorges Reservoir Area During 1980—2021[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(1): 300-306.
鄂施璇, 李琴, 张露洋. 三峡库区1980—2021年土地利用碳排放格局及碳补偿[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(1):300-306. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20230220.007.
E Shixuan, Li Qin, Zhang Luyang. Land Use Carbon Emission Pattern and Carbon Compensation in Three Gorges Reservoir Area During 1980—2021[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(1): 300-306. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20230220.007.
[目的
]
揭示三峡库区土地利用碳排放格局并测算碳补偿价值,为引导流域低碳发展,健全流域碳补偿机制提供参考。[方法
]
运用碳排放系数,单位GDP能耗及经济贡献系数等方法,测算三峡库区1980—2021年土地利用碳排放/碳吸收,并以净碳排放为基准值,对碳排放阈值及碳排放强度进行修正,测算土地利用碳补偿价值。[结果
]
①三峡库区1980—2021年土地利用碳排放及碳吸收整体呈上升趋势。耕地和林地是土地利用碳吸收主要载体,城乡工矿居民用地是土地利用碳排放主要来源; ②碳吸收格局整体呈现西低东高的分布特征。1980—2021年碳吸收处于中高水平和高水平类型的区县明显增加,且大多位于东部和北部,低水平类型区县有所减少; ③碳排放格局在1980—1990年均处于低水平及中低水平类型;2000—2021年库区整体碳排放量增加,其中西部重庆市主城区、中部万州、开州区、云阳县以及东部夷陵区处于中高水平和高水平类型,武隆区的碳排放处于中等水平类型;巫溪、巫山、巴东、兴山、秭归县等区县的碳排放处于低水平和中低水平类型; ④研究区9个区县为生态盈余区,应获碳补偿资金最高的是奉节县6.87×10
5
元,17个区县为生态赤字区,支付碳补偿金额较高的是渝北区1.53×10
7
元。[结论
]
应从以下方面引导流域低碳发展:推动区域合作治理碳排放,建立横向碳补偿机制;控制建设用地规模,优化土地利用配置;落实绿色发展理念,增强碳汇能力;优化能源供给结构,提高能源利用率等。
[Objective] The land use carbon emission pattern was analyzed and the value of carbon compensation was estimated in the Three Gorges reservoir area in order to provide a reference for guiding low-carbon development and improving the carbon compensation mechanism in the basin. [Methods] We used the carbon emission factor
energy consumption per unit GDP
and economic contribution coefficient to calculate the carbon compensation value of land use. The net carbon emission was taken as the benchmark value. The carbon emission threshold and carbon emission intensity were revised. [Results] ① Carbon emission and carbon absorption in the Three Gorges reservoir area showed an overall upward trend from 1980 to 2021. Cultivated land and forest land were the main sources of carbon sequestration from regional land use
and urban and rural industrial
mining
and residential land were the main sources of carbon emissions from regional land use; ② The carbon absorption pattern was low in the west and high in the east. From 1980 to 2021
the districts and counties with middle-high level and high level carbon absorption increased significantly
and most of them were located in the east and north of the study area
while the counties with low level carbon absorption decreased; ③ In terms of carbon emission patterns
land use carbon emissions in the Three Gorges Reservoir area from 1980 to 1990 were at a low level or medium-low level. The overall carbon emissions of the reservoir area increased from 2000 to 2021
with the main urban area of Chongqing City in the west; Wanzhou
Kaizhou District
and Yunyang County in the middle; and Yiling District in the east at medium and high levels. Wulong County was at a medium level. The carbon emissions of Badong
Wushan
Wuxi
Zigui County
and other surrounding areas were at low and medium-low levels; ④ In the study area
nine districts and counties were ecological surplus areas and should obtain carbon offset funds. Fengjie County should receive the highest carbon compensation fund of 6.87×105 yuan. Seventeen districts and counties were ecological deficit areas. Yubei District paid the highest amount of carbon offsets of 1.53×107 yuan. [Conclusion] In the ecological deficit areas
regional cooperation should be promoted to control carbon emissions
and a horizontal carbon compensation mechanism should be established. The scale of construction land should be controlled
and land use allocation should be optimized. The concept of green development should be implemented to enhance carbon sequestration capacity. Energy supply structure should be optimized and energy utilization rate should be increased to guide low-carbon development of the watershed.
周嘉,王钰萱,刘学荣,等.基于土地利用变化的中国省域碳排放时空差异及碳补偿研究[J].地理科学,2019,39(12):1955-1961.
韦玉琼,龙飞.乡村振兴背景下农业农村碳排放变动及减排策略[J].农业经济问题,2022(9):62-73.
杨静媛,张明,多玲花,等.江西省土地利用碳排放空间格局及碳平衡分区[J].环境科学研究,2022,35(10):2312-2321.
万伦来,林春鑫,陈艺.基于相对碳赤字的中国省际碳补偿时空格局研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2020,29(12):2572-2583.
王兆林,鄂施璇,陈军利.近40年来三峡库区农村人口与居民点用地演变脱钩及驱动效应分析[J].农业工程学报,2022,38(13):273-284.
张玥,代亚强,陈媛媛,等.土地利用隐性转型与土地利用碳排放空间关联研究[J].中国土地科学,2022,36(6):100-112.
易丹,欧名豪,郭杰,等.土地利用碳排放及低碳优化研究进展与趋势展望[J].资源科学,2022,44(8):1545-1559.
张中秋,劳燕玲,赵宁俊,等.广东省土地利用—碳减排—经济增长的脱钩关系[J].水土保持通报,2022,42(1):250-258.
禹康康,王延华,孙恬,等.太湖流域土地利用碳排放变化及其预测[J].土壤,2022,54(2):406-414.
Yang Guangchun, Shang Peipei, He Lichun, et al. Interregional carbon compensation cost forecast and priority index calculation based on the theoretical carbon deficit: China as a case [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019,654:786-800.
Cui Xiaolin, Wei Xiaoqing, Liu Wei, et al. Spatial and temporal analysis of carbon sources and sinks through land use/cover changes in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration region [J]. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth (A/B/C), 2019,110:61-70.
孙赫,梁红梅,常学礼,等.中国土地利用碳排放及其空间关联[J].经济地理,2015,35(3):154-162.
周萍,陈松林,李晶,等.福建省土地利用变化碳排放时空差异与碳补偿[J].水土保持通报,2022,42(3):356-365.
张杰,陈海,刘迪,等.基于县域尺度土地利用碳排放的时空分异及影响因素研究[J].西北大学学报(自然科学版),2022,52(1):21-31.
杨滨键,田景仁,孙红雨.农业生产碳足迹影响因素研究: 基于SVAR模型[J].生态经济,2019,35(8):120-127.
曹俊文,陶强强.长江经济带农业碳补偿修正测算及分析[J].农业资源与环境学报,2021,38(4):693-698.
伍国勇,陈莹,孙小钧.中国种植业碳补偿率区域差异、动态演进及收敛性分析[J].中国生态农业学报(中英文),2021,29(10):1774-1785.
李波,张俊飚,李海鹏.中国农业碳排放时空特征及影响因素分解[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2011,21(8):80-86.
陈芷君,刘毅华,林华荣.广东省土地利用碳排放与经济增长之间的脱钩分析[J].生态经济,2018,34(5):26-32.
周勇,赵伟.西安市土地利用结构碳排放核算及低碳优化研究[J].生态经济,2018,34(5):21-25.
赵荣钦,刘英,马林,等.基于碳收支核算的河南省县域空间横向碳补偿研究[J].自然资源学报,2016,31(10):1675-1687.
李璐,董捷,徐磊,等.功能区土地利用碳收支空间分异及碳补偿分区: 以武汉城市圈为例[J].自然资源学报,2019,34(5):1003-1015.
王政强,覃盟琳,唐世斌,等.北部湾城市群土地利用碳收支时空分异及碳补偿分区[J].水土保持通报,2022,42(5):348-359.
0
浏览量
682
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621