不同结皮类型对植被混凝土基材团聚体及有机碳的影响

闫书星; 夏栋; 艾尚进; 马佳鑫; 刘芳; 刘黎明; 林茂锋

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20230216.001

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

不同结皮类型对植被混凝土基材团聚体及有机碳的影响

试验研究

- 不同结皮类型对植被混凝土基材团聚体及有机碳的影响
- Effects of Different Crust Types on Soil Aggregates and Organic Carbon of Vegetated Concrete Substrates
- 水土保持通报 2023年43卷第3期页码：414-420
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 三峡大学水泥基生态修复技术湖北省工程研究中心,湖北,宜昌,443002
  2. 三峡大学水利与环境学院,湖北,宜昌,443002
  3. 三峡大学生药与制药学院,湖北,宜昌,443002
  4. 三峡大学土木与建筑学院,湖北,宜昌,443002
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金面上项目“干旱—碱性环境下丛枝菌根对植被混凝土生态修复植物抗逆性的影响”(51979147);内蒙古自治区科技重大专项课题“改性湖泊底泥协同寒旱地区堆填场生态修复技术研究”(2021ZD0007-03)
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20230216.001
  中图分类号： S152
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
闫书星, 夏栋, 艾尚进, 等. 不同结皮类型对植被混凝土基材团聚体及有机碳的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(3):414-420.

Yan Shuxing, Xia Dong, Ai Shangjin, et al. Effects of Different Crust Types on Soil Aggregates and Organic Carbon of Vegetated Concrete Substrates[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(3): 414-420.
闫书星, 夏栋, 艾尚进, 等. 不同结皮类型对植被混凝土基材团聚体及有机碳的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(3):414-420. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20230216.001.

Yan Shuxing, Xia Dong, Ai Shangjin, et al. Effects of Different Crust Types on Soil Aggregates and Organic Carbon of Vegetated Concrete Substrates[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(3): 414-420. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20230216.001.

摘要

[目的

]

分析土壤团聚体分布和有机碳含量特征，揭示生物结皮对边坡稳定和养分固持的影响，为生物结皮在修复工程中的运用提供参考和指导意见。[方法

]

以植被混凝土基材修复边坡为例，运用土壤干筛法、土壤湿筛法分别对结皮覆盖和无结皮覆盖坡面土壤的结皮层(0—2 cm)和结皮下层(2—7 cm)团聚体和有机碳特征进行研究。[结果

]

①生物结皮的存在明显影响了土壤团聚体分布、机械稳定性及R

0.25

含量。结皮覆盖层较CK(无结皮覆盖坡面)稳定性指标分别增加27.42%~33.51%(MWD)，21.66%~28.88%(GMD)，大团聚体含量(R

0.25

)增加10.68%，且苔藓类结皮影响最为显著。②湿筛法测定的不同结皮类型土壤团聚体均以＞0.25 mm粒径为主，其中结皮覆盖边坡的团聚体水稳性参数MWD，GMD，R

0.25

分别介于1.93~5.33 mm，0.85~3.16 mm，70.97%~87.50%，以苔藓覆盖边坡最大，D

值介于2.48~2.74间，以苔藓类值最小。团聚体水稳定性表现为苔藓覆盖边坡最好，裸坡最差。③结皮的存在促进了土壤有机碳累积，有机碳含量是CK组的两倍以上。其中对表层土壤有机碳水平提升作用明显，对下层土壤作用较低。④土壤有机碳含量与土壤水稳性参数MWD，GMD，R

0.25

呈显著正相关性(p＜0.05)，有机碳水平和团聚体稳定性联系密切，相互影响，有机碳水平的提高对增加团聚体稳定性具有重要作用。[结论

]

生物结皮的存在对修复边坡团聚体稳定和有机碳累积具有促进作用，结皮对生态修复边坡稳定和养分固持有一定的作用，且不同结皮类型作用强度不一，其中苔藓类和混生结皮固土和固碳效果最优。

Abstract

[Objective] The distribution of soil aggregates and the characteristics of organic carbon content were analyzed to determine the influence of biological crust on slope stability and nutrient retention in order to provide a reference and guidance for the application of biological crusts in slope restoration engineering.[Methods] Taking a restoration slope with vegetation concrete substrates as an example

the soil dry screening method and the soil wet screening method were used to study aggregates in the crust (0-2 cm) and subsurface layer (2-7 cm) and organic carbon characteristics of crust-covered and non-crust-covered slope soil.[Results] ① The presence of biological crusts significantly affected the distribution of soil aggregates

mechanical stability

and R0.25 content. Compared with the check treatment (CK

no crust-covered slope)

the stability index of the crust covering layer increased by 27.42%-33.51% (MWD) and 21.66%-28.88% (GMD)

and the content of large aggregates (R0.25) increased by 10.68%. Moss crust had the most significant impact. ② Soil aggregate particle size of different crust types measured by the wet sieving method were mainly>0.25 mm. The water stability parameters MWD

GMD

and R0.25 of the crust-covered slopes were between 1.93 and 5.33 mm

0.85 and 3.16 mm

and 70.97% and 87.50%

with moss-covered slopes having the largest values. The Dd values were between 2.48 and 2.74

with the smallest values observed for moss-covered slopes. The water stability of aggregates was best for moss-covered slopes and worst for bare slopes. ③ The presence of crust promoted the accumulation of organic carbon in the soil

and the organic carbon content was more than twice that of the CK treatment. The effect on the organic carbon level for the surface soil was obvious

and the effect for the subsurface soil layer was low. ④ There was a significant positive correlation between soil organic carbon content and soil water stability parameters MWD

GMD

and R0.25 (p<0.05). The level of organic carbon and the stability of aggregates were closely related and affected each other. Increasing organic carbon level played an important role in increasing aggregate stability.[Conclusion] The existence of a biological crust increases aggregate stability and organic carbon accumulation of repaired slopes. The crust has a certain effect on the stability of the ecologically repaired slope and on nutrient fixation. The strength of different crust types varies

with moss and mixed crusts having the best soil fixation and carbon sequestration effects.

关键词

Keywords

references

Sun Fuhai. Towards moss biocrust effects on surface soil water holding capacity:Soil water retention curve analysis and modeling[J]. Geoderma, 2021,399:115120.

Rodríguez-Caballero E. Ecosystem services provided by biocrusts:From ecosystem functions to social values[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2018,159:45-53.

张丙昌,武志芳,李彬.黄土高原生物土壤结皮研究进展与展望[J].土壤学报,2021,58(5):1123-1131.

Zhao Yang. The seasonal and successional variations of carbon release from biological soil crust-covered soil[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2016,127:148-153.

李新荣.荒漠生物土壤结皮生态与水文学研究[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2012.

Wang Xinping. Temporal stability analysis of surface and subsurface soil moisture for a transect in artificial revegetation desert area, China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2013,507:100-109.

赵冰琴,夏振尧,许文年,等.工程扰动区边坡生态修复技术研究综述[J].水利水电技术,2017,48(2):130-137.

Liu Daxiang, Xu Wennian, Cheng Zunlan, et al. Improvement test on frost resistance of vegetation-concrete and engineering application of test fruitage[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2013,69(1):161-170.

刘黎明,宋岩松,钟斌,等.植被混凝土生态修复技术研究进展[J].环境工程技术学报,2022,12(3):916-927.

刘杰,马艳婷,王宪玲,等.渭北旱塬土地利用方式对土壤团聚体稳定性及其有机碳的影响[J].环境科学,2019,40(7):3361-3368.

蒋腊梅,白桂芬,吕光辉,等.不同管理模式对干旱区草原土壤团聚体稳定性及其理化性质的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2018,36(4):15-21.

尚杰,耿增超,赵军,等.生物炭对土水热特性及团聚体稳定性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(7):1969-1976.

郭轶瑞,赵哈林,左小安,等.科尔沁沙地沙丘恢复过程中典型灌丛下结皮发育特征及表层土壤特性[J].环境科学,2008,29(4):1027-1034.

祁迎春,王益权,刘军,等.不同土地利用方式土壤团聚体组成及几种团聚体稳定性指标的比较[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(1):340-347.

李鉴霖,江长胜,郝庆菊.土地利用方式对缙云山土壤团聚体稳定性及其有机碳的影响[J].环境科学,2014,35(12):4695-4704.

鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000:30-34.

唐士明.北方农牧交错区不同土地利用方式对土壤团聚体和微生物群落的影响[D].北京:中国农业大学,2018.

Zhang Bin, Horn R. Mechanisms of aggregate stabilization in ultisols from subtropical China[J]. Geoderma, 2001,99(1/2):123-145.

林武星,黄雍容,郑郁善,等.闽南山地不同密度桉树人工林土壤肥力的分形研究[J].山地学报,2012,30(6):663-668.

Six J, Elliott E T, Paustian K. Soil structure and soil organic matter (Ⅱ):A normalized stability index and the effect of mineralogy[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2000,64(3):1042-1049.

韩贞贵,周运超,任娇娇,等.马尾松人工林土壤各粒径团聚体湿筛后的有机碳分配[J].生态学报,2021,41(23):9388-9398.

霍琳,杨思存,王成宝,等.耕作方式对甘肃引黄灌区灌耕灰钙土团聚体分布及稳定性的影响[J].应用生态学报,2019,30(10):3463-3472.

谢贤健,张继.巨桉人工林下土壤团聚体稳定性及分形特征[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(6):175-179.

陈曦,王改玲,刘焕焕,等.黄土高原吕梁山不同撂荒年限土壤团聚体稳定性及有机碳分布特征[J].土壤,2021,53(2):375-382.

赵允格,许明祥,Jayne Belnap.生物结皮光合作用对光温水的响应及其对结皮空间分布格局的解译:以黄土丘陵区为例[J].生态学报,2010,30(17):4668-4675.

孙华方,李希来,金立群,等.生物土壤结皮对黄河源区人工草地植被与土壤理化性质的影响[J].草地学报,2020,28(2):509-520.

Berhe A A, Harte J, Harden J W, et al. The significance of the erosion-induced terrestrial carbon sink[J]. BioScience, 2007,57(4):337-346.

肖波,赵允格,邵明安.陕北水蚀风蚀交错区两种生物结皮对土壤理化性质的影响[J].生态学报,2007(11):4662-4670.

王新平,肖洪浪,张景光,等.荒漠地区生物土壤结皮的水文物理特征分析[J].水科学进展,2006(5):592-598.

刘强,穆兴民,高鹏,等.土壤水力侵蚀对土壤质量理化指标影响的研究综述[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(6):386-392.

Hu Rui, Wang Xinping, Pan Yanxia, et al. The response mechanisms of soil N mineralization under biological soil crusts to temperature and moisture in temperate desert regions[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology, 2014,62:66-73.

苏延桂,李新荣,赵昕,等.不同类型生物土壤结皮固氮活性及对环境因子的响应研究[J.地球科学进展,2011,26(3):332-338.

樊瑾,李诗瑶,余海龙,等.毛乌素沙地不同类型生物结皮与下层土壤酶活性及土壤碳氮磷化学计量特征[J].中国沙漠,2021,41(4):109-120.

浏览量

560

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

黄土丘陵区典型草地土壤有机碳及微生物量碳的分布特征

基于文献计量的长江经济带重点湖泊生态环境研究进展与趋势分析

宁夏回族自治区“一河三山”区域生态资源本底状况分析及评价

黄土高原淤地坝碳汇量精准测量与计算

葵花秸秆水热炭对土壤有机碳及其矿化特征的影响