山西晋中理工学院 经济与管理学院,山西,晋中,030621
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
胡雪. 山西省生态经济系统协调度演变格局及其影响因素[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(2):285-292.
Hu Xue. Evolution Pattern of Ecosystem Coordination and Its Influencing Factors in Shanxi Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(2): 285-292.
胡雪. 山西省生态经济系统协调度演变格局及其影响因素[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(2):285-292. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20230215.002.
Hu Xue. Evolution Pattern of Ecosystem Coordination and Its Influencing Factors in Shanxi Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(2): 285-292. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20230215.002.
[目的] 探究山西省生态经济系统协调发展程度及其影响因素,为推动该地区生态经济协调高质量发展提供理论支撑与科学参考。 [方法] 基于2000—2020年5期土地利用数据,采用修正后的单位面积生态系统服务当量因子,结合生态系统服务价值(ESV)评估模型、生态经济协调度模型以及地理探测器与空间分析法对山西省ESV、经济发展以及生态经济协调度进行综合研究。 [结果] 2000—2020年山西省ESV由3 241.73亿元下降至3 189.70亿元,呈现出先增后减的动态变化特征,除林地ESV增加外,其余土地利用类型ESV均出现不同程度的下降,其中耕地下降幅度最大,降幅为5.42%;ESV空间分布格局较为稳定,高值区分布在太行山、太岳山以及吕梁山等山区地带,低值区分布在太原盆地、长治盆地、临汾盆地以及运城盆地等人类活动密集地区,且范围有所增扩。2000—2020年山西省生态经济系统协调度指数为-0.001 9,处于低度失调状态,其经历了由低度协调向低度失调转变的过程,生态经济协调关系出现恶化,空间上呈现出南高北低的分布格局,生态经济系统可持续协调发展面临极大挑战。NDVI和城镇化率对协调度的影响程度远大于其他影响因素,其次是GDP、人口密度、工业化率和土地开发强度,其余影响因素对生态经济系统协调度的影响程度较小,且社会经济因素对生态经济系统协调度的影响程度明显大于自然环境因素。 [结论] 人类社会经济活动是影响生态经济系统协调度的关键因素,合理开发和有效利用区域水土资源是实现山西省生态经济系统协调可持续发展的关键。
[Objective] The degree of coordinated development of ecological and economic systems in Shanxi Province and the factors influencing that development was determined in order to provide theoretical support and a scientific reference for promoting coordinated and high-quality ecological and economic development in the region. [Methods] Based on land use data of five periods from 2000 to 2020
we used the modified ecosystem service equivalent factor per unit area
combined with an ecosystem service value (ESV) assessment model
an ecological-economic coordination degree model
and a geographic probe and spatial analysis method to conduct a comprehensive study of ESV
economic development
and ecological-economic coordination degree in Shanxi Province. [Results] ESV in Shanxi Province from 2000 to 2020 decreased from RMB 324.173 billion to RMB 318.970 billion
showing a dynamic change characteristic of first increasing and then decreasing
except for the continued increase of forest land ESV. ESV for all other land use types decreased to different degrees
among which arable land decreased the most (5.42%). The ESV spatial distribution pattern was relatively stable
with high value areas located in mountainous areas such as the Taihang Mountains
the Taiyue Mountains
and the Luliang Mountains
and low value areas located in areas with intensive human activities such as the Taiyuan Basin
the Changzhi Basin
the Linfen Basin
and the Yuncheng Basin. The range has expanded over time. NDVI and urbanization rate had a greater influence on the coordination degree than GDP
population density
industrialization rate
and land development intensity. The remaining factors had a smaller influence on the coordination degree. The degree of influence of other factors on the coordination degree of eco-economic system was smaller
and the degree of influence of socio-economic factors on the coordination degree of the eco-economic system was significantly larger than that of natural environmental factors. [Conclusion] Human socio-economic activities were the key factors affecting the coordination degree of the eco-economic system. The rational development and effective utilization of regional water and soil resources were the key to understanding the coordinated and sustainable development of the eco-economic system in Shanxi Province.
魏晓旭,赵军,魏伟,等.基于县域单元的中国生态经济系统协调度及空间演化[J].地理科学进展,2014,33(11):1535-1545.
程静,陈红翔,韩永贵.三江源地区生态经济系统协调度评价及其时空演变特征[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(6):336-343.
杨小龙,武国胜,林惠花.基于LUCC的福建省生态系统功能与经济协调度动态变化研究[J].福建师范大学学报(自然科学版),2020,36(5):55-64.
张伟丽,王伊斌,李金晓,等.黄河流域生态保护与经济高质量发展耦合协调网络分析[J].生态经济,2022,38(10):179-189.
苏飞,张平宇.基于生态系统服务价值变化的环境与经济协调发展评价:以大庆市为例[J].地理科学进展,2009,28(3):471-477.
魏伟,石培基,魏晓旭,等.中国陆地经济与生态环境协调发展的空间演变[J].生态学报,2018,38(8):2636-2648.
马丽,金凤君,刘毅.中国经济与环境污染耦合度格局及工业结构解析[J].地理学报,2012,67(10):1299-1307.
张伟丽,王伊斌,李金晓,等.黄河流域生态保护与经济高质量发展耦合协调网络分析[J].生态经济,2022,38(10):179-189.
苏胜亮.宁夏回族自治区生态环境与经济发展耦合协调研究[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(2):367-374.
朱玉鑫,姚顺波.基于生态系统服务价值变化的环境与经济协调发展研究:以陕西省为例[J].生态学报,2021,41(9):3331-3342.
王鹏,刘小鹏,姚晓艳,等.基于能值分析的宁夏生态经济系统可持续发展评价[J].生态经济,2018,34(1):70-73.
张雅杰,马国创.荆州市域县市区生态经济耦合协调关系与发展模式研究[J].生态经济,2016,32(12):92-96.
高群.国外生态—经济系统整合模型研究进展[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(3):375-384.
程静,黄越.宁夏回族自治区生态系统服务价值时空演变及其驱动力[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(2):382-389.
李龙,吴大放,刘艳艳,等.基于CA-Markov模型的惠州市生态与经济协调度时空演变特征及模拟预测[J].生态与农村环境学报,2020,36(2):161-170.
谢高地,甄霖,鲁春霞,等.一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J].自然资源学报,2008,23(5):911-919.
王鹏,刘小鹏,王亚娟,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区生态移民过程及其生态系统服务价值评价:以宁夏海原县为例[J].干旱区地理,2019,42(2):433-443.
范胜龙,张珊珊,邱凌婧,等.福建省长汀县生态环境建设与经济发展的协调关系研究[J].中国农业大学学报,2018,23(3):175-184.
王劲峰,徐成东.地理探测器:原理与展望[J].地理学报,2017,72(1):116-134.
王鹏,王亚娟,刘小鹏,等.基于景观结构的生态移民安置区生态风险评价:以宁夏红寺堡区为例[J].生态学报,2018,38(8):2672-2682.
刘海龙,丁娅楠,王跃飞,等.山西省城镇化与生态系统服务时空相关性及空间效应分析[J].水土保持学报,2022,36(1):124-134.
杨翠翠,秦明星,张亚军,等.山西省生态系统服务价值与经济协调发展的时空演化研究[J].天津农业科学,2022,28(7):64-71.
刘海龙,石培基,李生梅,等.河西走廊生态经济系统协调度评价及其空间演化[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(12):3645-3654.
祖皮艳木·买买提,玉米提·哈力克,肉孜·阿基,等.基于生态系统服务价值变化的焉耆盆地环境与经济协调发展[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(3):875-883.
0
浏览量
663
下载量
3
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621