阴山北麓地区土壤侵蚀的时空变化及驱动力

吴帅; 阿如旱; 潘海伟

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.06.043

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

阴山北麓地区土壤侵蚀的时空变化及驱动力

试验研究

- 阴山北麓地区土壤侵蚀的时空变化及驱动力
- Spatial and Temporal Changes and Driving Factors of Soil Erosion in North Piedmont of Yinshan Mountain
- 水土保持通报 2023年43卷第6期页码：380-390
- 作者机构：
  
  内蒙古农业大学沙漠治理学院,内蒙古,呼和浩特,010010
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目“生态敏感煤炭富集区的区域发展空间均衡研究”（41061011）;内蒙古大学试验教学项目（YZ2017016）;内蒙古自治区风沙物理与防沙治沙工程重点实验室基金项目
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.06.043
  中图分类号： S157.1
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
吴帅, 阿如旱, 潘海伟. 阴山北麓地区土壤侵蚀的时空变化及驱动力[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(6):380-390.

Wu Shuai, Aruhan, Pan Haiwei. Spatial and Temporal Changes and Driving Factors of Soil Erosion in North Piedmont of Yinshan Mountain[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(6): 380-390.
吴帅, 阿如旱, 潘海伟. 阴山北麓地区土壤侵蚀的时空变化及驱动力[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(6):380-390. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.06.043.

Wu Shuai, Aruhan, Pan Haiwei. Spatial and Temporal Changes and Driving Factors of Soil Erosion in North Piedmont of Yinshan Mountain[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(6): 380-390. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.06.043.

摘要

[目的] 分析2000—2020年阴山北麓地区土壤侵蚀时空变化及其影响因素，为该区土壤侵蚀治理与国土空间规划提供科学指导。[方法] 基于降水、土地利用、土壤和遥感影像等数据，采用GIS技术和RUSLE模型开展研究。[结果] ①2000—2020年阴山北麓地区土壤侵蚀强度主要以微度侵蚀和轻度侵蚀为主，高等级侵蚀面积不断增加，阴山北麓地区土壤侵蚀状况十分严峻； ②阴山北麓地区土壤侵蚀严重区主要分布在阴山山脉沿线和内蒙古多伦县大部分地区； ③土地利用类型是阴山北麓地区土壤侵蚀主要影响因子，各因子解释力大小依次为：土地利用类型>植被覆盖度>降雨>坡度。土地利用类型为耕地，植被覆盖度小于0.3，坡度在15°～20°和降雨量在365～413 mm之间的地区为高风险侵蚀区域。[结论] 阴山北麓地区土壤侵蚀程度整体偏高。植被覆盖度低的耕地和草地应为阴山北麓地区土壤侵蚀治理重点区域，应采取植树造林种草，扩大林草覆盖面，改善植被覆盖率，降低地表径流速率，提高下渗能力，来控制土壤侵蚀发生。

Abstract

[Objective] The spatial and temporal changes of soil erosion and its influencing factors in the north piedmont of Yinshan Mountain from 2000 to 2020 were analyzed in order to provide scientific guidance for soil erosion control and land space planning in this area. [Methods] Based on precipitation

land use

soil and remote sensing image data

the research was carried out by using GIS technology and the RUSLE model. [Results] ① From 2000 to 2020

soil erosion intensity in the north piedmont of Yinshan Mountain was mainly micro-grade erosion and moderate-grade erosion. The area of high-grade erosion continued to increase over time. The soil erosion status in the north piedmont of Yinshan Mountain was very severe. ② The areas of severe soil erosion in the north piedmont of Yinshan Mountain were mainly located along the Yinshan Mountain range and most areas of Duolun County

Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region. ③ Land use type was the main influencing factor of soil erosion in the north piedmont of Yinshan Mountain. The explanatory power of each factor followed the order of:land use type > vegetation coverage > rainfall > slope. The area consisting of cultivated land with vegetation coverage less than 0.3

slope of 15°~20°

and rainfall of 365~413 mm was the high risk erosion area. [Conclusion] The degree of soil erosion in the north piedmont of Yinshan Mountain was generally high. Cultivated land and grassland with low vegetation coverage should be the key areas for soil erosion control in the north piedmont of Yinshan Mountain. Soil erosion should be controlled by planting trees and grasses to expand the coverage of forests and grasslands

improve vegetation coverage

reduce surface runoff rate

and improve infiltration capacity.

关键词

Keywords

references

李锐,上官周平,刘宝元,等.近60年我国土壤侵蚀科学研究进展[J].中国水土保持科学,2009,7(5):1-6.

Borrelli P R.An assessment of the global impact of 21st century land use change on soil erosion [J].Nature Communications, 2017,8(1):1-13.

Zhang Hua, Lei Jinping, Wang Hao, et al.Study on dynamic changes of soil erosion in the north and south mountains of Lanzhou [J].Water, 2022,14(15):23-88.

Eyasu T M.Assessment of spatial soil erosion using RUSLE model integration with GIS and RS tools a case study of Gojeb Catchment, Omo-Gibe Basin, Ethiopia [J].International Journal of Environmental Protection and Policy, 2022,10(5):130-139.

Bufalin M, Materazzi M, Martinelli C, et al.Soil erosion and deposition rate inside an artificial reservoir in Central Italy:bathymetry versus RUSLE and Morphometry [J].Land, 2022,11(11):19-24.

杜梅,赵健赟,杨静,等.基于MODIS和Landsat数据的湟水河流域土壤侵蚀时空变化研究[J].水土保持通报,2022,42(3):131-138.

高泗强,刘琪,罗歆.基于RUSLE模型的重庆土地利用变化及土壤侵蚀特征分析[J].中国水土保持,2022(11):32-36,7.

王猛,王鹤松,姜超,等.基于RUSLE和地理探测器模型的西南地区土壤侵蚀格局及定量归因[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2021,29(6):1386-1402.

牛丽楠,邵全琴,刘国波,等.六盘水市土壤侵蚀时空特征及影响因素分析[J].地球信息科学学报,2019,21(11):1755-1767.

王彦阁,胡晓海,孙海莲,等.阴山北麓农牧交错区2000-2015年土壤流失及保持量变化研究[J].西南林业大学学报(自然科学),2019,39(2):127-135.

朱丽,秦富仓,杨翠林,等.阴山北麓农牧交错带土壤侵蚀驱动机制研究[J].水土保持研究,2008,15(5):34-37.

刘建宇,聂洪峰,宋保芳,等.内蒙古阴山北麓的风蚀沙化作用及其生态地质效应[J].中国地质,2023(1):1-16.

秦新平.旱作农田土壤风力侵蚀研究[J].内蒙古水利,2014(1):11-12.

邹春霞,申向东,李夏子,等.内蒙古阴山北麓农牧交错带风蚀气候侵蚀力特征[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2011,41(4):1172-1178.

Mhaske S N, Pathak K, Dash S S, et al.Assessment and management of soil erosion in the hilltop mining dominated catchment using GIS integrated RUSLE model [J].Journal of Environmental Management, 2021,294(5):112-187.

王丰,刘金铜,付同刚,等.基于RUSLE模型的太行山区土壤侵蚀时空分异特征及影响因子研究[J].中国生态农业学报(中英文),2022,30(7):1064-1076.

魏健美,李常斌,武磊,等.基于USLE的甘南川西北土壤侵蚀研究[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(2):31-37,46.

李益敏,刘师旖,李盈盈,等.福贡县土壤侵蚀时空变化及其影响因素分析[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(3):57-63,70.

Sun Xiaohao, Miao Linchang, Yuan Junhao, et al.Application of enzymatic calcification for dust control and rainfall erosion resistance improvement [J].Science of the Total Environment, 2020,7(4):143-468.

Pimentel D, Kounang N.Ecology of soil erosion in ecosystems[J].Ecosystems, 1998,1(1):416-426.

高凡洁,张富,胡彦婷,等.基于GIS和RUSLE模型的定西市安定区土壤侵蚀时空变化[J].甘肃农业大学学报,2022,57(1):161-168.

牛慧兰,任鸿瑞.青藏高原草地非光合植被覆盖度时空动态[J].草业科学,2022,39(8):1521-1530.

刘英,魏嘉莉,岳辉,等.神东矿区土壤侵蚀时空特征及驱动力分析[J].测绘科学,2022,47(1):142-153.

赵蒙恩,闫庆武,刘政婷,等.鄂尔多斯市土壤侵蚀时空演变及影响因子分析[J].干旱区研究,2022,39(6):1819-1831.

高江波,张怡博,左丽媛.喀斯特山地土壤侵蚀和产水量的最优解释力[J].地理学报,2022,77(11):2920-2934.

Xiong Liwei, Li Shenxin, Zou Bin, et al.Long time-series urban heat island monitoring and driving factors analysis using remote sensing and geodetector [J].Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2022,51(9):721-759.

朱永杰,王超,刘自强.降雨和植被覆盖对铁路路基边坡土壤侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(6):8-14.

王劲峰,徐成东.地理探测器:原理与展望[J].地理学报,2017,72(1):116-134.

水利部.土壤侵蚀分类分级标准:SL 190-2007.[S].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2008.

李蕊.晋陕蒙神东矿区生态环境质量时空特征变化研究[D].内蒙古呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2021.

那木汗,阿如旱,苏德苏日古格.基于Logistic回归模型的阴山北麓农牧交错区耕地资源潜力研究[J].内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版),2022,43(4):19-24.

谢航宇,江怡,陈麒,等.2007-2020年白沙河流域土壤水力侵蚀时空变化[J].水土保持通报,2022,42(4):74-81,89.

李森,李凡,孙武,等.黑河下游额济纳绿洲现代荒漠化过程及其驱动机制[J].地理科学,2004,24(1):61-67.

浏览量

571

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

2010—2023年秦岭北麓（西安段）土壤侵蚀特征

基于无人机摄影测量的平陆运河弃土场水土流失综合防控研究

丹江口库区土壤侵蚀对土地利用变化的响应

基于RUSLE模型的2000-2010年长江三峡库区土壤侵蚀评价

基于随机森林算法的土壤侵蚀影响因子研究——以赣江上游流域为例