淮河生态经济带新型城镇化、经济发展与水生态环境耦合协调关系及其驱动因素

李明鸿; 卢辞

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.06.034

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

淮河生态经济带新型城镇化、经济发展与水生态环境耦合协调关系及其驱动因素

试验研究

- 淮河生态经济带新型城镇化、经济发展与水生态环境耦合协调关系及其驱动因素
- Coupling and Coordination Relationship Between New Urbanization, Economic Development, and Ecological Water Environment in Huaihe River Economic Belt, and Their Driving Factors
- 水土保持通报 2023年43卷第6期页码：282-293
- 作者机构：
  
  安徽财经大学经济学院,安徽,蚌埠,233030
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  安徽省教育厅人文社会科学研究项目“淮河生态经济带生态系统耦合适应性研究”（SK2019ZD41）;安徽省社会科学创新发展研究课题（2021CX061）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.06.034
  中图分类号： X24;F299.21
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
李明鸿, 卢辞. 淮河生态经济带新型城镇化、经济发展与水生态环境耦合协调关系及其驱动因素[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(6):282-293.

Li Minghong, Lu Ci. Coupling and Coordination Relationship Between New Urbanization, Economic Development, and Ecological Water Environment in Huaihe River Economic Belt, and Their Driving Factors[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(6): 282-293.
李明鸿, 卢辞. 淮河生态经济带新型城镇化、经济发展与水生态环境耦合协调关系及其驱动因素[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(6):282-293. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.06.034.

Li Minghong, Lu Ci. Coupling and Coordination Relationship Between New Urbanization, Economic Development, and Ecological Water Environment in Huaihe River Economic Belt, and Their Driving Factors[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(6): 282-293. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.06.034.

摘要

[目的] 对淮河生态经济带新型城镇化、经济发展与水生态环境耦合协调关系及驱动因素进行研究，为该区水生态环境的生态建设与环境保护工作提供科学参考。[方法] 以淮河生态经济带作为研究区域，建立评价指标体系，运用耦合模型和面板数据模型，分析2010—2020年区域内三者间耦合协调度时空演变特征及影响因素。[结果] ① 2010—2020年淮河生态经济带新型城镇化、经济发展、水生态环境三系统综合水平均呈上升趋势，三系统耦合度处于高水平，耦合协调度等级不断提升，东部、北部、中西部的三系统变化趋势趋同，耦合协调度发展趋势与全域相似； ②对外开放、经济发展、产业结构、用水效率、政府、科技、人口和教育因素在不同程度上对全域与三地区的耦合协调度产生正负两方面作用。[结论] 在淮河生态经济带应该同时关注城镇化质量的提升，经济高质量发展和水生态环境保护，充分发挥正向因素作用，减少负向因素影响，实现三系统优质耦合协调发展。

Abstract

[Objective] The coupling coordination relationship and driving factors between new urbanization

economic development

and the ecological water environment in the Huaihe River economic belt were analyzed in order to provide a scientific reference for ecological construction and environmental protection in the region. [Methods] An evaluation index system was established for the Huaihe River economic belt. A coupling model and a panel data model were used to analyze the spatio-temporal evolution characteristics and influencing factors of the coupling coordination degree among the three systems from 2010 to 2020. [Results] ① From 2010 to 2020

the comprehensive levels of new urbanization

economic development

and the ecological water environment in the Huaihe River economic belt showed an upward trend

and the coupling coordination degree of the three systems was at a high level. The level of coupling coordination degree continued to increase

and the change trends of the three systems in the eastern

northern

and central-western regions converged

similar to the overall trend. ② Factors such as opening up to the outside world

economic development

industrial structure

water use efficiency

government

science and technology

population

and education had different degrees of coupling coordination for the entire region and for the three sub-regions. [Conclusion] The Huaihe River economic belt should simultaneously focus on improving the quality of urbanization

promoting high-quality economic development

and protecting the ecological water environment while fully utilizing positive factors

reducing the impact of negative factors

and achieving the high-quality coupling coordination development of the three systems.

关键词

Keywords

references

Varis O, Fraboulet S.Water resources development in the lower Senegal River basin:conflictinginterests, environmental concerns and policy options [J].International Journal of Water Resourcesdevelopment, 2002,18(2):245-260.

Walter A.Rosenbaum, Environmental Politics and policy [M].Washington D C:Congressional Quarterly Inc., 2013.

吕有金,孔令池,李言.中国城镇化与生态环境耦合协调度测度[J].城市问题,2019(12):13-22.

郭文强,金梦.西北四省区城镇化与生态环境耦合协调及其驱动因素分析[J].西北师范大学学报(自然科学版),2022,58(6):29-37.

翁异静,周祥祥,张思哲.新型城市化与生态环境耦合协调时空特征研究:以长江经济带为例[J].林业经济,2020,42(11):63-74.

姜亚俊,慈福义,史佳璐,等.山东省新型城镇化与生态环境耦合协调发展研究[J].生态经济,2021,37(5):106-112.

杨光明,杨芸瑞,桂青青.基于灰色系统理论的生态环境-城镇化-旅游业的非协调性耦合识别及优化研究:以重庆市为例[J].曲靖师范学院学报,2022,41(6):91-101.

祝志川,徐铭璐.基于改进CRITIC修正AHP的区域新型城镇化与生态环境耦合协调分析[J].吉林师范大学学报(自然科学版),2021,42(4):36-47.

埃比尼泽·霍华德.明日的田园城市[M].金经元,译.北京:商务印书馆,2010.

Grossman G M, Krueger A B.Environmental Impact of a North American Free Trade Agreement [R].Cambridge:National Bureau of Economic Research, 1991.

黄雅雯.四川省新型城镇化与经济高质量发展耦合关系研究[D].重庆:重庆大学,2020.

李怡娜.陕西省生态环境与经济发展耦合协调分析[J].合作经济与科技,2022(18):14-17.

薛明月.黄河流域经济发展与生态环境耦合协调的时空格局研究[J].世界地理研究,2022,31(6):1261-1272.

张成钢.新疆生态环境与经济发展耦合关系研究[D].吉林延边:延边大学,2022.

Henderson J V.The urbanization process and economic growth:the so-what question [J].Journal of Economic Growth, 2003,8(1):47-71.

Bertinelli L, Strobl E.Urbanization, urban concentration and economic growth in developing countries[J]Urban Studies.2007, 44(13):2499-2510.

Jedwab R, Vollrath D.Urbanization without growth in histori-cal perspective [J].Explorations in Economic History, 2015,58:1-21.

付焕,张萌,王静.新型城镇化公共服务支出的经济增长效应研究[J].现代经济探讨,2017(8):111-118.

程莉,滕祥河,文传浩.人口城镇化质量对经济增长影响的实证分析[J].统计与决策,2017(2):136-139.

毛雁冰,原云轲.绿色新型城镇化对经济增长影响的实证研究[J].上海大学学报(社会科学版),2019,36(6):107-118.

陈春霖.四川省县域城镇化与生态环境耦合协调度评估及影响因素分析[D].四川成都:西南财经大学,2020.

孙黄平,黄震方,徐冬冬,等.泛长三角城市群城镇化与生态环境耦合的空间特征与驱动机制[J].经济地理,2017,37(2):163-170,186.

田逸飘,郭佳钦,廖望科.我国城镇化进程的驱动因素分解及阶段性变化:基于LMDI模型的再检验[J].生态经济,2021,37(7):73-77,110.

黄雅雯.四川省新型城镇化与经济高质量发展耦合关系研究[D].重庆:重庆大学,2020.

徐敏,秦顺兴,马乐宽,等.水生态环境保护回顾与展望:从污染防治到三水统筹[J].中国环境管理,2021,13(5):69-78.

肖圣,多玲花,邹自力.城镇化与水生态环境耦合协调时空演变及驱动因素:以长江中下游城市群为例[J].上海国土资源,2022,43(3):61-68.

贾晴雯,董增川,朱圣男,等.江苏省水生态与经济耦合协调度评价[J].水利经济,2022,40(3):42-47,94.

浏览量

549

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

兰州-西宁城市群城市化与生态系统服务价值耦合协调关系

西藏县域生态-经济-社会耦合协调发展的时空演变及预测

长江中游城市群降碳-减污-扩绿-增长耦合协调的时空演变及影响机制

黄河流域资源型城市韧性与碳排放的耦合协调、时空演进与空间集聚

江西省数字新质生产力与水资源利用效率的耦合协调关系