1. 内蒙古农业大学 能源与交通工程学院,内蒙古,呼和浩特,010018
2. 内蒙古工业大学 数据科学与应用学院,内蒙古,呼和浩特,010021
3. 内蒙古鄂尔多斯市造林总场, 内蒙古 树林召,014300
4. 鄂尔多斯市林业和草原局,内蒙古,鄂尔多斯,017000
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
韩青池, 王海超, 孙凯, 等. 库布齐沙漠人工林的水源涵养能力[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(6):133-141.
Han Qingchi, Wang Haichao, Sun Kai, et al. Water Conservation Function of Artificial Forests in Kubuqi Desert[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(6): 133-141.
韩青池, 王海超, 孙凯, 等. 库布齐沙漠人工林的水源涵养能力[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(6):133-141. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.06.017.
Han Qingchi, Wang Haichao, Sun Kai, et al. Water Conservation Function of Artificial Forests in Kubuqi Desert[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(6): 133-141. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.06.017.
[目的
]
针对库布齐沙漠东段护林站内人工林进行林下枯落物与土壤水文功能研究,科学计算该区人工林的各项指标综合权重值,确定人工林枯落物及土壤的水文效应与水源涵养能力,为该区和相关沙区退沙还林的定向抚育提供理论指导。[方法
]
以库布齐沙漠鄂尔多斯造林总场内5种常见人工林为研究对象,利用野外实测与室内浸泡进行枯落物及土壤持水性能研究,采用层次分析法(AHP)与熵权法(EWM)相结合对林分水源涵养能力综合评估。[结果
]
①各林分枯落物厚度介于6.56~22.2 mm,蓄积量介于1.44~13.62 t/hm
2
,拦蓄能力表现为:杨树旱柳混交林>杨树林>樟子松林>3 a沙柳林>8 a沙柳林。②枯落物的最大持水深与其干质量呈线性关系,各林分最大储存约1.36~2.04 L降水,表明枯落物最大持水能力主要取决于枯落物干重量,而树种、树龄、气象等相关因素通过影响枯落物干重量间接影响持水能力。③对数函数和幂函数可较好表现枯落物的动态持水量和动态吸水率。④随着土层深度增加,各林分土壤饱和持水率、毛管持水率与总孔隙度基本呈现下降趋势,土壤容重基本呈现上升趋势。⑤林分水源涵养能力杨柳混交林高于其他林分,杨树林与樟子松林水源涵养能力相近,沙柳林最低。[结论
]
未来在沙漠地区人工防护林建设中,优先培育混交林,并通过考虑树种间水源涵养差异开展更科学的退沙还林规划。
[Objective] Research was conducted on understory litter and soil hydrological function for artificial forests in the forest protection station in the eastern section of the Kubuqi Desert. The comprehensive weight value of various indicators of the artificial forests in this area were scientifically calculated
and the hydrological effect and water conservation function of artificial forest litter and soil were determined in order to provide theoretical guidance for the directional tending of returning sand to forest in this area and related sandy areas. [Methods] Five common types of artificial shelterbelts were used in the Ordos afforestation station in the Kubuqi Desert. The water-holding capacity of litter and soil were determined using field measurements and the indoor immersion method
and the water conservation function of each forest was assessed using a combination of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the entropy-weight method (EWM). [Results] ① The litter thickness in each stand ranged from 6.56 to 22.20 mm
and the litter accumulation ranged from 1.44 to 13.62 t/hm2. Interception capacity for the different forest stands followed the order of Salix matsudana-Populus×euramericana mixed forest > Populus×euramericana forest > Pinus sylvestris forest >3-year S. matsudana forest >8-year S. matsudana forest. ② The maximum water-holding depth of litter was linearly related to the dry mass
and the maximum storage was about 1.36~2.04 L of precipitation in each stand. These results showed that the maximum water-holding capacity of the litter depended mainly on the dry weight of the litter
while related factors such as tree species
age
and meteorology indirectly affected the water-holding capacity by influencing the dry weight of the litter. ③ Logarithmic and power functions provided good representations of the dynamic water-holding capacity and dynamic water uptake of litter
respectively. ④ The saturated water-holding rate
capillary water-holding rate
and total porosity basically showed decreasing trends as soil depth increased
and soil bulk density showed an increasing trend. ⑤ The S. matsudana-Populus×euramericana mixed forest exhibited a higher water conservation function than the other forests
the Populus×euramericana and Pinus sylvestris forests had similar water conservation functions
and the S. matsudana forests had the lowest water conservation functions. [Conclusion] Construction of future artificial shelterbelts in desert regions should prioritize the cultivation of mixed forests
and a more scientific plan for the return of sand to forests should be developed by considering differences in the water conservation function between tree species.
刘源,李晓晶,段玉玺,等.库布齐沙漠东部植被恢复对土壤生态化学计量的影响[J].干旱区研究,2022,39(3):924-932.
马启民,龙银平,汤世宇,等.库布齐沙漠典型沙地人工林蒸散对比分析[J].遥感技术与应用,2022,37(4):854-864.
王盛琦,傅文慧,寇建村,等.黄土高原水蚀风蚀交错区沙地枯落物的水源涵养功能[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(5):30-37.
赵阳,王飞,齐瑞,等.白龙江、洮河林区5种典型森林枯落物与土壤层水源涵养效应[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(3):118-125.
许小明,易海杰,何亮,等.黄土高原地区林地枯枝落叶层水土保持效应研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(4):415-421.
敖特根其木格,秦富仓,周佳宁,等.内蒙古自治区多伦县不同林地枯落物持水性能研究[J].水土保持通报,2017,37(4):114-118.
张峰,彭祚登,安永兴,等.北京西山主要造林树种林下枯落物的持水特性[J].林业科学,2010,46(10):6-14.
党毅,王维,余新晓,等.北京西山典型人工林分枯落物层生态水文效应[J].北京林业大学学报,2022,44(12):72-87.
马佳明,赵鹏,刘雪莹,等.崇陵流域不同林分类型枯落物水文效应研究[J].生态环境学报,2021,30(4):691-699.
Sato Y, Kumagai T, Kume A, et al.Experimental analysis of moisture dynamics of litter layers:the effects of rainfall conditions and leaf shapes [J].Hydrological Processes, 2004,18(16):3007-3018.
Zagyvai-Kiss K A, Kalicz P, Szilágyi J, et al.On the specific water holding capacity of litter for three forest ecosystems in the eastern foothills of the Alps [J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2019,278:107656.
孙艳红,张洪江,程金花,等.缙云山不同林地类型土壤特性及其水源涵养功能[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(2):106-109.
袁杰,曹广超,曹生奎,等.祁连山南坡不同植被类型枯落物及其土壤持水特性分析[J].生态科学,2018,37(5):180-190.
陈波,孟成生,赵耀新,等.冀北山地不同海拔华北落叶松人工林枯落物和土壤水文效应[J].水土保持学报,2012,26(3):216-221.
王先棒,贺康宁,董喆,等.北川河流域典型林型水源涵养能力评价[J].中国水土保持科学,2017,15(5):94-102.
汪永英,段文标.小兴安岭南坡3种林型林地水源涵养功能评价[J].中国水土保持科学,2011,9(5):31-36.
艾彪,黄云,朱元皓,等.赣南丘陵区典型林分水源涵养功能评价[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(1):197-205.
杜捷.北京山区森林枯落物层水文过程模拟研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2017.
许小明,邹亚东,孙景梅,等.黄土高原北洛河流域林地枯落物特征及水分吸持效应[J].生态学报,2021,41(13):5153-5165.
Kim J K, Onda Y, Kim M S, et al.Plot-scale study of surface runoff on well-covered forest floors under different canopy species [J].Quaternary International, 2014,344:75-85.
张艳华.浅谈混交林在植树造林应用中的重要意义:混交原则及营造技术要点[J].农业与技术,2019,39(24):83-84.
王涛,蒙仲举,党晓宏,等.库布齐沙漠人工防护林林下枯落物及土壤水文效应研究[J].生态环境学报,2021,30(4):700-707.
侍柳彤,史常青,杜晨曦,等.小五台山地区主要林分枯落物分布特征及水源涵养能力[J].水土保持学报,2022,36(5):195-203.
刘小娥,苏世平.兰州市南北两山5种典型人工林凋落物的水文功能[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(8):2574-2582.
0
浏览量
491
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621