1. 内蒙古农业大学 草原与资源环境学院 内蒙古自治区土壤质量与养分资源重点实验室,内蒙古,呼和浩特,010018
2. 中国科学院 绿色过程与工程重点实验室(中国科学院过程工程研究所),北京,100190
3. 中国科学院绿色过程制造创新研究院,北京,100190
4. 中国科学院 过程工程研究所 战略金属资源绿色循环利用国家工程研究中心,北京,100190
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
陈翔宇, 魏江生, 马淑花, 等. 土壤调理剂界面改性对黄灌区盐碱离子迁移特性的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(6):98-105.
Chen Xiangyu, Wei Jiangsheng, Ma Shuhua, et al. Effect of Soil Conditioner Interface Modification on Migration Characteristics of Saline-Alkali Ions in Irrigation Area of Yellow River[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(6): 98-105.
陈翔宇, 魏江生, 马淑花, 等. 土壤调理剂界面改性对黄灌区盐碱离子迁移特性的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(6):98-105. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.06.013.
Chen Xiangyu, Wei Jiangsheng, Ma Shuhua, et al. Effect of Soil Conditioner Interface Modification on Migration Characteristics of Saline-Alkali Ions in Irrigation Area of Yellow River[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(6): 98-105. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.06.013.
[目的
]
通过调理剂进行亲水和疏水处理,探究调理剂不同界面特性对黄灌区土壤水盐运移规律的影响,揭示粉煤灰基土壤调理剂对盐碱地的改良机理,为不同类型盐碱地改良提供科学参考。[方法
]
以宁夏回族自治区苏打盐碱土为例,设置土柱试验探究调理剂改性前后土壤中不同盐离子在空间上的运移规律。[结果
]
添加未改性调理剂、亲水改性调理剂、疏水改性调理剂后,表层脱盐率分别为79.72%,59.91%和84.79%,远高于未加调理剂的12.64%。较添加未改性调理剂组相比,亲水性处理组含水量提高6.59%,全盐量提高了47.13%;疏水性处理组土壤含水量降低了0.67%,全盐量降低了25.22%;pH值分别从10.5降低至8.08,8.71;表层Na
+
含量分别降低10.39%和30.46%,K
+
含量分别降低10.22%和45.93%。[结论
]
调理剂的界面特性可显著影响土壤中水盐运移。疏水处理更能提升调理剂对盐碱地的改良效果,强化盐分随土壤水的下渗对盐碱地改良更为重要。
[Objective] Through the treatment of hydrophilic and hydrophobic by the conditioner
the influence of different interface characteristics of the conditioner on the soil water and salt transport law was explored
and the improvement mechanism of fly ash-based soil conditioner on saline-alkali land was revealed in order to provide scientific reference for the improvement of different types of saline-alkali land in irrigation area of the Yellow River. [Methods] Taking sodic sline soil in Ningxi Hui Autonomous Region as a case study
the spatial transport patterns of different salt ions in the soil before and after modification with the soil conditioners were investigated by soil column experiments. [Results] After the addition of unmodified conditioner
hydrophilic-modified conditioner
and hydrophobic-modified conditioner
the surface desalination rates were 79.72%
59.91%
and 84.79%
respectively
for a sodic saline soil far greater than the values obtained without conditioner added (12.64%). Compared with the unmodified conditioner treatment group
the water content of the hydrophilic treatment group was 6.59% greater
and the total salt amount was 47.13% greater. The water content of the hydrophobic treatment group was 0.67% less
and the total salt amount was 25.22% less. The pH values were reduced from 10.5 to 8.08 and 8.71
respectively. The surface Na+ contents were reduced by 10.39% and 30.46%
and the K+ contents were reduced by 10.22% and 45.93%
respectively. [Conclusion] The interface properties of soil conditioners significantly affected water and salt transport in the soil. The hydrophobic conditioner treatment was more effective in improving saline land
and increasing the infiltration of salts with soil water is more important for saline land improvement.
Arora S, Rao G G, Bio-amelioration of salt-affected soils through halophyte plant species [J].Bioremediation of Salt Affected Soils:An Indian Perspective, 2017:71-85.
董合忠,辛承松,李维江,等.山东滨海盐渍棉田盐分和养分特征及对棉花出苗的影响[J].棉花学报,2009,21(4):290-295.
韩剑宏,李艳伟,张连科,等.生物炭和脱硫石膏对盐碱土壤基本理化性质及玉米生长的影响[J].环境工程学报,2017,11(9):5291-5297.
姜焕焕,李嘉钦,陈刚,等.解磷微生物及其在盐碱土中的应用研究进展[J].土壤,2021,53(6):1125-1131.
王丹,赵亚光,马蕊,等.微生物菌肥对盐碱地枸杞土壤改良及细菌群落的影响[J].农业生物技术学报,2020,28(8):1499-1510.
赵名彦,丁国栋,郑洪彬,等.覆盖对滨海盐碱土水盐运动及对刺槐生长影响的研究[J].土壤通报,2009,40(4):751-755.
王蒙.神东矿区脱硫石膏和粉煤灰改良盐碱地的配比模式研究[D].内蒙古呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2021.
徐冰,于健,李泽坤,等.SAP, PAM与粉煤灰复配对盐碱地土壤水盐变化及向日葵光合特性的影响[J].灌溉排水学报,2017,36(S2):166-170.
赵旭,彭培好,李景吉.盐碱地土壤改良试验研究:以粉煤灰和煤矸石改良盐碱土为例[J].河南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2011,39(4):70-74.
培峰.电厂粉煤灰高值化利用现状与最新进展[J].中国资源综合利用,2020,38(11):100-104.
侯迎迎,王祖伟.粉煤灰在土壤改良和污染治理中的研究进展[J].资源节约与环保,2014,36(10):142-143.
董少文,马淑花,初茉,等.粉煤灰基土壤调理剂作用下盐碱土壤微观结构变化规律[J].过程工程学报,2022,22(3):357-365.
吴克宁,赵瑞.土壤质地分类及其在我国应用探讨[J].土壤学报,2019,56(1):227-241.
马淑花,何广礼,王晓辉,等.一种土壤调理剂及其制备方法与应用[P].北京:CN114790393 A,2022.
王宝玉,张苏明,兰玉顺,等.KH-570表面改性超细SiO
2
的研究[J].北京化工大学学报(自然科学版),2010,37(5):30-34.
鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000.
王楠,赵兰坡,周彦明,等.玉米(超)高产与普通生产田土壤酸碱缓冲作用的研究[J].吉林农业科学,2009,34(2):24-27,29.
王小芳.斥水性土壤中水分运动规律的数值模拟[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2019.
王秋玲,施凡欣,刘志鹏,等.土壤斥水性影响土壤水分运动研究进展[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(24):96-103.
肖国举,罗成科,张峰举,等.燃煤电厂脱硫石膏改良碱化土壤的施用量[J].环境科学研究,2010,23(6):762-767.
程镜润,陈小华,刘振鸿,等.脱硫石膏改良滨海盐碱土的脱盐过程与效果试验研究[J].中国环境科学,2014,34(6):1505-1513.
李丹萍.不同镁肥在土壤中的迁移淋洗及其生物有效性研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2018.
李占君,张厚良,郭兴,等.不同改良措施对松嫩平原重度盐碱地土壤结构与元素组成、杨树叶片光合及生长状况影响差异研究[J].植物研究,2019,39(5):733-739.
刘丛强,吴佳红,于文辉.氢氧化铁胶体/水界面作用与地表水中稀土元素的分异:pH控制机理的试验研究[J].中国科学(D辑),2001,31(10):873-880.
姚同宇.粉煤灰基土壤调理剂改良锡盟退化草原应用研究[D].辽宁阜新:辽宁工程技术大学,2021.
0
浏览量
625
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621