北京师范大学 环境学院/水环境模拟国家重点实验室,北京,100875
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
王岚园, 王一宁, 任泳宁, 等. 坝上草原鱼鳞坑生态修复措施的水土保持效应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(6):89-97.
Wang Lanyuan, Wang Yining, Ren Yongning, et al. Effects of Ecological Restoration Measures of Fish-scale Pit on Soil and Water Conservation in Bashang Grassland[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(6): 89-97.
王岚园, 王一宁, 任泳宁, 等. 坝上草原鱼鳞坑生态修复措施的水土保持效应[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(6):89-97. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.06.012.
Wang Lanyuan, Wang Yining, Ren Yongning, et al. Effects of Ecological Restoration Measures of Fish-scale Pit on Soil and Water Conservation in Bashang Grassland[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(6): 89-97. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.06.012.
[目的] 探究不同位置鱼鳞坑的水土保持效果,确定合理的鱼鳞坑布置原则,为生态脆弱区鱼鳞坑选址与效果评估提供实证研究。[方法] 以坝上草原千松坝为研究区,在阴坡、阳坡和河谷分别设置样地,对比鱼鳞坑区和对照区的水土状况,分析不同位置鱼鳞坑对生物量、土壤容重、根系层和土壤养分的影响。[结果] ①阳坡、阴坡、河谷的鱼鳞坑均增加了地上生物量、地下生物量、根系深度、TN含量,DOC等指标,降低了土壤容重。②阴坡、阳坡、河谷的鱼鳞坑水土保持效果差异较大;阴坡、阳坡鱼鳞坑均能显著增加植被的根系深度(p<0.05)(阴坡104.19%,阳坡42.87%),而阴坡鱼鳞坑对土壤容重、TN含量、地上生物量的影响更显著(p<0.05)(分别减少9.26%,增加148.05%,增加136.32%);河谷鱼鳞坑能显著增加土壤氨氮和硝态氮(p<0.05)(125.16%,174.53%)。③鱼鳞坑位置、修建时间对水土保持指标影响较大,坡位的影响较小;随着鱼鳞坑修建时间的增长,地上地下生物量、TN含量、根系深度增加,土壤氧化还原电位降低。④土壤侵蚀严重地区的鱼鳞坑水土保持效果更显著。[结论] 鱼鳞坑水土保持效果显著,阴坡鱼鳞坑效果较阳坡显著,河谷鱼鳞坑提高土壤氨氮和硝态氮的效果较阴坡、阳坡显著,且随着鱼鳞坑修建时间增长,水土保持效果增强。应因地制宜地在阴坡、河谷修建鱼鳞坑,以增强鱼鳞坑的水土保持效果。
[Objective] The effects of fish-scale pits at different locations on soil and water conservation were studied in order to define underlying layout principles for fish-scale pits
and to provide information for fish-scale pit site selection and effect evaluation in ecologically fragile areas. [Methods] The study was conducted at Qiansongba in the Bashang grassland area. Plots were established in shady slope
sunny slope
and river valley areas. The effects of fish-scale pits on plant biomass and root system
soil bulk density
and soil nutrient loss were determined. [Results] ① Aboveground biomass
underground biomass
rooting depth
total nitrogen (TN) and dissolved organic carbon were increased for fish-scale pits on the sunny slope
shady slope
and river valley
and the soil bulk density was decreased compared with a control area. ② The effects of fish-scale pits on shady slope
sunny slope
and river valley locations were different. Fish-scale pits on the shady slope and sunny slope significantly increased rooting depth (p<0.05) (104.19% and 42.87%
respectively). Compared with fish-scale pits at the sunny slope
fish scale pits at the shady slope also had significant effects on soil bulk density
TN content
and aboveground biomass (p<0.05) (-9.26%
148.05%
and 136.32%
respectively). Ammonia nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen for the fish-scale pit at the river valley location were significantly higher than for the control group (p<0.05) (125.16% and 174.53%
respectively). ③ Fish-scale pit location and construction time were the most important factors influencing soil and water conservation
rather than slope position. As fish-scale pit construction time increased
aboveground biomass
underground biomass
TN content
and rooting depth increased
and soil redox potential decreased. ④ The effects of fish-scale pits on soil and water conservation in areas with severe soil erosion was more significant than in areas with less erosion. [Conclusion] Fish-scale pits produced significant soil and water conservation effects. The fish-scale pit on the shady slope had more significant soil storage and soil conservation effects than the fish-scale pit on the sunny slope. The fish-scale pit in the river valley had a greater ability to improve soil ammonia and nitrate nitrogen levels than the shady slope and sunny slope pits. Soil and water conservation was enhanced with the increase of construction time of fish-scale pits. In order to improve soil and water conservation effects
fish-scale pits should be built on shady slopes and in river valleys according to local conditions.
袁金国,王卫,龙丽民.河北坝上生态脆弱区的土地退化及生态重建[J].干旱区资源与环境,2006,20(2):139-143.
孙建中,盛学斌,刘云霞.河北坝上地区人类活动与生态环境变化研究[J].环境科学进展,1999,7(4):102-111.
刘孟竹,王彦芳,裴宏伟.基于土地利用变化的河北省坝上地区景观生态风险评价[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(4):303-311,345.
郑江坤,吴黎军,魏天兴,等.陕北不同地貌部位土壤抗冲性特征研究[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(6):14-18,98.
杨润泽,冯天骄,肖辉杰,等.京郊强降雨条件下不同水土保持治理措施配置模式效益评价[J].水土保持学报,2022,36(1):8-17.
杜轶,郭青霞,郭汉清,等.汾河上游不同土地利用方式对坡地水土流失的影响[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(4):44-51.
王月玲,蔡进军,张源润,等.半干旱退化山区不同生态恢复与重建措施下土壤理化性质的特征分析[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(1):11-14.
李萍,朱清科,王晶,等.半干旱黄土丘陵沟壑区不同规格鱼鳞坑集水效果研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2011,30(5):91-94.
赵名彦,李芳然,李如意,等.坝上地区生产建设项目水土流失因素分析[J].中国水土保持,2021(8):21-23.
刘庆德.河北张家口坝上草原草场退化的原因及防治对策[J].安徽农业科学,2010,38(15):8037-8038.
周颖,张泽文,温烁,等.塞罕坝华北落叶松针叶光响应指标变化规律及其影响因素[J].应用生态学报,2021,32(5):1690-1698.
李朝英,郑路.利用环刀法测定土壤水分精度的影响因素[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(2):118-123.
余飞燕,王坤悦,叶鑫,等.金马河温江段河岸带不同生境草本群落物种多样性和生物量变化研究[J].草地学报,2020,28(3):793-800.
郝建锋,余飞燕,姚小兰,等.放猪干扰对四川夹金山植物群落特征和生物量的影响[J].生态学报,2021,41(24):9645-9654.
彭守璋.中国1 km分辨率逐月降水量数据集(1901-2020) [M].北京:国家青藏高原科学数据中心,2020.
李苗苗.植被覆盖度的遥感估算方法研究[D].北京:中国科学院研究生院(遥感应用研究所),2003.
王丽梅,张谦,白利华,等.人工樟子松林对毛乌素沙地土壤颗粒组成和固碳效果的长期影响[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(4):89-96.
李金峰,刘林,薛丽萍,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区欧李人工林对坡面土壤分形特征及可蚀性的影响[J].水土保持通报,2017,37(2):21-26.
李茂萍,缪宁,刘世荣.固氮树种旱冬瓜对退化林地土壤修复和林下植被重建的生态驱动效应[J].生态学报,2022,42(6):2321-2330.
刘鹤龄,饶良懿,图尔荪,等.北方土石山区水蚀及水保措施对土壤有机碳的影响[J].浙江农林大学学报,2019,36(4):646-655.
陈晓光,于寒青,刘文祥,等.基于MDC方法评价林下劣地碳氮提升对短期恢复措施的响应[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(4):280-287.
宿婷婷,马红彬,周瑶,等.黄土丘陵典型草原土壤理化性质对生态恢复措施的响应[J].草业学报,2019,28(4):34-46.
刘鸿涛.薄层覆土砒砂岩区土壤水分养分特征及新型调控技术研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2021.
窦玉青.鱼鳞坑的水力性质及设计指标[J].水土保持通报,2014(4):53-58.
周连兄,李丹雄,杨之恒,等.山区景观生态项目建设中的水土保持问题[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(5):231-235,344-345.
王月玲,王思成,蔡进军,等.半干旱黄土丘陵区不同整地方式下退化草地植物群落恢复特征[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(5):80-84.
董一桥.人为践踏对南京紫金山林下植被根系及土壤渗透性影响[D].江苏南京:南京林业大学,2021.
周瑶.不同恢复措施下宁夏黄土丘陵区典型草原土壤性状及其质量评价[D].宁夏银川:宁夏大学,2018.
董艺博.干旱胁迫对构树幼苗根际环境及根系有机酸组成影响研究[D].贵州贵阳:贵州大学,2020.
王明明,谢永生,王恒俊.潮滦河小流域鱼鳞坑内外植被群落特征与环境关系[J].水土保持通报,2007,27(6):80-84.
裴宏伟,刘孟竹,李雅丽,等.生态修复措施对干旱半干旱地区生态系统服务影响研究:以河北坝上地区为例[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(2):192-199,205.
周琼.三江源区山坡退化草地生态恢复技术应用效果及区域适应性评价[D].甘肃兰州:兰州大学,2020.
王文涛.石匣小流域不同水保措施坡面小区产流产沙及污染物输出特征分析[D].北京:北京林业大学,2020.
刘鸿涛.薄层覆土砒砂岩区土壤水分养分特征及新型调控技术研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2021.
黎雅楠,熊宇斐.土壤氧化还原电位的研究及应用[J].农技服务,2019,36(9):49-50,52.
贾希洋,马红彬,周瑶,等.不同生态恢复措施对宁夏黄土丘陵区典型草原植物群落特征的影响[J].中国草地学报,2019,41(1):51-60.
涂立辉.六盘山叠叠沟小流域4种典型植物群落的多功能评价[D].北京:中国林业科学研究院,2020.
0
浏览量
697
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621