不同防护措施下流沙地表层温湿度的日变化特征

范严伟; 史金红; 唐兴鹏

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.06.010

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

不同防护措施下流沙地表层温湿度的日变化特征

试验研究

- 不同防护措施下流沙地表层温湿度的日变化特征
- Diurnal Variation Characteristics of Temperature and Water Content in Quicksand Surface Layer Under Different Protective Measures
- 水土保持通报 2023年43卷第6期页码：72-80
- 作者机构：
  
  兰州理工大学能源与动力工程学院,甘肃,兰州,730050
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目“竖管滴灌节水控温理论研究及其在固沙植物幼苗保育中的应用”（51969013）;甘肃省自然科学基金项目“重力式地下孔灌土壤水分运移规律及调控机理研究”（21JR7RA225）
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.06.010
  中图分类号： S728.4
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
范严伟, 史金红, 唐兴鹏. 不同防护措施下流沙地表层温湿度的日变化特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(6):72-80.

Fan Yanwei, Shi Jinhong, Tang Xingpeng. Diurnal Variation Characteristics of Temperature and Water Content in Quicksand Surface Layer Under Different Protective Measures[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(6): 72-80.
范严伟, 史金红, 唐兴鹏. 不同防护措施下流沙地表层温湿度的日变化特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(6):72-80. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.06.010.

Fan Yanwei, Shi Jinhong, Tang Xingpeng. Diurnal Variation Characteristics of Temperature and Water Content in Quicksand Surface Layer Under Different Protective Measures[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(6): 72-80. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.06.010.

摘要

[目的

]

探讨不同防护措施下流沙地表层温湿度变化规律及其影响机理，为沙漠区植被恢复提供理论依据。[方法

]

采用野外大田试验，设置5种防护措施（单管防护、管裹反光膜、管壁开孔、管内覆秸秆和双管防护），3种管件直径（75，90，110 mm）和3种露地高度（10，15，20 cm），以无防护流沙地表为对照，依托土壤温湿度记录仪对地表层温湿度日变化特征进行研究。[结果

]

5种防护措施均能起到降温作用，其中双管防护降温效果最好；同一防护措施下，06：00时刻管内地表层温度随管件直径的增大而增大，其他时段则随管件直径的增大而降低，而全天时段管内地表层温度随露地高度的增大而降低；管内地表层温度随流沙地表层温度的增大而增大，两者具有良好的线性关系（R

≥0.830）；与无灌溉相比，灌溉在白天时段（06：00—21：00）起降温作用，而夜间时段（21：00—06：00）起保温作用；管内地表层水热存在耦合效应，地表层含水率越高，其温度越低。[结论

]

双管防护+灌溉措施最有利于流沙地表层控温保水，其中最佳管件参数是管件直径110 mm和露地高度20 cm。

Abstract

[Objective] The variation of temperature and water content in a quicksand surface layer under different protective measures and their influencing mechanisms were investigated in order to provide a theoretical basis for vegetation restoration in a desert area. [Methods] Field tests were carried out to examine five protective measures (single pipe protection

pipe coated with reflective film

pipe wall opening

pipe covered with straw

and double-pipe protection)

three pipe diameters (75

110 mm)

and three open field heights (10

20 cm). The unprotected quicksand surface was used as the control. The diurnal variation characteristics of surface soil temperature and water content were measured using a soil temperature and water content recorder in the quicksand surface layer. [Results] The five protective measures contributed significantly to the cooling effect

with double-tube protection showing the best cooling effect. Under the same protective measures

the surface layer temperature of the pipe interior increased with increasing pipe diameter at 06:00 am

and decreased with increasing pipe diameter at other times. The surface layer temperature of the pipe interior decreased with increasing open ground height during the entire day. The surface layer temperature of the inner tube increased with the surface layer temperature of the quicksand surface layer. Additionally

there was a strong linear relationship between the surface layer temperatures of the inner tube and the quicksand (R2 ≥ 0.830). Irrigation cooled the surface layer during the daytime (06:00-21:00) and preserved heat during the nighttime (21:00-06:00). Furthermore

there existed a coupling effect between the surface layer water content and the temperature inside the pipe. This result signified that the higher the surface layer water content

the lower the temperature. [Conclusion] Double-pipe protection and irrigation were found to be the most beneficial to temperature control and water conservation in the surface layer of quicksand. The optimum pipe parameters were a pipe diameter of 110 mm and an open field height of 20 cm.

关键词

Keywords

references

Bestelmeyer B T, Okin G S, Duniway M C, et al.Desertification, land use, and the transformation of global drylands [J].Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2015,13(1):28-36.

Yang Xiaohui, Zhang Kebin, Jia Baoquan, et al.Desertification assessment in China:an overview [J].Journal of Arid Environments, 2005,63(2):517-531.

国家林业局.中国第五次全国荒漠化和沙化状况公报[EB/OL].国家林业和草原局政府网,(2015-12-29) [2016-05-05].http://www.forestry.gov.cn/main/69/content-831684.html.

王涛.中国防沙治沙实践与沙漠科学发展的70年:Ⅰ.初创篇[J].中国沙漠,2022,42(1):1-4.

卢琦,雷加强,李晓松,等.大国治沙:中国方案与全球范式[J].中国科学院院,2020,35(6):656-664.

Breckle S W, Veste M, Wucherer W.The role of biological soil crusts on desert sand dunes in the Northwestern Negev, Israel [J].Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2001,38:357-367.

张克存,屈建军,鱼燕萍,等.中国铁路风沙防治的研究进展[J].地球科学进展,2019,34(6):573-583.

Li Xinrong, Zhang Zhishan, Tan Huijuan, et al.Ecological restoration and recovery in the wind-blown sand hazardareas of northern China:relationship between soil water and carrying capacity for vegetationin the Tengger Desert [J].Science China, 2014,57(5):539-548.

Zandalinas S I, Mittler R, Balfagón D, et al.Plant adaptations to the combination of drought and high temperatures [J].Physiologia Plantarum, 2018,162(1):2-12.

王波,薛源,潘绒,等.梭梭幼苗在高温胁迫适应性建立过程中的细胞死亡特征分析[J].分子植物育种,2021,19(15):5157-5163.DOI:10,13271/j.mpb.019.005157.

Stephenson N L, Das A J.Height-related changes in forest composition explain increasing tree mortality with height during an extreme drought [J].Nature Communications, 2020,11(1):1-4.

周洁,杨晓东,王雅芸,等.梭梭和骆驼刺对干旱的适应策略差异[J].植物生态学报,2022,46(9):1064-1076.

张增志,杜红梅,渠永平.沙漠水科学材料研究综述[J].中国材料进展,2018,37(2):81-87,125.

李久生,栗岩峰,王军,等.微灌在中国:历史、现状和未来[J].水利学报,2016,47(3):372-381.

孟天歌,吴路遥,张少磊,等.极端干旱区咸水灌溉人工防护林土壤可溶性碳的垂直分布及其影响因素[J].环境科学,2020,41(4):1950-1959.

杜虎林,冯起,石新根,等.直插式根灌节水装置设计及应用示例[J].灌溉排水学报,2021,40(S1):65-71.

王海峰,雷加强,李生宇,等.塔里木沙漠公路防护林的温度和湿度效应研究[J].科学通报,2008,53(S2):33-42.

李火青,吴新萍,买买提艾力·买买提依明,等.塔克拉玛干沙漠地表浅层土壤热扩散率、温度和热通量计算方法的比较研究[J].土壤通报,2016,47(4):805-813.

李永康,王新军,马燕飞,等.基于Catboost的AMSR-2半经验地表温度降尺度[J].干旱区研究,2021,38(6):1637-1649.

麻浩,张桦,马林,等.无灌溉管件防护梭梭荒漠造林新技术及其示范推广[J].中国科学(生命科学),2014,44(3):248-256.

王泽,梁燕,阿不都克玉木·米吉提,等.防护条件下梭梭幼苗生长及养分吸收特性[J].干旱区研究,2017,34(1):112-118.

朱琳,晋强,胡荻.石膏基棉秆复合材料防护管件的制备及防护性能研究[J].新疆农业大学学报,2018,41(4):292-297.

曹辉,冯勇,晋强.石膏基棉花秸秆矿渣复合砌块的试制研究[J].新型建筑材料,2013,40(1):55-56,65.

龚建清,方萍,吴慧敏.普通硅酸盐水泥对石膏基混合胶结材的改性研究[J].湖南大学学报(自然科学版),1997,24(6):79-84.

范严伟,王延祥,朱鹏程,等.竖管地表滴灌下风沙土稳定入渗率与湿润体估算模型[J].农业工程学报,2021,37(7):103-111.

范严伟,王延祥,史金红,等.竖管地表滴灌与普通地表滴灌土壤水分运移特性对比试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2022,36(6):163-170.

王建东,龚时宏,许迪,等.地表滴灌条件下水热耦合迁移数值模拟与验证[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(12):66-71.

Helms T C, Deckard E, Goos R J, et al.Soil moisture, temperature, and drying influence on soybean emergence [J].Agron, 1996,88:662-667.

浏览量

548

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

灌溉方式对设施黄瓜氮素气态损失及氮循环功能基因的影响

灌溉和施磷对紫花苜蓿土壤水分动态及根重的影响

黑方台台缘灌溉水诱发黄土滑坡群的系统分析

西北地区生态产品价值实现成效评价——基于29个典型案例

微生物-生物炭改良盐碱土互作机制研究进展