1. 中国水利水电科学研究院 内蒙古阴山北麓草原生态水文国家野外科学观测研究站,北京,100038
2. 水利部牧区水利科学研究所,内蒙古,呼和浩特,010020
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
唐国栋, 葛楠, 张铁军, 等. 腾格里沙漠东北缘飞播植物群落土壤水分特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(6):10-17.
Tang Guodong, Ge Nan, Zhang Tiejun, et al. Soil Water Characteristics of Different Aerial-seeded Plant Communities at Northeastern Edge of Tengger Desert[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(6): 10-17.
唐国栋, 葛楠, 张铁军, 等. 腾格里沙漠东北缘飞播植物群落土壤水分特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(6):10-17. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.06.002.
Tang Guodong, Ge Nan, Zhang Tiejun, et al. Soil Water Characteristics of Different Aerial-seeded Plant Communities at Northeastern Edge of Tengger Desert[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(6): 10-17. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.06.002.
[目的] 研究腾格里沙漠东北缘1992年飞播造林区主要植物群落土壤水分特征,为区域人工固沙植被合理建设与管理提供理论依据。[方法] 采用环刀法测定研究区4种不同植物群落不同坡位200 cm深度土壤含水量,分析其土壤水分分布、变异性及土壤贮水亏缺度。[结果] ①不同植物群落土壤平均含水量呈现:花棒群落(0.57%)>沙拐枣群落(0.55%)>花棒+沙拐枣群落(0.51%)>沙拐枣+花棒群落(0.51%),花棒群落土壤含水量与花棒+沙拐枣群落和沙拐枣+花棒群落之间具有显著差异(p<0.05),不同坡位平均土壤含水量均呈现出:坡底>坡中>坡顶的趋势。花棒和沙拐枣组合的植被群落土壤水分垂直变异性以及随坡位的变异性小于花棒群落和沙拐枣群落。②不同植物群落200 cm深度土壤总贮水量变化范围为15.45~17.79 mm,土壤贮水量随土层深度变化趋势与土壤含水量一致。③不同植物群落土壤贮水亏缺度呈现:花棒+沙拐枣群落(97.74%)>沙拐枣+花棒群落(97.62%)>花棒群落(97.48%)>沙拐枣群落(97.44%)。[结论] 研究区土壤含水量偏低,不足1%,丘间低地大于坡中和坡顶,垂向随土层深度增大,花棒和沙拐枣组合的植物群落土壤含水量垂直变异性更低。因此,花棒和沙拐枣组合的植物群落能够更大程度利用不同土层土壤水分,整体水分吸收和利用效率更高,对干旱环境的适应性更强。
[Objective] Soil water characteristics of different plant communities at different slope positions on aerial-seeded afforestation areas in 1992 were studied at the northeastern edge of the Tengger Desert in order to provide a theoretical basis for the rational construction and management of an artificial sand fixation vegetation system in the arid desert areas of Northwest China. [Methods] Soil water contents at the depth of 200 cm for different plant communities at different slope positions were measured using the ring knife method. The water distribution
variability and water storage deficit of soilwere analyzed. [Results] ① The average soil water contents of different plant communities followed the order of Hedysarum scoparium community (0.57%) >Calligonum mongolicum community (0.54%) > H. scoparium+C. mongolicum community (0.51%) > C. mongolicum+H. scoparium community (0.51%). There was a significant difference (p<0.05) between the H. scoparium and the H. scoparium+C. mongolicum communities
as well as the C. mongolicum+H. scoparium community. The average soil water contents at different slope positions followed the order of bottom slope > middle slope > top slope. The vertical variability of soil water in the two combined communities of H. scoparium and C. mongolicum
and its variability with slope position were significantly smaller than the vertical variability of soil water in the H. scoparium and C. mongolicum communities. ② The variation range of total soil water storage in different plant communities was between 15.45 mm and 17.79 mm
and the trend of soil water storage with soil depth was consistent with soil water content. ③ Soil water storage deficits for the different plant communities followed the order of H. scoparium+C. mongolicum community (97.74%) > C. mongolicum+H. scoparium community (97.62%) > H. scoparium community (97.48%) > C. mongolicum community (97.44%). [Conclusion] Soil water content was relatively low (less than 1%). Soil water content at the bottom of the sand dune was greater than at the middle slope and top slope positions
and soil water content increased with soil depth. The vertical variability of soil water content in the H. scoparium and C. mongolicum combined communities was lower than the soil water content of the single species communities. Therefore
a plant community comprised of a combination of H. scoparium and C. mongolicum can utilize soil water to a greater extent
has greater water absorption
and uses soil water more efficiently. These combination plant communities are better adapted to arid environments.
缑倩倩,韩致文,杜鹤强,等.中国沙尘暴源区及其治理研究述评[J].中国沙漠,2012,32(6):1559-1564.
田永祯,司建华,程业森,等.阿拉善沙区飞播造林试验研究初探[J].干旱区资源与环境,2010,24(7):149-153.
满多清,吴春荣,徐先英,等.腾格里沙漠东南缘荒漠植被盖度月变化特征及生态恢复[J].中国沙漠,2005,25(1):142-146.
祁京,焦亮,陈可,等.腾格里沙漠南缘昌岭山1872年以来干湿变化研究[J].干旱区研究,2021,38(5):1318-1326.
Xia Jun, Ning Like, Wang Quan, et al.Vulnerability of and risk to water resources in arid and semin-arid regions of West China under a scenario of climate change [J].Climatic Change, 2017,144(3):549-563.
秦洁,司建华,贾冰,等.巴丹吉林沙漠植被群落特征与土壤水分关系研究[J].干旱区研究,2021,38(1):207-222.
赵晨光,李慧瑛,鱼腾飞,等.腾格里沙漠东北缘人工植被对土壤物理性质的影响[J].干旱区研究,2022,39(4):1112-1121.
陈嘉嘉,黄磊,贾鸿飞,等.腾格里沙漠人工植被区不同植被类型土壤水分垂直变异特征及其动态变化模型[J].干旱区资源与环境,2022,36(4):126-133.
顾梦鹤,谢泽慧,王春晖,等.库布其沙漠8种防护林的土壤水分特征[J].草业科学,2017,34(12):2437-2444.
付华,周志宇,陈善科.腾格里沙漠东南缘飞播区白沙蒿植被密度与土壤水分关系的研究[J].中国沙漠,2001,21(3):51-56.
赵晨光,程业森,李慧瑛,等.腾格里沙漠东北缘人工植被恢复区土地利用/覆被变化及其驱动因素分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2021,35(6):131-138.
李新荣,张志山,谭会娟,等.我国北方风沙危害区生态重建与恢复:腾格里沙漠土壤水分与植被承载力的探讨[J].中国科学(生命科学),2014,44(3):257-266.
图娜拉,巴音青克乐,莫日根,等.毛乌素沙地不同植被类型土壤水分特征研究[J].人民黄河,2020,42(S1):63-64,72.
郝宝宝,艾宁,贾艳梅,等.毛乌素沙地南缘不同植被类型土壤水分特征[J].干旱区资源与环境,2020,34(5):196-200.
宗巧鱼,艾宁,刘广全,等.撂荒年限对陕北黄土区山地枣林土壤水分的影响[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(4):70-76.
王宁,毕华兴,孔凌霄,等.晋西黄土区不同密度刺槐林地土壤水分补偿特征[J].水土保持学报,2019,33(4):255-262.
叶冬梅,秦佳琪,韩胜利,等.乌兰布和沙漠流动沙地土壤水分动态、土壤水势特征的研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2005,19(3):126-130.
安桂香,曾凡江,孙旭伟,等.塔克拉玛干沙漠南缘不同植被区土壤水分状况研究[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(1):63-67,164.
刘源,段玉玺,王博,等.库布齐东段典型人工固沙林土壤水分时空变化特征[J].西北林学院学报,2021,36(1):1-8.
Gwak Y, Kim S.Factors affecting soil moisture spatial variability for a humid forest hillslope [J].Hydrological Processes, 2017,31(2):431-445.
张圆浩,阿拉木萨,印家旺,等.沙丘土壤含水量与地下水埋深时空变化特征[J].干旱区研究,2020,37(6):1427-1436.
郭伟,张鸾,刘爽,等.晋北风沙区人工林土壤水分及粒度特征[J].中国水土保持科学,2018,16(2):80-87.
Chen, Liding, Zhilin Huang, Jie Gong, et al.The effect of land cover/vegetation on soil water dynamic in the hilly area of the Loess Plateau, China [J].Catena, 2007,70(2):200-208.
艾宁,张智勇,宗巧鱼,等.水蚀风蚀交错区典型人工林土壤水分亏缺特征[J].森林与环境学报,2021,41(3):272-280.
Grayson R B, Western A W, Chiew F H S, et al.Preferred states in spatial soil moisture patterns:local and nonlocal controls [J].Water Resources Research, 1997,33(12):2897-2908.
Jun Li, Chengyi Zhao, Yajun Song, et al.Spatial patterns of desert annuals in relation to shrub effects on soil moisture [J].Journal of Vegetation Science, 2010,21(2):221-232.
Xinping Wang, Cui Yan, Yanxia Pan, et al.Effects of rainfall characteristics on infiltration and redistribution patterns in revegetation-stabilized desert ecosystems [J].Journal of Hydrology, 2008,358(1/2):134-143.
王晶,朱清科,刘中奇,等.黄土丘陵区不同林地土壤水分动态变化[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(1):220-223.
莫保儒,蔡国军,杨磊,等.半干旱黄土区成熟柠条林地土壤水分利用及平衡特征[J].生态学报,2013,33(13):4011-4020.
0
浏览量
636
下载量
2
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621