山西大同大学 商学院,山西,大同,037009
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
蒋毓琪, 杨怡康, 田文博, 等. 黄河流域碳生态安全水平空间格局与动态演进[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(5):419-425.
Jiang Yuqi, Yang Yikang, Tian Wenbo, et al. Spatial Pattern and Dynamic Evolution of Carbon Ecological Security Level in Yellow River Basin[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(5): 419-425.
蒋毓琪, 杨怡康, 田文博, 等. 黄河流域碳生态安全水平空间格局与动态演进[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(5):419-425. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.05.048.
Jiang Yuqi, Yang Yikang, Tian Wenbo, et al. Spatial Pattern and Dynamic Evolution of Carbon Ecological Security Level in Yellow River Basin[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(5): 419-425. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.05.048.
[目的] 分析中国重要的“能源流域”黄河流域的碳生态安全水平空间差异与动态演进,客观反映黄河流域碳生态安全现状及其演变趋势,为碳生态安全格局优化提供参考。[方法] 在驱动力—压力—状态—影响—响应(DPSIR)分析框架下构建黄河流域碳生态安全评价指标体系,借助逼近于理想解的排序方法(TOPSIS)评估碳生态安全水平并运用核密度估计法分析时空演变特征。[结果] ①2012—2021年黄河流域碳汇量和碳排放量逐年增加,碳排放量增长速度快于碳汇量。从空间范围看,碳汇量具有“西高东低”的特点,而碳排放量呈“西低东高”的特征。②黄河流域碳生态安全水平逐年提升,由2012的0.356增长到2021年的0.639。在空间分布上,上游地区碳生态安全水平高于中、下游地区,呈现出“上游领先,中游追赶,下游超越”的特征。此外,碳生态安全等级均趋于良好。③基于核密度估计结果,黄河流域区域间碳安全水平差异逐渐缩小,且上游区域内碳生态安全水平差异性下降快于中、下游地区。[结论] 基于黄河流域碳生态安全现状,建议上游地区继续增强碳汇能力,中、下游地区发展附加值高的技术密集型和清洁能源产业,推动GDP绿色增长。此外,应建立碳生态补偿机制,协调解决跨区域碳生态安全问题,提升全流域碳生态安全水平。
[Objective] The spatial differences and dynamic evolution of carbon ecological security level were analyzed to optimize the overall plan of carbon ecological security in the Yellow River basin (an important “energy basin” in China) in order to objectively reflect the current status and evolution trend of carbon ecological security
and to provide a reference for optimizing the carbon ecological security pattern. [Methods] An evaluation index system for carbon ecological security in the Yellow River basin was constructed under the framework of driving-pressure-state-impact-response (DPSIR) analysis. The technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) model was used to evaluate the level of carbon ecological security
and the spatial-temporal evolution characteristics were analyzed by the kernel density estimation method. [Results] ① Carbon sinks and carbon emissions increased from 2012 to 2021 in the Yellow River basin
and the growth rate of carbon emissions was faster than that of carbon sinks. Carbon sinks were spatially characterized as “higher in the west and lower in the east”
while carbon emissions were “lower in the west and higher in the east”. ② The carbon ecological security level in the Yellow River basin increased over time
from 0.356 in 2012 to 0.639 in 2021. In terms of spatial distribution
the carbon ecological security level in the upstream region was higher than in the middle and downstream regions
and was characterized as “upstream leading
midstream catching up
and downstream surpassing”. In addition
the level of carbon ecological security tended to be good. ③ Based on the kernel density estimation results
the differences in carbon security levels among different regions in the Yellow River basin were gradually narrowing
and were decreasing in the upstream region faster than in the middle and downstream regions. [Conclusion] Based on the current status of carbon ecological security in the Yellow River basin
carbon sink capacity in the upstream region is expected to increase over time
while clean energy industries and technology-intensive industries with high added value should be developed to promote green GDP growth in the middle and downstream regions. In addition
a carbon ecological compensation mechanism should be established to coordinate and resolve cross-regional security issues
and to improve the carbon ecological security level of the entire basin.
杨怡康,蒋毓琪,朱少英.环境规制对山西煤炭经济绿色转型的影响研究[J].资源节约与环保,2021(7):126-127,130.
黄博,李博文,雷正烨,等.基于TOPSIS模型及综合权重的武威市水资源承载力和水安全评价[J].水利规划与设计,2023(2):56-63.
文惠,邓西鹏,李颖,等.整合生态空间的县域生态安全格局识别与构建:以武夷山市为例[J].生态学杂志,2023,42(5):1197-1204.
魏家星,张昱镇,连紫璇,等.基于生态供需空间的区域生态安全格局构建研究:以苏南城市群为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2022,31(2):387-397.
王耕,周腾禹.基于文献计量分析的区域生态安全研究热点与趋势.生态学报,2019,39(18):378-385.
赵先贵,肖玲,马彩虹,等.山西省碳足迹动态分析及碳排放等级评估[J].干旱区资源与环境,2014,28(9):21-26.
韦良焕,林宁,鞠美庭.基于碳足迹和碳承载力的新疆碳安全评价[J].水土保持通报,2017,37(1):281-285,291.
邱高会.区域碳安全评价及预测研究[J].生态经济,2014,30(8):14-17,41.
吴立军,田启波.碳中和目标下中国地区碳生态安全与生态补偿研究[J].地理研究,2022,41(1):149-166.
魏竞超,李自涵,董媛媛.基于压力—状态—响应(PSR)模型的黄河流域环境安全评价体系法治化研究[J].中国环境监测,2023,39(1):19-28.
杨园园,戴尔阜,付华.基于InVEST模型的生态系统服务功能价值评估研究框架[J].首都师范大学学报:自然科学版,2012,33(3):41-47.
熊鹰,艾赣雄,周晨,等.基于改进三维生态足迹模型的洞庭湖区生态可持续时空演化研究[J].生态学报,2022,42(3):1165-1179.
彭月,李昌晓,李健.2000—2012年宁夏黄河流域生态安全综合评价[J].资源科学,2015,37(12):2480-2490.
冯琰玮,甄江红.黄河流域内蒙古段生态安全格局优化研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2022,43(10):129-138.
宋玲玲,田青,李宗杰,等.基于PSR模型的甘肃黄河流域生态安全研究[J].西部林业科学,2015,44(2):126-130,140.
王怡然,王雅晖,杨金霖,等.黄河流域森林生态安全等级评价与时空演变分析[J].生态学报,2022,42(6):2112-2121.
赵诚诚,潘竟虎.基于供需视角的黄河流域甘肃段生态安全格局识别与优化[J].生态学报,2022,42(17):6973-6984.
董战峰,龙凤.黄河流域低碳发展:困境与路径[J].华北水利水电大学学报(社会科学版),2022,38(4):1-6.
张乐艺,李霞,冯京辉,等.2000—2018年黄河流域NDVI时空变化及其对气候和人类活动的双重响应[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(5):276-286.
张可云,张颖.不同空间尺度下黄河流域区域经济差异的演变[J].经济地理,2020,40(7):1-11.
葛全胜,戴君虎,何凡能,等.过去300年中国土地利用、土地覆被变化与碳循环研究[J].中国科学(D辑:地球科学),2008,38(2):197-210.
郑德凤,刘晓星,王燕燕,等.中国省际碳足迹广度、深度评价及时空格局[J].生态学报,2020,40(2):447-458.
马荥,孙艳红.基于DPSIR框架的黄河流域旅游生态安全动态评价研究[J].生态经济,2021,37(12):145-151,162.
朱艳娜,何刚,张贵生,等.皖江示范区新型城镇化与生态环境耦合协调及空间分异研究[J].安全与环境学报,2021,21(6):2865-2874.
冯彦,郑洁,祝凌云,等.基于PSR模型的湖北省县域森林生态安全评价及时空演变[J].经济地理,2017,37(2):171-178.
田泽,陈柯婧,潘晶晶,等.基于突变理论方法的我国黄河流域土地生态安全评价[J].水利经济,2021,39(5):13-19.
牛最荣,贾玲.三生空间角度的甘肃长江流域水生态安全评价及障碍诊断[J].水生态学杂志,2023,44(2):19-25.
余灏哲,韩美.基于模糊物元模型的山东省水资源安全TOPSIS评价[J].安全与环境工程,2015,22(6):1-6.
蒋毓琪,陈珂.浑河流域上游森林生态服务空间流转价值及其对沈阳城市段供水量影响的通径分析[J].水土保持通报,2017,37(6):285-290.
张建威,黄茂兴.黄河流域经济高质量发展与生态环境耦合协调发展研究[J].统计与决策,2021,37(16):142-145.
杨光明,陈也,张帆,等.基于PSR模型的三峡库区生态安全评价及动态预警研究[J].生态经济,2021,37(4):209-214.
夏美君,李健,闫永蚕.京津冀城市群生态福利绩效时空格局及演进特征[J].生态环境学报,2023,32(4):814-824.
马小雯,郭精军.黄河流域生态安全评价及障碍因素研究[J].统计与决策,2023,39(8):63-68.
蒋毓琪,杨怡康,朱少英.基于三维生态足迹模型的山西省矿区2010—2019年自然资本存量动态评估[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(6):165-170,179.
0
浏览量
656
下载量
2
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621