2030年中国主要省域间碳排放配额测算

王莉; 刘莹莹; 姜惠源

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.05.033

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

2030年中国主要省域间碳排放配额测算

试验研究

- 2030年中国主要省域间碳排放配额测算
- Carbon Emission Quota Budget Among Main Provinces of China in 2030
- 水土保持通报 2023年43卷第5期页码：279-287
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 郑州大学生态与环境学院,河南,郑州,450001
  2. 河南省减污降碳协同工程技术研究中心,河南,郑州,450001
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项“清潩河(许昌段)多目标多部门综合管理决策平台及水环境功能恢复综合示范子课题”(2015ZX07204-002-05)
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.05.033
  中图分类号： X32
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
王莉, 刘莹莹, 姜惠源. 2030年中国主要省域间碳排放配额测算[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(5):279-287.

Wang Li, Liu Yingying, Jiang Huiyuan. Carbon Emission Quota Budget Among Main Provinces of China in 2030[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(5): 279-287.
王莉, 刘莹莹, 姜惠源. 2030年中国主要省域间碳排放配额测算[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(5):279-287. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.05.033.

Wang Li, Liu Yingying, Jiang Huiyuan. Carbon Emission Quota Budget Among Main Provinces of China in 2030[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(5): 279-287. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.05.033.

摘要

[目的] 在控制碳排放总量条件下，对省域间碳排放配额进行公平科学地分配是实现“双碳”目标的关键途径，也是碳排放交易机制体系的重要基石。分析不同情景下碳排放配额测算结果的碳减排边际成本，以期以最小成本确定最优的碳排放定额分配方案，为区域后期开展分配工作提供理论基础，为地区碳减排方案制定提供工作参考。[方法] 在前人建立的碳配额测算指标基础上引入生态性指标，并设置公平、效率、生态、兼顾公平—生态—效率4种情景，利用SBM (slacks-based measure)对偶模型测算不同情景下区域碳边际减排成本，并以此为依据确定最优分配方案。[结果] 在公平、效率、生态、兼顾情景下平均碳边际减排成本分别为2 950，3 120，2 910，3 090元/t，引入生态性指标的方案减排成本明显更低，可推断出是碳汇抵消掉部分减排难度较大，成本较高的碳排放所致；兼顾情景下减排成本明显高于公平、生态情景，表明碳排放效率的提升同时会导致碳边际减排成本增加。[结论] 生态情景下的碳排放配额是以最低碳边际减排成本实现“双碳”目标的最优方案，在地区碳排放方案及碳交易机制制定时应予以重视。

Abstract

[Objective] Under total carbon emission control

an equitable and scientific allocation of carbon emission quota among provinces of China is a key approach for achieving the “dual carbon” goal

as well as an important cornerstone of the carbon emission trading system. The marginal cost of carbon emission reduction was analyzed under different scenarios with regard to the results of carbon emission quota allocation in order to determine the optimal carbon emission quota budget scheme at the lowest cost

thereby providing a theoretical basis for subsequent regional allocation work and a reference for the formulation of regional carbon emission reduction schemes. [Methods] An ecological index was introduced based on the carbon quota budget index established in previous studies. Four scenarios (including equity

efficiency

ecology

and balanced equity-efficiency-ecology) were evaluated. The slacks-based measure (SBM) dual model was used to calculate the regional marginal carbon emission reduction cost under different scenarios

and the optimal budget scheme was determined based on these results. [Results] Under the scenarios of equity

efficiency

ecology and balanced

the average marginal costs of carbon emission reduction were 0.295 million yuan/t

0.312 million yuan/t

0.291 million yuan/t

and 0.309 million yuan/t

respectively. When the ecological index was introduced

the emission reduction cost of the scheme was significantly lower

and it can be inferred that the carbon sink offsets a portion of the carbon emissions that are more difficult and costly to reduce. The cost of emission reduction under the balanced scenario was significantly higher than under the equity and ecology scenarios

indicating that improvement in carbon emission efficiency will lead to an increase in marginal carbon emission reduction cost. [Conclusion] The carbon emission quota under the ecology scenario was the best scheme for achieving the “dual carbon” goal with the lowest marginal carbon emission reduction cost. Attention should be paid to the formulation of regional carbon emission schemes and carbon trading mechanisms.

关键词

Keywords

references

李治国,杨雅涵,赵园春.地方政府竞争促进了地区碳排放强度吗?[J].经济与管理评论,2022,38(2):136-146.

高艳丽,董捷,李璐,等.碳排放权交易政策的有效性及作用机制研究: 基于建设用地碳排放强度省际差异视角[J].长江流域资源与环境,2019,28(4):783-793.

戚永颖.碳中和愿景下的能源绿色转型发展: 访中国海油集团能源经济研究院院长王震[J].国际石油经济,2021,29(10):1-6.

李泽坤,任丽燕,马仁锋,等.基于效率视角的浙江省2030年碳排放配额分析[J].生态科学,2020,39(3):201-211.

宋杰鲲,张凯新,曹子建.省域碳排放配额分配：融合公平和效率的研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2017,31(5):7-13.

王勇,程瑜,杨光春,等.2020和2030年碳强度目标约束下中国碳排放权的省区分解[J].中国环境科学,2018,38(8):3180-3188.

Yang Yuan, Cai Wenjia, Wang Can, et al. Regional allocation of CO

intensity reduction targets based on cluster analysis [J]. Advances in Climate Change Research, 2012,3(4):220-228.

Chang Liyue, Hao Xuguang, Song Mei, et al. Carbon emission performance and quota allocation in the Bohai Rim Economic Circle [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2020,258:120722.

Zhou Xing, Guan Xueling, Zhang Ming, et al. Allocation and simulation study of carbon emission quotas among China's Provinces in 2020[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2017,24(8):7088-7113.

Chen Liyun, He Yuan, Li Guang, et al. Initial allocation model of CO

emission allowances based on the equity-efficiency tradeoff [J]. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 2021,38(2):2050048.

Cheng Yonglong, Gu Baihe, Tan Xianchun, et al. Allocation of provincial carbon emission allowances under China's 2030 carbon peak target: a dynamic multi-criteria decision analysis method [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2022,837:155798.

Kong Yingchao, Zhao Tao, Yuan Rong, et al. Allocation of carbon emission quotas in Chinese Provinces based on equality and efficiency principles [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019,211:222-232.

林枫,金刚.中国县域二氧化碳边际减排成本: 基本事实、影响因素及区域差异分解[J].环境经济研究,2023,8(1):29-52.

Choi Y, Zhang Ning, Zhou P. Efficiency and abatement costs of energy-related CO

emissions in China: a slacks-based efficiency measure [J]. Applied Energy, 2012,98:198-208.

Duan Fumei, Wang Yong, Wang Ying, et al. Estimation of marginal abatement costs of CO

in Chinese Provinces under 2020 carbon emission rights allocation: 2005—2020[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2018,25(24):24445-24468.

张涛.《2030年前碳达峰行动方案》解读[J].生态经济,2022,38(1):9-12.

孔颖超.基于公平和效率原则的中国碳配额初始分配研究[D].天津:天津大学,2019.

周迪,郑楚鹏,华诗润,等.公平与效率协调视角下的中国碳减排潜力与路径[J].自然资源学报,2019,34(1):80-91.

田云,林子娟.巴黎协定下中国碳排放权省域分配及减排潜力评估研究[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(4):921-933.

黄奇.基于WITCH模型的区域碳排放权分配与排放路径研究[D].黑龙江哈尔滨:哈尔滨工程大学,2020.

丁仲礼,段晓男,葛全胜,等.2050年大气CO

浓度控制: 各国排放权计算[J].中国科学(D辑: 地球科学),2009,39(8):1009-1027.

周小惠.碳交易市场背景下区域碳排放权配额动态分配机制及方法研究[D].四川成都:西华大学,2022.

武振华.我国化工行业碳排放效率、影响因素及碳配额分配研究[D].天津:天津大学,2018.

蒋惠琴.碳排放权初始配额分配研究[D].浙江杭州:浙江工业大学,2019.

邢佳琛.基于零和收益DEA模型的中国2030年碳排放目标省际分配研究[D].天津:天津大学,2019.

Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978,2(6):429-444.

郑立群.中国各省区碳减排责任分摊: 基于零和收益DEA模型的研究[J].资源科学,2012,34(11):2087-2096.

Lins M P E, Gomes E G, Soares de Mello J C C B, et al. Olympic ranking based on a zero sum gains DEA model [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2003,148(2):312-322.

Gomes E G, Lins M E. Modelling undesirable outputs with zero sum gains data envelopment analysis models [J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2008,59(5):616-623.

崔晓燕.中国省际电力部门碳排放配额分配: 基于熵法和零和DEA模型[D].天津:天津大学,2020.

Cecchini L, Venanzi S, Pierri A, et al. Environmental efficiency analysis and estimation of CO

abatement costs in dairy cattle farms in Umbria (Italy): a SBM-DEA model with undesirable output [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018,197:895-907.

赵敏.中国碳排放效率及边际减排成本研究[D].甘肃兰州:兰州财经大学,2022.

王文举,陈真玲.中国省级区域初始碳配额分配方案研究: 基于责任与目标、公平与效率的视角[J].管理世界,2019,35(3):81-98.

张凯新.我国省域碳排放权配额分配研究[D].山东东营:中国石油大学(华东),2017.

王文举,孔晓旭.基于2030年碳达峰目标的中国省域碳配额分配研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2022,39(7):113-132.

郭茹,吕爽,曹晓静,等.基于ZSG-DEA模型的中国六大行业碳减排分配效率研究[J].生态经济,2020,36(1):13-18.

高杨,姚雪,白永秀,等.有为“链长”赋能绿色低碳农业产业链: 内在机理与实现路径[J].经济学家,2022(12):116-124.

肖玉仙,尹海涛.我国碳排放权交易试点的运行和效果分析[J].生态经济,2017,33(5):57-62.

浏览量

605

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

黄河中游沙家湾小流域风沙环境特征及其入沟过程

基于CiteSpace的中国荒漠植物多样性研究现状与热点分析

基于PLUS-InVEST模型的江西省萍乡市碳储量时空演变与多情景模拟

数字经济对长江经济带农业生态产品价值转化效率的影响

兰州-西宁城市群城市化与生态系统服务价值耦合协调关系