1. 北京林业大学 水土保持学院,北京,100083
2. 宁夏水土保持监测总站,宁夏,银川,750021
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
张维琛, 张国军, 魏小燕, 等. 宁夏固原市水土流失风险与人居环境自然适宜性的耦合关系[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(5):252-261.
Zhang Weichen, Zhang Guojun, Wei Xiaoyan, et al. Coupling Relationship Between Soil Erosion Risk and Natural Suitability of Human Settlements in Guyuan City, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(5): 252-261.
张维琛, 张国军, 魏小燕, 等. 宁夏固原市水土流失风险与人居环境自然适宜性的耦合关系[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(5):252-261. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.05.030.
Zhang Weichen, Zhang Guojun, Wei Xiaoyan, et al. Coupling Relationship Between Soil Erosion Risk and Natural Suitability of Human Settlements in Guyuan City, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(5): 252-261. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.05.030.
[目的] 探究宁夏固原市水土流失风险与人居环境自然适宜性的耦合关系,为小流域水土流失精准防治及有序治理提供理论支撑,使水土流失治理更好地服务于人居环境提升。[方法] 采用PSR模型、人居环境指数模型等方法计算小流域水土流失风险和人居环境自然适宜性,对两者进行相关性及耦合度分析,计算并分析其耦合协调度和耦合协调类型。[结果] ①研究区水土流失风险为中度、高度危险小流域占28%,分布在西南部和东南部;人居环境自然适宜性等级为不适宜的小流域占12%,分布在西吉县南部和隆德县东北部。②水土流失风险与人居环境自然适宜性相关系数为0.61。74%的小流域为高水平耦合与良性共振耦合;67%的小流域为协调发展和优质协调。③协调同步型、失调共损型、水土流失滞后型和人居环境滞后型小流域分别为75,36,79,114条。[结论] ①固原市水土流失与人居环境具有较高的相关性和耦合度,且具有明显的相互促进作用。②研究区有79条水土流失风险滞后型小流域需要进行水土流失治理,有36条失调共损型小流域应结合地区实际进行自然环境重点治理和改造。
[Objective] Investigating the coupling relationship between the risk of soil erosion and the natural suitability of human settlements in Guyuan City
Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region provides theoretical support for the prevention and control of soil erosion in small watersheds
and thereby contributes more to the improvement of human settlements. [Methods] The PSR model and the human settlement index model were used to calculate the risk of soil erosion in a small watershed as well as the natural suitability for human settlement. The correlation and the coupling degree of the two factors were calculated to analyze their coupling coordination degree and the coupling coordination type. [Results] ① The small watersheds with moderate and high risk of soil erosion accounted for 28% of the area
and were located in the southwest and southeast. Small watersheds that were rated as unsuitable for human settlement accounted for 12% of the area
located in the southern of Xiji County and Northeastern Longde County. ② The correlation coefficient between soil erosion risk and natural suitability of human settlements was 0.61. 74% of small watersheds were found to have high coupling degree and benign resonance coupling areas
and 67% of small watersheds were found to be coordinated development and highly coordinated development areas. ③ There were 75
36
79
and 114 watersheds classified as coordination and synchronization type small watersheds
imbalance and co-loss type small watersheds
soil erosion lag type small watersheds
and human settlement lag type small watersheds
respectively. [Conclusion] ① Soil erosion and human settlement in Guyuan City had high correlation
high coupling degree
and significant mutual promotion effects. ② There were 79 small watersheds with lagging risk of soil erosion that needed to be controlled
and 36 dysfunctional co-loss type small watersheds should be treated and reconstructed according to the local conditions.
傅伯杰.黄土高原生态平衡的探讨[J].生态科学,1983,2(1):44-48.
李永红,高照良.黄土高原地区水土流失的特点、危害及治理[J].生态经济,2011,27(8):148-153.
朱显谟,任美锷.中国黄土高原的形成过程与整治研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,1991,1(1):21-28.
张璐,雍振华.固原市绿地生态网络构建研究[J].苏州科技大学学报(工程技术版),2017,30(2):75-80.
姜德文.新时代水土流失治理目标及评价标准[J].中国水土保持科学,2020,18(2):140-144.
金钊.走进新时代的黄土高原生态恢复与生态治理[J].地球环境学报,2019,10(3):316-322.
李晓松,吴炳方,王浩,等.区域尺度海河流域水土流失风险评估[J].遥感学报,2011,15(2):372-387.
任祁荣,于恩逸.甘肃省生态环境与社会经济系统协调发展的耦合分析[J].生态学报,2021,41(8):2944-2953.
苏新宇,吴镇宇,刘霞,等.基于CSLE模型的区域水土流失风险分析[J].中国水土保持科学(中英文),2021,19(5):27-36.
吴艳霞,陈步宇,张磊.黄河流域社会经济与生态环境耦合协调态势及动力因素[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(2):240-249.
方创琳,周成虎,顾朝林,等.特大城市群地区城镇化与生态环境交互耦合效应解析的理论框架及技术路径[J].地理学报,2016,71(4):531-550.
陈佳,吴孔森,尹莎,等.水土流失风险扰动下区域人地系统适应性研究:以榆林市为例[J].自然资源学报,2016,31(10):1688-1701.
邓际洪.基于PSR模型的四川省耕地可持续利用评价[D].四川雅安:四川农业大学,2015.
时宇,史明昌.基于GIS的北京市水土流失生态风险评价[J].生态科学,2014,33(6):1100-1105.
中华人民共和国水利部.土壤侵蚀分类分级标准: SL 190-2007[S].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2008.
王礼先,朱金兆.水土保持学[M].2版.北京:中国林业出版社,2005:126-129.
刘燕,刘康.水土流失敏感性与土壤类型格局相关性分析: 以陕北黄土高原为例[J].水土保持通报,2009,29(5):94-97.
马云峰,徐海.基于层次分析法开展政府信息化评估指标及权重研究[J].中国电子科学研究院学报,2020,15(9):832-839.
邓雪,李家铭,曾浩健,等.层次分析法权重计算方法分析及其应用研究[J].数学的实践与认识,2012,42(7):93-100.
范英,李辰,晋民杰,等.三角模糊数和层次分析法在风险评价中的应用研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2014,24(7):70-74.
杨艳昭,郭广猛.基于GIS的内蒙古人居环境适宜性评价[J].干旱区资源与环境,2012,26(3):9-16.
封志明,唐焰,杨艳昭,等.基于GIS的中国人居环境指数模型的建立与应用[J].地理学报,2008,63(12):1327-1336.
李捷.基于GIS技术的湖北省人居环境自然适宜性评价[J].湖北农业科学,2015,54(21):5235-5239,5245.
孙小舟,周致远,邵文静,等.人居环境自然适宜性评价的GIS空间分析建模研究[J].湖北文理学院学报,2015,36(08):27-32.
李威,赵卫权,苏维词.基于GIS技术的黔中地区人居环境自然适宜性评价[J].长江流域资源与环境,2018,27(5):1082-1091.
张翀,任志远,李晶.关中地区人居环境自然适宜性评价[J].水土保持通报,2012,32(2):137-141.
郝慧梅,任志远.基于栅格数据的陕西省人居环境自然适宜性测评[J].地理学报,2009,64(4):498-506.
刘燕华,李秀彬.脆弱生态环境与可持续发展[M].北京:商务印书馆,2007.
蒋正云,胡艳.中部地区新型城镇化与农业现代化耦合协调机制及优化路径[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(3):702-721.
李静怡,王艳慧.吕梁地区生态环境质量与经济贫困的空间耦合特征[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(6):1715-1724.
黄海峰.珠三角地区环境与经济协调发展研究及GIS技术应用[D].广东广州:中国科学院广州地球化学研究所,2006.
陈红翔,赵永涛.宁夏南部山区生态环境脆弱性评价[J].宁夏工程技术,2011,10(3):252-254.
朱志玲,吴咏梅,张敏.基于GIS的宁夏生态环境敏感性综合评价[J].水土保持研究,2012,19(4):101-105.
郑雪慧,杨志,任正龑,等.基于GIS的宁夏土壤侵蚀敏感性与景观生态风险评价[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(6):8-13.
0
浏览量
693
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621