1. 昆明理工大学 电力工程学院,云南,昆明,650500
2. 云南省水文水资源局 曲靖分局,云南,曲靖,655000
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
刘安友, 邹进, 刘磊, 等. 饮用水源地产水量时空变化及其影响因子——以云龙水库为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(4):385-395.
Liu Anyou, Zou Jin, Liu Lei, et al. Spatiotemporal Variation and Influencing Factors of Water Yield in Drinking Water Sources—A Case Study at Yunlong Reservoir Basin[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(4): 385-395.
刘安友, 邹进, 刘磊, 等. 饮用水源地产水量时空变化及其影响因子——以云龙水库为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(4):385-395. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.04.044.
Liu Anyou, Zou Jin, Liu Lei, et al. Spatiotemporal Variation and Influencing Factors of Water Yield in Drinking Water Sources—A Case Study at Yunlong Reservoir Basin[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(4): 385-395. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.04.044.
[目的] 探究昆明市饮用水源地之一的云龙水库流域2001—2020年产水量时空格局变化及其影响因子,为水源地产水量服务功能的可持续发展、生态补偿机制和生态保护政策的制定提供科学依据。[方法] 基于InVEST模型与ArcGIS空间地理分析工具分析产水量时空变化,采用多情景分析与差值比较法对影响因子进行比较分析。[结果] ①云龙水库流域产水量呈现季节性分布特点,多集中于夏季,2001—2020年产水量整体呈先下降后上升趋势,3期单位面积产水量均值分别为495,278,364 mm。②在空间格局分布上,产水量由西南向东北逐步增加,高值区位于东北部,低值区位于中部。③2001—2020年土地利用变化、降水量、潜在蒸散量对云龙水库流域产水量变化的贡献度依次为1.93%,85.66%,12.41%。[结论] 气候因子是影响云龙水库流域产水量变化的主导因子,土地利用类型变化最小,在土地利用类型中林地年产水量最高。未来在云龙水库流域应减少人类生产生活中向大气释放的废热,加强水源涵养林的建设与保护,降低人类活动改变下垫面性质对气候产生的消极影响。
[Objective] The spatial and temporal distribution of water yield at Yunlong Reservoir basin (one of the sources of drinking water in Kunming) from 2001 to 2020 was studied in order to provide a scientific basis for the sustainable development of a water yield service function
and for constructing an ecological compensation mechanism and ecological protection policies. [Methods] We used the InVEST model and the ArcGIS spatial geographic analysis tool to determine the spatial and temporal changes of water yield. The factors influencing these changes were compared and analyzed by multi-scenario analysis and the difference comparison method. [Results] ① The water yield of Yunlong Reservoir basin showed seasonal distribution characteristics
mostly concentrated in summer. From 2001 to 2020
the water yield of Yunlong Reservoir basin initially decreased and then increased. The average water yield per unit area in the three study phases were 495 mm
278 mm
and 364 mm
respectively. ② Water production gradually increased spatially from southwest to northeast
with high values located in the northeast and low values in the middle. ③ The contribution rates of land use change
precipitation
and potential evapotranspiration to water yield change at Yunlong Reservoir basin from 2001 to 2020 were 1.93%
85.66%
and 12.41%
respectively. [Conclusion] Climate was the dominant factor affecting water yield changes at Yunlong Reservoir basin
and changes in land use type had the smallest impact on water yield. The annual water yield of forest land was the highest among the land use types. In the future
efforts should be made at Yunlong Reservoir basin to reduce the waste heat released to the atmosphere by human production activities and life
to strengthen the construction and protection of water conservation forests
and to reduce the negative impacts of human activities on climate which are the results of changing the underlying surface properties.
Daily G C. Natures Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems [M]. Washington D C: Island Press, 1997.
欧阳志云,王效科,苗鸿.中国陆地生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值的初步研究[J].生态学报,1999(5):19-25.
赵同谦,欧阳志云,王效科,等.中国陆地地表水生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值评价[J].自然资源学报,2003(4):443-452.
Robert Costanza, Ralph d’Arge, Rudolf de Groot, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital [J]. Ecological Economics,1998,25(1):253-260.
张彪,李文华,谢高地,等.森林生态系统的水源涵养功能及其计量方法[J].生态学杂志,2009,28(3):529-534.
胡宝怡,王磊.陆地水储量变化及其归因:研究综述及展望[J].水利水电技术(中英文),2021,52(5):13-25.
Stephen P, Gregory V, Insu Koh, et al. Global use of ecosystem service models [J]. Ecosystem Services, 2016,17:131-141.
黄从红,杨军,张文娟.生态系统服务功能评估模型研究进展[J].生态学杂志,2013,32(12):3360-3367.
Bejagam V, Keesara V R, Sridhar V. Impacts of climate change on water provisional services in Tungabhadra basin using InVEST Model [J]. River Research and Applications, 2021,38(1):94-106.
Pan Tao, Wu Shaohong, Dai Erfu, et al. Spatiotemporal variation of water source supply service in Three Rivers Source Area of China based on InVEST model.[J]. The journal of applied ecology, 2013,24(1):183-189.
Yang Dong, Liu Wen, Tang Lingying, et al. Estimation of water provision service for monsoon catchments of South China: applicability of the InVEST model [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2019,182:133-143.
郭洪伟,孙小银,廉丽姝,等.基于CLUE-S和InVEST模型的南四湖流域生态系统产水功能对土地利用变化的响应[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(9):2899-2906.
Yang Jie, Xie Baopeng, Zhang Degang, et al. Climate and land use change impacts on water yield ecosystem service in the Yellow River basin, China [J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2021,80(3):72-83.
Budyko M I. Climate and Life [M]. New York: Aca-demic Press, 1974.
Sharp R, Douglass J, Olwero, et al. InVEST User’s Guide [M]. Stanford:the Natural Capital Project, 2022.
Zhang L, Hickel K, Dawes W R, et al. A rational function approach for estimating mean annual evapotranspiration [J]. Water Resources Research, 2004,40(2):W02502.
Jafarzadeh A A, Mahdavi A, Shamsi S F, et al. Annual water yield estimation for different land uses by GIS-Based InVEST model: case study: Mish-khas Catchment, Ilam Province, Iran [J]. Journal of Rangeland Science, 2019,9(1):1-12.
Zhang L, Dawes W R, Walker G R. Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale [J]. Water Resources Research, 2001,37(3):701-708.
周文佐,刘高焕,潘剑君,等.中国土壤有效含水量分布[J].地理学报(英文版),2005,15(1):3-12.
Yan Fapeng, Shangguan Wei, Zhang Jing, et al. Depth-to-bedrock map of China at a spatial resolution of 100 meters [J]. Scientific Data, 2020,7(1):74-86.
杜佳衡,王锦.基于InVEST模型的大理州永平县水生态系统服务功能时空变化分析[J].西部林业科学,2021,50(6):91-102.
胡砚霞,于兴修,廖雯,等.汉江流域产水量时空格局及影响因素研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2022,31(1):73-82.
刘瑞,朱道林.基于转移矩阵的土地利用变化信息挖掘方法探讨[J].资源科学,2010,32(8):1544-1550.
洪忠.云龙水库水源保护区水源涵养林建设探讨[J].林业建设,2020(2):42-48.
黄欣,彭双云,王哲,等.基于地理探测器的云南省生态系统产水服务的空间异质性及驱动因素[J].应用生态学报,2022,33(10):2813-2821.
0
浏览量
707
下载量
2
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621