基于“贡献力—活力—组织力—恢复力”的武汉市自然资源生态安全评价

朱锦维; 柯新利; 周婷; 何利杰

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.04.030

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

基于“贡献力—活力—组织力—恢复力”的武汉市自然资源生态安全评价

试验研究

- 基于“贡献力—活力—组织力—恢复力”的武汉市自然资源生态安全评价
- Ecological Security Evaluation of Natural Resources in Wuhan City Based on a Framework of Contribution, Vigor, Organization and Resilience
- 水土保持通报 2023年43卷第4期页码：248-255
- 作者机构：
  
  华中农业大学公共管理学院,湖北,武汉,430070
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目“城市生态用地破碎化与土地功能演变的互馈机理研究”(41971240);国家自然科学基金青年项目(42101265);湖北省自然资源厅科研计划项目(ZRZY2020KJ02)
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.04.030
  中图分类号： X826
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
朱锦维, 柯新利, 周婷, 等. 基于“贡献力—活力—组织力—恢复力”的武汉市自然资源生态安全评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(4):248-255.

Zhu Jinwei, Ke Xinli, Zhou Ting, et al. Ecological Security Evaluation of Natural Resources in Wuhan City Based on a Framework of Contribution, Vigor, Organization and Resilience[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(4): 248-255.
朱锦维, 柯新利, 周婷, 等. 基于“贡献力—活力—组织力—恢复力”的武汉市自然资源生态安全评价[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(4):248-255. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.04.030.

Zhu Jinwei, Ke Xinli, Zhou Ting, et al. Ecological Security Evaluation of Natural Resources in Wuhan City Based on a Framework of Contribution, Vigor, Organization and Resilience[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(4): 248-255. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.04.030.

摘要

[目的] 构建生态系统健康与生态系统服务关联的自然资源生态安全评估框架，分析城市化过程中自然资源生态安全的演变规律，为区域国土空间优化和生态文明建设提供理论依据。[方法] 基于生态系统健康与生态系统服务关联的视角，构建“贡献力—活力—组织力—恢复力”的自然资源生态安全评估框架，综合运用InVEST模型、景观指数和德尔菲法评估武汉市2000和2021年的自然资源生态安全，并分析其时空演变规律。[结果] ①2000和2021年武汉市自然资源生态安全指数分别为0.394 4和0.374 5，生态安全等级在空间上呈现中部低、四周高的分布格局，且黄陂区生态安全水平最高； ②2000—2021年武汉市自然资源生态安全整体呈下降趋势，下降的地区主要沿中心城区边缘呈环状分布，“低安全”范围有从中部核心区逐步向外扩张的趋势，且“中等安全”降为“较低安全”，“较高安全”降为“中等安全”的分布范围较广。[结论] 城市扩张过程中面对自然资源生态安全不断下降的压力，应进一步加强国土空间规划的引领作用，严惩非法侵占生态用地，加强生态空间的保护。

Abstract

[Objective] An assessment framework for ecological security evaluation of natural resources was constructed to further analyze its evolution law in response to urbanization

in order to provie references for regional territorial space optimization and ecological civilization construction. [Methods] Based on the correlation between ecosystem health and ecosystem services

an ecological security framework based on “contribution

vigor

organization and resilience” was constructed. By using the InVEST model

landscape indices

and the Delphi method to evaluate the ecological security of Wuhan City in 2000 and 2021

the temporal and spatial evolution of ecological security was also analyzed. [Results] ① The ecological security index of Wuhan City was 0.394 4 in 2000 and 0.374 5 in 2021. Ecological security level showed a spatial distribution pattern of “low in the middle and high in the surrounding area”. The ecological security level of the Huangpi District was the highest. ② From 2000 to 2021

the overall ecological security of Wuhan City showed a downward trend. The declining areas were mainly located in a ring along the edge of the central urban area. The distribution of the “low security” area tended to gradually expand from the central core area. The transition of areas from “medium ecological safety” to “low ecological safety” and from “high ecological security” to “medium ecological safety” was widespread. [Conclusion] Urban expansion has resulted in declining ecological security of natural resources. Therefore

territorial space planning should be further strengthened

including punishments for illegal occupation of ecological land and strengthening the protection of ecological space.

关键词

Keywords

references

Pirages D. Demographic change and ecological security [J]. Environmental Change and Security Project Report, 1997,3:37-46.

徐智超,刘华民,韩鹏,等.内蒙古生态安全时空演变特征及驱动力[J].生态学报,2021,41(11):4354-4366.

崔馨月,方雷,王祥荣,等.基于DPSIR模型的长三角城市群生态安全评价研究[J].生态学报,2021,41(1):302-319.

肖笃宁,陈文波,郭福良.论生态安全的基本概念和研究内容[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(3):354-358.

吴艳霞,罗恒,梁志康.长江经济带生态安全测度研究[J].生态学报,2020,40(19):6761-6775.

Shi Xiaoqing, Zhao Jingzhu, Ouyang Zhiyun. Assessment of eco-security in the Knowledge Grid e-science environment [J]. Journal of Systems and Software, 2006,79(2):246-252.

Zeng Chen, Deng Xiangzheng, Xu Shan, et al. An integrated approach for assessing the urban ecosystem health of megacities in China [J]. Cities, 2016,53:110-119.

Caniani D, Labella A, Lioi D, et al. Habitat ecological integrity and environmental impact assessment of anthropic activities: a GIS-based fuzzy logic model for sites of high biodiversity conservation interest [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2016,67:238-249.

Dizdaroglu D. Developing micro-level urban ecosystem indicators for sustainability assessment [J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2015,54:119-124.

王争磊,刘海龙,丁娅楠,等.山西省生态安全时空演变特征及影响因素[J].生态学报,2022,42(18):7470-7483.

赵鹏宇,薛慧敏.基于PSR模型的能源—生态复合区生态安全预警研究:以山西省忻州市为例[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(2):285-290,298.

石丹,关婧文.基于DPSIR-物元的吉林省旅游生态安全时空格局测度及障碍诊断[J].生态学杂志,2022,41(8):1653-1664.

邵月花,杨调调,谈存峰.基于DPSIR模型的渭河干流甘肃段生态安全评价[J].水土保持通报,2022,42(3):166-170.

彭建,王仰麟,吴健生,等.区域生态系统健康评价:研究方法与进展[J].生态学报,2007,27(11):4877-4885.

俞鸿千,蒋齐,王占军,等. VOR, CVOR指数在宁夏干旱风沙区荒漠草原健康评价中的应用:以盐池县为例[J].草地学报,2018,26(3):584-590.

Peng Jian, Liu Yanxu, Li Tianyi, et al. Regional ecosystem health response to rural land use change: a case study in Lijiang City, China [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2017,72:399-410.

潘竟虎,王云.基于CVOR和电路理论的讨赖河流域生态安全评价及生态格局优化[J].生态学报,2021,41(7):2582-2595.

Yang Bohan, Ke Xinli. Analysis on urban lake change during rapid urbanization using a synergistic approach: a case study of Wuhan, China [J]. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 2015,89:127-135.

谢启姣,刘进华.1987—2016年武汉城市湖泊时空演变及其生态服务价值响应[J].生态学报,2020,40(21):7840-7850.

朱晓南,刘艳中,陈勇,等.武汉市城市用地扩张对生态系统服务的时空影响[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(5):288-294.

曾忠平,彭浩轩.城市湿地损失和内涝灾害响应的遥感分析:以武汉市南湖为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2018,27(4):929-938.

袁毛宁,刘焱序,王曼,等.基于“活力—组织力—恢复力—贡献力”框架的广州市生态系统健康评估[J].生态学杂志,2019,38(4):1249-1257.

董玉红,刘世梁,安南南,等.基于景观指数和空间自相关的吉林大安市景观格局动态研究[J].自然资源学报,2015,30(11):1860-1871.

王良杰,马帅,许稼昌,等.基于生态系统服务权衡的优先保护区选取研究:以南方丘陵山地带为例[J].生态学报,2021,41(5):1716-1727.

Tang Lanping, Ke Xinli, Zhou Ting, et al. Impacts of cropland expansion on carbon storage: a case study in Hubei, China [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020,265:110515.

陈泽怡,余珮珩,陈奕云,等.汉江流域水源涵养和水质净化服务时空分析[J].生态经济,2022,38(4):193-200.

朱杰,龚健,李靖业.青藏高原东部生态敏感区生境质量时空演变特征:以青海省河湟谷地为例[J].资源科学,2020,42(5):991-1003.

张学雷,屈永慧,任圆圆,等.土壤、土地利用多样性及其与相关景观指数的关联分析[J].生态环境学报,2014,23(6):923-931.

Peng Jian, Liu Yanxu, Wu Jiansheng, et al. Linking ecosystem services and landscape patterns to assess urban ecosystem health: a case study in Shenzhen City, China [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2015,143:56-68.

尹燕亭,运向军,郭明英,等.基于牧户感知和野外调查相结合的内蒙古东部草甸草原健康评价[J].生态学报,2019,39(2):709-716.

欧维新,张伦嘉,陶宇,等.基于土地利用变化的长三角生态系统健康时空动态研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018,28(5):84-92.

浏览量

728

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

黄河下游城市群生态系统健康时空演变特征

山西省太原市土地利用转型及其生态效应

数量—质量—生态“三位一体”视角下云南省耕地利用格局变化分析与风险评估

黄河是新世纪济南生态城市建设的关键

基于生态足迹的青海省生态安全初步研究