1. 南京林业大学 南方现代林业协同创新中心 江苏省水土保持与生态修复重点实验室,江苏,南京,210037
2. 江苏省水利科学研究院,江苏,南京,210017
3. 山东省水文中心,山东,济南,250002
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
戴玉婷, 齐斐, 董明明, 等. 基于地理探测器的山东省莱阳市耕地类型时空分布及其影响因素[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(4):211-219.
Dai Yuting, Qi Fei, Dong Mingming, et al. Spatio-temporal Distribution of Cultivated Land Types and Their Influencing Factors in Laiyang City of Shandong Province Based on Geographical Detectors[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(4): 211-219.
戴玉婷, 齐斐, 董明明, 等. 基于地理探测器的山东省莱阳市耕地类型时空分布及其影响因素[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(4):211-219. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.04.026.
Dai Yuting, Qi Fei, Dong Mingming, et al. Spatio-temporal Distribution of Cultivated Land Types and Their Influencing Factors in Laiyang City of Shandong Province Based on Geographical Detectors[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(4): 211-219. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.04.026.
[目的
]
探索不同耕地类型的空间分布、动态变化及其影响因素,为该区域耕地保护、可持续农业发展和水土保持综合治理提供科学指导。[方法
]
以山东省莱阳市为研究区,基于2019—2021年高分遥感数据,结合野外调查,采用动态变化度、土地利用转移矩阵及地理探测器等方法,对耕地类型进一步细分为水浇地、旱平地、旱坡地、旱梯田、撂荒地等5类,并探讨其空间分布影响因素、年际时空分布格局及其易变化区域识别。[结果
]
①研究区耕地占土地总面积的54.44%,整体呈现南多北少,西多东少的特征;以旱梯田为主,所占比例为61.19%;其次为水浇地、旱平地和旱坡地,撂荒地仅占0.33%。②单因子探测器结果表明,地貌类型、坡度及土壤类型是影响耕地类型分布的主导因素,因子交互作用时,影响因子的解释力q值均达0.3以上。③2019—2021年耕地总体动态度为-0.25%,面积减少4.73 km
2
,主要由旱梯田、旱坡地、旱平地、水浇地转化为建设用地,多发生在城镇周边,且以低丘陵区坡度小于5°的棕壤土居多。[结论
]
研究区耕地类型以旱梯田为主,分布在低丘陵区且坡度较平缓(耕作质量较好)的耕地类型易发生变化,从而使耕地面积持续减少。因此,应加强对高质量耕地的保护措施。
[Objective] The temporal and spatial variation characteristics of cultivated land types and their influencing factors were studied in order to provide a theoretical basis for policy-making regarding cultivated land protection
sustainable agricultural development
and soil and water conservation in this region. [Methods] The study was conducted for Laiyang City in Shandong Province. High-resolution remote sensing data from 2019 to 2021 were combined with field observations in order to divide cultivated land types into five categories: irrigated land
arid flat land
arid sloping land
arid terrace land
and abandoned land. We determined the spatio-temporal distribution and variation of different types of cultivated land and their influencing factors
and identified the variable regions by using dynamic change degree
land use transfer matrix
and geographic detector. [Results] ① Cultivated land of Laiyang City accounted for 54.44% of the total land area
with an overall distribution pattern of more cultivated land in the southern and western areas of the city
and less in the northern and eastern areas of the city. Arid terrace land accounted for 61.19% of the total cultivated land area
which was followed by irrigated land
arid flat land
and arid sloping land. Abandoned land accounted for only 0.33% of the total cultivated land area. ② The analysis of single factor detector showed that landform type
slope
and soil type were the three main factors affecting the distribution of cultivated land type
and the (q values) were all above 0.3 when the factors interacted with each other. ③ From 2019 to 2021
the net rate of cultivated land conversion was -0.25%. The total area decreased 4.73 km2
mainly due to conversion of arid terrace land
arid sloping land
arid flat land
and irrigated land to construction land. This conversion mostly occurred in the urban area located in the low hilly area with a slope of less than 5° and a brown soil type. [Conclusion] The mainly cultivated land type is dry terraced field. Cultivated land distributed in low hilly area with gentle slopes (representing cultivated land with good quality) is easy to change. As the area continues to decrease
the protection measures of high-quality cultivated land should be strengthened.
王文旭,曹银贵,苏锐清,等.我国耕地变化驱动力研究进展:驱动因子与驱动机理[J].中国农业资源与区划,2020,41(7):21-30.
卫新东,林良国,罗平平,等.耕地多功能耦合协调发展时空格局与驱动力分析[J].农业工程学报,2022,38(4):260-269.
Li Huan, Wu Yuzhe, Huang Xianjin, et al. Spatial-temporal evolution and classification of marginalization of cultivated land in the process of urbanization [J]. Habitat International, 2017,61:1-8.
代仁丽,钟九生,江丽,等.基于地理探测器的铜仁市耕地分布特征及驱动因子探究[J].科学技术与工程,2021,21(28):12072-12079.
王瑷玲,刘文鹏,纪广韦,等.山东低山丘陵土地整治区耕地生态价值评价[J].农业工程学报,2013,29(S1):244-250.
侯青青,陈英,裴婷婷,等.近25年来甘肃省耕地资源时空变化及其影响因子[J].干旱区研究,2022,39(3):955-967.
刘涛,史秋洁,王雨,等.中国城乡建设占用耕地的时空格局及形成机制[J].地理研究,2018,37(8):1609-1623.
袁承程,张定祥,刘黎明,等.近10年中国耕地变化的区域特征及演变态势[J].农业工程学报,2021,37(1):267-278.
罗芳,潘安,陈忠升,等.四川省宜宾市耕地时空格局变化及驱动力分析[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(6):336-344.
张扬,周忠发,黄登红,等.喀斯特山区耕地时空演变与影响因子分析[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(22):266-275.
李辉丹,史东梅,夏蕊,等.基于地理探测器的重庆坡耕地时空格局演变特征及驱动机制[J].农业工程学报,2022,38(12):280-290.
杨懿,高华端,王群,等.多因素影响下的喀斯特山区坡耕地分布特征:以贵阳市花溪区为例[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(1):361-367.
冯茂秋,潘洪义,朱芳,等.不同撂荒耕地类型空间格局及影响因素研究:以德阳市中江县为例[J].西南农业学报,2018,31(6):1260-1266.
王祯,吴金华,白帅,等.延安市坡耕地资源时空变化及其土壤侵蚀效应[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(3):1-11.
王秀兰,包玉海.[J].地理科学进展,1999,18(1):83-89.
Yu B, Rosewell C. A robust estimator of the R-factor for the universal soil loss equation [J]. Transactions of the Asae, 1996,39(2):559-561.
Keli Zhang, Li Lian, Zhuodong Zhang. Reliability of soil erodibility estimation in areas outside the US:a comparison of erodibility for main agricultural soils in the US and China [J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2016,75(3):252.
张科利,彭文英,杨红丽.中国土壤可蚀性值及其估算[J].土壤学报,2007,44(1):7-13.
符素华,刘宝元,周贵云,等.坡长坡度因子计算工具[J].中国水土保持科学,2015,13(5):105-110.
王劲峰,徐成东.地理探测器:原理与展望[J].地理学报,2017,72(1):116-134.
梁鑫源,李阳兵.三峡库区规模农地时空变化特征及其驱动机制[J].地理学报,2018,73(9):1630-1646.
常玉旸,张天柱,张凤荣,等.赣东山地丘陵区耕地细碎化时空变异与驱动因子探析:以江西省万年县为例[J].水土保持研究,2021,28(3):264-271.
曹银贵,袁春,周伟,等.中国耕地变化的驱动因子及其省域差异分析[J].中国土地科学,2008(2):17-22.
Wang Hua, Zhu Yuxin, Wang Mengyu et al. Spatial characteristics and driving forces of cultivated land changes by coupling spatial autocorrelation model and spatial-temporal big data [J]. Ksii Transactions on Internet and Information Systems(Tiis), 2021,15(2):767-785.
0
浏览量
617
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621