1. 石家庄首创水汇环境治理有限公司,河北,石家庄,051430
2. 北京首创生态环保集团股份有限公司,北京,100044
3. 北京水星环境有限公司,北京,101599
4. 河北大学 生态环境学院(筹) 河北省湿地近自然修复技术重点实验室,河北,保定,071002
5. 天津大学 建筑学院,天津,300110
6. 河北师范大学,河北,石家庄,050024
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
韩元, 刘玲, 姚一珍, 等. 北京市海绵城市试点区雨水花园植物群落生态适应性及其应用效果[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(4):186-194.
Han Yuan, Liu Ling, Yao Yizhen, et al. Ecological Adaptability and Application of Rainwater Garden Plants in Sponge City Pilot Area of Beijing City[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(4): 186-194.
韩元, 刘玲, 姚一珍, 等. 北京市海绵城市试点区雨水花园植物群落生态适应性及其应用效果[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(4):186-194. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.04.023.
Han Yuan, Liu Ling, Yao Yizhen, et al. Ecological Adaptability and Application of Rainwater Garden Plants in Sponge City Pilot Area of Beijing City[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(4): 186-194. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.04.023.
[目的] 针对已建成的城市雨水花园项目,从生物多样性的角度进行多指标调查评价,分析雨水花园植物的适应性及景观应用效果,旨在为北京地区雨水花园植物群落优化配置提供科学参考。[方法] 通过实地调研,分析和掌握雨水花园植物群落的多样性特征,在定量分析的基础上构建雨水花园植物群落景观评价模型对15个典型雨水花园植物群落进行分级和评价。[结果] ①北京市海绵城市试点建成区雨水花园草本植物共20科,43属,45种,优势科主要集中于菊科(Compositae)、禾本科(Gramineae)、百合科(Liliaceae)、景天科(Crassulaceae)等。试点区各样地指数数值差异较小,各调查样地草本植物丰富度相似,植物物种集中性较一致。②试点区雨水花园植物群落景观综合评价总体处于较高水平,各样地中小区类雨水花园植物群落评价明显高于道路类雨水花园植物群落景观。受所在区域地表径流污染程度的影响,不同样地植物生长情况、群落构成有所差别。[结论] 未来还需加强对建成雨水花园植物的定期监测、评估,重视开发本土植物,筛选出优势物种,总结出结构稳定的植物群落配置模式与维护管理手段,为北京市雨水花园植物选择与配置提供科学参考。
[Objective] The adaptability and landscape application effects of rainwater garden plants were studied using a multi-index from a biodiversity perspective in order to provide a scientific reference for the optimal allocation of rainwater garden plant communities in Beijing City. [Methods] A field investigation was conducted to analyze and understand the diversity characteristics of rain garden plant communities. Quantitative analysis was used to construct a landscape evaluation model of rain garden plant communities to classify and evaluate 15 typical rain garden plant communities. [Results] ① There were 45 species of rain garden plants belonging to 43 genera and 20 families in Beijing sponge city pilot area. The dominant plant families were mainly Compositae
Gramineae
Liliaceae
Crassulaceae
etc. There was little difference in the index values of different plots in the pilot area
the richness of herbaceous plants was similar
and the concentration of plant species was consistent in the investigated plots. ② The comprehensive evaluation of the rain garden plant community landscape in the pilot area was at a high level
and the evaluation of the rain garden plant community landscape was significantly higher than that of road rain garden plant community landscape. Due to the influence of the pollution in surface runoff in the region causing differences in plant growth
the plant community structure was different at different sites. [Conclusion] In the future
it will be necessary to strengthen regular monitoring and evaluation of constructed rain garden plant communities
screen out dominant species
and summarize the stable plant community allocation patterns and maintenance management methods in order to provide a reference for the selection and configuration of rain garden plants in Beijing City.
Katsifarakis K L, Vafeiadis M, Theodossiou N. Sustainable drainage and urban landscape upgrading using rain gardens. Site selection in Thessaloniki, Greece [J]. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 2015(4):338-347.
Basdeki A, Katsifarakis L, Katsifarakis K L. Rain gardens as integral parts of urban sewage systems: a case study in Thessaloniki, Greece [J]. Procedia Engineering, 2016,162:426-432.
马晓菲,石龙宇.基于景感学的景感营造研究:以雨水花园为例[J].生态学报,2020,40(22):8167-8175.
韩林桅,张淼,石龙宇.生态基础设施的定义、内涵及其服务能力研究进展[J].生态学报,2019,39(19):7311-7321.
陈垚,杨威,王健斌,等.雨水生物滞留设施中植被的设计与养护[J].中国给水排水,2017,33(12):6.
Nagase A, Dunnett N. Amount of water runoff from different vegetation types on extensive green roofs: effects of plant species, diversity and plant structure [J]Landscape and Urban Planning, 2012,104(3):356.
Ishimatsu K, Ito K, Mitani Y, et al. Use of rain gardens for stormwater management in urban design and planning [J].Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 2017,13(1):205-212.
Vineyard D, Ingwersen W W, Hawkins T R, et al. Comparing green and grey infrastructure using life cycle cost and environmental impact: a rain garden case study in Cincinnati, OH [J].Jawra Journal of the American Water Resources, 2015,51(5):1342-1360.
赵寒雪,殷利华.2005—2015中国十年来雨水花园研究进展[J].中国园林,2016,32(10):60-64.
杨阳,谌多.西北半干湿地区雨水花园植物应用及适宜性评价[J].中国农学通报,2021,37(2):54-60.
李聪.西咸新区海绵城市植物选择与配置研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2018.
王佳,王思思,车伍,等.雨水花园植物的选择与设计[J].北方园艺,2012(19):77-81.
孙明,杜小玉,杨炜茹.北京市公园绿地植物景观评价模型及其应用[J].北京林业大学学报, 2010,32(S1):163-167.
刘本本,孙清琳,柳鑫,等.基于群决策和层次分析法的雄安新区公园绿地植物综合评价体系构建与物种筛选[J].应用与环境生物学报, 2022,28(3):770-778.
闫霄雯,李俊奇,郭晓鹏.绿色雨水基础设施适应性植物的选择和设计[J].环境工程, 2020,38(6):170-175,251.
张起鹏,王倩,张丽,等.黄河兰州段湿地植物多样性研究[J].水土保持通报,2012,32(3):240-244.
李运国.南亚热带景观湖泊水、湿生植物筛选研究(Ⅰ):水、湿生植物丰富度与多样性[J].草原与草坪,2021,41(3):137-142.
龙佳.北京老城区建筑与小区绿地植被对雨水的截留效应研究[D].北京:北京建筑大学,2020.
郭超.雨水花园集中入渗对土壤和地下水影响的试验研究[D].陕西西安:西安理工大学,2019.
向师庆,赵相华.北京主要造林树种的根系研究[J].北京林学院学报,1981(2):19-32.
桑凯新.黄河下游河岸带典型植物根系结构特征及对土壤渗透性的影响[D].河南郑州:河南农业大学2020.
Gaiotti F, Marcuzzo P, Belfiore N, et al. Influence of compost addition on soil properties, root growth and vine performances of
Vitis vinifera
cv
Cabernet sauvignon
. Scientia Horticulturae, 2017,225: 88-95.
张千千,李向全,王效科,等.城市路面降雨径流污染特征及源解析的研究进展[J].生态环境学报,2014,23(2):352-358.
霍炜洁,周怀东,刘玲花,等.土壤—植物系统对径流污染物截留的影响因子分析[J].农业环境科学学报,2013,32(4):798-804.
李怀恩,贾斌凯,成波,等.海绵城市雨水径流集中入渗对土壤和地下水影响研究进展[J].水科学展,2019,30(4):589-600.
商瑜,刘海龙.华北地区陆生园林植物去除道路径流污染物的实证研究[J].中国园林, 2021,37(12):116-121.
周媛,张立秋,杨龙,等.生物滞留设施运行常见问题及调控措施研究进展[J].净水技术2022,41(9):26-34.
龙佳,王思思,冯梦珂,等.北京市低影响开发设施植物应用现状与评价优化[J].环境工程,2020,38(4):89-95.
朱玲,刘一达,王睿,等.新自然主义种植理念下的草本植物群落空间研究[J].风景园林,2020,27(2):72-76.
冯梦珂.低影响开发设施的植物景观评价与优化研究[D].北京:北京建筑大学,2019.
0
浏览量
676
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621