水生生态系统服务功能与辐射效应——以河南省洛阳市为例

徐金鹏; 许迎君; 孟钰; 石悸锋; 管新建

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.04.021

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

水生生态系统服务功能与辐射效应——以河南省洛阳市为例

试验研究

- 水生生态系统服务功能与辐射效应——以河南省洛阳市为例
- Radiation Effects and Service Function of Aquatic Ecosystem—Taking Luoyang City, Henan Province as an Example
- 水土保持通报 2023年43卷第4期页码：170-177
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 河南省南阳水文水资源勘测局,河南,南阳,473000
  2. 郑州大学水利与交通学院,河南,郑州,450001
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  国家自然科学基金项目“水质水量双控作用下流域生态补偿机制研究”(51879241)
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.04.021
  中图分类号： TV213.4
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
徐金鹏, 许迎君, 孟钰, 等. 水生生态系统服务功能与辐射效应——以河南省洛阳市为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(4):170-177.

Xu Jinpeng, Xu Yingjun, Meng Yu, et al. Radiation Effects and Service Function of Aquatic Ecosystem—Taking Luoyang City, Henan Province as an Example[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(4): 170-177.
徐金鹏, 许迎君, 孟钰, 等. 水生生态系统服务功能与辐射效应——以河南省洛阳市为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(4):170-177. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.04.021.

Xu Jinpeng, Xu Yingjun, Meng Yu, et al. Radiation Effects and Service Function of Aquatic Ecosystem—Taking Luoyang City, Henan Province as an Example[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(4): 170-177. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.04.021.

摘要

[目的

]

分析区域水生生态系统服务功能的价值变化和辐射效应，为区域水资源可持续发展和流域生态补偿提供科学依据。[方法

]

利用ArcGIS软件对2000—2020年河南省洛阳市土地利用数据进行提取得到水域类型面积，采用能值方法对水生生态系统服务功能进行量化，并分析其变化。同时通过断裂点模型分析其功能辐射。[结果

]

2000—2020年洛阳市水生生态服务总能值分别为8.01×10

sej， 1.29×10

sej， 1.27×10

sej， 1.29×10

sej， 1.31×10

sej，总体上呈增长趋势。其中，服务构成重心已由供给功能向文化功能偏移，系统中生物多样性保护、水产品生产、水资源供给、水资源调蓄和休闲娱乐功能居于支配地位，且休闲娱乐功能已成为核心功能。此外，洛阳市水生生态系统服务功能主要转出地区为嵩县和洛宁县，向外转移总量分别为3.10×10

sej和3.21×10

sej，主要转入地区为栾川县、宜阳县、伊川县及汝阳县。[结论

]

在洛阳市同类地区，需要重视水生态保护，加大对区域旅游事业的扶持引导，同时合理地进行流域内生态补偿，促进各地区经济、社会、生态协调发展。

Abstract

[Objective] The value change and radiation effect of the regional aquatic ecosystem service function were analyzed in order to provide a scientific basis for sustainable development of regional water resources and ecological compensation of a river basin. [Methods] ArcGIS software was used to extract land use data for Luoyang City

Henan Province from 2000 to 2020 in order to obtain the area of water type. The emergy method was used to quantify and analyze the changes of aquatic ecosystem service functions

and the functional radiation was analyzed by the break point model. [Results] From 2000 to 2020 (in five-year time steps)

the total emergy values of aquatic ecosystem services at Luoyang City were 8.01×1021 sej， 1.29×1022 sej， 1.27×1022 sej， 1.29×1022 sej， and 1.31×1022 sej

respectively

with a general increasing trend. Among these emergy values

the focus of service composition had shifted from supply function to cultural function. In this system

biodiversity protection

aquatic product production

water resource supply

water resource regulation

and leisure and entertainment functions were dominant. Leisure and entertainment functions have become core functions. In addition

the main transfer areas of the aquatic ecosystem service function in Luoyang City were Songxian County and Luoning County

with total outward transfer values of 3.10×1020 sej and 3.21×1020 sej

respectively. The main transfer areas were Luanchuan County

Yiyang County

Yichuan County

and Ruyang County. [Conclusion] Greater attention will need to be given to ecological protection of water

increasing support and guidance for regional tourism

and reasonably carrying out ecological compensation in areas similar to Luoyang City to promote the coordinated development of the economy

society

and ecology in various regions.

关键词

Keywords

references

欧阳志云,赵同谦,王效科,等.水生态服务功能分析及其间接价值评价[J].生态学报,2004,24(10):2091-2099.

齐娜,孙威威,阚海明,等.密云水库2008—2019年水生态服务功能评价[J].水土保持通报,2021,41(4):276-283,291.

Daily G. Nature’s Services:Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems [M]. Washington D C: Island Press, 1997.

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystem and Human Well-being: Synthesis [M]. Washing D C: Island Press, 2005.

昝欣,张玉玲,贾晓宇,等.永定河上游流域水生态系统服务价值评估[J].自然资源学报,2020,35(6):1326-1337.

刘玉龙,马俊杰,金学林,等.生态系统服务功能价值评估方法综述[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2005，15(1):91-95.

Meng Yu, Zhang Hao, Jiang, Pengkun, et al. Quantitative assessment of safety, society and economy, sustainability benefits from the combined use of reservoirs [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021,324:129242.

薛达元,包浩生,李文华.长白山自然保护区森林生态系统间接经济价值评估[J].中国环境科学,1999,19(3):247-252.

马程,王晓玥,张雅昕,等.北京市生态涵养区生态系统服务供给与流动的能值分析[J].地理学报,2017,72(6):974-985.

Odum H T. Self-organization, transformity, and information [J]. Science, 1988,242(4882):1132-1139.

王耕,张红玉.辽西北地区防风固沙辐射效应空间差异研究[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(6):161-166.

Brown M T, Ulgiati S. Energy quality, emergy, and transformity: H T Odum’s contributions to quantifying and understanding systems [J]. Ecological Modelling, 2004,178(1/2):201-213.

贺成龙.水力发电的能值转换率计算方法[J].自然资源学报,2016,31(11):1958-1968.

吕翠美.区域水资源生态经济价值的能值研究[D].河南郑州：郑州大学,2009.

张佩,姚娟.大喀纳斯旅游区湖泊—河流生态系统服务能值变化研究[J].水电能源科学,2015,33(8):37-41.

乔旭宁,杨永菊,杨德刚.生态服务功能价值空间转移评价:以渭干河流域为例[J].中国沙漠,2011,31(4):1008-1014.

陈璐,牟子平,秦惠平,等.湿地生态系统生态服务功能及其辐射效应研究[J].环境科学与技术,2017,40(5):179-186.

张翔,陈德超,范金鼎,等.生态系统服务价值变化及其与人类活动关联性研究:以常州市为例[J].环境工程技术学报,2022,12(6):2124-2131.

雷金睿,陈宗铸,吴庭天,等.海南岛东北部土地利用与生态系统服务价值空间自相关格局分析[J].生态学报,2019,39(7):2366-2377.

Wang Hong, Zhou Shunli, Li Xiaobing, et al. The influence of climate change and human activities on ecosystem service value [J]. Ecological Engineering, 2016,87:224-239.

Zhao Yue, Wu Fengping, Li Fang, et al. Ecological compensation standard of trans-boundary river basin based on ecological spillover value: a case study for the Lancang-Mekong River basin [J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021,18(3):1251.

浏览量

740

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

陕西省黄土丘陵沟壑区典型农林复合生产模式能值评价及可持续性分析

城市湿地主导生态系统服务功能及价值评估--以江苏省镇江市为例

成都平原不同秸秆还田模式下稻麦轮作农田系统能值分析

甘肃省庆阳市董志塬水土保持功能服务价值估算

不同空间尺度耕地埂坎提取方法及其分布特征