不同铺设形式对固沙砖沙障防风沙效果影响的风洞试验

孙婧; 王君; 洪俊哲; 贾小静; 张少云

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.04.006

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

不同铺设形式对固沙砖沙障防风沙效果影响的风洞试验

试验研究

- 不同铺设形式对固沙砖沙障防风沙效果影响的风洞试验
- Wind Tunnel Experiment on Impacts of Different Sand Barrier Layouts on Windbreak and Sand-fixing
- 水土保持通报 2023年43卷第4期页码：44-52
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 河北建筑工程学院土木工程学院,河北,张家口,075000
  2. 河北省土木工程诊断、改造与抗灾重点实验室,河北,张家口,075000
  3. 河北省高校道桥结构健康监测与维修加固应用技术研发中心,河北,张家口,075000
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  河北省科技厅重点研发计划项目“冀北风沙地区废弃铁尾矿道路阻沙屏障关键技术研究”(20373802D);河北省建设科技研究计划项目(2020-266);河北省教育厅2022年省级研究生创新资助项目(CXZZSS2022059);张家口市科技局重点研发科技项目(2021012B)
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.04.006
  中图分类号： X915.5;S157.1
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
孙婧, 王君, 洪俊哲, 等. 不同铺设形式对固沙砖沙障防风沙效果影响的风洞试验[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(4):44-52.

Sun Jing, Wang Jun, Hong Junzhe, et al. Wind Tunnel Experiment on Impacts of Different Sand Barrier Layouts on Windbreak and Sand-fixing[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(4): 44-52.
孙婧, 王君, 洪俊哲, 等. 不同铺设形式对固沙砖沙障防风沙效果影响的风洞试验[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(4):44-52. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.04.006.

Sun Jing, Wang Jun, Hong Junzhe, et al. Wind Tunnel Experiment on Impacts of Different Sand Barrier Layouts on Windbreak and Sand-fixing[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(4): 44-52. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.04.006.

摘要

[目的] 研究带孔沙砖的铺设形式对风场特性和防风沙效果的影响，旨在为选择新型防风固沙材料提供理论依据。[方法] 通过风洞试验，探究净风条件下方格沙障、梯度行列式沙障的风压分布及平均风压系数波动情况；重点对比分析了风沙条件下这2种不同沙障形式的障后风速、防风效能和积沙效果。[结果] 相比于梯度行列式沙障，方格沙障内部平均风压系数均为负值，内部风流循环产生涡旋使其受压更稳定，且障后平均风速衰减率更高；防风效能沙障高度出现了先升高后下降的趋势，在10 cm高度方格沙障的防风效能为64.3%，比梯度行列式沙障高4.2%；方格沙障第1排、第2排后方格内总沙粒沉积率分别是梯度行列式沙障的1.14，1.66倍，且方格沙障的障后沉积沙粒量、障后沉积范围均要小于梯度行列式沙障。[结论] 方格沙障具有使风流明显衰减的功能，阻沙率大于梯度行列式沙障，沙粒主要沉降在方格内部，其防风沙效果最好，为最优铺设形式。

Abstract

[Objective] The influences of porous sand-fixing bricks layout on wind field characteristics

windbreak effect and sand-fixing were studied in order to provide a theoretical basis for the selection of new windbreak and sand-fixing materials. [Methods] The wind pressure distribution and the fluctuation of average wind pressure coefficient of a grid sand barrier and a gradient determinant sand barrier under wind conditions were explored by wind tunnel experiment. It was compared and analyzed emphatically for wind speed

windbreak efficiency

and sand accumulation for the two different types of sand barrier under sand storm. [Results] The average wind pressure coefficient inside the grid sand barrier was negative compared with the gradient determinant sand barrier

and the vortex generated by the internal wind circulation made it more stable under pressure. The average wind speed attenuation rate behind the grid sand barrier was higher than that behind the gradient determinant sand barrier. The windbreak efficiency first increased and then decreased with the increases of height along the height divection of sand barrier in barrier height. At 10 cm height

the windbreak efficiency of the grid sand barrier was 64.3%

which was 4.2% higher than that of gradient determinant sand barrier. The total sand deposition rates in the first row and the second row of the grid sand barrier were 1.14 and 1.66

respectively

times higher than that of the gradient determinant sand barrier. The amount of sand deposited behind the grid sand barrier and the deposition range behind the grid sand barrier were smaller than those values observed for the gradient determinant sand barrier. [Conclusion] The grid sand barrier had a significant attenuation effect on wind flow

and the sand resistance rate was higher than that of the gradient determinant sand barrier. Sand particles mainly settled inside the grid sand barrier

and its windbreak effect was better than observed for the gradient determinant sand barrier. The grid sand barrier was

therefore

judged to be the optimal sand barrier layout.

关键词

Keywords

references

张克存,安志山,何明珠,等.中国沙区公路风沙危害及防治研究进展[J].中国沙漠,2022,42(3):222-232.

李昂,王扬,薛建国,等.北方风沙区生态修复的科学原理、工程实践和恢复效果[J].生态学报,2019,39(20):7452-7462.

Li Congjuan, Wang Yongdong, Lei Jiaqiang, et al. Damage by wind-blown sand and its control measures along the Taklimakan Desert Highway in China [J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2021,13(1):98-106.

马学喜,王海峰,李生宇,等.两种固沙方格沙障的防护效益及地形适应性对比[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(3):344-349.

鱼燕萍,肖建华,屈建军,等.不同坡角公路路基流场的风洞试验[J].中国沙漠,2018,38(3):464-472.

Pan Xia, Wang Zhenyi, Gao Yong. Effects of compound sand barrier for habitat restoration on sediment grain-size distribution in ulan buh desert [J]. Scientific Reports, 2020,10(1):1-9.

Xin Guowei, Huang Ning, Zhang Jie, et al. Investigations into the design of sand control fence for Gobi buildings [J]. Aeolian Research, 2021,49:100662.

Li Bailiang, Sherman D J. Aerodynamics and morphodynamics of sand fences: a review [J]. Aeolian Research, 2015,17:33-48.

Liu Li, Bo Tianli. Effects of checkerboard sand barrier belt on sand transport and dune advance [J]. Aeolian Research, 2020,42:100546.

程建军,智凌岩,薛春晓,等.铁路沿线下导风板对风沙流场的控制规律[J].中国铁道科学,2017,38(6):16-23.

Zhang Shuai, Ding Guodong, Yu Minghan, et al. Application of boundary layer displacement thickness in wind erosion protection evaluation: case study of a salix psammophila sand barrier [J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019,16(4):592-608.

Wang Tao, Qu Jianjun, Ling Yuquan, et al. Shelter effect efficacy of sand fences: a comparison of systems in a wind tunnel [J]. Aeolian Research, 2018,30:32-40.

田美荣,傅馨逸,杨伟超,等.挡风墙设计及其在呼伦贝尔沙地治理中的应用[J].环境工程技术学报,2021,11(5):970-975.

康向光,李生宇,王海峰,等.高立式沙障不同叠加模式的阻沙量对比分析[J].干旱区研究,2013,30(3):550-555.

王海龙,刘畅,孙婧,等.沙漠铁路固沙砖设计参数的数值模拟[J].铁道标准设计,2018,62(11):59-64.

丛顺,李正农,宫博,等.风沙流场特性及对建筑物影响的风洞试验研究[J].安全与环境学报,2019,19(6):1989-2001.

鲁涛,刘维,徐玉波,等.台特玛湖干涸湖盆区风蚀起沙研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2021,35(11):119-126.

Yang Wei, Yu Meng, Yan Bowen, et al. Wind tunnel tests of wake characteristics for a scaled wind turbine model based on dynamic similarity [J]. Energies, 2022,15(17):61-78.

中华人民共和国住房和城乡建设部. JGJ/T338-2014建筑工程风洞试验方法标准[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2014.

刘畅.防风沙设施力学行为的研究及工程应用[D].河北张家口：河北建筑工程学院,2019.

陈波,骆盼育,杨庆山.测压管道系统频响函数及对风效应的影响[J].振动与冲击,2014,33(3):130-134.

Huang Bing, Li Zhengnong, Zhao Zhefei, et al. Near-ground impurity-free wind and wind-driven sand of photovoltaic power stations in a desert area [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2018,179:483-502.

孙涛,王祺,刘世增,等.单排光伏板防风固沙功能的风洞模拟研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2022,36(4):111-119.

Tominaga Y, Okaze T, Mochida A. Wind tunnel experiment and CFD analysis of sand erosion/deposition due to wind around an obstacle [J]. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 2018,182:262-271.

郝贠洪,刘艳晨,郭健,等.风沙环境变量相似理论及其应用研究[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2018,26(3):640-649.

杨具瑞,方铎,毕慈芬,等.非均匀风沙起动规律研究[J].中国沙漠,2004,24(2):136-139.

辛林桂,程建军,张志平,等.铁路侧向导沙沙障流场演化规律研究[J].铁道科学与工程学报,2018,15(3):621-628.

浏览量

628

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

雅布赖山风沙口白刺灌丛沙堆形态与防风效能

乌兰布和沙漠东北缘人工梭梭林防风效能分析

河北省坝上地区牧场防护林的防风效能研究

前高后低型防风固沙林防风效应及其对风向的响应

不同雨强和坡度下新安江流域典型土壤坡面的产流产沙特征