1. 广东海洋大学管理学院,广东,湛江,524088
2. 广东沿海经济带发展研究院,广东,湛江,524088
3. 湖南省社会科学院,湖南,长沙,410003
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
宾津佑, 唐小兵. 广东省农田生态系统碳源汇效应时空分异及驱动因素[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(3):382-389.
Bin Jinyou, Tang Xiaobing. Spatio-temporal Differentiation and Driving Factors of Farmland Ecosystem Carbon Source-Sink Effects in Guangdong Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(3): 382-389.
宾津佑, 唐小兵. 广东省农田生态系统碳源汇效应时空分异及驱动因素[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(3):382-389. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.03.043.
Bin Jinyou, Tang Xiaobing. Spatio-temporal Differentiation and Driving Factors of Farmland Ecosystem Carbon Source-Sink Effects in Guangdong Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(3): 382-389. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.03.043.
[目的] 探究广东省农田生态系统碳源汇效应时空分异及驱动因素,为广东省科学合理制定区域农业减排固碳措施提供参考。[方法] 采用参数估计法、GIS空间分析等方法定量评估2010—2020年广东省农田生态系统碳源汇效应时空演变规律,并借助LMDI因素分解模型探究农田生态系统碳源汇效应空间分异的驱动因素。[结果] ①广东省农田生态系统碳源汇效应水平维持持续向好发展态势,减排增汇效应逐渐凸显。具体表现为:固碳总量呈波动上升态势,稻谷、甘蔗、蔬菜为主要的碳汇作物;碳排放得到有效控制,减排效应日益显现,稻田种植、农资投入为主要的碳源类型;农田生态系统固碳量增长有效抵消了碳排放增长。②广东省农田生态系统碳源汇效应空间分异明显,总体呈相对集聚分布态势,湛江为主要的高碳源—高碳汇地区,低碳源—低碳汇则主要分布在珠三角地区。③经济因素为农田生态系统碳汇提升的关键驱动因素,结构因素表现出两面性且因地而异,效率因素、劳动力因素则表现为抑制作用。[结论] 广东省农田生态系统碳源汇效应水平稳中向好,但区域分异明显,应结合各地经济、结构、效率、劳动力等因素的驱动效应差异,因地制宜制定农业减排固碳措施。
[Objective] The spatio-temporal differentiation and driving factors of farmland ecosystem carbon source-sink effects in Guangdong Province were analyzed in order to provide a valuable reference for the scientific and rational formulation of regional agricultural carbon reduction and carbon sequestration measures in the region.[Methods] Quantitative assessment of the spatial-temporal distribution of carbon source-sink effects in farmland ecosystems in Guangdong Province from 2010 to 2020 was conducted by using the parameter estimation method and GIS spatial analysis. The driving factors of spatial differentiation of the carbon source-sink effect in farmland ecosystems were determined by using the LMDI factor decomposition model.[Results] ① The level of carbon source-sink effects in Guangdong Province farmland ecosystems continued to maintain a good
positive development trend
and the effects of reducing emissions and sequestering carbon gradually became prominent. Specifically
the total carbon sequestration fluctuated and increased
and rice
sugarcane
and vegetables were the main carbon sources. Carbon emissions were effectively controlled
and the effect of reducing emissions was becoming increasingly evident. Rice planting and agricultural inputs were the main carbon sources. Moreover
the growth of carbon sequestration in farmland ecosystems effectively offset the growth of carbon emissions. ② The spatial heterogeneity of carbon source-sink effects of farmland ecosystems was obvious
and the overall distribution was relatively clustered. Zhanjiang was the main high-carbon source-high-carbon sink area
while low-carbon source-low-carbon sink areas were mainly found in the Pearl River Delta region. ③ Economic factors were the key driving force causing increased carbon sequestration in farmland ecosystems
while structural factors exhibited inconsistent responses and varied with their locations. Efficiency factors and labor force factors
on the other hand
had a restraining effect.[Conclusion] The carbon source-sink effect of farmland ecosystems in Guangdong Province exhibited a continuous increasing trend overall
but there were significant regional differences. Therefore
measures to reduce emissions and sequester carbon in agriculture should be tailored to local conditions
taking into account the differences in the driving effects of economic
structural
efficiency
and labor force factors in each region.
Kay S, Rega C, Moreno G, et al. Agroforestry creates carbon sinks whilst enhancing the environment in agricultural landscapes in Europe[J]. Land Use Policy, 2019,83:581-593.
Fan Jianling, McConkey B G, Liang B C, et al. Increasing crop yields and root input make Canadian farmland a large carbon sink[J]. Geoderma, 2019,336:49-58.
赵宁,周蕾,庄杰,等.中国陆地生态系统碳源/汇整合分析[J].生态学报,2021,41(19):7648-7658.
谢婷,张慧,苗洁,等.湖北省农田生态系统温室气体排放特征与源/汇分析[J].农业资源与环境学报,2021,38(5):839-848.
谭美秋,崔耀平,马晓哲,等.河南省农田生态系统碳汇核算研究[J].生态与农村环境学报,2022,38(9):1129-1137.
孙小祥,张华兵,于英鹏.江苏沿海地区农田生态系统碳源/汇时空变化及公平性研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2021,42(10):56-64.
田志会,刘瑞涵.北京市农田生态系统碳汇及释氧功能年际变化研究[J].生态经济,2016,32(1):68-71.
许萍萍,赵言文,陈颢明,等.江苏省农田生态系统碳源/汇、碳足迹动态变化[J].水土保持通报,2018,38(5):238-243.
王梁,赵杰,陈守越.山东省农田生态系统碳源、碳汇及其碳足迹变化分析[J].中国农业大学学报,2016,21(7):133-141.
张精,方堉,魏锦达,等.基于碳足迹的安徽省农田生态系统碳源/汇时空差异[J].福建农业学报,2021,36(1):78-90.
王莉,刘莹莹,张亚慧,等.河南省农田生态系统碳源/汇时空分布及影响因素分解[J].环境科学学报,2022,42(12):410-422.
林秀群,葛颖.中国西南地区农田生态系统碳源/汇时空差异研究[J].江苏农业学报,2016,32(5):1088-1093.
王梁,赵杰,秦利,等.临沂市农田生态系统碳源/汇时空变化及其影响因素分析[J].水土保持学报,2015,29(2):183-187.
李明琦,刘世梁,武雪,等.云南省农田生态系统碳足迹时空变化及其影响因素[J].生态学报,2018,38(24):8822-8834.
郭永奇.河南省农田生态系统碳源/碳汇及其碳足迹动态变化[J].东北农业科学,2021,46(6):87-92.
郝小雨.黑龙江省30年来农田生态系统碳源/汇强度及碳足迹变化[J].黑龙江农业科学,2021(8):97-104.
刘欣铭,孙丽,王康,等.中国省域农田生态系统碳排放时空差异及公平性研究[J].湖南师范大学自然科学学报,2019,42(2):23-30.
范大莎,杨旭,吴相利,等.东北三省农田生态系统碳排放时空分异特征及驱动因素研究[J].环境科学学报,2017,37(7):2797-2804.
赵荣钦,秦明周.中国沿海地区农田生态系统部分碳源/汇时空差异[J].生态与农村环境学报,2007,23(2):1-6.
唐海明,李超,肖小平,等.不同耕作模式对双季稻田生态系统净碳汇效应及收益的影响[J].生态环境学报,2020,29(2):215-222.
刘晶晶,张阿凤,冯浩,等.不同灌溉量对小麦-玉米轮作农田生态系统净碳汇的影响[J].应用生态学报,2017,28(1):169-179.
孟成民,刘清,王建武.广东省农田生态系统碳源汇时空差异[J].广东农业科学,2014,41(8):198-201.
谢永浩,刘争.中国省域种植业碳汇量、碳排放量的时空分异及公平性研究[J].世界农业,2022(2):100-109.
West T O, Marland G. A synthesis of carbon sequestration, carbon emissions, and net carbon flux in agriculture:Comparing tillage practices in the United States[J]. Agriculture,Ecosystems & Environment, 2002,91(1/2/3):217-232.
段华平,张悦,赵建波,等.中国农田生态系统的碳足迹分析[J].水土保持学报,2011,25(5):203-208.
吴昊玥,何宇,黄瀚蛟,等.中国种植业碳补偿率测算及空间收敛性[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2021,31(6):113-123.
田云,张俊飚.中国农业生产净碳效应分异研究[J].自然资源学报,2013,28(8):1298-1309.
丁宝根,赵玉,邓俊红.中国种植业碳排放的测度、脱钩特征及驱动因素研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2022,43(5):1-11.
田云,张君.地理分区视角下的农业碳效应驱动机理研究[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2020(2):78-87.
0
浏览量
812
下载量
4
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621