1991-2020年全球沟蚀研究进展

罗丽; 段胜丹; 郭文召; 刘恒; 孙昊泽; 杨硕

doi:10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.03.031

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

1991-2020年全球沟蚀研究进展

试验研究

- 1991-2020年全球沟蚀研究进展
- Global Research Progress Regarding Gully Erosion from 1991 to 2020
- 水土保持通报 2023年43卷第3期页码：265-276
- 作者机构：
  
  1. 西北农林科技大学, 水利与建筑工程学院, 陕西杨凌,712100
  2. 西北农林科技大学, 资源环境学院, 陕西杨凌,712100
  3. 西北农林科技大学, 水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌,712100
  4. 中国科学院地球环境研究所, 黄土与第四纪地质国家重点实验室,陕西,西安,710061
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  陕西省自然科学基础研究计划项目“典型退耕还林(草)小流域黄土滑坡关键致灾因子及其群发机理”(2023-JC-QN-0361);黄土与第四纪地质国家重点实验室开放基金“强降雨下黄土沟坡根土层浅层滑坡破坏机制研究”(SKLLQG2215)
- DOI：10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.03.031
  中图分类号： S157.1
- 纸质出版：2023
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
罗丽, 段胜丹, 郭文召, 等. 1991-2020年全球沟蚀研究进展[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(3):265-276.

Luo Li, Duan Shengdan, Guo Wenzhao, et al. Global Research Progress Regarding Gully Erosion from 1991 to 2020[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(3): 265-276.
罗丽, 段胜丹, 郭文召, 等. 1991-2020年全球沟蚀研究进展[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(3):265-276. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.03.031.

Luo Li, Duan Shengdan, Guo Wenzhao, et al. Global Research Progress Regarding Gully Erosion from 1991 to 2020[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(3): 265-276. DOI： 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.03.031.

摘要

[目的] 分析1991—2020年国内外沟蚀领域不同时期的国际研究形势、研究现状以及研究热点的变化趋势，定量分析沟蚀测量技术和沟蚀模型的发展趋势，旨在促进沟蚀研究的深入发展并为相关领域学者提供参考信息。[方法] 采用Web of Science核心合集中1991—2020年的2 568篇沟蚀相关文献进行计量分析，使用VOSviewer软件对国家和机构研究形势以及沟蚀研究热点变化趋势进行可视化分析。[结果] 近30 a沟蚀的研究呈现上升趋势，且在2011—2020年迅猛上升。中国(23.7%)和美国(20.8%)为沟蚀研究的主要国家，发文量占全球的44.5%，且两国间合作更密切。全球沟蚀研究排名前10的机构中，中国的机构占3所(中国科学院、西北农林科技大学和北京师范大学)。沟蚀研究涉及多个学科领域，以地质学最多。沟蚀影响因子、沟蚀测量技术和沟蚀研究模型为沟蚀领域主要研究热点。径流、土地利用、植被、降雨和土壤等影响因子一直是沟蚀研究的重点。近些年气候变化特别是极端降雨对沟蚀的影响越来越受重视。高精度的3 D立体测量技术逐步替代2 D平面测量技术，并得到广泛应用。经验模型应用早，应用最广泛，2000年之后基于定量分析的估算模型开始建立，提高了沟蚀监测及预报的精度。[结论] 未来沟蚀研究应在植被恢复后极端降雨下沟蚀的形成、不同因素对于沟蚀过程的交互影响、沟蚀监测新方法的开发以及沟道侵蚀过程预测模型等方面加强工作。

Abstract

[Objective] The international research situation

current research status

and trends in research hotspots in the field of gully erosion at home and abroad from 1991 to 2020 were analyzed

and the development trends of gully erosion measurement techniques and models were analyzed quantitatively in order to promote the in-depth development of gully erosion research and provide reference information for scholars in related fields.[Methods] We acquired 2 568 research papers dealing with gully erosion from the Web of Science from 1991 to 2020. We used a bibliometric analysis method and VOSviewer software to analyze the research situation of countries and institutions and the change trend of hotspots for gully erosion research.[Results] The number of papers published on gully erosion research presented an upward trend in the recent 30 years

and rose rapidly from 2011 to 2020. China (23.7% of papers) and the United States(20.8%) were the main countries conducting and publishing gully erosion research

with 44.5% of the word's publications

and close cooperation between the two countries. Among the top ten institutions conducting global gully erosion research

three institutions (the Chinese Academy of Sciences

Northwest University of Agriculture and Forestry

and Beijing Normal University) were located in China. This field of research involved many disciplines

most of which were related to geology. Influencing factors

measurement techniques

and gully erosion research models were the main research focuses in the field of gully erosion. The impact factors of runoff

land use

vegetation

rainfall and soil had always been the focus of gully erosion research. The impact of climate change

especially extreme rainfall

received greater attention in recent years. High precision 3D stereo measurement technology gradually replaced 2D plane measurement technology

and was widely used. Empirical models were applied early and widely. Estimation models based on quantitative analysis began to be established after 2000

and this devlopment improved the accuracy of gully erosion monitoring and prediction.[Conclusion] Future gully erosion research should focus on the formation of gully erosion under extreme rainfall after vegetation restoration

interaction of different factors on the gully erosion process

development of new methods for gully erosion monitoring

and developing prediction models of gully erosion processes.

关键词

Keywords

references

Poesen J, Nachtergaele J, Verstraeten G, et al. Gully erosion and environmental change:Importance and research needs[J]. Catena, 2003,50(2/3/4):91-133.

张洪江.土壤侵蚀原理[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2000:54.

刘宝元,杨扬,陆绍娟.几个常用土壤侵蚀术语辨析及其生产实践意义[J].中国水土保持科学,2018,16(1):9-16.

张光辉.切沟侵蚀研究进展与展望[J].水土保持学报,2020,34(5):1-13.

郑粉莉,徐锡蒙,覃超.沟蚀过程研究进展[J].农业机械学报,2016,47(8):48-59.

刘宝元,刘刚,王大安,等.区域沟蚀野外调查方法:以东北地区为例[J].中国水土保持科学,2018,16(4):34-40.

Wasson R J, Caitcheon G, Murray A S, et al. Sourcing sediment using multiple tracers in the catchment of lake argyle, Northwestern Australia[J]. Environmental Management, 2002,29(5):634-646.

Coronato F R, del Valle H F. Methodological comparison in the estimate of fluvial erosion in an arid closed basin of Northeastern Patagonia[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 1993,24(3):231-239.

Kakembo V, Xanga W W, Rowntree K. Topographic thresholds in gully development on the hillslopes of communal areas in Ngqushwa Local Municipality, Eastern Cape, South Africa[J]. Geomorphology, 2009,110(3/4):188-194.

Harden C. Special focus on new studies of gully erosion[J]. Physical Geography, 2016,37(6):385-386.

刘元保,朱显谟,周佩华,等.黄土高原坡面沟蚀的类型及其发生发展规律[J].中国科学院西北水土保持研究所集刊,1988(1):9-18.

Valentin C, Poesen J, Li Yong. Gully erosion:Impacts,factors and control[J]. Catena, 2005,63(2/3):132-153.

Moges A, Holden N M. Estimating the rate and consequences of gully development, a case study of umbulo catchment in Southern Ethiopia[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2008,19(5):574-586.

Kakembo V, Rowntree K M. The relationship between land use and soil erosion in the communal lands near Peddie town, Eastern Cape, South Africa[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2003,14(1):39-49.

Yibeltal M, Tsunekawa A, Haregeweyn N, et al. Analysis of long-term gully dynamics in different agro-ecology settings[J]. Catena, 2019,179:160-174.

何涛,史扬子,杨扬,等.切沟侵蚀测量方法研究进展[J].中国水土保持科学(中英文),2021,19(2):151-158.

李镇,张岩,姚文俊.切沟侵蚀监测与预报技术研究述评[J].中国水土保持科学,2012,10(6):110-115.

刘青,范建容.沟蚀监测研究现状及发展展望[J].中国水土保持,2012(8):38-41.

Kaiser A, Neugirg F, Rock G, et al. Small-scale surface reconstruction and volume calculation of soil erosion in complex Moroccan gully morphology using structure from motion[J]. Remote Sensing, 2014,6(8):7050-7080.

武敏,郑粉莉.浅沟侵蚀过程及预报模型研究进展[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(4):113-116.

李斌兵,郑粉莉,张鹏.黄土高原丘陵沟壑区小流域浅沟和切沟侵蚀区的界定[J].水土保持通报,2008,28(5):16-20.

丁晓斌,郑粉莉,王彬,等.子午岭地区坡面浅沟侵蚀临界模型研究[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(3):122-125.

胡刚,伍永秋,刘宝元,等.东北漫川漫岗黑土区浅沟和切沟发生的地貌临界模型探讨[J].地理科学,2006,26(4):4449-4454.

宋长青,谭文峰.基于文献计量分析的近30年国内外土壤科学发展过程解析[J].土壤学报,2015,52(5):957-969.

王俊丽,张忠华,胡刚,等.基于文献计量分析的喀斯特植被生态学研究态势[J].生态学报,2020,40(3):1113-1124.

高凯.文献计量分析软件VOSviewer的应用研究[J].科技情报开发与经济,2015,25(12):95-98.

Liu Gang, Zheng Fenli, Wilson G V, et al. Three decades of ephemeral gully erosion studies[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2021,212:105046.

Hirsch J E. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005,102(46):16569-16572.

吴健,王敏,靳志辉,等.土壤环境中多环芳烃研究的回顾与展望:基于Web of Science大数据的文献计量分析[J].土壤学报,2016,53(5):1085-1096.

Van Zijl G M, Ellis F, Rozanov A. Understanding the combined effect of soil properties on gully erosion using quantile regression[J]. South African Journal of Plant and Soil, 2014,31(3):163-172.

Ollobarren Del Barrio P, Campo-Bescós M A, Giménez R, et al. Assessment of soil factors controlling ephemeral gully erosion on agricultural fields[J]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2018,43(9):1993-2008.

秦高远,周跃,杨黎.切沟侵蚀研究初探:以云南省文山县新开田村为例[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(5):84-86.

Chaplot V, Brown J, Dlamini P, et al. Rainfall simulation to identify the storm-scale mechanisms of gully bank retreat[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2011,98(11):1704-1710.

秦伟,殷哲,曹文洪,等.东北黑土区侵蚀沟系统防治现状与未来[J].泥沙研究,2021,46(3):72-80.

刘宝元,阎百兴,沈波,等.东北黑土区农地水土流失现状与综合治理对策[J].中国水土保持科学,2008,6(1):1-8.

黄玉华,武文英,冯卫,等.陕北延安"7·3暴雨"诱发地质灾害主要类型与特征[J].西北地质,2014,47(3):140-146.

Yang Bo, Wang Wenlong, Guo Mingming, et al. Soil erosion of unpaved loess roads subjected to an extreme rainstorm event:A case study of the Jiuyuangou watershed on the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2019,16(6):1396-1407.

Guo Wenzhao, Chen Zhuoxin, Wang Wenlong, et al. Telling a different story:The promote role of vegetation in the initiation of shallow landslides during rainfall on the Chinese Loess Plateau[J]. Geomorphology, 2020,350:106879.

López-Vicente M, Quijano L, Gaspar L, et al. Severe soil erosion during a 3-day exceptional rainfall event:Combining modelling and field data for a fallow cereal field[J]. Hydrological Processes, 2015,29(10):2358-2372.

Prosser I P, Soufi M. Controls on gully formation following forest clearing in a humid temperate environment[J]. Water Resources Research, 1998,34(12):3661-3671.

Yuan Mutian, Zhang Yan, Zhao Yiyang, et al. Effect of rainfall gradient and vegetation restoration on gully initiation under a large-scale extreme rainfall event on the hilly Loess Plateau:A case study from the Wuding River basin, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020,739:140066.

Tang Jie, Xie Yun, Liu Chuan, et al. Effects of rainfall characteristics and contour tillage on ephemeral gully development in a field in Northeastern China[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2022,218:105312.

Prosser I P, Slade C J. Gully formation and the role of valley-floor vegetation, Southeastern Australia[J]. Geology, 1994,22(12):1127.

Stöcker C, Eltner A, Karrasch P. Measuring gullies by synergetic application of UAV and close range photogrammetry:A case study from Andalusia, Spain[J]. Catena, 2015,132:1-11.

Guan Yabing, Yang Shengtian, Zhao Changsen, et al. Monitoring long-term gully erosion and topographic thresholds in the marginal zone of the Chinese Loess Plateau[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2021,205:104800.

Whitford J A, Newham L T H, Vigiak O, et al. Rapid assessment of gully sidewall erosion rates in data-poor catchments:A case study in Australia[J]. Geomorphology, 2010,118(3/4):330-338.

Yang Dan, Mu Kai, Yang Hui, et al. A study on prediction model of gully volume based on morphological features in the Jinsha dry-hot valley region of southwest China[J]. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 2021,10(5):300.

Lentz R, Dowdy R, Rust R. Soil property patterns and topographic parameters associated with ephemeral gully erosion[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1993,48:354-361.

Casalí J, López J J, Giráldez J V. Ephemeral gully erosion in Southern Navarra (Spain)[J]. Catena, 1999,36(1/2):65-84.

Nachtergaele J, Poesen J, Steegen A, et al. The value of a physically based model versus an empirical approach in the prediction of ephemeral gully erosion for loess-derived soils[J]. Geomorphology, 2001,40(3/4):237-252.

李镇,齐志国,秦伟,等.利用高分立体影像构建东北黑土山地丘陵区切沟体积估算模型[J].农业工程学报,2021,37(7):122-130.

张晟旻,李浩.东北黑土区的侵蚀沟治理措施与模式[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(3):221-227.

王誉闻.辽阳市东部山区坡耕地侵蚀沟治理体系探索[J].水土保持应用技术,2022(4):32-33.

孙业欣.典型黑土区侵蚀沟的综合生态治理实践[J].水利科学与寒区工程,2022,5(8):83-86.

王磊.营口市侵蚀沟水土保持综合治理方法及效益分析[J].地下水,2020,42(2):208-209.

浏览量

767

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

降雨与植被对大别山“林改园”区土壤侵蚀的影响

藏东南干旱河谷区土壤抗蚀性和水土流失过程模拟

2010—2023年秦岭北麓（西安段）土壤侵蚀特征

土壤改良剂在防治南方红壤区土壤侵蚀中的应用研究进展

基于无人机摄影测量的平陆运河弃土场水土流失综合防控研究