云南师范大学 地理学部, 云南省高原地理过程与环境变化重点实验室,云南,昆明,650500
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
徐宗恒, 陈云英, 张宇, 等. 云南省昭通市烂泥箐滑坡源区草本植物根系抗拉特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(3):11-18.
Xu Zongheng, Chen Yunying, Zhang Yu, et al. Root Tensile Characteristics of Herbaceous Plants from Source Areas of Lanniqing Landslide in Zhaotong City, Yunnan Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(3): 11-18.
徐宗恒, 陈云英, 张宇, 等. 云南省昭通市烂泥箐滑坡源区草本植物根系抗拉特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(3):11-18. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.03.002.
Xu Zongheng, Chen Yunying, Zhang Yu, et al. Root Tensile Characteristics of Herbaceous Plants from Source Areas of Lanniqing Landslide in Zhaotong City, Yunnan Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(3): 11-18. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.03.002.
[目的] 研究植物根系的抗拉强度特征,了解根系在复合体中的表现,为开展生态护坡时植物的选择提供依据。[方法] 对取自于云南省昭通市烂泥箐滑坡滑源区的鸢尾和艾根系开展单根拉伸试验,从宏观破坏特征,变形—拉力曲线以及断裂拉力、最大抗拉力、抗拉强度、延伸率和拉伸模量等参数揭示两者变形破坏特征和抗拉特征。[结果] ①鸢尾根系破坏具有明显延性,而艾根系呈现脆性破坏特征;破坏时前者的平均延伸率约是后者的3倍。鸢尾根系在拉伸过程表现出较好弹塑性变形特征和较强的变形能力。②由于周皮组织的保护作用,鸢尾根系变形—拉力曲线多呈现波动多峰值型,而艾根系主要呈现近似直线型。③根径和根系长度明显影响着根系抗拉特征,根系的断裂拉力和最大抗拉力、抗拉强度和拉伸模量随根径增加而呈现增加或减小的变化特点,待测根系长度较短会导致抗拉特征参数变异程度增强。所以建议选择根径沿轴向变化不大,尽量长的根系开展相关力学试验。[结论] 建议选择根组织结构好,周皮组织厚,变形能力强,延伸率大且具有明显延性破坏特征的植物作为草本护坡植物。
[Objective] The tensile strength characteristics of plant roots were studied to understand the performance of roots in complexes
in order to provide a basis for the selection of plants to be used in ecological slope protection.[Methods] Single root tensile tests were carried out on the roots of Iris tectorummaxim and Artemisia argyi taken from the source areas of the Lanniqing Landslide in Zhaotong City
Yunnan Province. The deformation and failure characteristics and tensile strength features were determined from macroscopic failure characteristics
deformation-tension curve
and feature parameters of fracture tension
maximum tension force
tensile strength
elongation rate
and tensile modulus.[Results] ① Iris root damage showed obvious ductility
while A. argyi root damage showed brittleness. The average elongation rate of I. tectorummaxim was about three times of A. argyi when damaged
and the root system of I. tectorummaxim showed good elastic-plastic deformation characteristics and strong deformation ability in the tensile process. ② Due to the protective effect of the periderm
the deformation-tension curves of Iris tectorummaxim roots mostly showed fluctuation and multiple peak values
while the roots of A. argyi mainly showed an approximately linear response. ③ Diameter and length significantly affected the mechanical features and parameters of roots. Fracture tension and maximum tension force increased with increasing root diameter
while tensile strength and tensile modulus decreased. The variation of the characteristic parameters of tensile strength was enhanced when the root length was short. Therefore
it is recommended that plants be selected that have little change in root diameter along the axial direction and the roots be as long as possible when carrying out relevant mechanical tests.[Conclusion] We recommend selecting vegetation with good root tissue structure
thick periderm tissue
strong deformation ability
large elongation rate
and obvious ductile failure characteristics to be used as slope protection plants.
李怡帆,张国涛,雷鸣宇,等.西南山区云南松根土复合体力学特性及其对浅层坡体稳定性的影响[J].水土保持通报,2022,42(6):88-96.
薛海龙,唐彪,张竞元,等.尖萼金丝桃根系对边坡土体抗剪强度的影响[J].水土保持通报,2019,39(3):87-92.
付江涛,李晓康,刘昌义,等.标距对垂穗披碱草根系抗拉特性影响统计研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2021,40(S2):3399-3413.
Vergani C, Chiaradia E A, Bischetti G B. Variability in the tensile resistance of roots in Alpine forest tree species[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2012,46:43-56.
Zhang Lun, Xia Zhenyao, Zhou Zhengjun, et al. Experimental study on tensile properties and reinforcement ability of plant roots[J]. Nature Environment and Pollution Technology, 2018,17(3):729-738.
Mahannopkul K, Jotisankasa A. Influence of root suction on tensile strength of
Chrysopogon zizanioides
roots and its implication on bioslope stabilization[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2019,16(2):275-284.
刘亚斌,余冬梅,祁兆鑫,等.寒旱环境黄土区灌木植物根系拉拔试验及其根系表面微观结构特征研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2018,37(S1):3701-3713.
郑明新,黄钢,彭晶.不同生长期多花木兰根系抗拉拔特性及其根系边坡的稳定性[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(20):175-182.
崔天民,格日乐,杨锐婷,等.内蒙古中西部3种典型乡土植物根系抗折力学特性[J].水土保持学报,2021,35(2):138-143.
高安生,郭荣芬,柴秀芬,等.γ中尺度单体合并在昭通小河镇"2010.7.13"灾害性天气中的特征分析[J].灾害学,2011,26(2):96-101.
徐宗恒, 张宇, 陶真鹏,等. 昭通烂泥箐滑坡源区原生状态根-土复合体抗剪特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2022, 36(4):128-134.
姜在民,贺学礼.植物学[M].2版.杨凌:西北农林科技大学出版社,2016.
李佳林,姜升林,李云霞,等.禾本科草本植物根状茎发育调控机理研究进展[J].草业学报,2022,31(8):211-220.
张玉,朱海丽,张珂,等.3种滨河植物单根抗拉特性与其微观结构关系[J].干旱区研究,2022,39(2):572-583.
杨苑君.华北典型乔木根系抗拉及土壤抗剪性能研究[D].北京:北京林业大学,2016.
李可,朱海丽,宋路,等.青藏高原两种典型植物根系抗拉特性与其微观结构的关系[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(2):240-249.
严小龙.根系生物学原理与应用[M].北京:科学出版社,2007.
徐文秀,杨玲,鲍玉海,等.大型水库消落带2种典型耐淹草本植物单根抗拉力学特性[J].水土保持研究,2020,27(5):259-264.
李慧强.都江堰市蒲虹路边坡草本植物根系分布及抗拉特性研究[D].雅安:四川农业大学,2015.
吕春娟.乔木根系抗拉力学特性及其与化学成分关系[D].北京:北京林业大学,2013.
0
浏览量
597
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621