1. 西北农林科技大学 水利与建筑工程学院, 陕西 杨凌,712100
2. 西北农林科技大学 水土保持研究所, 陕西 杨凌,712100
3. 中国科学院 水利部 水土保持研究所, 陕西 杨凌,712100
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
涂雯, 马理辉, 冯喆. 乡村振兴视角下“三生”空间格局演变及优化策略——以陕西省米脂县高西沟村为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(2):372-380.
Tu Wen, Ma Lihui, Feng Zhe. Evolution and Optimization Strategy of Productive-Living-Ecological Spatial Pattern in Perspective of Rural Revitalization—A Case Study at Gaoxigou Village, Mizhi County, Shaanxi Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(2): 372-380.
涂雯, 马理辉, 冯喆. 乡村振兴视角下“三生”空间格局演变及优化策略——以陕西省米脂县高西沟村为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(2):372-380. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.02.042.
Tu Wen, Ma Lihui, Feng Zhe. Evolution and Optimization Strategy of Productive-Living-Ecological Spatial Pattern in Perspective of Rural Revitalization—A Case Study at Gaoxigou Village, Mizhi County, Shaanxi Province[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(2): 372-380. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.02.042.
[目的
]
探寻城镇化快速发展条件下作为生态示范村的陕西省米脂县高西沟村的土地利用转型特征,为陕北黄土高原地区的乡村“三生”空间可持续发展提供参考。 [方法
]
通过土地利用动态度、土地利用转移矩阵分析高西沟1953—2022年的“三生”空间特征,并结合实地调研对村域多年“三生”空间格局演变特征及对应的空间治理优化策略展开分析。 [结果
]
①1953—2022年,高西沟生产空间呈减小趋势,生活空间和生态空间呈增大趋势。1953—1973年,生态空间变化幅度最大,绿地生态空间从12.07 hm
2
增加到100.33 hm
2
,其他生态空间从12.07 hm
2
减小到100.33 hm
2
,生产空间逐渐减小,从145.67 hm
2
减小到110.07 hm
2
。1986—2022年,生产空间减少了42.4 hm
2
,生活空间增加了5 hm
2
,生态空间增加了37.39 hm
2
。 ②1986—2022年,高西沟“三生”空间转型体现在绿地生态空间和农村生活空间的增加,农业生产空间、其他生态空间和水域生态空间的减少。有67.83 hm
2
的农业生产空间和59.95 hm
2
的其他生态空间转化为绿地生态空间,而部分绿地生态空间转化为农业生产空间和农村生活空间,其转移面积分别为21.20和3.22 hm
2
。 ③高西沟针对生产空间效益不足的问题,采取改变广种薄收的耕种方式,大幅提高粮食产量,改变单一的农业生产状况,实现多种经营模式并存的举措;针对生活空间品质低下的问题,采取全力抓牢基建,量力新建家园,鼓励青年外出,从事其他产业的举措;针对生态空间破坏严重的问题,采取控制水土流失,退耕还林还草,打造旅游文化,推广生态风光的举措。 [结论
]
根据早期“三生”空间的主要问题,高西沟做出适宜的优化策略,提高土地利用率,扩大林草面积,使绿地生态空间达到80%。农林牧的高效发展,生产、生活、生态的全面改善,使高西沟成为黄土丘陵区的生态示范代表。
[Objective] The characteristics of land use transformation of Gaoxigou village
Mizhi County
Shaanxi Province
an ecological demonstration village under the rapid development of urbanization were studied in order to provide reference for the sustainable development of rural productive-living-ecological space in the Loess Plateau region of Northern Shaanxi Province. [Methods] The dynamic attitude of land use and land use transfer matrix were used to analyze the spatial characteristics of productive-living-ecological space at Gaoxigou village from 1953 to 2022. Combined with field research
the spatial pattern evolution characteristics and corresponding spatial governance optimization strategies were analyzed. [Results] ① from 1953 to 2022
the production space of Gaoxigou village decreased
while the living space and ecological space increased. From 1953 to 1973
the ecological space changed the most
the green space increased from 12.07 hm2 to 100.33 hm2
the other ecological space decreased from 12.07 hm2 to 100.33 hm2
and the production space gradually decreased from 145.67 hm2 to 110.07 hm2. From 1986 to 2022
the production space decreased by 42.4 hm2
the living space increased by 5 hm2
and the ecological space increased by 37.39 hm2. ② From 1986 to 2022
the transformation of productive-living-ecological space at Gaoxigou village reflected in the increase of green space and rural living space
and the decrease of agricultural production space
other ecological space and water ecological space. There were 67.83 hm2 of agricultural production space and 59.95 hm2 of other ecological space transformed into green space
and part of green space ecological space transformed into agricultural production space and rural living space
with the transfer area of 21.20 hm2 and 3.22 hm2
respectively. ③ To solve the problem of insufficient production space efficiency
Gaoxigou village adopt the measures to change the cultivation method of wide planting and low harvest
greatly increase the grain yield
change the single agricultural production situation
and realize the coexistence of multiple business modes; In response to the low quality of living space
Gaoxigou village had taken measures to strengthen infrastructure
build new homes
and encourage young people to go out and engage in other industries. In view of the serious damage to ecological space
measures have been taken to control soil erosion
return farmland to forest or grassland
build tourism culture and promote ecological scenery. [Conclusion] According to the main problems of early productive-living-ecological space
Gaoxigou village made appropriate optimization strategies to improve the utilization rate of land
expand the area of forest and grass
so that the green ecological space reached 80%. The efficient development of agriculture
forestry and animal husbandry
and the overall improvement of production
life and ecology make Gaoxigou village an ecological demonstration representative of the loess hilly region.
程婷,赵荣,梁勇.国土“三生空间”分类及其功能评价[J].遥感信息,2018,33(2):114-121.
乡村振兴战略规划实施协调推进机制办公室.乡村振兴战略规划实施报告(2018-2022年)[J].农村工作通讯,2022(22):65.
赖玲玲,王金叶.乡村振兴视阈下广西少数民族村寨“三生”空间优化管控:以兴安县华江瑶族乡高寨村为例[J].南宁师范大学学报(自然科学版),2022,39(2):134-139.
许伟.“三生空间”的内涵、关系及其优化路径[J].东岳论丛,2022,43(5):126-134.
谢晓彤.共生视角下的河南省国土空间功能识别与优化管控研究[D].北京:中国矿业大学,2022.
周玉婷.“三生空间”视角下东北地区城乡协调发展水平评价及优化策略研究[D].辽宁 沈阳:辽宁大学,2022.
丁慧敏,杨朝现,李鑫,等.高原传统农区土地利用功能演变及其生态环境效应[J].水土保持研究,2022,29(6):399-407.
冯晓娟,雷国平,马泉来,等.1990-2020年河南省黄淮海平原国土空间“三生”功能时空演变[J].水土保持通报,2022,42(4):357-364.
Zou Lilin, Liu Yansui, Yang Jianxin, et al. Quantitative identification and spatial analysis of land use ecological-production-living functions in rural areas on China’s southeast coast [J]. Habitat International, 2020,100:102182.
付晶莹,郜强,江东,等.黑土保护与粮食安全背景下齐齐哈尔市国土空间优化调控路径[J].地理学报,2022,77(7):1662-1680.
彭棋,周佳,邵姝遥,等.巢湖湖滨带村庄格局优化方法研究[J].生态与农村环境学报,2022,38(3):300-307.
Duan Yaming, Wang Hui, Huang An, et al. Identification and spatial-temporal evolution of rural “production-living-ecological” space from the perspective of villagers’behavior: A case study of Ertai Town, Zhangjiakou City [J]. Land Use Policy, 2021,106:105457.
董建红,张志斌,笪晓军,等.“三生”空间视角下土地利用转型的生态环境效应及驱动力:以甘肃省为例[J].生态学报,2021,41(15):5919-5928.
周鹏,邓伟,张少尧,等.太行山区国土空间格局演变特征及其驱动力[J].山地学报,2020,38(2):276-289.
Li Jiangsu, Sun Wei, Li Mingyue, et al. Coupling coordination degree of production, living and ecological spaces and its influencing factors in the Yellow River Basin [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021,298:126803.
冯晓菁,罗志军,许巾,等.基于“三生”空间的城乡建设用地开发适宜性及空间格局匹配评价:以江西省乐平市为例[J].西南农业学报,2021,34(9):2014-2024.
赖国华,胡宝清,李敏,等.桂西南—北部湾地区“三生”空间适宜性评价[J].水土保持通报,2020,40(6):221-227,331.
Liao Tian, Li Dang, Wan Qing. Tradeoff of exploitation-protection and suitability evaluation of low-slope hilly from the perspective of “production-living-ecological” optimization[J]. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 2020,120:102943.
李慧燕.乡村振兴战略背景下天津市特色小镇“三生空间”融合发展路径研究:以天津市上仓镇为例[J].天津农学院学报,2021,28(4):83-88.
赵万民,常林欢,孙爱庐.“三生空间”融合视角下海岛山地乡村空间优化策略:以宁波象山县南田岛为例[J].小城镇建设,2022,40(10):31-41.
刘法威,杨衍.城乡融合背景下乡村土地利用多功能转型研究[J].郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020,53(3):32-36.
张芊芊,邵战林,林娟,等.“三生空间”视角下西部绿洲城市土地利用功能转型的时空格局演变分析:以乌鲁木齐市为例[J].中国农机化学报,2022,43(1):176-185,194.
李航鹤.县域“三生”空间格局优化研究[D].北京:中国矿业大学,2021.
0
浏览量
758
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621