1. 西藏大学 生态环境学院,西藏,拉萨,850000
2. 西藏农牧学院,西藏,林芝,860000
纸质出版:2023
移动端阅览
郝守宁, 苏立彬, 郭永刚. 西藏尼洋河流域土地利用变化对生态敏感性的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(2):303-309.
Hao Shouning, Su Libin, Guo Yonggang. Effects of Land Use Changes on Ecological Sensitivity of Nyang River Basin in Tibet[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(2): 303-309.
郝守宁, 苏立彬, 郭永刚. 西藏尼洋河流域土地利用变化对生态敏感性的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023,43(2):303-309. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.02.035.
Hao Shouning, Su Libin, Guo Yonggang. Effects of Land Use Changes on Ecological Sensitivity of Nyang River Basin in Tibet[J]. Bulletin of Soiland Water Conservation, 2023, 43(2): 303-309. DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.02.035.
[目的] 以西藏尼洋河流域作为高原生态脆弱区的典型代表,对流域1995—2020年土地利用变化影响下的生态敏感性进行探索分析,为该流域土地利用规划和生态环境保护提供理论依据。[方法] 通过计算流域土地利用强度指数和生态系统服务价值,构建土地利用变化下的生态敏感性指数,基于土地利用强度指数和生态系统服务价值在各子流域内的时空变化,利用GIS空间分析技术获得尼洋河流域生态敏感性空间分布状况。[结果] 1995—2020年尼洋河流域林地和建筑用地面积呈增加的趋势,而未利用地和水域面积呈下降趋势;土地利用强度指数由1.725 5上升到1.725 9,土地利用生态系统服务价值减少了约3 000万元。土地利用强度指数上升的区域分布在下游流域;流域生态敏感性指数由0.3增加到9.4,流域中、高敏感区主要分布在中下游流域,且高敏感区面积呈扩增趋势。[结论] 流域内区域生态敏感性变化由土地利用类型间的转移流动的方向所决定。总体而言,近25 a来流域生态敏感性对生态系统中土地利用变化的响应较为明显,中下游区域生态敏感性呈恶化的趋势。
[Objective] The ecological sensitivity of the the Nyang River basin in Tibet (a typical ecologically fragile plateau area) under land use changes during 1995—2020 was studied in order to provide theoretical references for land use planning and ecological environment protection in the watershed. [Methods] We calculated the watershed land use intensity index and the ecosystem service value to construct the land use change. The ecological sensitivity index was based on the temporal and spatial changes of the land use intensity index and the ecosystem service value in each sub-basin. The spatial distribution of ecological sensitivity in the Nyang River basin was obtained using GIS spatial analysis technology. [Results] The areas of woodland and construction land in the Nyang River basin increased from 1995 to 2020
while the unused land area and water area declined. The land use intensity index increased from 1.725 5 to 1.725 9
and the ecosystem service value of land use decreased about 30 million yuan. The areas exhibiting increasing intensity index were located in the downstream basin. The ecological sensitivity index of the basin increased from 0.3 to 9.4. The middle and high sensitive areas of the basin were mainly located in the middle and lower reaches. The extent of the high sensitive areas was increasing. [Conclusion] The change in regional ecological sensitivity for the watershed was determined by the direction of transfer and flow between land use types. Overall
the ecological sensitivity of the basin has responded more significantly to land use changes in the ecosystem over the last 25 years
with a deteriorating trend in the middle and lower reaches.
林芝市统计局.林芝统计年鉴[M].西藏 林芝:林芝市统计局,2020.
师学萍,曹志翔.尼洋河流域农户生计方式与生态安全屏障建设[J].生态经济,2016,32(9):177-180.
芮菡艺,朱洪标,鞠昌华.畜禽养殖生态敏感性分析及空间管控研究:以金湖县为例[J].家畜生态学报,2017,38(2):67-71.
王效科,苗鸿.中国生态环境敏感性及其区域差异规律研究[J].生态学报,2000,20(1):9-12.
李志江,马晓冬.基于GIS的徐州生态敏感性分析[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(4):244-247,253.
张强,冯悦,魏伟,等.基于GIS的祁连山生态敏感性评价[J].安全与环境学报,2019,19(3):1056-1064.
宋姣姣,彭鹏,周国华,等. GIS支持下的长沙市生态环境敏感性分析[J].中南林业科技大学学报(社会科学版),2017,11(4):21-26.
Angelo Pecci, Ganapati Patil, Orazio Rossi, et al. Biodiversity protection funding preference: A case study of hotspot geoinformatics and digital governance for the
Map of Italian Nature
in the presence of multiple indicators of ecological value, ecological sensitivity and anthropic pressure for the Oltrepò Pavese and Ligurian-Emilian Apennine study area in Italy [J]. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 2010,17(4):473-502.
路昌,韩笑,韩会芹.山东省土地利用转型与生态服务功能交叉敏感性研究[J].农业机械学报,2020,51(10):223-231.
Jgtap T, Komarpant D, Rodrigues R. Status of asea grass ecosystem:An ecologically sensitive wetland habiat from India [J]. Wetlands, 2003,23(1):161-170.
Wiktelius S, Ardo J, Fransson T. Desert locust control in ecologically sensitive areas: Need for guide lines [J]. Ambio, 2003,32(7):463-468.
Muhammad A B, KhadiJ N, Syed A M, et al. Toward GIS-based approach for identification of ecological sensitivity areas:Multi-criteria evaluation technique for promotion of tourism in Soon Valley, Pakistan[J]. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 2019,47(9):1527-1536.
Carrington D, Gallimore R, Kutzbach J. Climate sensitivity to wetlands and wetland vegetation in Mid-Holocene North Africa[J]. Climate Dynamics, 2001,17(3):151-157.
Ivan M. Sensitivity of hydrologic systems to climate change[J]. Canadian Water Resources Journal, 2001,26(2):233-252.
高星,高宇,李晏,等.雄安新区土地生态系统服务价值变化与敏感性分析[J].金陵科技学院学报(社会科学版),2019,33(3):6-10.
吴昆,彭红霞,李江风,等.基于变异系数法的灵宝市土地生态敏感性分析[J].湖北农业科学,2018,57(14):32-37.
康婧,孙永光,李方,等.辽河口海域使用变化下的生态敏感性分析[J].中国环境科学,2017,37(12):4722-4733.
汤峰,王力,张蓬涛,等.基于生态保护红线和生态网络的县域生态安全格局构建[J].农业工程学报,2020,36(9):263-272.
李益敏,管成文,郭丽琴,等.基于生态敏感性分析的江川区土地利用空间格局优化配置[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(20):267-276,316.
郝守宁,董飞,刘晓波,等.尼洋河流域土地利用结构对水质的关联分析[J].环境科学与技术,2020,43(1):194-200.
黄静,崔胜辉,李方一,等.厦门市土地利用变化下的生态敏感性[J].生态学报,2011,31(24):7441-7449.
谢高地,张彩霞,张昌顺,等.中国生态系统服务的价值[J].资源科学,2015,37(9):1740-1746.
赵瑜,陈超,胡振琪.中国西部生态脆弱区生态系统服务价值评估研究进展[J].林业经济问题,2018,38(4):91-97,112.
丁丽莲,王奇,陈欣,等.近30年淀山湖地区生态系统服务价值对土地利用变化的响应[J].生态学报,2019,39(8):2973-2985.
谢高地,鲁春霞,冷允法,等.青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J].自然资源学报,2003,18(2):189-196.
戴云哲,李江风.洞庭湖区生态用地生态服务价值时空演化的地形梯度效应[J].水土保持研究,2018,25(3):197-204.
0
浏览量
631
下载量
1
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621